Loading…
Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design
This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of formative design in learning 2019-12, Vol.3 (2), p.133-145 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3 |
container_end_page | 145 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Journal of formative design in learning |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Phillips, Jeffrey Klein, James D. Dunne, Elizabeth Siriwardena, Michael |
description | This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States. The design team combined ADDIE with four instructional models: Dick, Carey, and Carey’s Systematic Instructional Design, Keller’s ARCS Motivational Design Process, Gagné’s nine events of instruction, and Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The redesign consisted of four phases—an instructional analysis and three phases that included elements of design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The design team was able to (a) align the workshop’s objectives with the English teacher’s expectations, (b) maintain a high-level of student motivation during the redesign, (c) improve student learning for several objectives, (d) make the instruction replicable, and (e) reduce the number of library consultations from students who had attended the workshop. The team made evidence-based decisions throughout the redesign, using formative data to make improvements. The design team felt that using multiple instructional theories simultaneously helped them execute the systematic design process by providing greater detail about each phase of ADDIE. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41686-019-00036-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2932576755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2932576755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gKeA52j-bJLNUbutChVB7Dmk2dmSandrsi3YT--uK-jJ0wzD-72ZeQhdMnrNKNU3KWMqV4QyQyilQpHjCRpxSQ3JqTCnf_pzNElp04mYEVnG6QjNlynUazxv4ta14QC4cK3DbYOf3Bvg2SGUUHsgdy5BiQvwIYWmTrjYxx57AVJACuv6Ap1V7j3B5KeO0XI-e50-kMXz_eP0dkE8F6YluZZQilXuJdNGQcWVoBkvBaOKstJ380z5ctUdmAm90kLyyuTeVCxToHPnxRhdDb672HzsIbV20-xj3a203AgutdJSdio-qHxsUopQ2V0MWxc_LaO2j8wOkdkuB_sdmT12kBigtOt_g_hr_Q_1BVUUbLU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932576755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Phillips, Jeffrey ; Klein, James D. ; Dunne, Elizabeth ; Siriwardena, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jeffrey ; Klein, James D. ; Dunne, Elizabeth ; Siriwardena, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States. The design team combined ADDIE with four instructional models: Dick, Carey, and Carey’s Systematic Instructional Design, Keller’s ARCS Motivational Design Process, Gagné’s nine events of instruction, and Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The redesign consisted of four phases—an instructional analysis and three phases that included elements of design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The design team was able to (a) align the workshop’s objectives with the English teacher’s expectations, (b) maintain a high-level of student motivation during the redesign, (c) improve student learning for several objectives, (d) make the instruction replicable, and (e) reduce the number of library consultations from students who had attended the workshop. The team made evidence-based decisions throughout the redesign, using formative data to make improvements. The design team felt that using multiple instructional theories simultaneously helped them execute the systematic design process by providing greater detail about each phase of ADDIE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2509-8039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2509-8039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41686-019-00036-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Assessment ; Audiences ; Behavioral Objectives ; Designers ; Education ; Educational Environment ; Educational materials ; Educational Resources ; Educational Technology ; English teachers ; Formative evaluation ; Instructional design ; Instructional Materials ; Instructional Systems ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Librarians ; Libraries ; Objectives ; Students ; Taxonomy ; Teaching methods ; Testing and Evaluation ; User training</subject><ispartof>Journal of formative design in learning, 2019-12, Vol.3 (2), p.133-145</ispartof><rights>Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2019</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0708-6460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2932576755?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21358,21374,27903,27904,33590,33856,43712,43859</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siriwardena, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design</title><title>Journal of formative design in learning</title><addtitle>J Form Des Learn</addtitle><description>This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States. The design team combined ADDIE with four instructional models: Dick, Carey, and Carey’s Systematic Instructional Design, Keller’s ARCS Motivational Design Process, Gagné’s nine events of instruction, and Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The redesign consisted of four phases—an instructional analysis and three phases that included elements of design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The design team was able to (a) align the workshop’s objectives with the English teacher’s expectations, (b) maintain a high-level of student motivation during the redesign, (c) improve student learning for several objectives, (d) make the instruction replicable, and (e) reduce the number of library consultations from students who had attended the workshop. The team made evidence-based decisions throughout the redesign, using formative data to make improvements. The design team felt that using multiple instructional theories simultaneously helped them execute the systematic design process by providing greater detail about each phase of ADDIE.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational materials</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>English teachers</subject><subject>Formative evaluation</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Instructional Systems</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Testing and Evaluation</subject><subject>User training</subject><issn>2509-8039</issn><issn>2509-8039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gKeA52j-bJLNUbutChVB7Dmk2dmSandrsi3YT--uK-jJ0wzD-72ZeQhdMnrNKNU3KWMqV4QyQyilQpHjCRpxSQ3JqTCnf_pzNElp04mYEVnG6QjNlynUazxv4ta14QC4cK3DbYOf3Bvg2SGUUHsgdy5BiQvwIYWmTrjYxx57AVJACuv6Ap1V7j3B5KeO0XI-e50-kMXz_eP0dkE8F6YluZZQilXuJdNGQcWVoBkvBaOKstJ380z5ctUdmAm90kLyyuTeVCxToHPnxRhdDb672HzsIbV20-xj3a203AgutdJSdio-qHxsUopQ2V0MWxc_LaO2j8wOkdkuB_sdmT12kBigtOt_g_hr_Q_1BVUUbLU</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Phillips, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Klein, James D.</creator><creator>Dunne, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Siriwardena, Michael</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0708-6460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design</title><author>Phillips, Jeffrey ; Klein, James D. ; Dunne, Elizabeth ; Siriwardena, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational materials</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>English teachers</topic><topic>Formative evaluation</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Instructional Systems</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Testing and Evaluation</topic><topic>User training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siriwardena, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of formative design in learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Jeffrey</au><au>Klein, James D.</au><au>Dunne, Elizabeth</au><au>Siriwardena, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of formative design in learning</jtitle><stitle>J Form Des Learn</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>133-145</pages><issn>2509-8039</issn><eissn>2509-8039</eissn><abstract>This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States. The design team combined ADDIE with four instructional models: Dick, Carey, and Carey’s Systematic Instructional Design, Keller’s ARCS Motivational Design Process, Gagné’s nine events of instruction, and Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The redesign consisted of four phases—an instructional analysis and three phases that included elements of design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The design team was able to (a) align the workshop’s objectives with the English teacher’s expectations, (b) maintain a high-level of student motivation during the redesign, (c) improve student learning for several objectives, (d) make the instruction replicable, and (e) reduce the number of library consultations from students who had attended the workshop. The team made evidence-based decisions throughout the redesign, using formative data to make improvements. The design team felt that using multiple instructional theories simultaneously helped them execute the systematic design process by providing greater detail about each phase of ADDIE.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s41686-019-00036-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0708-6460</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2509-8039 |
ispartof | Journal of formative design in learning, 2019-12, Vol.3 (2), p.133-145 |
issn | 2509-8039 2509-8039 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2932576755 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Link |
subjects | Assessment Audiences Behavioral Objectives Designers Education Educational Environment Educational materials Educational Resources Educational Technology English teachers Formative evaluation Instructional design Instructional Materials Instructional Systems Learning Learning and Instruction Librarians Libraries Objectives Students Taxonomy Teaching methods Testing and Evaluation User training |
title | Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A24%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Formative%20Data%20to%20Make%20Evidence-Based%20Decisions%20During%20Re-Design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20formative%20design%20in%20learning&rft.au=Phillips,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=133-145&rft.issn=2509-8039&rft.eissn=2509-8039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41686-019-00036-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2932576755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932576755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |