Loading…

Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry

As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:CEAS space journal 2024-03, Vol.16 (2), p.225-237
Main Authors: Herrmann, Lars, Bieber, Marie, Verhagen, Wim J. C., Cosson, Fabrice, Santos, Bruno F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423
container_end_page 237
container_issue 2
container_start_page 225
container_title CEAS space journal
container_volume 16
creator Herrmann, Lars
Bieber, Marie
Verhagen, Wim J. C.
Cosson, Fabrice
Santos, Bruno F.
description As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the necessity for expert interpretation and continual updates to match the dynamic mission environment. This paper critically examines the use of deep anomaly detection (DAD) methods in addressing these challenges, evaluating their efficacy on real-world spacecraft telemetry data. It exposes limitations in current DAD research, highlighting the tendency for performance results to be overestimated and suggesting that simpler methods can sometimes outperform more complex DAD algorithms. By comparing established metrics for anomaly detection with newly proposed ones, this paper aims to improve the evaluation of DAD algorithms. It underscores the importance of using less accuracy-inflating metrics and offers a comprehensive comparison of DAD methods on popular benchmark datasets and real-life satellite telemetry data. Among the DAD methods examined, the LSTM algorithm demonstrates considerable promise. However, the paper also reveals the potential limitations of this approach, particularly in complex systems that lack a single, clear predictive failure channel. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for future research, including the adoption of best practices, the need for high-quality, pre-split datasets, and the investigation of other prediction error methods. Through these insights, this paper contributes to the improved understanding and application of DAD methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of anomaly detection in real-world scenarios.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12567-023-00529-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2968914099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2968914099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIVNAf4GSJs2HtxEnMDVW8pEpc6ImD5TrrKiWJg51W6t9jGgQ3TvuamdUMIVccbjhAeRu5kEXJQGQMQArF5AmZ8aqomJAcTn97EOdkHuMWAATPAXI-I--rvjPxo-k31O8xYBybzoyN7--ooQEZ7k27Oy6od7RGHKjpfWfaQxpGtMdL09M4GIs2GDfSEVvscAyHS3LmTBtx_lMvyOrx4W3xzJavTy-L-yWzGc9HpsBVdVGs12CNQVkilnmWI1el4Ohq69YFGl4CGGWtKSAHVWXosK6kSJPILsj1pDsE_7lLFvTW70KfXmqhikolr0ollJhQNvgYAzo9hOQ1HDQH_Z2jnnLUKUd9zFHLRMomUkzgfoPhT_of1hcI_HbR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2968914099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Herrmann, Lars ; Bieber, Marie ; Verhagen, Wim J. C. ; Cosson, Fabrice ; Santos, Bruno F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Lars ; Bieber, Marie ; Verhagen, Wim J. C. ; Cosson, Fabrice ; Santos, Bruno F.</creatorcontrib><description>As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the necessity for expert interpretation and continual updates to match the dynamic mission environment. This paper critically examines the use of deep anomaly detection (DAD) methods in addressing these challenges, evaluating their efficacy on real-world spacecraft telemetry data. It exposes limitations in current DAD research, highlighting the tendency for performance results to be overestimated and suggesting that simpler methods can sometimes outperform more complex DAD algorithms. By comparing established metrics for anomaly detection with newly proposed ones, this paper aims to improve the evaluation of DAD algorithms. It underscores the importance of using less accuracy-inflating metrics and offers a comprehensive comparison of DAD methods on popular benchmark datasets and real-life satellite telemetry data. Among the DAD methods examined, the LSTM algorithm demonstrates considerable promise. However, the paper also reveals the potential limitations of this approach, particularly in complex systems that lack a single, clear predictive failure channel. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for future research, including the adoption of best practices, the need for high-quality, pre-split datasets, and the investigation of other prediction error methods. Through these insights, this paper contributes to the improved understanding and application of DAD methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of anomaly detection in real-world scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-2502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-2510</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12567-023-00529-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Aerospace Technology and Astronautics ; Algorithms ; Anomalies ; Best practice ; Complex systems ; Datasets ; Engineering ; Error analysis ; Original Paper ; Satellites ; Spacecraft ; Telemetry</subject><ispartof>CEAS space journal, 2024-03, Vol.16 (2), p.225-237</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-1350-3672</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieber, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhagen, Wim J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosson, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Bruno F.</creatorcontrib><title>Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry</title><title>CEAS space journal</title><addtitle>CEAS Space J</addtitle><description>As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the necessity for expert interpretation and continual updates to match the dynamic mission environment. This paper critically examines the use of deep anomaly detection (DAD) methods in addressing these challenges, evaluating their efficacy on real-world spacecraft telemetry data. It exposes limitations in current DAD research, highlighting the tendency for performance results to be overestimated and suggesting that simpler methods can sometimes outperform more complex DAD algorithms. By comparing established metrics for anomaly detection with newly proposed ones, this paper aims to improve the evaluation of DAD algorithms. It underscores the importance of using less accuracy-inflating metrics and offers a comprehensive comparison of DAD methods on popular benchmark datasets and real-life satellite telemetry data. Among the DAD methods examined, the LSTM algorithm demonstrates considerable promise. However, the paper also reveals the potential limitations of this approach, particularly in complex systems that lack a single, clear predictive failure channel. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for future research, including the adoption of best practices, the need for high-quality, pre-split datasets, and the investigation of other prediction error methods. Through these insights, this paper contributes to the improved understanding and application of DAD methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of anomaly detection in real-world scenarios.</description><subject>Aerospace Technology and Astronautics</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Complex systems</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><issn>1868-2502</issn><issn>1868-2510</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIVNAf4GSJs2HtxEnMDVW8pEpc6ImD5TrrKiWJg51W6t9jGgQ3TvuamdUMIVccbjhAeRu5kEXJQGQMQArF5AmZ8aqomJAcTn97EOdkHuMWAATPAXI-I--rvjPxo-k31O8xYBybzoyN7--ooQEZ7k27Oy6od7RGHKjpfWfaQxpGtMdL09M4GIs2GDfSEVvscAyHS3LmTBtx_lMvyOrx4W3xzJavTy-L-yWzGc9HpsBVdVGs12CNQVkilnmWI1el4Ohq69YFGl4CGGWtKSAHVWXosK6kSJPILsj1pDsE_7lLFvTW70KfXmqhikolr0ollJhQNvgYAzo9hOQ1HDQH_Z2jnnLUKUd9zFHLRMomUkzgfoPhT_of1hcI_HbR</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Herrmann, Lars</creator><creator>Bieber, Marie</creator><creator>Verhagen, Wim J. C.</creator><creator>Cosson, Fabrice</creator><creator>Santos, Bruno F.</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1350-3672</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry</title><author>Herrmann, Lars ; Bieber, Marie ; Verhagen, Wim J. C. ; Cosson, Fabrice ; Santos, Bruno F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aerospace Technology and Astronautics</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Complex systems</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieber, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhagen, Wim J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosson, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Bruno F.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>CEAS space journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrmann, Lars</au><au>Bieber, Marie</au><au>Verhagen, Wim J. C.</au><au>Cosson, Fabrice</au><au>Santos, Bruno F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry</atitle><jtitle>CEAS space journal</jtitle><stitle>CEAS Space J</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>225-237</pages><issn>1868-2502</issn><eissn>1868-2510</eissn><abstract>As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the necessity for expert interpretation and continual updates to match the dynamic mission environment. This paper critically examines the use of deep anomaly detection (DAD) methods in addressing these challenges, evaluating their efficacy on real-world spacecraft telemetry data. It exposes limitations in current DAD research, highlighting the tendency for performance results to be overestimated and suggesting that simpler methods can sometimes outperform more complex DAD algorithms. By comparing established metrics for anomaly detection with newly proposed ones, this paper aims to improve the evaluation of DAD algorithms. It underscores the importance of using less accuracy-inflating metrics and offers a comprehensive comparison of DAD methods on popular benchmark datasets and real-life satellite telemetry data. Among the DAD methods examined, the LSTM algorithm demonstrates considerable promise. However, the paper also reveals the potential limitations of this approach, particularly in complex systems that lack a single, clear predictive failure channel. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for future research, including the adoption of best practices, the need for high-quality, pre-split datasets, and the investigation of other prediction error methods. Through these insights, this paper contributes to the improved understanding and application of DAD methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of anomaly detection in real-world scenarios.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s12567-023-00529-5</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1350-3672</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-2502
ispartof CEAS space journal, 2024-03, Vol.16 (2), p.225-237
issn 1868-2502
1868-2510
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2968914099
source Springer Nature
subjects Aerospace Technology and Astronautics
Algorithms
Anomalies
Best practice
Complex systems
Datasets
Engineering
Error analysis
Original Paper
Satellites
Spacecraft
Telemetry
title Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A10%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unmasking%20overestimation:%20a%20re-evaluation%20of%20deep%20anomaly%20detection%20in%20spacecraft%20telemetry&rft.jtitle=CEAS%20space%20journal&rft.au=Herrmann,%20Lars&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=225-237&rft.issn=1868-2502&rft.eissn=1868-2510&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12567-023-00529-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2968914099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2968914099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true