Loading…

Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)

Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economia e politica industriale 2024-03, Vol.51 (1), p.111-134
Main Authors: Rahman, Nida, Rahman, Mohd Nayyer, Manini, Muganda Munir, Sharma, Krishan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443
container_end_page 134
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Economia e politica industriale
container_volume 51
creator Rahman, Nida
Rahman, Mohd Nayyer
Manini, Muganda Munir
Sharma, Krishan
description Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the important positioning of RCEP member countries like Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam in factory Asia and prominent GVC assembly hubs, this paper examines the determinants of GVC participation in RCEP bloc by employing fixed effects regression method over a period of 1995–2018. The paper also explores the impact of the level of development of the member countries on GVC participation. Latest GVC measures provided by OECD Tiva, 2021 edition are used. The degree of openness to trade and economic freedom positively impacts backward participation rate whereas FDI inflows exerts negative influence on forward participation rate of RCEP countries. However, the developing countries within RCEP appears to have benefitted from FDI inflows, as it significantly affects their forward participation rate in positive direction in relation to their developed counterparts. Similarly, the positive impact of trade openness on backward participation is more pronounced in RCEP member countries with a developing country status relative to developed countries.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933033279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933033279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKov4CrgRhejJ5eZSdxJrRcoKKLrkM6caVM6kzGZFnwI39loFXeeTQ7h-z8OPyEnDC4YQHkZJSjGM-AiA-CKZWyPjJgueSZ1We6TEQjNMg6lOiTHMa4gTS4V6HxEPm5wwNC6znZDpL6hi7Wf2zXd2vUGabW0rqO9DYOrXG8H5zuaPgIu0paoIdgaqV0ExBaT4IoOy5SyEb9Uz7_YxLd9wCV20W2RTivf-dZV9Cl5Owxx6Xp69jyZPp0fkYPGriMe_7xj8no7fZncZ7PHu4fJ9SyrBFdDphgKrYq5ZU1dS2DAJEepkbNaoihqKLi0JVM8L6TKtc2B2UICYiUbrKUUY3K68_bBv20wDmblNyGdGg3XQoAQvNSJ4juqCj7GgI3pg2tteDcMzFfzZte8Sc2b7-YNSyGxC8UEdwsMf-p_Up8mAobe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933033279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Rahman, Nida ; Rahman, Mohd Nayyer ; Manini, Muganda Munir ; Sharma, Krishan</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Nida ; Rahman, Mohd Nayyer ; Manini, Muganda Munir ; Sharma, Krishan</creatorcontrib><description>Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the important positioning of RCEP member countries like Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam in factory Asia and prominent GVC assembly hubs, this paper examines the determinants of GVC participation in RCEP bloc by employing fixed effects regression method over a period of 1995–2018. The paper also explores the impact of the level of development of the member countries on GVC participation. Latest GVC measures provided by OECD Tiva, 2021 edition are used. The degree of openness to trade and economic freedom positively impacts backward participation rate whereas FDI inflows exerts negative influence on forward participation rate of RCEP countries. However, the developing countries within RCEP appears to have benefitted from FDI inflows, as it significantly affects their forward participation rate in positive direction in relation to their developed counterparts. Similarly, the positive impact of trade openness on backward participation is more pronounced in RCEP member countries with a developing country status relative to developed countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-2078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1972-4977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Business Strategy/Leadership ; Developing countries ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Entrepreneurship ; Industrial economics ; Industrial Organization ; LDCs ; R &amp; D/Technology Policy ; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ; Value chain</subject><ispartof>Economia e politica industriale, 2024-03, Vol.51 (1), p.111-134</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-1122-7184 ; 0000-0001-6512-0028 ; 0000-0002-4564-1691</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Nida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Mohd Nayyer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Muganda Munir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Krishan</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)</title><title>Economia e politica industriale</title><addtitle>J. Ind. Bus. Econ</addtitle><description>Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the important positioning of RCEP member countries like Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam in factory Asia and prominent GVC assembly hubs, this paper examines the determinants of GVC participation in RCEP bloc by employing fixed effects regression method over a period of 1995–2018. The paper also explores the impact of the level of development of the member countries on GVC participation. Latest GVC measures provided by OECD Tiva, 2021 edition are used. The degree of openness to trade and economic freedom positively impacts backward participation rate whereas FDI inflows exerts negative influence on forward participation rate of RCEP countries. However, the developing countries within RCEP appears to have benefitted from FDI inflows, as it significantly affects their forward participation rate in positive direction in relation to their developed counterparts. Similarly, the positive impact of trade openness on backward participation is more pronounced in RCEP member countries with a developing country status relative to developed countries.</description><subject>Business Strategy/Leadership</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Industrial economics</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>R &amp; D/Technology Policy</subject><subject>Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership</subject><subject>Value chain</subject><issn>0391-2078</issn><issn>1972-4977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKov4CrgRhejJ5eZSdxJrRcoKKLrkM6caVM6kzGZFnwI39loFXeeTQ7h-z8OPyEnDC4YQHkZJSjGM-AiA-CKZWyPjJgueSZ1We6TEQjNMg6lOiTHMa4gTS4V6HxEPm5wwNC6znZDpL6hi7Wf2zXd2vUGabW0rqO9DYOrXG8H5zuaPgIu0paoIdgaqV0ExBaT4IoOy5SyEb9Uz7_YxLd9wCV20W2RTivf-dZV9Cl5Owxx6Xp69jyZPp0fkYPGriMe_7xj8no7fZncZ7PHu4fJ9SyrBFdDphgKrYq5ZU1dS2DAJEepkbNaoihqKLi0JVM8L6TKtc2B2UICYiUbrKUUY3K68_bBv20wDmblNyGdGg3XQoAQvNSJ4juqCj7GgI3pg2tteDcMzFfzZte8Sc2b7-YNSyGxC8UEdwsMf-p_Up8mAobe</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Rahman, Nida</creator><creator>Rahman, Mohd Nayyer</creator><creator>Manini, Muganda Munir</creator><creator>Sharma, Krishan</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1122-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6512-0028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4564-1691</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)</title><author>Rahman, Nida ; Rahman, Mohd Nayyer ; Manini, Muganda Munir ; Sharma, Krishan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Business Strategy/Leadership</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Industrial economics</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>R &amp; D/Technology Policy</topic><topic>Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership</topic><topic>Value chain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Nida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Mohd Nayyer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Muganda Munir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Krishan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Economia e politica industriale</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahman, Nida</au><au>Rahman, Mohd Nayyer</au><au>Manini, Muganda Munir</au><au>Sharma, Krishan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)</atitle><jtitle>Economia e politica industriale</jtitle><stitle>J. Ind. Bus. Econ</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>111-134</pages><issn>0391-2078</issn><eissn>1972-4977</eissn><abstract>Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the important positioning of RCEP member countries like Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam in factory Asia and prominent GVC assembly hubs, this paper examines the determinants of GVC participation in RCEP bloc by employing fixed effects regression method over a period of 1995–2018. The paper also explores the impact of the level of development of the member countries on GVC participation. Latest GVC measures provided by OECD Tiva, 2021 edition are used. The degree of openness to trade and economic freedom positively impacts backward participation rate whereas FDI inflows exerts negative influence on forward participation rate of RCEP countries. However, the developing countries within RCEP appears to have benefitted from FDI inflows, as it significantly affects their forward participation rate in positive direction in relation to their developed counterparts. Similarly, the positive impact of trade openness on backward participation is more pronounced in RCEP member countries with a developing country status relative to developed countries.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1122-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6512-0028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4564-1691</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0391-2078
ispartof Economia e politica industriale, 2024-03, Vol.51 (1), p.111-134
issn 0391-2078
1972-4977
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2933033279
source Springer Nature
subjects Business Strategy/Leadership
Developing countries
Economics
Economics and Finance
Entrepreneurship
Industrial economics
Industrial Organization
LDCs
R & D/Technology Policy
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership
Value chain
title Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20global%20value%20chain%20participation%20in%20regional%20trade%20agreements:%20the%20case%20of%20Regional%20Comprehensive%20Economic%20Partnership%20(RCEP)&rft.jtitle=Economia%20e%20politica%20industriale&rft.au=Rahman,%20Nida&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=111-134&rft.issn=0391-2078&rft.eissn=1972-4977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933033279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933033279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true