Loading…

Herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California

Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) is a global aquatic weed. Although a number of herbicides such as 2,4-D and glyphosate effectively control this plant, additional herbicides need to be evaluated to address concerns for herbicide stewardship and environmental restrictions on the use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of aquatic plant management 2020-07, Vol.58 (2), p.98-104
Main Authors: Madsen, John D, Kyser, Guy B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 104
container_issue 2
container_start_page 98
container_title Journal of aquatic plant management
container_volume 58
creator Madsen, John D
Kyser, Guy B
description Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) is a global aquatic weed. Although a number of herbicides such as 2,4-D and glyphosate effectively control this plant, additional herbicides need to be evaluated to address concerns for herbicide stewardship and environmental restrictions on the use of herbicides in particular areas. Waterhyacinth has become a significant nuisance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. The predominant herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Delta have been 2,4-D and glyphosate. However, environmental restrictions related to irrigation water residues and restrictions for preservation of endangered species are prompting consideration of the new reduced-risk herbicides imazamox and penoxsulam. Two trials were performed in floating quadrats in the Delta during the summer of 2016. In the first trial, two rates each of 2,4-D, glyphosate, imazamox, and penoxsulam were treated in four replicate quadrats. In this trial, the highest rates of all four herbicides provided greater than 80% control (2,4-D, 82%; glyphosate, 87%; imazamox, 93%; and penoxsulam, 94%). In the second trial, the lower rate of glyphosate (1,681 g a.e. [ha.sup.-1]) was compared to four rates each of imazamox (187 to 1,494 g a.i. [ha.sup.-1]) and penoxsulam (12 to 98 g a.i. [ha.sup.-1]). In this trial, the highest rates of imazamox and penoxsulam provided 96 and 95% control, respectively, compared to the untreated reference. Imazamox and penoxsulam will provide suitable control of waterhyacinth as part of an operational program and may be used as part of an integrated pest management program with considerations of herbicide resistance management. In addition, incorporating these reduced-risk herbicides into the management program can reduce the amount of pesticides applied per acre to achieve waterhyacinth control. Key words: Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms, Glyphosate, Imazamox, Penoxsulam, 2,4-D
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3037401651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A749069633</galeid><sourcerecordid>A749069633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g152t-5dd665de4e79a596909f4ff0f8615496dce665769a3abb33815f0c5064e4baaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjU9LAzEUxPegYK1-h4BXV7Kb5G1zLPVPKwXB6rm-zb60KdvEZlPFb2-kMoeBmR8zZ8WIVxJKgFpcFJfDsONcaV3DqPiYU2ydcR0NzIbI9uhxQ3vyiQXLvjFR3P6gcT5tmfMsbYmt0ET8I0K5Qs-eAx6OuXp1XxTZPfUJb9kMe5fnvMOr4txiP9D1v4-L98eHt9m8XL48LWbTZbmpVJ1K1XUAqiNJjUalQXNtpbXcTqBSUkNnKPcNaBTYtkJMKmW5URwkyRYRxbi4Oe1-xnA40pDWu3CMPl-uBReN5BWoKlN3J2qDPa2dtyFFNFkd7Z0JnqzL-bSRmoMGIcQv1gpfwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3037401651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Madsen, John D ; Kyser, Guy B</creator><creatorcontrib>Madsen, John D ; Kyser, Guy B</creatorcontrib><description>Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) is a global aquatic weed. Although a number of herbicides such as 2,4-D and glyphosate effectively control this plant, additional herbicides need to be evaluated to address concerns for herbicide stewardship and environmental restrictions on the use of herbicides in particular areas. Waterhyacinth has become a significant nuisance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. The predominant herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Delta have been 2,4-D and glyphosate. However, environmental restrictions related to irrigation water residues and restrictions for preservation of endangered species are prompting consideration of the new reduced-risk herbicides imazamox and penoxsulam. Two trials were performed in floating quadrats in the Delta during the summer of 2016. In the first trial, two rates each of 2,4-D, glyphosate, imazamox, and penoxsulam were treated in four replicate quadrats. In this trial, the highest rates of all four herbicides provided greater than 80% control (2,4-D, 82%; glyphosate, 87%; imazamox, 93%; and penoxsulam, 94%). In the second trial, the lower rate of glyphosate (1,681 g a.e. [ha.sup.-1]) was compared to four rates each of imazamox (187 to 1,494 g a.i. [ha.sup.-1]) and penoxsulam (12 to 98 g a.i. [ha.sup.-1]). In this trial, the highest rates of imazamox and penoxsulam provided 96 and 95% control, respectively, compared to the untreated reference. Imazamox and penoxsulam will provide suitable control of waterhyacinth as part of an operational program and may be used as part of an integrated pest management program with considerations of herbicide resistance management. In addition, incorporating these reduced-risk herbicides into the management program can reduce the amount of pesticides applied per acre to achieve waterhyacinth control. Key words: Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms, Glyphosate, Imazamox, Penoxsulam, 2,4-D</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gainesville: Aquatic Plant Management Society</publisher><subject>2,4-D ; Agricultural practices ; Aquatic plants ; Aquatic weeds ; Biomass ; Chemical pest control ; Constrictions ; Endangered species ; Freshwater plants ; Glyphosate ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; Integrated pest management ; Irrigation water ; Maintenance management ; Pest control ; Pesticides ; Protection and preservation ; Rare species ; Restrictions ; Rivers ; Seeds ; Stewardship ; Water transportation ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Journal of aquatic plant management, 2020-07, Vol.58 (2), p.98-104</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Aquatic Plant Management Society</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3037401651?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madsen, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyser, Guy B</creatorcontrib><title>Herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California</title><title>Journal of aquatic plant management</title><description>Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) is a global aquatic weed. Although a number of herbicides such as 2,4-D and glyphosate effectively control this plant, additional herbicides need to be evaluated to address concerns for herbicide stewardship and environmental restrictions on the use of herbicides in particular areas. Waterhyacinth has become a significant nuisance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. The predominant herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Delta have been 2,4-D and glyphosate. However, environmental restrictions related to irrigation water residues and restrictions for preservation of endangered species are prompting consideration of the new reduced-risk herbicides imazamox and penoxsulam. Two trials were performed in floating quadrats in the Delta during the summer of 2016. In the first trial, two rates each of 2,4-D, glyphosate, imazamox, and penoxsulam were treated in four replicate quadrats. In this trial, the highest rates of all four herbicides provided greater than 80% control (2,4-D, 82%; glyphosate, 87%; imazamox, 93%; and penoxsulam, 94%). In the second trial, the lower rate of glyphosate (1,681 g a.e. [ha.sup.-1]) was compared to four rates each of imazamox (187 to 1,494 g a.i. [ha.sup.-1]) and penoxsulam (12 to 98 g a.i. [ha.sup.-1]). In this trial, the highest rates of imazamox and penoxsulam provided 96 and 95% control, respectively, compared to the untreated reference. Imazamox and penoxsulam will provide suitable control of waterhyacinth as part of an operational program and may be used as part of an integrated pest management program with considerations of herbicide resistance management. In addition, incorporating these reduced-risk herbicides into the management program can reduce the amount of pesticides applied per acre to achieve waterhyacinth control. Key words: Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms, Glyphosate, Imazamox, Penoxsulam, 2,4-D</description><subject>2,4-D</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Aquatic weeds</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Chemical pest control</subject><subject>Constrictions</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Freshwater plants</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Integrated pest management</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Maintenance management</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Stewardship</subject><subject>Water transportation</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0146-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotjU9LAzEUxPegYK1-h4BXV7Kb5G1zLPVPKwXB6rm-zb60KdvEZlPFb2-kMoeBmR8zZ8WIVxJKgFpcFJfDsONcaV3DqPiYU2ydcR0NzIbI9uhxQ3vyiQXLvjFR3P6gcT5tmfMsbYmt0ET8I0K5Qs-eAx6OuXp1XxTZPfUJb9kMe5fnvMOr4txiP9D1v4-L98eHt9m8XL48LWbTZbmpVJ1K1XUAqiNJjUalQXNtpbXcTqBSUkNnKPcNaBTYtkJMKmW5URwkyRYRxbi4Oe1-xnA40pDWu3CMPl-uBReN5BWoKlN3J2qDPa2dtyFFNFkd7Z0JnqzL-bSRmoMGIcQv1gpfwQ</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Madsen, John D</creator><creator>Kyser, Guy B</creator><general>Aquatic Plant Management Society</general><general>Aquatic Plant Management Society, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California</title><author>Madsen, John D ; Kyser, Guy B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g152t-5dd665de4e79a596909f4ff0f8615496dce665769a3abb33815f0c5064e4baaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>2,4-D</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Aquatic weeds</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Chemical pest control</topic><topic>Constrictions</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Freshwater plants</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Integrated pest management</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Maintenance management</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Stewardship</topic><topic>Water transportation</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madsen, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyser, Guy B</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Science Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of aquatic plant management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madsen, John D</au><au>Kyser, Guy B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aquatic plant management</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>98-104</pages><issn>0146-6623</issn><abstract>Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) is a global aquatic weed. Although a number of herbicides such as 2,4-D and glyphosate effectively control this plant, additional herbicides need to be evaluated to address concerns for herbicide stewardship and environmental restrictions on the use of herbicides in particular areas. Waterhyacinth has become a significant nuisance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. The predominant herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Delta have been 2,4-D and glyphosate. However, environmental restrictions related to irrigation water residues and restrictions for preservation of endangered species are prompting consideration of the new reduced-risk herbicides imazamox and penoxsulam. Two trials were performed in floating quadrats in the Delta during the summer of 2016. In the first trial, two rates each of 2,4-D, glyphosate, imazamox, and penoxsulam were treated in four replicate quadrats. In this trial, the highest rates of all four herbicides provided greater than 80% control (2,4-D, 82%; glyphosate, 87%; imazamox, 93%; and penoxsulam, 94%). In the second trial, the lower rate of glyphosate (1,681 g a.e. [ha.sup.-1]) was compared to four rates each of imazamox (187 to 1,494 g a.i. [ha.sup.-1]) and penoxsulam (12 to 98 g a.i. [ha.sup.-1]). In this trial, the highest rates of imazamox and penoxsulam provided 96 and 95% control, respectively, compared to the untreated reference. Imazamox and penoxsulam will provide suitable control of waterhyacinth as part of an operational program and may be used as part of an integrated pest management program with considerations of herbicide resistance management. In addition, incorporating these reduced-risk herbicides into the management program can reduce the amount of pesticides applied per acre to achieve waterhyacinth control. Key words: Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms, Glyphosate, Imazamox, Penoxsulam, 2,4-D</abstract><cop>Gainesville</cop><pub>Aquatic Plant Management Society</pub><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-6623
ispartof Journal of aquatic plant management, 2020-07, Vol.58 (2), p.98-104
issn 0146-6623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3037401651
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects 2,4-D
Agricultural practices
Aquatic plants
Aquatic weeds
Biomass
Chemical pest control
Constrictions
Endangered species
Freshwater plants
Glyphosate
Herbicide resistance
Herbicides
Integrated pest management
Irrigation water
Maintenance management
Pest control
Pesticides
Protection and preservation
Rare species
Restrictions
Rivers
Seeds
Stewardship
Water transportation
Wildlife conservation
title Herbicides for management of waterhyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T14%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Herbicides%20for%20management%20of%20waterhyacinth%20in%20the%20Sacramento-San%20Joaquin%20River%20Delta,%20California&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aquatic%20plant%20management&rft.au=Madsen,%20John%20D&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=98-104&rft.issn=0146-6623&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA749069633%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g152t-5dd665de4e79a596909f4ff0f8615496dce665769a3abb33815f0c5064e4baaa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3037401651&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A749069633&rfr_iscdi=true