Loading…

The Futility of Language as a Means of Communication in Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Fam and Yam, and The Sandbox

The three plays Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1962) The Sandbox (1959) and Fam and Yam (1959) all display the absurdist tendencies to dispel the traditional view of language as the rational means of communication amongst mankind. In absurdist drama the world is portrayed as one that is meaningles...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of language teaching and research 2024-03, Vol.15 (2), p.626-633
Main Authors: Abd-Rabbo, Muna M., Zalloum, Ghadir B., Al-Wahsh, Dima M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 633
container_issue 2
container_start_page 626
container_title Journal of language teaching and research
container_volume 15
creator Abd-Rabbo, Muna M.
Zalloum, Ghadir B.
Al-Wahsh, Dima M.
description The three plays Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1962) The Sandbox (1959) and Fam and Yam (1959) all display the absurdist tendencies to dispel the traditional view of language as the rational means of communication amongst mankind. In absurdist drama the world is portrayed as one that is meaningless and incomprehensible to the human mind. Language, which is confined to faulty human perception and subjectivity, is inefficient in the face of an unfathomable universe. A gap persists between the meanings in language and the world it purports to describe. In addition, the lack of fit between what language permits man to say and what he actually wants to say leads to a breakdown in communication and ultimately to the alienation of the individual.  In absurdist works this chaotic sphere of existence is reflected in the dispensing of traditional elements in drama as well as in the illogical usage of language by the characters. Thus, absurdist drama acts as a counter-discourse to the previously dominant, essentialist discourse of realist drama. In this article a brief overview of the absurdist depiction of language’s insufficiency in communication is presented to serve as a backdrop for the analysis of certain segments in Albee’s aforementioned plays in order to assess the extent to which Albee’s plays demonstrate the absurdist’s notion of language’s deficiencies. Thus, the sections chosen for discussion are those that showcase language’s apparent shortcomings in generating human contact.
doi_str_mv 10.17507/jltr.1502.31
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2973458464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A786742002</galeid><sourcerecordid>A786742002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-21b0105d371b28969f347b3d08c581974620b4c80dd015127f4ef72237eccf2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUctqHDEQFMGBLI6PuQty9az1mpHmFJbFawfW5BAnJieh0WOtZUaypRls33z0L-T38iXW7Kb7UE1R1U1TAHzBaIl5jfjFvh_TEteILCn-ABYE1bRCjWAnYIF5KyrGm_YTOMt5j0oVHa_FArzd3lu4mUbf-_EFRge3KuwmtbNQZajgjVUhz_Q6DsMUvFajjwH6AC_Nk0oGrvrO2n-vfzO8u48HXLmkvJk9v33a-eAVvIuxd9_O4UYNUAUD_6jh_DDMx3-WoYvPn8FHp_psz_7jKfi1ubxdX1fbH1ff16ttpcubY0VwhzCqDeW4I6JtWkcZ76hBQtcCt5w1BHVMC2QMwjUm3DHrOCGUW60d0fQUfD3ufUjxcbJ5lPs4pVBOStJyymrBGlZUy6Nqp3orfXBxTEqXNnbwOgbrfOFXXDScEYRIMVRHg04x52SdfEh-UOlFYiQPAck5IDkHJCmm70-Sgx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2973458464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Futility of Language as a Means of Communication in Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Fam and Yam, and The Sandbox</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Abd-Rabbo, Muna M. ; Zalloum, Ghadir B. ; Al-Wahsh, Dima M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abd-Rabbo, Muna M. ; Zalloum, Ghadir B. ; Al-Wahsh, Dima M.</creatorcontrib><description>The three plays Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1962) The Sandbox (1959) and Fam and Yam (1959) all display the absurdist tendencies to dispel the traditional view of language as the rational means of communication amongst mankind. In absurdist drama the world is portrayed as one that is meaningless and incomprehensible to the human mind. Language, which is confined to faulty human perception and subjectivity, is inefficient in the face of an unfathomable universe. A gap persists between the meanings in language and the world it purports to describe. In addition, the lack of fit between what language permits man to say and what he actually wants to say leads to a breakdown in communication and ultimately to the alienation of the individual.  