Loading…
Antibiotic resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture of patients in intensive care units
Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are especially prevalent among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Furthermore, bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa are serious conditions that result in significant patient mortality as well as healthcare costs. Therefore it is important t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of critical care 2024-06, Vol.81, p.154709, Article 154709 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 154709 |
container_title | Journal of critical care |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Uyar, Neval Yurttutan Ayaş, Meltem Kocagöz, Ayşe Sesin |
description | Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are especially prevalent among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Furthermore, bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa are serious conditions that result in significant patient mortality as well as healthcare costs. Therefore it is important to determine the antibiotic susceptibilities of the agents that cause bloodstream infections in order to be able to guide the clinician in the formulation of a correct and appropriate empirical treatment plan. The aim of this study was to investigate the resistance rates of P. aeruginosa growth in blood cultures of hospitalized patients in our intensive care units.
Total of 529 P. aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture samples sent from ICUs to microbiology laboratory in a ten years (January 2013–April 2023) span, were included in the study. Blood cultures were incubated in the BD BACTEC FX 200 (Becton Dickinson, US) automated blood culture system. Bacterial identification was performed using MALDI TOF MS (Bruker, Germany), and susceptibility testing was performed by Vitek 2 compact (bioMérieux, France) automated system and also using conventional methods according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Standards) and EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines. The following antibiotics were tested: amikacin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam. Additionally colistin and ceftazidime-avibactam which are preferred in treatment for multi-resistant strains were tested in the study. Colistin susceptibility tests were performed in 433 of 529 isolates both Vitek 2 compact and broth microdilution test. Ceftazidime–avibactam susceptibility tests were performed for 217 of 529 isolates by using disk diffusion method.
Highest resistance percentage among P. aeruginosa strains was to imipenem with 50.2% rate. Followed by Meropenem (37.6%), ciprofloxacin (35.7%), ceftazidime (33.4%), piperacillin-tazobactam (31.6%), cefepime (31.6%), gentamicin (19.3%), and amikacin (19.1%). Among 433 isolates, 44 (10, 2%) were defined as colistin resistant. Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was detected in 42 of 217 (19, 4%) tested strains.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the strains are shown in Table 1.
Due to the high antibiotic resistance rates of P. aeruginosa isolates in ICUs, infection control measures and antibiotic stewardship program needs to be increased, and eac |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154709 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3020341843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883944124001965</els_id><sourcerecordid>3020341843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1243-891f70fe28b0c603555d24ab2630bfa8fe2fa4aaad57f3111a76e312698a34663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE-LFDEQxYMoOK77BTwFPPeYv9094GVZXBUWdg96DtXpypKmJxlT6QVPfvXNOJ6FgjrU-1XVe4x9kGIvhew_LfvFF79XQpm9tGYQh1dsJ60durGX9jXbiXHU3cEY-Za9I1qEkIPWdsf-3KQap5hr9LwgRaqQPPJTySGuyHPgj4TbnI85AXHAsj3FlAk41QIxEY-UV6g481DykU9rzjP321q38pc-QY2YatOlVhUTxWfkHtp0S7HSe_YmwEp4_a9fsZ93X37cfuvuH75-v72577xURnfjQYZBBFTjJHwvtLV2VgYm1WsxBRjbJIABgNkOQUspYehRS9UfRtCm7_UV-3jZ25z92pCqW_JWUjvptFBCGzka3VTqovIlExUM7lTiEcpvJ4U7B-0Wdw7anYN2l6Ab9PkCYfv_OWJx5Jtnj3Ms6Kubc_wf_gJOPIkT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3020341843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture of patients in intensive care units</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Uyar, Neval Yurttutan ; Ayaş, Meltem ; Kocagöz, Ayşe Sesin</creator><creatorcontrib>Uyar, Neval Yurttutan ; Ayaş, Meltem ; Kocagöz, Ayşe Sesin</creatorcontrib><description>Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are especially prevalent among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Furthermore, bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa are serious conditions that result in significant patient mortality as well as healthcare costs. Therefore it is important to determine the antibiotic susceptibilities of the agents that cause bloodstream infections in order to be able to guide the clinician in the formulation of a correct and appropriate empirical treatment plan. The aim of this study was to investigate the resistance rates of P. aeruginosa growth in blood cultures of hospitalized patients in our intensive care units.
Total of 529 P. aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture samples sent from ICUs to microbiology laboratory in a ten years (January 2013–April 2023) span, were included in the study. Blood cultures were incubated in the BD BACTEC FX 200 (Becton Dickinson, US) automated blood culture system. Bacterial identification was performed using MALDI TOF MS (Bruker, Germany), and susceptibility testing was performed by Vitek 2 compact (bioMérieux, France) automated system and also using conventional methods according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Standards) and EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines. The following antibiotics were tested: amikacin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam. Additionally colistin and ceftazidime-avibactam which are preferred in treatment for multi-resistant strains were tested in the study. Colistin susceptibility tests were performed in 433 of 529 isolates both Vitek 2 compact and broth microdilution test. Ceftazidime–avibactam susceptibility tests were performed for 217 of 529 isolates by using disk diffusion method.
Highest resistance percentage among P. aeruginosa strains was to imipenem with 50.2% rate. Followed by Meropenem (37.6%), ciprofloxacin (35.7%), ceftazidime (33.4%), piperacillin-tazobactam (31.6%), cefepime (31.6%), gentamicin (19.3%), and amikacin (19.1%). Among 433 isolates, 44 (10, 2%) were defined as colistin resistant. Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was detected in 42 of 217 (19, 4%) tested strains.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the strains are shown in Table 1.
Due to the high antibiotic resistance rates of P. aeruginosa isolates in ICUs, infection control measures and antibiotic stewardship program needs to be increased, and each hospital should periodically review its own antibiotic resistance profile to determine empirical treatment options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154709</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Automation ; Blood culture ; Drug resistance ; Infections ; Intensive care ; Intensive care units ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2024-06, Vol.81, p.154709, Article 154709</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uyar, Neval Yurttutan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayaş, Meltem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocagöz, Ayşe Sesin</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture of patients in intensive care units</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><description>Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are especially prevalent among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Furthermore, bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa are serious conditions that result in significant patient mortality as well as healthcare costs. Therefore it is important to determine the antibiotic susceptibilities of the agents that cause bloodstream infections in order to be able to guide the clinician in the formulation of a correct and appropriate empirical treatment plan. The aim of this study was to investigate the resistance rates of P. aeruginosa growth in blood cultures of hospitalized patients in our intensive care units.
Total of 529 P. aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture samples sent from ICUs to microbiology laboratory in a ten years (January 2013–April 2023) span, were included in the study. Blood cultures were incubated in the BD BACTEC FX 200 (Becton Dickinson, US) automated blood culture system. Bacterial identification was performed using MALDI TOF MS (Bruker, Germany), and susceptibility testing was performed by Vitek 2 compact (bioMérieux, France) automated system and also using conventional methods according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Standards) and EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines. The following antibiotics were tested: amikacin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam. Additionally colistin and ceftazidime-avibactam which are preferred in treatment for multi-resistant strains were tested in the study. Colistin susceptibility tests were performed in 433 of 529 isolates both Vitek 2 compact and broth microdilution test. Ceftazidime–avibactam susceptibility tests were performed for 217 of 529 isolates by using disk diffusion method.
Highest resistance percentage among P. aeruginosa strains was to imipenem with 50.2% rate. Followed by Meropenem (37.6%), ciprofloxacin (35.7%), ceftazidime (33.4%), piperacillin-tazobactam (31.6%), cefepime (31.6%), gentamicin (19.3%), and amikacin (19.1%). Among 433 isolates, 44 (10, 2%) were defined as colistin resistant. Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was detected in 42 of 217 (19, 4%) tested strains.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the strains are shown in Table 1.
Due to the high antibiotic resistance rates of P. aeruginosa isolates in ICUs, infection control measures and antibiotic stewardship program needs to be increased, and each hospital should periodically review its own antibiotic resistance profile to determine empirical treatment options.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood culture</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE-LFDEQxYMoOK77BTwFPPeYv9094GVZXBUWdg96DtXpypKmJxlT6QVPfvXNOJ6FgjrU-1XVe4x9kGIvhew_LfvFF79XQpm9tGYQh1dsJ60durGX9jXbiXHU3cEY-Za9I1qEkIPWdsf-3KQap5hr9LwgRaqQPPJTySGuyHPgj4TbnI85AXHAsj3FlAk41QIxEY-UV6g481DykU9rzjP321q38pc-QY2YatOlVhUTxWfkHtp0S7HSe_YmwEp4_a9fsZ93X37cfuvuH75-v72577xURnfjQYZBBFTjJHwvtLV2VgYm1WsxBRjbJIABgNkOQUspYehRS9UfRtCm7_UV-3jZ25z92pCqW_JWUjvptFBCGzka3VTqovIlExUM7lTiEcpvJ4U7B-0Wdw7anYN2l6Ab9PkCYfv_OWJx5Jtnj3Ms6Kubc_wf_gJOPIkT</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Uyar, Neval Yurttutan</creator><creator>Ayaş, Meltem</creator><creator>Kocagöz, Ayşe Sesin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Antibiotic resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture of patients in intensive care units</title><author>Uyar, Neval Yurttutan ; Ayaş, Meltem ; Kocagöz, Ayşe Sesin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1243-891f70fe28b0c603555d24ab2630bfa8fe2fa4aaad57f3111a76e312698a34663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood culture</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uyar, Neval Yurttutan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayaş, Meltem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocagöz, Ayşe Sesin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uyar, Neval Yurttutan</au><au>Ayaş, Meltem</au><au>Kocagöz, Ayşe Sesin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture of patients in intensive care units</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>154709</spage><pages>154709-</pages><artnum>154709</artnum><issn>0883-9441</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are especially prevalent among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Furthermore, bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa are serious conditions that result in significant patient mortality as well as healthcare costs. Therefore it is important to determine the antibiotic susceptibilities of the agents that cause bloodstream infections in order to be able to guide the clinician in the formulation of a correct and appropriate empirical treatment plan. The aim of this study was to investigate the resistance rates of P. aeruginosa growth in blood cultures of hospitalized patients in our intensive care units.
Total of 529 P. aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture samples sent from ICUs to microbiology laboratory in a ten years (January 2013–April 2023) span, were included in the study. Blood cultures were incubated in the BD BACTEC FX 200 (Becton Dickinson, US) automated blood culture system. Bacterial identification was performed using MALDI TOF MS (Bruker, Germany), and susceptibility testing was performed by Vitek 2 compact (bioMérieux, France) automated system and also using conventional methods according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Standards) and EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines. The following antibiotics were tested: amikacin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam. Additionally colistin and ceftazidime-avibactam which are preferred in treatment for multi-resistant strains were tested in the study. Colistin susceptibility tests were performed in 433 of 529 isolates both Vitek 2 compact and broth microdilution test. Ceftazidime–avibactam susceptibility tests were performed for 217 of 529 isolates by using disk diffusion method.
Highest resistance percentage among P. aeruginosa strains was to imipenem with 50.2% rate. Followed by Meropenem (37.6%), ciprofloxacin (35.7%), ceftazidime (33.4%), piperacillin-tazobactam (31.6%), cefepime (31.6%), gentamicin (19.3%), and amikacin (19.1%). Among 433 isolates, 44 (10, 2%) were defined as colistin resistant. Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was detected in 42 of 217 (19, 4%) tested strains.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the strains are shown in Table 1.
Due to the high antibiotic resistance rates of P. aeruginosa isolates in ICUs, infection control measures and antibiotic stewardship program needs to be increased, and each hospital should periodically review its own antibiotic resistance profile to determine empirical treatment options.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154709</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-9441 |
ispartof | Journal of critical care, 2024-06, Vol.81, p.154709, Article 154709 |
issn | 0883-9441 1557-8615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3020341843 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Antibiotics Automation Blood culture Drug resistance Infections Intensive care Intensive care units Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title | Antibiotic resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from blood culture of patients in intensive care units |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A27%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20resistance%20profile%20of%20Pseudomonas%20aeruginosa%20strains%20isolated%20from%20blood%20culture%20of%20patients%20in%20intensive%20care%20units&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Uyar,%20Neval%20Yurttutan&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=154709&rft.pages=154709-&rft.artnum=154709&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154709&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3020341843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1243-891f70fe28b0c603555d24ab2630bfa8fe2fa4aaad57f3111a76e312698a34663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3020341843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |