The effect of PDCA cycle strategy on pupils’ tangible programming skills and reflective thinking

Tangible programming combines the advantages of object manipulation with programmable hardware, which plays an essential role in improving programming skills. As a tool for ensuring the quality of projects and improving learning outcomes, the PDCA cycle strategy is conducive to cultivating reflectiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Education and information technologies 2024-04, Vol.29 (5), p.6383-6405
Main Authors: Gong, Xin, Yu, Shufan, Xu, Jie, Qiao, Ailing, Han, Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Computer Science
Computers and Education
Control Groups
Education
Educational Technology
Experimental Groups
Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)
Object Manipulation
Programming
Reflective practice
Research Methodology
Statistical Analysis
Students
Technology education
User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Tangible programming combines the advantages of object manipulation with programmable hardware, which plays an essential role in improving programming skills. As a tool for ensuring the quality of projects and improving learning outcomes, the PDCA cycle strategy is conducive to cultivating reflective thinking. However, there is still a lack of empirical research on the effect of introducing the PDCA cycle strategy into programming education. In this study, using a PDCA cycle strategy, in a four-pronged model of “(P)draw up a plan, (D)assemble and programming, (C)test and debug, display and reflect (A),” and its effects on students’ programming skills and their reflective thinking were explored. There were 65 children between the ages of 7 and 8 years participated in this study. There were 31 students in each of the experimental group and the control group. A combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods was adopted in this research, and students’ programming processes and results were observed and counted. The study results revealed that after attending the ‘Magic Card Robot’ course that applied the PDCA cycle strategy, the experimental group students outperformed their counterparts in programming skills (sequencing, repetitive and conditional structures). Meanwhile, the experimental group students’ reflective thinking levels were higher than those of the control group students. These findings imply that tangible programming education using the PDCA cycle strategy in the course has potential.
ISSN:1360-2357
1573-7608
DOI:10.1007/s10639-023-12037-4