Loading…

Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design

This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of formative design in learning 2019-12, Vol.3 (2), p.133-145
Main Authors: Phillips, Jeffrey, Klein, James D., Dunne, Elizabeth, Siriwardena, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3
container_end_page 145
container_issue 2
container_start_page 133
container_title Journal of formative design in learning
container_volume 3
creator Phillips, Jeffrey
Klein, James D.
Dunne, Elizabeth
Siriwardena, Michael
description This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States. The design team combined ADDIE with four instructional models: Dick, Carey, and Carey’s Systematic Instructional Design, Keller’s ARCS Motivational Design Process, Gagné’s nine events of instruction, and Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The redesign consisted of four phases—an instructional analysis and three phases that included elements of design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The design team was able to (a) align the workshop’s objectives with the English teacher’s expectations, (b) maintain a high-level of student motivation during the redesign, (c) improve student learning for several objectives, (d) make the instruction replicable, and (e) reduce the number of library consultations from students who had attended the workshop. The team made evidence-based decisions throughout the redesign, using formative data to make improvements. The design team felt that using multiple instructional theories simultaneously helped them execute the systematic design process by providing greater detail about each phase of ADDIE.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s41686-019-00036-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2932576755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2932576755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gKeA52j-bJLNUbutChVB7Dmk2dmSandrsi3YT--uK-jJ0wzD-72ZeQhdMnrNKNU3KWMqV4QyQyilQpHjCRpxSQ3JqTCnf_pzNElp04mYEVnG6QjNlynUazxv4ta14QC4cK3DbYOf3Bvg2SGUUHsgdy5BiQvwIYWmTrjYxx57AVJACuv6Ap1V7j3B5KeO0XI-e50-kMXz_eP0dkE8F6YluZZQilXuJdNGQcWVoBkvBaOKstJ380z5ctUdmAm90kLyyuTeVCxToHPnxRhdDb672HzsIbV20-xj3a203AgutdJSdio-qHxsUopQ2V0MWxc_LaO2j8wOkdkuB_sdmT12kBigtOt_g_hr_Q_1BVUUbLU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932576755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Phillips, Jeffrey ; Klein, James D. ; Dunne, Elizabeth ; Siriwardena, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jeffrey ; Klein, James D. ; Dunne, Elizabeth ; Siriwardena, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States. The design team combined ADDIE with four instructional models: Dick, Carey, and Carey’s Systematic Instructional Design, Keller’s ARCS Motivational Design Process, Gagné’s nine events of instruction, and Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The redesign consisted of four phases—an instructional analysis and three phases that included elements of design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The design team was able to (a) align the workshop’s objectives with the English teacher’s expectations, (b) maintain a high-level of student motivation during the redesign, (c) improve student learning for several objectives, (d) make the instruction replicable, and (e) reduce the number of library consultations from students who had attended the workshop. The team made evidence-based decisions throughout the redesign, using formative data to make improvements. The design team felt that using multiple instructional theories simultaneously helped them execute the systematic design process by providing greater detail about each phase of ADDIE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2509-8039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2509-8039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41686-019-00036-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Assessment ; Audiences ; Behavioral Objectives ; Designers ; Education ; Educational Environment ; Educational materials ; Educational Resources ; Educational Technology ; English teachers ; Formative evaluation ; Instructional design ; Instructional Materials ; Instructional Systems ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Librarians ; Libraries ; Objectives ; Students ; Taxonomy ; Teaching methods ; Testing and Evaluation ; User training</subject><ispartof>Journal of formative design in learning, 2019-12, Vol.3 (2), p.133-145</ispartof><rights>Association for Educational Communications &amp; Technology 2019</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications &amp; Technology 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0708-6460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2932576755?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21358,21374,27903,27904,33590,33856,43712,43859</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siriwardena, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design</title><title>Journal of formative design in learning</title><addtitle>J Form Des Learn</addtitle><description>This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States. The design team combined ADDIE with four instructional models: Dick, Carey, and Carey’s Systematic Instructional Design, Keller’s ARCS Motivational Design Process, Gagné’s nine events of instruction, and Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The redesign consisted of four phases—an instructional analysis and three phases that included elements of design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The design team was able to (a) align the workshop’s objectives with the English teacher’s expectations, (b) maintain a high-level of student motivation during the redesign, (c) improve student learning for several objectives, (d) make the instruction replicable, and (e) reduce the number of library consultations from students who had attended the workshop. The team made evidence-based decisions throughout the redesign, using formative data to make improvements. The design team felt that using multiple instructional theories simultaneously helped them execute the systematic design process by providing greater detail about each phase of ADDIE.