Loading…

Suicide prospective prediction based on pattern analysis of suicide factor

People who seem unable to make it through life may make the tragic and saddening decision to end their lives. The nation’s backbone is its youth; with their health and bravery, they have the power to influence the future of society. Nevertheless, youth have a higher percentage of attempting suicide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dawood, Aya Qusay, Mostafa, Salama A., Mahdin, Hairulnizam, Pramudya, Gede, Kasim, Shahreen, Alkhayyat, Ahmed, Ismail, Saidatul Akmar, Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2919
creator Dawood, Aya Qusay
Mostafa, Salama A.
Mahdin, Hairulnizam
Pramudya, Gede
Kasim, Shahreen
Alkhayyat, Ahmed
Ismail, Saidatul Akmar
Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan
description People who seem unable to make it through life may make the tragic and saddening decision to end their lives. The nation’s backbone is its youth; with their health and bravery, they have the power to influence the future of society. Nevertheless, youth have a higher percentage of attempting suicide and it is due to different reasons including physical disorders, mental disorders and substance use disorders. Support from family, friends, and society is essential in preventing individuals from making such tragic mistakes. Different studies attempt to acquire suicide indicators and measure risk factors to take preventive actions against potential suicidal situations. This paper presents the comparative analysis of four machine learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Decision Tree (DT) in predicting suicide risk rate. The result of this study shows that the RF has outperformed the other three algorithms with an average accuracy of 92%. The DT and NN show an average accuracy of 88% and 80%, respectively, while the LR shows the lowest accuracy of 69%.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0188323
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2979201562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2979201562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1683-fec979a14ffc87df00f6724a0e87eda38ff92dd6169e5a9272733a18e98e9ee53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1LxDAQxYMoWFcP_gcFb0LXfDRNcpTFTxY8qOAtjM0EsqxtTVph_3tTtjAw7_Bm-L1HyDWja0YbcSfXlGktuDghBZOSVaphzSkpKDV1xWvxdU4uUtpRyo1SuiCv71Nog8NyiH0asB3D36zRhSz7rvyGhK7MYoBxxNiV0MH-kEIqe1-m5dZDO_bxkpx52Ce8WvaKfD4-fGyeq-3b08vmflsNrNGi8tgaZYDV3rdaOU-pbxSvgaJW6EBo7w13LmMblGC44koIYBpNHkQpVuTm-Dcj_06YRrvrp5ixks2hDKdMNjy7bo-u1IYR5ix2iOEH4sEyaueurLRLV-Iff0Rb1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2979201562</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Suicide prospective prediction based on pattern analysis of suicide factor</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Dawood, Aya Qusay ; Mostafa, Salama A. ; Mahdin, Hairulnizam ; Pramudya, Gede ; Kasim, Shahreen ; Alkhayyat, Ahmed ; Ismail, Saidatul Akmar ; Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan</creator><contributor>Gupta, Deepak ; Bashir, Ali Kashif ; Kaushik, Achal ; Khanna, Ashish</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dawood, Aya Qusay ; Mostafa, Salama A. ; Mahdin, Hairulnizam ; Pramudya, Gede ; Kasim, Shahreen ; Alkhayyat, Ahmed ; Ismail, Saidatul Akmar ; Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan ; Gupta, Deepak ; Bashir, Ali Kashif ; Kaushik, Achal ; Khanna, Ashish</creatorcontrib><description>People who seem unable to make it through life may make the tragic and saddening decision to end their lives. The nation’s backbone is its youth; with their health and bravery, they have the power to influence the future of society. Nevertheless, youth have a higher percentage of attempting suicide and it is due to different reasons including physical disorders, mental disorders and substance use disorders. Support from family, friends, and society is essential in preventing individuals from making such tragic mistakes. Different studies attempt to acquire suicide indicators and measure risk factors to take preventive actions against potential suicidal situations. This paper presents the comparative analysis of four machine learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Decision Tree (DT) in predicting suicide risk rate. The result of this study shows that the RF has outperformed the other three algorithms with an average accuracy of 92%. The DT and NN show an average accuracy of 88% and 80%, respectively, while the LR shows the lowest accuracy of 69%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0188323</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Decision trees ; Machine learning ; Mental disorders ; Neural networks ; Pattern analysis ; Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2919 (1)</ispartof><rights>AIP Publishing LLC</rights><rights>2024 AIP Publishing LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Gupta, Deepak</contributor><contributor>Bashir, Ali Kashif</contributor><contributor>Kaushik, Achal</contributor><contributor>Khanna, Ashish</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dawood, Aya Qusay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostafa, Salama A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdin, Hairulnizam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pramudya, Gede</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasim, Shahreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhayyat, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Saidatul Akmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan</creatorcontrib><title>Suicide prospective prediction based on pattern analysis of suicide factor</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>People who seem unable to make it through life may make the tragic and saddening decision to end their lives. The nation’s backbone is its youth; with their health and bravery, they have the power to influence the future of society. Nevertheless, youth have a higher percentage of attempting suicide and it is due to different reasons including physical disorders, mental disorders and substance use disorders. Support from family, friends, and society is essential in preventing individuals from making such tragic mistakes. Different studies attempt to acquire suicide indicators and measure risk factors to take preventive actions against potential suicidal situations. This paper presents the comparative analysis of four machine learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Decision Tree (DT) in predicting suicide risk rate. The result of this study shows that the RF has outperformed the other three algorithms with an average accuracy of 92%. The DT and NN show an average accuracy of 88% and 80%, respectively, while the LR shows the lowest accuracy of 69%.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Pattern analysis</subject><subject>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1LxDAQxYMoWFcP_gcFb0LXfDRNcpTFTxY8qOAtjM0EsqxtTVph_3tTtjAw7_Bm-L1HyDWja0YbcSfXlGktuDghBZOSVaphzSkpKDV1xWvxdU4uUtpRyo1SuiCv71Nog8NyiH0asB3D36zRhSz7rvyGhK7MYoBxxNiV0MH-kEIqe1-m5dZDO_bxkpx52Ce8WvaKfD4-fGyeq-3b08vmflsNrNGi8tgaZYDV3rdaOU-pbxSvgaJW6EBo7w13LmMblGC44koIYBpNHkQpVuTm-Dcj_06YRrvrp5ixks2hDKdMNjy7bo-u1IYR5ix2iOEH4sEyaueurLRLV-Iff0Rb1g</recordid><startdate>20240325</startdate><enddate>20240325</enddate><creator>Dawood, Aya Qusay</creator><creator>Mostafa, Salama A.</creator><creator>Mahdin, Hairulnizam</creator><creator>Pramudya, Gede</creator><creator>Kasim, Shahreen</creator><creator>Alkhayyat, Ahmed</creator><creator>Ismail, Saidatul Akmar</creator><creator>Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240325</creationdate><title>Suicide prospective prediction based on pattern analysis of suicide factor</title><author>Dawood, Aya Qusay ; Mostafa, Salama A. ; Mahdin, Hairulnizam ; Pramudya, Gede ; Kasim, Shahreen ; Alkhayyat, Ahmed ; Ismail, Saidatul Akmar ; Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1683-fec979a14ffc87df00f6724a0e87eda38ff92dd6169e5a9272733a18e98e9ee53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Pattern analysis</topic><topic>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dawood, Aya Qusay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostafa, Salama A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdin, Hairulnizam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pramudya, Gede</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasim, Shahreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhayyat, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Saidatul Akmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dawood, Aya Qusay</au><au>Mostafa, Salama A.</au><au>Mahdin, Hairulnizam</au><au>Pramudya, Gede</au><au>Kasim, Shahreen</au><au>Alkhayyat, Ahmed</au><au>Ismail, Saidatul Akmar</au><au>Arshad, Mohammad Syafwan</au><au>Gupta, Deepak</au><au>Bashir, Ali Kashif</au><au>Kaushik, Achal</au><au>Khanna, Ashish</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Suicide prospective prediction based on pattern analysis of suicide factor</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-03-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2919</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>People who seem unable to make it through life may make the tragic and saddening decision to end their lives. The nation’s backbone is its youth; with their health and bravery, they have the power to influence the future of society. Nevertheless, youth have a higher percentage of attempting suicide and it is due to different reasons including physical disorders, mental disorders and substance use disorders. Support from family, friends, and society is essential in preventing individuals from making such tragic mistakes. Different studies attempt to acquire suicide indicators and measure risk factors to take preventive actions against potential suicidal situations. This paper presents the comparative analysis of four machine learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Decision Tree (DT) in predicting suicide risk rate. The result of this study shows that the RF has outperformed the other three algorithms with an average accuracy of 92%. The DT and NN show an average accuracy of 88% and 80%, respectively, while the LR shows the lowest accuracy of 69%.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0188323</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2919 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2979201562
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Decision trees
Machine learning
Mental disorders
Neural networks
Pattern analysis
Suicides & suicide attempts
title Suicide prospective prediction based on pattern analysis of suicide factor
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A37%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Suicide%20prospective%20prediction%20based%20on%20pattern%20analysis%20of%20suicide%20factor&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Dawood,%20Aya%20Qusay&rft.date=2024-03-25&rft.volume=2919&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0188323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2979201562%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1683-fec979a14ffc87df00f6724a0e87eda38ff92dd6169e5a9272733a18e98e9ee53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2979201562&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true