Loading…
Evaluation of Welding Processes Based on Multi-dimensional Sustainability Assessment Model
Welding is a widely used manufacturing process that has a significant impact on the sustainability dimensions represented by environmental, economic and social aspects. In this work, a general and comprehensive framework for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes is applied to select t...
Saved in:
| Published in: | International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology 2021-01, Vol.8 (1), p.57-75 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-86985b9e36fc64fae9d4142f0e4fe75e3e145961ab0a453af5e41fbf6a0194ee3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-86985b9e36fc64fae9d4142f0e4fe75e3e145961ab0a453af5e41fbf6a0194ee3 |
| container_end_page | 75 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 57 |
| container_title | International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Saad, Mohammed H. Darras, Basil M. Nazzal, Mohammad A. |
| description | Welding is a widely used manufacturing process that has a significant impact on the sustainability dimensions represented by environmental, economic and social aspects. In this work, a general and comprehensive framework for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes is applied to select the most sustainable welding process among several alternatives for a certain application. The considered alternatives are friction stir welding (FSW), gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), gas metal arc welding (GMAW), and shielded metal arc welding (SMAW). The four processes are used to weld two aluminum plates. Relevant sustainability indicators are selected from all sustainability dimensions. A dimension for physical performance of the welded parts is also considered. Entropy weight method is used for assigning weights to the indicators to avoid uncertainties of subjective weighting. Three multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) are used for normalization and aggregation of data. The reliability of the results is investigated by conducting sensitivity analysis. The results of the study show that FSW is the most sustainable welding process for this study. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40684-019-00184-4 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933755749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933755749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-86985b9e36fc64fae9d4142f0e4fe75e3e145961ab0a453af5e41fbf6a0194ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gKuA6-jNcybLWuoDWhRUBDchM3MjkWmnTmaE_ntT6-oeOB-Hcw8hlxyuOUBxkxSYUjHglgHwrNQJmQhuSwYlh9OsRVkyI8Cck1lKsQIBhdDGwIR8LH98O_ohdlvaBfqObRO3n_S572pMCRO99Qkbmt312A6RNXGD25Rp39KXMQ0-bn0V2zjs6fzAp2wPdN012F6Qs-DbhLP_OyVvd8vXxQNbPd0_LuYrVkstB1YaW-rKojShNip4tI3iSgRAFbDQKJErbQ33FXilpQ8aFQ9VMD4_rBDllFwdc3d99z1iGtxXN_a5YHLCSlloXSibKXGk6r5Lqcfgdn3c-H7vOLjDjO44o8up7m9Gp-Qv4t1mZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933755749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Welding Processes Based on Multi-dimensional Sustainability Assessment Model</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Saad, Mohammed H. ; Darras, Basil M. ; Nazzal, Mohammad A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saad, Mohammed H. ; Darras, Basil M. ; Nazzal, Mohammad A.</creatorcontrib><description>Welding is a widely used manufacturing process that has a significant impact on the sustainability dimensions represented by environmental, economic and social aspects. In this work, a general and comprehensive framework for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes is applied to select the most sustainable welding process among several alternatives for a certain application. The considered alternatives are friction stir welding (FSW), gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), gas metal arc welding (GMAW), and shielded metal arc welding (SMAW). The four processes are used to weld two aluminum plates. Relevant sustainability indicators are selected from all sustainability dimensions. A dimension for physical performance of the welded parts is also considered. Entropy weight method is used for assigning weights to the indicators to avoid uncertainties of subjective weighting. Three multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) are used for normalization and aggregation of data. The reliability of the results is investigated by conducting sensitivity analysis. The results of the study show that FSW is the most sustainable welding process for this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2288-6206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2198-0810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40684-019-00184-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Alloys ; Alternatives ; Aluminum ; Aluminum alloys ; Decision making ; Energy consumption ; Entropy (statistics) ; Environmental impact ; Friction stir welding ; Gas metal arc welding ; Gas tungsten arc welding ; Gases ; Impact analysis ; Indicators ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industry ; Metal plates ; Metal workers ; Multiple criterion ; Performance evaluation ; Sensitivity analysis ; Shielded metal arc welding ; Social factors ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Tungsten ; Weighting methods ; Welding</subject><ispartof>International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology, 2021-01, Vol.8 (1), p.57-75</ispartof><rights>Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2020.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-86985b9e36fc64fae9d4142f0e4fe75e3e145961ab0a453af5e41fbf6a0194ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-86985b9e36fc64fae9d4142f0e4fe75e3e145961ab0a453af5e41fbf6a0194ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saad, Mohammed H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darras, Basil M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazzal, Mohammad A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Welding Processes Based on Multi-dimensional Sustainability Assessment Model</title><title>International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology</title><description>Welding is a widely used manufacturing process that has a significant impact on the sustainability dimensions represented by environmental, economic and social aspects. In this work, a general and comprehensive framework for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes is applied to select the most sustainable welding process among several alternatives for a certain application. The considered alternatives are friction stir welding (FSW), gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), gas metal arc welding (GMAW), and shielded metal arc welding (SMAW). The four processes are used to weld two aluminum plates. Relevant sustainability indicators are selected from all sustainability dimensions. A dimension for physical performance of the welded parts is also considered. Entropy weight method is used for assigning weights to the indicators to avoid uncertainties of subjective weighting. Three multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) are used for normalization and aggregation of data. The reliability of the results is investigated by conducting sensitivity analysis. The results of the study show that FSW is the most sustainable welding process for this study.