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational materials</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>English teachers</subject><subject>Formative evaluation</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Instructional Systems</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Testing and Evaluation</subject><subject>User training</subject><issn>2509-8039</issn><issn>2509-8039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gKeA52j-bJLNUbutChVB7Dmk2dmSandrsi3YT--uK-jJ0wzD-72ZeQhdMnrNKNU3KWMqV4QyQyilQpHjCRpxSQ3JqTCnf_pzNElp04mYEVnG6QjNlynUazxv4ta14QC4cK3DbYOf3Bvg2SGUUHsgdy5BiQvwIYWmTrjYxx57AVJACuv6Ap1V7j3B5KeO0XI-e50-kMXz_eP0dkE8F6YluZZQilXuJdNGQcWVoBkvBaOKstJ380z5ctUdmAm90kLyyuTeVCxToHPnxRhdDb672HzsIbV20-xj3a203AgutdJSdio-qHxsUopQ2V0MWxc_LaO2j8wOkdkuB_sdmT12kBigtOt_g_hr_Q_1BVUUbLU</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Phillips, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Klein, James D.</creator><creator>Dunne, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Siriwardena, Michael</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0708-6460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design</title><author>Phillips, Jeffrey ; Klein, James D. ; Dunne, Elizabeth ; Siriwardena, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational materials</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>English teachers</topic><topic>Formative evaluation</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Instructional Systems</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Testing and Evaluation</topic><topic>User training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siriwardena, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of formative design in learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Jeffrey</au><au>Klein, James D.</au><au>Dunne, Elizabeth</au><au>Siriwardena, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of formative design in learning</jtitle><stitle>J Form Des Learn</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>133-145</pages><issn>2509-8039</issn><eissn>2509-8039</eissn><abstract>This paper describes how a novice instructional designer and his team followed the systems approach to redesign and implement a library workshop offered each year to over 4400 Freshmen enrolled in approximately 200 undergraduate English classes at a large university in the southeastern United States. The design team combined ADDIE with four instructional models: Dick, Carey, and Carey’s Systematic Instructional Design, Keller’s ARCS Motivational Design Process, Gagné’s nine events of instruction, and Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The redesign consisted of four phases—an instructional analysis and three phases that included elements of design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The design team was able to (a) align the workshop’s objectives with the English teacher’s expectations, (b) maintain a high-level of student motivation during the redesign, (c) improve student learning for several objectives, (d) make the instruction replicable, and (e) reduce the number of library consultations from students who had attended the workshop. The team made evidence-based decisions throughout the redesign, using formative data to make improvements. The design team felt that using multiple instructional theories simultaneously helped them execute the systematic design process by providing greater detail about each phase of ADDIE.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s41686-019-00036-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0708-6460</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2509-8039
ispartof Journal of formative design in learning, 2019-12, Vol.3 (2), p.133-145
issn 2509-8039
2509-8039
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2932576755
source Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Link
subjects Assessment
Audiences
Behavioral Objectives
Designers
Education
Educational Environment
Educational materials
Educational Resources
Educational Technology
English teachers
Formative evaluation
Instructional design
Instructional Materials
Instructional Systems
Learning
Learning and Instruction
Librarians
Libraries
Objectives
Students
Taxonomy
Teaching methods
Testing and Evaluation
User training
title Using Formative Data to Make Evidence-Based Decisions During Re-Design
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A24%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Formative%20Data%20to%20Make%20Evidence-Based%20Decisions%20During%20Re-Design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20formative%20design%20in%20learning&rft.au=Phillips,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=133-145&rft.issn=2509-8039&rft.eissn=2509-8039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41686-019-00036-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2932576755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-875ed3b8c51796ef263042d310601dc8c546cdb000437b7352f98c9f146e78ac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932576755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true