In absurdist works this chaotic sphere of existence is reflected in the dispensing of traditional elements in drama as well as in the illogical usage of language by the characters. Thus, absurdist drama acts as a counter-discourse to the previously dominant, essentialist discourse of realist drama. In this article a brief overview of the absurdist depiction of language’s insufficiency in communication is presented to serve as a backdrop for the analysis of certain segments in Albee’s aforementioned plays in order to assess the extent to which Albee’s plays demonstrate the absurdist’s notion of language’s deficiencies. Thus, the sections chosen for discussion are those that showcase language’s apparent shortcomings in generating human contact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1798-4769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-0684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17507/jltr.1502.31</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Academy Publication Co., LTD</publisher><subject>Absurdism ; Albee, Edward ; Albee, Edward (1928-2016) ; American literature ; Communication ; Deafness ; Drama ; Language ; Language usage ; Literary characters ; Subjectivity ; Theater ; Woolf, Virginia (1882-1941)</subject><ispartof>Journal of language teaching and research, 2024-03, Vol.15 (2), p.626-633</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Academy Publication Co., LTD</rights><rights>Copyright Academy Publication Co., Ltd. Mar 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2973458464?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,21382,21394,27924,27925,31269,33611,33911,43733,43896,62661,62662,62677</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abd-Rabbo, Muna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalloum, Ghadir B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Wahsh, Dima M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Futility of Language as a Means of Communication in Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Fam and Yam, and The Sandbox</title><title>Journal of language teaching and research</title><description>The three plays Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1962) The Sandbox (1959) and Fam and Yam (1959) all display the absurdist tendencies to dispel the traditional view of language as the rational means of communication amongst mankind. In absurdist drama the world is portrayed as one that is meaningless and incomprehensible to the human mind. Language, which is confined to faulty human perception and subjectivity, is inefficient in the face of an unfathomable universe. A gap persists between the meanings in language and the world it purports to describe. In addition, the lack of fit between what language permits man to say and what he actually wants to say leads to a breakdown in communication and ultimately to the alienation of the individual.  In absurdist works this chaotic sphere of existence is reflected in the dispensing of traditional elements in drama as well as in the illogical usage of language by the characters. Thus, absurdist drama acts as a counter-discourse to the previously dominant, essentialist discourse of realist drama. In this article a brief overview of the absurdist depiction of language’s insufficiency in communication is presented to serve as a backdrop for the analysis of certain segments in Albee’s aforementioned plays in order to assess the extent to which Albee’s plays demonstrate the absurdist’s notion of language’s deficiencies. Thus, the sections chosen for discussion are those that showcase language’s apparent shortcomings in generating human contact.</description><subject>Absurdism</subject><subject>Albee, Edward</subject><subject>Albee, Edward (1928-2016)</subject><subject>American literature</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Drama</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language usage</subject><subject>Literary characters</subject><subject>Subjectivity</subject><subject>Theater</subject><subject>Woolf, Virginia (1882-1941)</subject><issn>1798-4769</issn><issn>2053-0684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><recordid>eNotUctqHDEQFMGBLI6PuQty9az1mpHmFJbFawfW5BAnJieh0WOtZUaypRls33z0L-T38iXW7Kb7UE1R1U1TAHzBaIl5jfjFvh_TEteILCn-ABYE1bRCjWAnYIF5KyrGm_YTOMt5j0oVHa_FArzd3lu4mUbf-_EFRge3KuwmtbNQZajgjVUhz_Q6DsMUvFajjwH6AC_Nk0oGrvrO2n-vfzO8u48HXLmkvJk9v33a-eAVvIuxd9_O4UYNUAUD_6jh_DDMx3-WoYvPn8FHp_psz_7jKfi1ubxdX1fbH1ff16ttpcubY0VwhzCqDeW4I6JtWkcZ76hBQtcCt5w1BHVMC2QMwjUm3DHrOCGUW60d0fQUfD3ufUjxcbJ5lPs4pVBOStJyymrBGlZUy6Nqp3orfXBxTEqXNnbwOgbrfOFXXDScEYRIMVRHg04x52SdfEh-UOlFYiQPAck5IDkHJCmm70-Sgx0</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Abd-Rabbo, Muna M.</creator><creator>Zalloum, Ghadir B.</creator><creator>Al-Wahsh, Dima M.</creator><general>Academy Publication Co., LTD</general><general>Academy Publication Co., Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>The Futility of Language as a Means of Communication in Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Fam and Yam, and The Sandbox</title><author>Abd-Rabbo, Muna M. ; Zalloum, Ghadir B. ; Al-Wahsh, Dima M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-21b0105d371b28969f347b3d08c581974620b4c80dd015127f4ef72237eccf2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Absurdism</topic><topic>Albee, Edward</topic><topic>Albee, Edward (1928-2016)</topic><topic>American literature</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Drama</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language usage</topic><topic>Literary characters</topic><topic>Subjectivity</topic><topic>Theater</topic><topic>Woolf, Virginia (1882-1941)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abd-Rabbo, Muna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalloum, Ghadir B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Wahsh, Dima M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of language teaching and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abd-Rabbo, Muna M.</au><au>Zalloum, Ghadir B.</au><au>Al-Wahsh, Dima M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Futility of Language as a Means of Communication in Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Fam and Yam, and The Sandbox</atitle><jtitle>Journal of language teaching and research</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>626-633</pages><issn>1798-4769</issn><eissn>2053-0684</eissn><abstract>The three plays Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1962) The Sandbox (1959) and Fam and Yam (1959) all display the absurdist tendencies to dispel the traditional view of language as the rational means of communication amongst mankind. In absurdist drama the world is portrayed as one that is meaningless and incomprehensible to the human mind. Language, which is confined to faulty human perception and subjectivity, is inefficient in the face of an unfathomable universe. A gap persists between the meanings in language and the world it purports to describe. In addition, the lack of fit between what language permits man to say and what he actually wants to say leads to a breakdown in communication and ultimately to the alienation of the individual.  In absurdist works this chaotic sphere of existence is reflected in the dispensing of traditional elements in drama as well as in the illogical usage of language by the characters. Thus, absurdist drama acts as a counter-discourse to the previously dominant, essentialist discourse of realist drama. In this article a brief overview of the absurdist depiction of language’s insufficiency in communication is presented to serve as a backdrop for the analysis of certain segments in Albee’s aforementioned plays in order to assess the extent to which Albee’s plays demonstrate the absurdist’s notion of language’s deficiencies. Thus, the sections chosen for discussion are those that showcase language’s apparent shortcomings in generating human contact.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Academy Publication Co., LTD</pub><doi>10.17507/jltr.1502.31</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1798-4769
ispartof Journal of language teaching and research, 2024-03, Vol.15 (2), p.626-633
issn 1798-4769
2053-0684
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2973458464
source Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Absurdism
Albee, Edward
Albee, Edward (1928-2016)
American literature
Communication
Deafness
Drama
Language
Language usage
Literary characters
Subjectivity
Theater
Woolf, Virginia (1882-1941)
title The Futility of Language as a Means of Communication in Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Fam and Yam, and The Sandbox
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A17%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Futility%20of%20Language%20as%20a%20Means%20of%20Communication%20in%20Edward%20Albee%E2%80%99s%20Who%E2%80%99s%20Afraid%20of%20Virginia%20Woolf?,%20Fam%20and%20Yam,%20and%20The%20Sandbox&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20language%20teaching%20and%20research&rft.au=Abd-Rabbo,%20Muna%20M.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=626-633&rft.issn=1798-4769&rft.eissn=2053-0684&rft_id=info:doi/10.17507/jltr.1502.31&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA786742002%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-21b0105d371b28969f347b3d08c581974620b4c80dd015127f4ef72237eccf2c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2973458464&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A786742002&rfr_iscdi=true