</description><subject>Alloys</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum alloys</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Entropy (statistics)</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Friction stir welding</subject><subject>Gas metal arc welding</subject><subject>Gas tungsten arc welding</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Metal plates</subject><subject>Metal workers</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Shielded metal arc welding</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Tungsten</subject><subject>Weighting methods</subject><subject>Welding</subject><issn>2288-6206</issn><issn>2198-0810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gKuA6-jNcybLWuoDWhRUBDchM3MjkWmnTmaE_ntT6-oeOB-Hcw8hlxyuOUBxkxSYUjHglgHwrNQJmQhuSwYlh9OsRVkyI8Cck1lKsQIBhdDGwIR8LH98O_ohdlvaBfqObRO3n_S572pMCRO99Qkbmt312A6RNXGD25Rp39KXMQ0-bn0V2zjs6fzAp2wPdN012F6Qs-DbhLP_OyVvd8vXxQNbPd0_LuYrVkstB1YaW-rKojShNip4tI3iSgRAFbDQKJErbQ33FXilpQ8aFQ9VMD4_rBDllFwdc3d99z1iGtxXN_a5YHLCSlloXSibKXGk6r5Lqcfgdn3c-H7vOLjDjO44o8up7m9Gp-Qv4t1mZg</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Saad, Mohammed H.</creator><creator>Darras, Basil M.</creator><creator>Nazzal, Mohammad A.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Welding Processes Based on Multi-dimensional Sustainability Assessment Model</title><author>Saad, Mohammed H. ; Darras, Basil M. ; Nazzal, Mohammad A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-86985b9e36fc64fae9d4142f0e4fe75e3e145961ab0a453af5e41fbf6a0194ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alloys</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum alloys</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Entropy (statistics)</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Friction stir welding</topic><topic>Gas metal arc welding</topic><topic>Gas tungsten arc welding</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Metal plates</topic><topic>Metal workers</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Shielded metal arc welding</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Tungsten</topic><topic>Weighting methods</topic><topic>Welding</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saad, Mohammed H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darras, Basil M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazzal, Mohammad A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saad, Mohammed H.</au><au>Darras, Basil M.</au><au>Nazzal, Mohammad A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Welding Processes Based on Multi-dimensional Sustainability Assessment Model</atitle><jtitle>International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>57-75</pages><issn>2288-6206</issn><eissn>2198-0810</eissn><abstract>Welding is a widely used manufacturing process that has a significant impact on the sustainability dimensions represented by environmental, economic and social aspects. In this work, a general and comprehensive framework for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes is applied to select the most sustainable welding process among several alternatives for a certain application. The considered alternatives are friction stir welding (FSW), gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), gas metal arc welding (GMAW), and shielded metal arc welding (SMAW). The four processes are used to weld two aluminum plates. Relevant sustainability indicators are selected from all sustainability dimensions. A dimension for physical performance of the welded parts is also considered. Entropy weight method is used for assigning weights to the indicators to avoid uncertainties of subjective weighting. Three multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) are used for normalization and aggregation of data. The reliability of the results is investigated by conducting sensitivity analysis. The results of the study show that FSW is the most sustainable welding process for this study.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s40684-019-00184-4</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2288-6206 |
| ispartof | International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology, 2021-01, Vol.8 (1), p.57-75 |
| issn | 2288-6206 2198-0810 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2933755749 |
| source | Springer Link |
| subjects | Alloys Alternatives Aluminum Aluminum alloys Decision making Energy consumption Entropy (statistics) Environmental impact Friction stir welding Gas metal arc welding Gas tungsten arc welding Gases Impact analysis Indicators Manufacturing Manufacturing industry Metal plates Metal workers Multiple criterion Performance evaluation Sensitivity analysis Shielded metal arc welding Social factors Sustainability Sustainable development Tungsten Weighting methods Welding |
| title | Evaluation of Welding Processes Based on Multi-dimensional Sustainability Assessment Model |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A37%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Welding%20Processes%20Based%20on%20Multi-dimensional%20Sustainability%20Assessment%20Model&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20precision%20engineering%20and%20manufacturing-green%20technology&rft.au=Saad,%20Mohammed%20H.&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=57-75&rft.issn=2288-6206&rft.eissn=2198-0810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40684-019-00184-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933755749%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-86985b9e36fc64fae9d4142f0e4fe75e3e145961ab0a453af5e41fbf6a0194ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933755749&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |