Loading…

Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation

China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of urban affairs 2024-03, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-14
Main Authors: Zhu, Jieming, Tong, De
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553
container_end_page 14
container_issue ahead-of-print
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of urban affairs
container_volume ahead-of-print
creator Zhu, Jieming
Tong, De
description China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in the dynamic urbanizing regions. The rural collective vigorously challenges the notion of collective land as a means of production that denies villagers' claim of land rent. The contest for land rent through confrontation and negotiation with the urban state demonstrates a process of bottom-up informal institutional change. Without certainty, informal institutional change gives rise to substandard built environment that is unsustainable to the high-density urbanization. Formalization to legitimize the informal institutional change comes to minimize land rent dissipation so as to enhance welfare to both the urban state and rural collective. Land reform from below show an evolutionary route of institutional change to the collective land.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/07352166.2022.2062373
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933688531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933688531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43pqP5suTUvwoFLzUc8juZmvKNqlJaum_d2Pr1csMA8-8zDwA3GI0wUiieyQoI5jzCUGEDIUTKugZGOEpF5VSiJ-DUWGqAl2Cq5TWCCEuERuB5cL4FkbbhbiBXQwbWNs-7B_g3Kfs8i674E0Pm0_jVxa20X1bD-sDbIIfaJ9NAWDJ8HYVsvudr8FFZ_pkb059DD5enpezt2rx_jqfPS2qhgqch3OmFDdSYkEIV0Z0HWKG1K0QvCGSMMYF6dpWcIuxkqrm3EhqiUVSUaQYo2Nwd8zdxvC1synrddjF4d6kiaKUS8koHih2pJoYUhpe1dvoNiYeNEa6CNR_AnURqE8Ch73H457zxY7Zh9i3OptDH2IXjW9c0vT_iB-RCXZC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933688531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Zhu, Jieming ; Tong, De</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jieming ; Tong, De</creatorcontrib><description>China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in the dynamic urbanizing regions. The rural collective vigorously challenges the notion of collective land as a means of production that denies villagers' claim of land rent. The contest for land rent through confrontation and negotiation with the urban state demonstrates a process of bottom-up informal institutional change. Without certainty, informal institutional change gives rise to substandard built environment that is unsustainable to the high-density urbanization. Formalization to legitimize the informal institutional change comes to minimize land rent dissipation so as to enhance welfare to both the urban state and rural collective. Land reform from below show an evolutionary route of institutional change to the collective land.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-2166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9906</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2022.2062373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newark: Routledge</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Built environment ; Changes ; China ; collective land rights ; Conflict ; Economic reform ; governance ; Informal institutional change ; Institutional change ; Land ownership ; Land reform ; Negotiation ; Negotiations ; Urban environments ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban affairs, 2024-03, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>2022 Urban Affairs Association 2022</rights><rights>2022 Urban Affairs Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5781-3975 ; 0000-0003-1541-4479</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jieming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, De</creatorcontrib><title>Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation</title><title>Journal of urban affairs</title><description>China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in the dynamic urbanizing regions. The rural collective vigorously challenges the notion of collective land as a means of production that denies villagers' claim of land rent. The contest for land rent through confrontation and negotiation with the urban state demonstrates a process of bottom-up informal institutional change. Without certainty, informal institutional change gives rise to substandard built environment that is unsustainable to the high-density urbanization. Formalization to legitimize the informal institutional change comes to minimize land rent dissipation so as to enhance welfare to both the urban state and rural collective. Land reform from below show an evolutionary route of institutional change to the collective land.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>collective land rights</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Informal institutional change</subject><subject>Institutional change</subject><subject>Land ownership</subject><subject>Land reform</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0735-2166</issn><issn>1467-9906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43pqP5suTUvwoFLzUc8juZmvKNqlJaum_d2Pr1csMA8-8zDwA3GI0wUiieyQoI5jzCUGEDIUTKugZGOEpF5VSiJ-DUWGqAl2Cq5TWCCEuERuB5cL4FkbbhbiBXQwbWNs-7B_g3Kfs8i674E0Pm0_jVxa20X1bD-sDbIIfaJ9NAWDJ8HYVsvudr8FFZ_pkb059DD5enpezt2rx_jqfPS2qhgqch3OmFDdSYkEIV0Z0HWKG1K0QvCGSMMYF6dpWcIuxkqrm3EhqiUVSUaQYo2Nwd8zdxvC1synrddjF4d6kiaKUS8koHih2pJoYUhpe1dvoNiYeNEa6CNR_AnURqE8Ch73H457zxY7Zh9i3OptDH2IXjW9c0vT_iB-RCXZC</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Zhu, Jieming</creator><creator>Tong, De</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-3975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1541-4479</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation</title><author>Zhu, Jieming ; Tong, De</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>collective land rights</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Informal institutional change</topic><topic>Institutional change</topic><topic>Land ownership</topic><topic>Land reform</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jieming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, De</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Jieming</au><au>Tong, De</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban affairs</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>ahead-of-print</volume><issue>ahead-of-print</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0735-2166</issn><eissn>1467-9906</eissn><abstract>China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in the dynamic urbanizing regions. The rural collective vigorously challenges the notion of collective land as a means of production that denies villagers' claim of land rent. The contest for land rent through confrontation and negotiation with the urban state demonstrates a process of bottom-up informal institutional change. Without certainty, informal institutional change gives rise to substandard built environment that is unsustainable to the high-density urbanization. Formalization to legitimize the informal institutional change comes to minimize land rent dissipation so as to enhance welfare to both the urban state and rural collective. Land reform from below show an evolutionary route of institutional change to the collective land.</abstract><cop>Newark</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/07352166.2022.2062373</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-3975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1541-4479</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-2166
ispartof Journal of urban affairs, 2024-03, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-14
issn 0735-2166
1467-9906
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2933688531
source PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Agriculture
Built environment
Changes
China
collective land rights
Conflict
Economic reform
governance
Informal institutional change
Institutional change
Land ownership
Land reform
Negotiation
Negotiations
Urban environments
Urbanization
title Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land%20reform%20from%20below:%20Institutional%20change%20driven%20by%20confrontation%20and%20negotiation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20affairs&rft.au=Zhu,%20Jieming&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=ahead-of-print&rft.issue=ahead-of-print&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0735-2166&rft.eissn=1467-9906&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07352166.2022.2062373&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933688531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933688531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true