Loading…

Simplifying molecular testing through electronic order entry

Abstract Our solid-tumor molecular laboratory receives more than 3,000 orders each year, with about two-thirds coming from internal providers. Before this project, molecular tests were ordered using one of two different paper forms, which the care team then faxed or e-mailed to the Genetics Preanaly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of clinical pathology 2023-11, Vol.160 (Supplement_1), p.S135-S136
Main Authors: Kwon, Regina, Krumm, Niklas, Hoffman, Noah, Mathias, Patrick, Konnick, Eric
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page S136
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page S135
container_title American journal of clinical pathology
container_volume 160
creator Kwon, Regina
Krumm, Niklas
Hoffman, Noah
Mathias, Patrick
Konnick, Eric
description Abstract Our solid-tumor molecular laboratory receives more than 3,000 orders each year, with about two-thirds coming from internal providers. Before this project, molecular tests were ordered using one of two different paper forms, which the care team then faxed or e-mailed to the Genetics Preanalytical Service (GPS). These requests led to frequent modifications and cancellations due to the complexity of molecular testing. A small fraction of requisitions were lost due to transmission errors. We undertook a project to design, develop, and implement computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in Epic (Epic Systems Corp., Verona, WI) and Sunquest (Clinisys, Tucson, AZ). We conducted extensive interviews with the directors of the molecular lab, laboratory medicine IT, GPS, anatomic pathology staff, laboratory scientists, laboratory genetic counselors, oncologists, clinicians, and nurse coordinators. The order itself and other technical changes underwent iterative review and testing by a subset of interviewees. Five oncologists participated in formal beta-testing. The user interviews allowed us to produce a detailed process diagram that drew attention to specific areas of repetition or risk. We proposed a new workflow that would eliminate repetition, provide redundant order-tracking, and automate some lab processes. Once approved, we built the electronic order in Epic and modified existing laboratory programs and interfaces as needed. The process of placing an order, which previously typically involved both nurses and doctors over several calendar days, was now being completed in fewer than 5 minutes by a single practitioner. Requisition status events were no longer created manually in Sunquest by GPS. Certain data-entry tasks were eliminated through the incorporation of label printers. Within one month of launch, more than 50% of somatic molecular orders arrived via CPOE, increasing to 90% within six months. At a rate of 125 CPOE orders per month, time savings range from 20 hours per month for GPS staff, 50 hours per month for nursing, and 20 hours per month for physicians. The success of this project demonstrates the feasibility of replacing a paper-based process for a complex test menu with CPOE. Due to the intricacies of molecular testing, such a change will undoubtedly involve multiple divisions. We attribute the success of this project to early involvement by key stakeholder groups, including developers; an extended testing phase to ensure reliability at
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajcp/aqad150.293
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2955224622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ajcp/aqad150.293</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2955224622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1473-75f54593d585bbe5c9aade10d5d9a6e0b50adcb915ccc4ad5a3cb03054230c383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgMeJe3sxzRZ8CLFqlDwoJ6Xze6mTUiy6SY59L93S3v3NPDmvZnHj5BHCgsKki91bfqlPmhLERZM8isyo1LwNMsYuyYzAGCppBm_JXfDUANQloOYkZfvqu2bqjxW3S5pfePM1OiQjG4YT8q4D37a7RMXF2PwXWUSH6wLievGcLwnN6VuBvdwmXPyu3n7WX-k26_3z_XrNjVUZLEClihQcos5FoVDI7W2joJFK_XKQYGgrSkkRWOM0BY1NwVwQME4GJ7zOXk63-2DP0yxmqr9FLr4UjGJyJhYMRZdcHaZ4IchuFL1oWp1OCoK6sRInRipC6OY5DHyfI74qf_f_QeB-WrK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2955224622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simplifying molecular testing through electronic order entry</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Kwon, Regina ; Krumm, Niklas ; Hoffman, Noah ; Mathias, Patrick ; Konnick, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Regina ; Krumm, Niklas ; Hoffman, Noah ; Mathias, Patrick ; Konnick, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Our solid-tumor molecular laboratory receives more than 3,000 orders each year, with about two-thirds coming from internal providers. Before this project, molecular tests were ordered using one of two different paper forms, which the care team then faxed or e-mailed to the Genetics Preanalytical Service (GPS). These requests led to frequent modifications and cancellations due to the complexity of molecular testing. A small fraction of requisitions were lost due to transmission errors. We undertook a project to design, develop, and implement computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in Epic (Epic Systems Corp., Verona, WI) and Sunquest (Clinisys, Tucson, AZ). We conducted extensive interviews with the directors of the molecular lab, laboratory medicine IT, GPS, anatomic pathology staff, laboratory scientists, laboratory genetic counselors, oncologists, clinicians, and nurse coordinators. The order itself and other technical changes underwent iterative review and testing by a subset of interviewees. Five oncologists participated in formal beta-testing. The user interviews allowed us to produce a detailed process diagram that drew attention to specific areas of repetition or risk. We proposed a new workflow that would eliminate repetition, provide redundant order-tracking, and automate some lab processes. Once approved, we built the electronic order in Epic and modified existing laboratory programs and interfaces as needed. The process of placing an order, which previously typically involved both nurses and doctors over several calendar days, was now being completed in fewer than 5 minutes by a single practitioner. Requisition status events were no longer created manually in Sunquest by GPS. Certain data-entry tasks were eliminated through the incorporation of label printers. Within one month of launch, more than 50% of somatic molecular orders arrived via CPOE, increasing to 90% within six months. At a rate of 125 CPOE orders per month, time savings range from 20 hours per month for GPS staff, 50 hours per month for nursing, and 20 hours per month for physicians. The success of this project demonstrates the feasibility of replacing a paper-based process for a complex test menu with CPOE. Due to the intricacies of molecular testing, such a change will undoubtedly involve multiple divisions. We attribute the success of this project to early involvement by key stakeholder groups, including developers; an extended testing phase to ensure reliability at roll-out; creation of straightforward reference documents; and rapid response to user questions, especially during the first weeks post-launch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad150.293</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Genetic counseling ; Laboratories ; Order entry ; Repetition</subject><ispartof>American journal of clinical pathology, 2023-11, Vol.160 (Supplement_1), p.S135-S136</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krumm, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Noah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konnick, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Simplifying molecular testing through electronic order entry</title><title>American journal of clinical pathology</title><description>Abstract Our solid-tumor molecular laboratory receives more than 3,000 orders each year, with about two-thirds coming from internal providers. Before this project, molecular tests were ordered using one of two different paper forms, which the care team then faxed or e-mailed to the Genetics Preanalytical Service (GPS). These requests led to frequent modifications and cancellations due to the complexity of molecular testing. A small fraction of requisitions were lost due to transmission errors. We undertook a project to design, develop, and implement computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in Epic (Epic Systems Corp., Verona, WI) and Sunquest (Clinisys, Tucson, AZ). We conducted extensive interviews with the directors of the molecular lab, laboratory medicine IT, GPS, anatomic pathology staff, laboratory scientists, laboratory genetic counselors, oncologists, clinicians, and nurse coordinators. The order itself and other technical changes underwent iterative review and testing by a subset of interviewees. Five oncologists participated in formal beta-testing. The user interviews allowed us to produce a detailed process diagram that drew attention to specific areas of repetition or risk. We proposed a new workflow that would eliminate repetition, provide redundant order-tracking, and automate some lab processes. Once approved, we built the electronic order in Epic and modified existing laboratory programs and interfaces as needed. The process of placing an order, which previously typically involved both nurses and doctors over several calendar days, was now being completed in fewer than 5 minutes by a single practitioner. Requisition status events were no longer created manually in Sunquest by GPS. Certain data-entry tasks were eliminated through the incorporation of label printers. Within one month of launch, more than 50% of somatic molecular orders arrived via CPOE, increasing to 90% within six months. At a rate of 125 CPOE orders per month, time savings range from 20 hours per month for GPS staff, 50 hours per month for nursing, and 20 hours per month for physicians. The success of this project demonstrates the feasibility of replacing a paper-based process for a complex test menu with CPOE. Due to the intricacies of molecular testing, such a change will undoubtedly involve multiple divisions. We attribute the success of this project to early involvement by key stakeholder groups, including developers; an extended testing phase to ensure reliability at roll-out; creation of straightforward reference documents; and rapid response to user questions, especially during the first weeks post-launch.</description><subject>Genetic counseling</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Order entry</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><issn>0002-9173</issn><issn>1943-7722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgMeJe3sxzRZ8CLFqlDwoJ6Xze6mTUiy6SY59L93S3v3NPDmvZnHj5BHCgsKki91bfqlPmhLERZM8isyo1LwNMsYuyYzAGCppBm_JXfDUANQloOYkZfvqu2bqjxW3S5pfePM1OiQjG4YT8q4D37a7RMXF2PwXWUSH6wLievGcLwnN6VuBvdwmXPyu3n7WX-k26_3z_XrNjVUZLEClihQcos5FoVDI7W2joJFK_XKQYGgrSkkRWOM0BY1NwVwQME4GJ7zOXk63-2DP0yxmqr9FLr4UjGJyJhYMRZdcHaZ4IchuFL1oWp1OCoK6sRInRipC6OY5DHyfI74qf_f_QeB-WrK</recordid><startdate>20231129</startdate><enddate>20231129</enddate><creator>Kwon, Regina</creator><creator>Krumm, Niklas</creator><creator>Hoffman, Noah</creator><creator>Mathias, Patrick</creator><creator>Konnick, Eric</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231129</creationdate><title>Simplifying molecular testing through electronic order entry</title><author>Kwon, Regina ; Krumm, Niklas ; Hoffman, Noah ; Mathias, Patrick ; Konnick, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1473-75f54593d585bbe5c9aade10d5d9a6e0b50adcb915ccc4ad5a3cb03054230c383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Genetic counseling</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Order entry</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krumm, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Noah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konnick, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>American journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kwon, Regina</au><au>Krumm, Niklas</au><au>Hoffman, Noah</au><au>Mathias, Patrick</au><au>Konnick, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simplifying molecular testing through electronic order entry</atitle><jtitle>American journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><date>2023-11-29</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>S135</spage><epage>S136</epage><pages>S135-S136</pages><issn>0002-9173</issn><eissn>1943-7722</eissn><abstract>Abstract Our solid-tumor molecular laboratory receives more than 3,000 orders each year, with about two-thirds coming from internal providers. Before this project, molecular tests were ordered using one of two different paper forms, which the care team then faxed or e-mailed to the Genetics Preanalytical Service (GPS). These requests led to frequent modifications and cancellations due to the complexity of molecular testing. A small fraction of requisitions were lost due to transmission errors. We undertook a project to design, develop, and implement computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in Epic (Epic Systems Corp., Verona, WI) and Sunquest (Clinisys, Tucson, AZ). We conducted extensive interviews with the directors of the molecular lab, laboratory medicine IT, GPS, anatomic pathology staff, laboratory scientists, laboratory genetic counselors, oncologists, clinicians, and nurse coordinators. The order itself and other technical changes underwent iterative review and testing by a subset of interviewees. Five oncologists participated in formal beta-testing. The user interviews allowed us to produce a detailed process diagram that drew attention to specific areas of repetition or risk. We proposed a new workflow that would eliminate repetition, provide redundant order-tracking, and automate some lab processes. Once approved, we built the electronic order in Epic and modified existing laboratory programs and interfaces as needed. The process of placing an order, which previously typically involved both nurses and doctors over several calendar days, was now being completed in fewer than 5 minutes by a single practitioner. Requisition status events were no longer created manually in Sunquest by GPS. Certain data-entry tasks were eliminated through the incorporation of label printers. Within one month of launch, more than 50% of somatic molecular orders arrived via CPOE, increasing to 90% within six months. At a rate of 125 CPOE orders per month, time savings range from 20 hours per month for GPS staff, 50 hours per month for nursing, and 20 hours per month for physicians. The success of this project demonstrates the feasibility of replacing a paper-based process for a complex test menu with CPOE. Due to the intricacies of molecular testing, such a change will undoubtedly involve multiple divisions. We attribute the success of this project to early involvement by key stakeholder groups, including developers; an extended testing phase to ensure reliability at roll-out; creation of straightforward reference documents; and rapid response to user questions, especially during the first weeks post-launch.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ajcp/aqad150.293</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9173
ispartof American journal of clinical pathology, 2023-11, Vol.160 (Supplement_1), p.S135-S136
issn 0002-9173
1943-7722
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2955224622
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Genetic counseling
Laboratories
Order entry
Repetition
title Simplifying molecular testing through electronic order entry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A24%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simplifying%20molecular%20testing%20through%20electronic%20order%20entry&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Kwon,%20Regina&rft.date=2023-11-29&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=S135&rft.epage=S136&rft.pages=S135-S136&rft.issn=0002-9173&rft.eissn=1943-7722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajcp/aqad150.293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2955224622%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1473-75f54593d585bbe5c9aade10d5d9a6e0b50adcb915ccc4ad5a3cb03054230c383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2955224622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ajcp/aqad150.293&rfr_iscdi=true