Loading…
Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)
Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Economia e politica industriale 2024-03, Vol.51 (1), p.111-134 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443 |
container_end_page | 134 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 111 |
container_title | Economia e politica industriale |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Rahman, Nida Rahman, Mohd Nayyer Manini, Muganda Munir Sharma, Krishan |
description | Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the important positioning of RCEP member countries like Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam in factory Asia and prominent GVC assembly hubs, this paper examines the determinants of GVC participation in RCEP bloc by employing fixed effects regression method over a period of 1995–2018. The paper also explores the impact of the level of development of the member countries on GVC participation. Latest GVC measures provided by OECD Tiva, 2021 edition are used. The degree of openness to trade and economic freedom positively impacts backward participation rate whereas FDI inflows exerts negative influence on forward participation rate of RCEP countries. However, the developing countries within RCEP appears to have benefitted from FDI inflows, as it significantly affects their forward participation rate in positive direction in relation to their developed counterparts. Similarly, the positive impact of trade openness on backward participation is more pronounced in RCEP member countries with a developing country status relative to developed countries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933033279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933033279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKov4CrgRhejJ5eZSdxJrRcoKKLrkM6caVM6kzGZFnwI39loFXeeTQ7h-z8OPyEnDC4YQHkZJSjGM-AiA-CKZWyPjJgueSZ1We6TEQjNMg6lOiTHMa4gTS4V6HxEPm5wwNC6znZDpL6hi7Wf2zXd2vUGabW0rqO9DYOrXG8H5zuaPgIu0paoIdgaqV0ExBaT4IoOy5SyEb9Uz7_YxLd9wCV20W2RTivf-dZV9Cl5Owxx6Xp69jyZPp0fkYPGriMe_7xj8no7fZncZ7PHu4fJ9SyrBFdDphgKrYq5ZU1dS2DAJEepkbNaoihqKLi0JVM8L6TKtc2B2UICYiUbrKUUY3K68_bBv20wDmblNyGdGg3XQoAQvNSJ4juqCj7GgI3pg2tteDcMzFfzZte8Sc2b7-YNSyGxC8UEdwsMf-p_Up8mAobe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933033279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Rahman, Nida ; Rahman, Mohd Nayyer ; Manini, Muganda Munir ; Sharma, Krishan</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Nida ; Rahman, Mohd Nayyer ; Manini, Muganda Munir ; Sharma, Krishan</creatorcontrib><description>Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the important positioning of RCEP member countries like Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam in factory Asia and prominent GVC assembly hubs, this paper examines the determinants of GVC participation in RCEP bloc by employing fixed effects regression method over a period of 1995–2018. The paper also explores the impact of the level of development of the member countries on GVC participation. Latest GVC measures provided by OECD Tiva, 2021 edition are used. The degree of openness to trade and economic freedom positively impacts backward participation rate whereas FDI inflows exerts negative influence on forward participation rate of RCEP countries. However, the developing countries within RCEP appears to have benefitted from FDI inflows, as it significantly affects their forward participation rate in positive direction in relation to their developed counterparts. Similarly, the positive impact of trade openness on backward participation is more pronounced in RCEP member countries with a developing country status relative to developed countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-2078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1972-4977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Business Strategy/Leadership ; Developing countries ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Entrepreneurship ; Industrial economics ; Industrial Organization ; LDCs ; R & D/Technology Policy ; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ; Value chain</subject><ispartof>Economia e politica industriale, 2024-03, Vol.51 (1), p.111-134</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-1122-7184 ; 0000-0001-6512-0028 ; 0000-0002-4564-1691</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Nida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Mohd Nayyer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Muganda Munir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Krishan</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)</title><title>Economia e politica industriale</title><addtitle>J. Ind. Bus. Econ</addtitle><description>Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the important positioning of RCEP member countries like Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam in factory Asia and prominent GVC assembly hubs, this paper examines the determinants of GVC participation in RCEP bloc by employing fixed effects regression method over a period of 1995–2018. The paper also explores the impact of the level of development of the member countries on GVC participation. Latest GVC measures provided by OECD Tiva, 2021 edition are used. The degree of openness to trade and economic freedom positively impacts backward participation rate whereas FDI inflows exerts negative influence on forward participation rate of RCEP countries. However, the developing countries within RCEP appears to have benefitted from FDI inflows, as it significantly affects their forward participation rate in positive direction in relation to their developed counterparts. Similarly, the positive impact of trade openness on backward participation is more pronounced in RCEP member countries with a developing country status relative to developed countries.