Loading…
Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry
As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the ne...
Saved in:
Published in: | CEAS space journal 2024-03, Vol.16 (2), p.225-237 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423 |
container_end_page | 237 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 225 |
container_title | CEAS space journal |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Herrmann, Lars Bieber, Marie Verhagen, Wim J. C. Cosson, Fabrice Santos, Bruno F. |
description | As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the necessity for expert interpretation and continual updates to match the dynamic mission environment. This paper critically examines the use of deep anomaly detection (DAD) methods in addressing these challenges, evaluating their efficacy on real-world spacecraft telemetry data. It exposes limitations in current DAD research, highlighting the tendency for performance results to be overestimated and suggesting that simpler methods can sometimes outperform more complex DAD algorithms. By comparing established metrics for anomaly detection with newly proposed ones, this paper aims to improve the evaluation of DAD algorithms. It underscores the importance of using less accuracy-inflating metrics and offers a comprehensive comparison of DAD methods on popular benchmark datasets and real-life satellite telemetry data. Among the DAD methods examined, the LSTM algorithm demonstrates considerable promise. However, the paper also reveals the potential limitations of this approach, particularly in complex systems that lack a single, clear predictive failure channel. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for future research, including the adoption of best practices, the need for high-quality, pre-split datasets, and the investigation of other prediction error methods. Through these insights, this paper contributes to the improved understanding and application of DAD methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of anomaly detection in real-world scenarios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12567-023-00529-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2968914099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2968914099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIVNAf4GSJs2HtxEnMDVW8pEpc6ImD5TrrKiWJg51W6t9jGgQ3TvuamdUMIVccbjhAeRu5kEXJQGQMQArF5AmZ8aqomJAcTn97EOdkHuMWAATPAXI-I--rvjPxo-k31O8xYBybzoyN7--ooQEZ7k27Oy6od7RGHKjpfWfaQxpGtMdL09M4GIs2GDfSEVvscAyHS3LmTBtx_lMvyOrx4W3xzJavTy-L-yWzGc9HpsBVdVGs12CNQVkilnmWI1el4Ohq69YFGl4CGGWtKSAHVWXosK6kSJPILsj1pDsE_7lLFvTW70KfXmqhikolr0ollJhQNvgYAzo9hOQ1HDQH_Z2jnnLUKUd9zFHLRMomUkzgfoPhT_of1hcI_HbR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2968914099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Herrmann, Lars ; Bieber, Marie ; Verhagen, Wim J. C. ; Cosson, Fabrice ; Santos, Bruno F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Lars ; Bieber, Marie ; Verhagen, Wim J. C. ; Cosson, Fabrice ; Santos, Bruno F.</creatorcontrib><description>As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the necessity for expert interpretation and continual updates to match the dynamic mission environment. This paper critically examines the use of deep anomaly detection (DAD) methods in addressing these challenges, evaluating their efficacy on real-world spacecraft telemetry data. It exposes limitations in current DAD research, highlighting the tendency for performance results to be overestimated and suggesting that simpler methods can sometimes outperform more complex DAD algorithms. By comparing established metrics for anomaly detection with newly proposed ones, this paper aims to improve the evaluation of DAD algorithms. It underscores the importance of using less accuracy-inflating metrics and offers a comprehensive comparison of DAD methods on popular benchmark datasets and real-life satellite telemetry data. Among the DAD methods examined, the LSTM algorithm demonstrates considerable promise. However, the paper also reveals the potential limitations of this approach, particularly in complex systems that lack a single, clear predictive failure channel. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for future research, including the adoption of best practices, the need for high-quality, pre-split datasets, and the investigation of other prediction error methods. Through these insights, this paper contributes to the improved understanding and application of DAD methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of anomaly detection in real-world scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-2502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-2510</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12567-023-00529-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Aerospace Technology and Astronautics ; Algorithms ; Anomalies ; Best practice ; Complex systems ; Datasets ; Engineering ; Error analysis ; Original Paper ; Satellites ; Spacecraft ; Telemetry</subject><ispartof>CEAS space journal, 2024-03, Vol.16 (2), p.225-237</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-1350-3672</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieber, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhagen, Wim J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosson, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Bruno F.</creatorcontrib><title>Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry</title><title>CEAS space journal</title><addtitle>CEAS Space J</addtitle><description>As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the necessity for expert interpretation and continual updates to match the dynamic mission environment. This paper critically examines the use of deep anomaly detection (DAD) methods in addressing these challenges, evaluating their efficacy on real-world spacecraft telemetry data. It exposes limitations in current DAD research, highlighting the tendency for performance results to be overestimated and suggesting that simpler methods can sometimes outperform more complex DAD algorithms. By comparing established metrics for anomaly detection with newly proposed ones, this paper aims to improve the evaluation of DAD algorithms. It underscores the importance of using less accuracy-inflating metrics and offers a comprehensive comparison of DAD methods on popular benchmark datasets and real-life satellite telemetry data. Among the DAD methods examined, the LSTM algorithm demonstrates considerable promise. However, the paper also reveals the potential limitations of this approach, particularly in complex systems that lack a single, clear predictive failure channel. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for future research, including the adoption of best practices, the need for high-quality, pre-split datasets, and the investigation of other prediction error methods. Through these insights, this paper contributes to the improved understanding and application of DAD methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of anomaly detection in real-world scenarios.</description><subject>Aerospace Technology and Astronautics</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Complex systems</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><issn>1868-2502</issn><issn>1868-2510</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIVNAf4GSJs2HtxEnMDVW8pEpc6ImD5TrrKiWJg51W6t9jGgQ3TvuamdUMIVccbjhAeRu5kEXJQGQMQArF5AmZ8aqomJAcTn97EOdkHuMWAATPAXI-I--rvjPxo-k31O8xYBybzoyN7--ooQEZ7k27Oy6od7RGHKjpfWfaQxpGtMdL09M4GIs2GDfSEVvscAyHS3LmTBtx_lMvyOrx4W3xzJavTy-L-yWzGc9HpsBVdVGs12CNQVkilnmWI1el4Ohq69YFGl4CGGWtKSAHVWXosK6kSJPILsj1pDsE_7lLFvTW70KfXmqhikolr0ollJhQNvgYAzo9hOQ1HDQH_Z2jnnLUKUd9zFHLRMomUkzgfoPhT_of1hcI_HbR</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Herrmann, Lars</creator><creator>Bieber, Marie</creator><creator>Verhagen, Wim J. C.</creator><creator>Cosson, Fabrice</creator><creator>Santos, Bruno F.</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1350-3672</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry</title><author>Herrmann, Lars ; Bieber, Marie ; Verhagen, Wim J. C. ; Cosson, Fabrice ; Santos, Bruno F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aerospace Technology and Astronautics</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Complex systems</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieber, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhagen, Wim J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosson, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Bruno F.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>CEAS space journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrmann, Lars</au><au>Bieber, Marie</au><au>Verhagen, Wim J. C.</au><au>Cosson, Fabrice</au><au>Santos, Bruno F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry</atitle><jtitle>CEAS space journal</jtitle><stitle>CEAS Space J</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>225-237</pages><issn>1868-2502</issn><eissn>1868-2510</eissn><abstract>As the volume of telemetry data generated by satellites and other complex systems continues to grow, there is a pressing need for more efficient and accurate anomaly detection methods. Current techniques often rely on human analysis and preset criteria, presenting several challenges including the necessity for expert interpretation and continual updates to match the dynamic mission environment. This paper critically examines the use of deep anomaly detection (DAD) methods in addressing these challenges, evaluating their efficacy on real-world spacecraft telemetry data. It exposes limitations in current DAD research, highlighting the tendency for performance results to be overestimated and suggesting that simpler methods can sometimes outperform more complex DAD algorithms. By comparing established metrics for anomaly detection with newly proposed ones, this paper aims to improve the evaluation of DAD algorithms. It underscores the importance of using less accuracy-inflating metrics and offers a comprehensive comparison of DAD methods on popular benchmark datasets and real-life satellite telemetry data. Among the DAD methods examined, the LSTM algorithm demonstrates considerable promise. However, the paper also reveals the potential limitations of this approach, particularly in complex systems that lack a single, clear predictive failure channel. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for future research, including the adoption of best practices, the need for high-quality, pre-split datasets, and the investigation of other prediction error methods. Through these insights, this paper contributes to the improved understanding and application of DAD methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of anomaly detection in real-world scenarios.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s12567-023-00529-5</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1350-3672</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1868-2502 |
ispartof | CEAS space journal, 2024-03, Vol.16 (2), p.225-237 |
issn | 1868-2502 1868-2510 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2968914099 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aerospace Technology and Astronautics Algorithms Anomalies Best practice Complex systems Datasets Engineering Error analysis Original Paper Satellites Spacecraft Telemetry |
title | Unmasking overestimation: a re-evaluation of deep anomaly detection in spacecraft telemetry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A10%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unmasking%20overestimation:%20a%20re-evaluation%20of%20deep%20anomaly%20detection%20in%20spacecraft%20telemetry&rft.jtitle=CEAS%20space%20journal&rft.au=Herrmann,%20Lars&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=225-237&rft.issn=1868-2502&rft.eissn=1868-2510&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12567-023-00529-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2968914099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-90f8d66bb0caae57ee7434e19721efdcfb6ea1700a9cca6040983efed85260423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2968914099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |