Loading…
Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation
China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of urban affairs 2024-03, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-14 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553 |
container_end_page | 14 |
container_issue | ahead-of-print |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of urban affairs |
container_volume | ahead-of-print |
creator | Zhu, Jieming Tong, De |
description | China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in the dynamic urbanizing regions. The rural collective vigorously challenges the notion of collective land as a means of production that denies villagers' claim of land rent. The contest for land rent through confrontation and negotiation with the urban state demonstrates a process of bottom-up informal institutional change. Without certainty, informal institutional change gives rise to substandard built environment that is unsustainable to the high-density urbanization. Formalization to legitimize the informal institutional change comes to minimize land rent dissipation so as to enhance welfare to both the urban state and rural collective. Land reform from below show an evolutionary route of institutional change to the collective land. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07352166.2022.2062373 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933688531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933688531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43pqP5suTUvwoFLzUc8juZmvKNqlJaum_d2Pr1csMA8-8zDwA3GI0wUiieyQoI5jzCUGEDIUTKugZGOEpF5VSiJ-DUWGqAl2Cq5TWCCEuERuB5cL4FkbbhbiBXQwbWNs-7B_g3Kfs8i674E0Pm0_jVxa20X1bD-sDbIIfaJ9NAWDJ8HYVsvudr8FFZ_pkb059DD5enpezt2rx_jqfPS2qhgqch3OmFDdSYkEIV0Z0HWKG1K0QvCGSMMYF6dpWcIuxkqrm3EhqiUVSUaQYo2Nwd8zdxvC1synrddjF4d6kiaKUS8koHih2pJoYUhpe1dvoNiYeNEa6CNR_AnURqE8Ch73H457zxY7Zh9i3OptDH2IXjW9c0vT_iB-RCXZC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933688531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Zhu, Jieming ; Tong, De</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jieming ; Tong, De</creatorcontrib><description>China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in the dynamic urbanizing regions. The rural collective vigorously challenges the notion of collective land as a means of production that denies villagers' claim of land rent. The contest for land rent through confrontation and negotiation with the urban state demonstrates a process of bottom-up informal institutional change. Without certainty, informal institutional change gives rise to substandard built environment that is unsustainable to the high-density urbanization. Formalization to legitimize the informal institutional change comes to minimize land rent dissipation so as to enhance welfare to both the urban state and rural collective. Land reform from below show an evolutionary route of institutional change to the collective land.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-2166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9906</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2022.2062373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newark: Routledge</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Built environment ; Changes ; China ; collective land rights ; Conflict ; Economic reform ; governance ; Informal institutional change ; Institutional change ; Land ownership ; Land reform ; Negotiation ; Negotiations ; Urban environments ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban affairs, 2024-03, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>2022 Urban Affairs Association 2022</rights><rights>2022 Urban Affairs Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5781-3975 ; 0000-0003-1541-4479</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jieming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, De</creatorcontrib><title>Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation</title><title>Journal of urban affairs</title><description>China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in the dynamic urbanizing regions. The rural collective vigorously challenges the notion of collective land as a means of production that denies villagers' claim of land rent. The contest for land rent through confrontation and negotiation with the urban state demonstrates a process of bottom-up informal institutional change. Without certainty, informal institutional change gives rise to substandard built environment that is unsustainable to the high-density urbanization. Formalization to legitimize the informal institutional change comes to minimize land rent dissipation so as to enhance welfare to both the urban state and rural collective. Land reform from below show an evolutionary route of institutional change to the collective land.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>collective land rights</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Informal institutional change</subject><subject>Institutional change</subject><subject>Land ownership</subject><subject>Land reform</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0735-2166</issn><issn>1467-9906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43pqP5suTUvwoFLzUc8juZmvKNqlJaum_d2Pr1csMA8-8zDwA3GI0wUiieyQoI5jzCUGEDIUTKugZGOEpF5VSiJ-DUWGqAl2Cq5TWCCEuERuB5cL4FkbbhbiBXQwbWNs-7B_g3Kfs8i674E0Pm0_jVxa20X1bD-sDbIIfaJ9NAWDJ8HYVsvudr8FFZ_pkb059DD5enpezt2rx_jqfPS2qhgqch3OmFDdSYkEIV0Z0HWKG1K0QvCGSMMYF6dpWcIuxkqrm3EhqiUVSUaQYo2Nwd8zdxvC1synrddjF4d6kiaKUS8koHih2pJoYUhpe1dvoNiYeNEa6CNR_AnURqE8Ch73H457zxY7Zh9i3OptDH2IXjW9c0vT_iB-RCXZC</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Zhu, Jieming</creator><creator>Tong, De</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-3975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1541-4479</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation</title><author>Zhu, Jieming ; Tong, De</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>collective land rights</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Informal institutional change</topic><topic>Institutional change</topic><topic>Land ownership</topic><topic>Land reform</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jieming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, De</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Jieming</au><au>Tong, De</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban affairs</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>ahead-of-print</volume><issue>ahead-of-print</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0735-2166</issn><eissn>1467-9906</eissn><abstract>China's collective landownership was created by the revolutionary land reform in the early 1950s. Economic reforms since the early 1980s have dismantled the collective farming, but the collective landownership remains unchanged. Nonagricultural economies have manifested collective land rent in the dynamic urbanizing regions. The rural collective vigorously challenges the notion of collective land as a means of production that denies villagers' claim of land rent. The contest for land rent through confrontation and negotiation with the urban state demonstrates a process of bottom-up informal institutional change. Without certainty, informal institutional change gives rise to substandard built environment that is unsustainable to the high-density urbanization. Formalization to legitimize the informal institutional change comes to minimize land rent dissipation so as to enhance welfare to both the urban state and rural collective. Land reform from below show an evolutionary route of institutional change to the collective land.</abstract><cop>Newark</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/07352166.2022.2062373</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-3975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1541-4479</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-2166 |
ispartof | Journal of urban affairs, 2024-03, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-14 |
issn | 0735-2166 1467-9906 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2933688531 |
source | PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Agriculture Built environment Changes China collective land rights Conflict Economic reform governance Informal institutional change Institutional change Land ownership Land reform Negotiation Negotiations Urban environments Urbanization |
title | Land reform from below: Institutional change driven by confrontation and negotiation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land%20reform%20from%20below:%20Institutional%20change%20driven%20by%20confrontation%20and%20negotiation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20affairs&rft.au=Zhu,%20Jieming&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=ahead-of-print&rft.issue=ahead-of-print&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0735-2166&rft.eissn=1467-9906&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07352166.2022.2062373&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933688531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-21431c88172269a7ff05a2bd776c28255672fdd76e11989b66a83e2e089309553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933688531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |