Loading…

Modern English-Language Historiography on Challenges to Russian Autocracy During the Crimean War

The article analyzes noted books written by leading contemporary English-language researchers who offered non-trivial solutions to the scientific and historiographical re-actualization of the most important events of the Crimean War of 1853–1856. The studied array of historiographical sources indica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2023-12, Vol.93 (Suppl 3), p.S240-S249
Main Author: Khaziev, R. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page S249
container_issue Suppl 3
container_start_page S240
container_title Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
container_volume 93
creator Khaziev, R. A.
description The article analyzes noted books written by leading contemporary English-language researchers who offered non-trivial solutions to the scientific and historiographical re-actualization of the most important events of the Crimean War of 1853–1856. The studied array of historiographical sources indicates that the history of the Crimean War, which plays an important role in the collective memory of the Anglo-Saxon world, has evolved by the second decade of the 21 century into a renewed ideology. It focused on the differences between British/European and Russian imperial identities viewed from a hybrid perspective (acculturation, multivariate analysis, ethnopsychology, etc.) in chronicling the military campaign of 1853–1856. This article aims to systematize the latest English-language historiographical sources on the Crimean War, to determine the scientific effectiveness of the research approaches used by scholars, and to outline the direction of possible further research. The examination of the results of studies conducted by English-language scholars on the participation of the Russian Empire in the Crimean War allows us to state that, while different in quality, they are mainly dominated by viewpoints oriented towards advocacy by the authors of the historical interests of their countries with few attempts to reach the level of non-aligned research discourse of “ours and theirs.” These historiographical tendencies are to a greater extent predetermined by the belief well-established in foreign Russian studies that research should conform to the current political trend. This approach sometimes generates the effect of tunnel vision for the complex totality of the Russian imperial archetype that underwent a multifactorial national, subnational and global impact during the Crimean War.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S1019331623090058
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2932486244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2932486244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-a65455b7acfda431c7aa345bd037591cd92e5d462d1c3ba3b816b18067e125bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoB7gKuq7l5tV0OdXSEEcEHLmuapo-hJjVpF_17O4zgQlzdC-dxzz0IXQK5BmD85gUIpIyBpIykhIjkCC1ACBFJntLjeZ_haI-forMQdoRwQQldoI9HVxpv8drWXRuaaKtsPara4E0bBudbV3vVNxN2FmeN6jpjaxPw4PDzGEKrLF6Ng9Ne6Qnfjr61NR4agzPffpoZfFf-HJ1Uqgvm4mcu0dvd-jXbRNun-4dstY00lckQKSm4EEWsdFUqzkDHSjEuipKwWKSgy5QaUXJJS9CsUKxIQBaQEBkboKKo2BJdHXx7775GE4Z850Zv55M5TRnliaSczyw4sLR3IXhT5f0cVfkpB5Lvi8z_FDlr6EET-v2Dxv86_y_6Bvk3dLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932486244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modern English-Language Historiography on Challenges to Russian Autocracy During the Crimean War</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Khaziev, R. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Khaziev, R. A.</creatorcontrib><description>The article analyzes noted books written by leading contemporary English-language researchers who offered non-trivial solutions to the scientific and historiographical re-actualization of the most important events of the Crimean War of 1853–1856. The studied array of historiographical sources indicates that the history of the Crimean War, which plays an important role in the collective memory of the Anglo-Saxon world, has evolved by the second decade of the 21 century into a renewed ideology. It focused on the differences between British/European and Russian imperial identities viewed from a hybrid perspective (acculturation, multivariate analysis, ethnopsychology, etc.) in chronicling the military campaign of 1853–1856. This article aims to systematize the latest English-language historiographical sources on the Crimean War, to determine the scientific effectiveness of the research approaches used by scholars, and to outline the direction of possible further research. The examination of the results of studies conducted by English-language scholars on the participation of the Russian Empire in the Crimean War allows us to state that, while different in quality, they are mainly dominated by viewpoints oriented towards advocacy by the authors of the historical interests of their countries with few attempts to reach the level of non-aligned research discourse of “ours and theirs.” These historiographical tendencies are to a greater extent predetermined by the belief well-established in foreign Russian studies that research should conform to the current political trend. This approach sometimes generates the effect of tunnel vision for the complex totality of the Russian imperial archetype that underwent a multifactorial national, subnational and global impact during the Crimean War.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-3316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-6492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S1019331623090058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Chemistry/Food Science ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Engineering ; English language ; Environment ; Life Sciences ; Multivariate analysis ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023-12, Vol.93 (Suppl 3), p.S240-S249</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2023. ISSN 1019-3316, Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023, Vol. 93, Suppl. 3, pp. S240–S249. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2023.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khaziev, R. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Modern English-Language Historiography on Challenges to Russian Autocracy During the Crimean War</title><title>Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Her. Russ. Acad. Sci</addtitle><description>The article analyzes noted books written by leading contemporary English-language researchers who offered non-trivial solutions to the scientific and historiographical re-actualization of the most important events of the Crimean War of 1853–1856. The studied array of historiographical sources indicates that the history of the Crimean War, which plays an important role in the collective memory of the Anglo-Saxon world, has evolved by the second decade of the 21 century into a renewed ideology. It focused on the differences between British/European and Russian imperial identities viewed from a hybrid perspective (acculturation, multivariate analysis, ethnopsychology, etc.) in chronicling the military campaign of 1853–1856. This article aims to systematize the latest English-language historiographical sources on the Crimean War, to determine the scientific effectiveness of the research approaches used by scholars, and to outline the direction of possible further research. The examination of the results of studies conducted by English-language scholars on the participation of the Russian Empire in the Crimean War allows us to state that, while different in quality, they are mainly dominated by viewpoints oriented towards advocacy by the authors of the historical interests of their countries with few attempts to reach the level of non-aligned research discourse of “ours and theirs.” These historiographical tendencies are to a greater extent predetermined by the belief well-established in foreign Russian studies that research should conform to the current political trend. This approach sometimes generates the effect of tunnel vision for the complex totality of the Russian imperial archetype that underwent a multifactorial national, subnational and global impact during the Crimean War.</description><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1019-3316</issn><issn>1555-6492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoB7gKuq7l5tV0OdXSEEcEHLmuapo-hJjVpF_17O4zgQlzdC-dxzz0IXQK5BmD85gUIpIyBpIykhIjkCC1ACBFJntLjeZ_haI-forMQdoRwQQldoI9HVxpv8drWXRuaaKtsPara4E0bBudbV3vVNxN2FmeN6jpjaxPw4PDzGEKrLF6Ng9Ne6Qnfjr61NR4agzPffpoZfFf-HJ1Uqgvm4mcu0dvd-jXbRNun-4dstY00lckQKSm4EEWsdFUqzkDHSjEuipKwWKSgy5QaUXJJS9CsUKxIQBaQEBkboKKo2BJdHXx7775GE4Z850Zv55M5TRnliaSczyw4sLR3IXhT5f0cVfkpB5Lvi8z_FDlr6EET-v2Dxv86_y_6Bvk3dLk</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Khaziev, R. A.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Modern English-Language Historiography on Challenges to Russian Autocracy During the Crimean War</title><author>Khaziev, R. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-a65455b7acfda431c7aa345bd037591cd92e5d462d1c3ba3b816b18067e125bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khaziev, R. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khaziev, R. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modern English-Language Historiography on Challenges to Russian Autocracy During the Crimean War</atitle><jtitle>Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences</jtitle><stitle>Her. Russ. Acad. Sci</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>S240</spage><epage>S249</epage><pages>S240-S249</pages><issn>1019-3316</issn><eissn>1555-6492</eissn><abstract>The article analyzes noted books written by leading contemporary English-language researchers who offered non-trivial solutions to the scientific and historiographical re-actualization of the most important events of the Crimean War of 1853–1856. The studied array of historiographical sources indicates that the history of the Crimean War, which plays an important role in the collective memory of the Anglo-Saxon world, has evolved by the second decade of the 21 century into a renewed ideology. It focused on the differences between British/European and Russian imperial identities viewed from a hybrid perspective (acculturation, multivariate analysis, ethnopsychology, etc.) in chronicling the military campaign of 1853–1856. This article aims to systematize the latest English-language historiographical sources on the Crimean War, to determine the scientific effectiveness of the research approaches used by scholars, and to outline the direction of possible further research. The examination of the results of studies conducted by English-language scholars on the participation of the Russian Empire in the Crimean War allows us to state that, while different in quality, they are mainly dominated by viewpoints oriented towards advocacy by the authors of the historical interests of their countries with few attempts to reach the level of non-aligned research discourse of “ours and theirs.” These historiographical tendencies are to a greater extent predetermined by the belief well-established in foreign Russian studies that research should conform to the current political trend. This approach sometimes generates the effect of tunnel vision for the complex totality of the Russian imperial archetype that underwent a multifactorial national, subnational and global impact during the Crimean War.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S1019331623090058</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1019-3316
ispartof Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023-12, Vol.93 (Suppl 3), p.S240-S249
issn 1019-3316
1555-6492
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2932486244
source Springer Link
subjects Chemistry/Food Science
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Engineering
English language
Environment
Life Sciences
Multivariate analysis
Social Sciences
title Modern English-Language Historiography on Challenges to Russian Autocracy During the Crimean War
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A03%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modern%20English-Language%20Historiography%20on%20Challenges%20to%20Russian%20Autocracy%20During%20the%20Crimean%20War&rft.jtitle=Herald%20of%20the%20Russian%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=Khaziev,%20R.%20A.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=S240&rft.epage=S249&rft.pages=S240-S249&rft.issn=1019-3316&rft.eissn=1555-6492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S1019331623090058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2932486244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-a65455b7acfda431c7aa345bd037591cd92e5d462d1c3ba3b816b18067e125bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932486244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true