</description><subject>Business Strategy/Leadership</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Industrial economics</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>R & D/Technology Policy</subject><subject>Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership</subject><subject>Value chain</subject><issn>0391-2078</issn><issn>1972-4977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKov4CrgRhejJ5eZSdxJrRcoKKLrkM6caVM6kzGZFnwI39loFXeeTQ7h-z8OPyEnDC4YQHkZJSjGM-AiA-CKZWyPjJgueSZ1We6TEQjNMg6lOiTHMa4gTS4V6HxEPm5wwNC6znZDpL6hi7Wf2zXd2vUGabW0rqO9DYOrXG8H5zuaPgIu0paoIdgaqV0ExBaT4IoOy5SyEb9Uz7_YxLd9wCV20W2RTivf-dZV9Cl5Owxx6Xp69jyZPp0fkYPGriMe_7xj8no7fZncZ7PHu4fJ9SyrBFdDphgKrYq5ZU1dS2DAJEepkbNaoihqKLi0JVM8L6TKtc2B2UICYiUbrKUUY3K68_bBv20wDmblNyGdGg3XQoAQvNSJ4juqCj7GgI3pg2tteDcMzFfzZte8Sc2b7-YNSyGxC8UEdwsMf-p_Up8mAobe</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Rahman, Nida</creator><creator>Rahman, Mohd Nayyer</creator><creator>Manini, Muganda Munir</creator><creator>Sharma, Krishan</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1122-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6512-0028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4564-1691</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)</title><author>Rahman, Nida ; Rahman, Mohd Nayyer ; Manini, Muganda Munir ; Sharma, Krishan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Business Strategy/Leadership</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Industrial economics</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>R & D/Technology Policy</topic><topic>Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership</topic><topic>Value chain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Nida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Mohd Nayyer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Muganda Munir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Krishan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Economia e politica industriale</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahman, Nida</au><au>Rahman, Mohd Nayyer</au><au>Manini, Muganda Munir</au><au>Sharma, Krishan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)</atitle><jtitle>Economia e politica industriale</jtitle><stitle>J. Ind. Bus. Econ</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>111-134</pages><issn>0391-2078</issn><eissn>1972-4977</eissn><abstract>Globally, the share of Global Value Chain (GVC) trade currently accounts for around 70% of total trade. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) region, around 46% of the total trade involves GVC trade. Besides, RCEP is the first agreement between China, Japan and South Korea. Given the important positioning of RCEP member countries like Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam in factory Asia and prominent GVC assembly hubs, this paper examines the determinants of GVC participation in RCEP bloc by employing fixed effects regression method over a period of 1995–2018. The paper also explores the impact of the level of development of the member countries on GVC participation. Latest GVC measures provided by OECD Tiva, 2021 edition are used. The degree of openness to trade and economic freedom positively impacts backward participation rate whereas FDI inflows exerts negative influence on forward participation rate of RCEP countries. However, the developing countries within RCEP appears to have benefitted from FDI inflows, as it significantly affects their forward participation rate in positive direction in relation to their developed counterparts. Similarly, the positive impact of trade openness on backward participation is more pronounced in RCEP member countries with a developing country status relative to developed countries.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1122-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6512-0028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4564-1691</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0391-2078 |
ispartof | Economia e politica industriale, 2024-03, Vol.51 (1), p.111-134 |
issn | 0391-2078 1972-4977 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2933033279 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Business Strategy/Leadership Developing countries Economics Economics and Finance Entrepreneurship Industrial economics Industrial Organization LDCs R & D/Technology Policy Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Value chain |
title | Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20global%20value%20chain%20participation%20in%20regional%20trade%20agreements:%20the%20case%20of%20Regional%20Comprehensive%20Economic%20Partnership%20(RCEP)&rft.jtitle=Economia%20e%20politica%20industriale&rft.au=Rahman,%20Nida&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=111-134&rft.issn=0391-2078&rft.eissn=1972-4977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933033279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-81e3986ba1fdd4010142e49e21d4e36d0624a7182564859a501a640eec4fed443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933033279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |