Canine Support Program: Student perceptions and preferences at a regional university and implications for health, well-being, and student support enhancements

• Published in: Health promotion journal of Australia 2024-04, Vol.35 (2), p.525-533
• Main Authors: Tom, Vana, King, Jemma C., McBain‐Rigg, Kristin E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age factors; Animals; Australia; Certification; College campuses; College students; Colleges & universities; Dogs; Evaluation; Handlers; Health education; Health promotion; Health promotion services; Higher education; Homesickness; Humans; Mental Health; Mental health promotion; Mental health services; Multiple choice; Multiple choice questionnaires; Perceptions; Physical contact; Population studies; Questionnaires; Regions; Social aspects; Social behavior; Social factors; Social interaction; Social interactions; Social support; Statistical analysis; Statistical tests; Students; Students - psychology; Support services; Therapy Animals; Universities; Universities and colleges; Welfare; Well being
• ISSN: 1036-1073; 2201-1617
• DOI: 10.1002/hpja.782

Issue Addressed: Canine Support Programs (CSPs) are a potential solution to growing university student support demands. While current studies focus on the impacts of CSPs, there is limited understanding of the views and expectations of tertiary students about CSPs. This study explored the perceptions and preferences of students in an Australian regional university about CSPs. Methods: A questionnaire with multiple choice and open-ended questions surveyed residential students' perspectives about CSP. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical tests and thematic analysis for open responses. Results: Majority (98%) of participants (sample n equivalent 48) would support a CSP on campus. Frequent, small-group interactions of >=15 min involving physical contact were preferred. Dog disposition, welfare-trained handlers, and veterinary certification were important aspects of program safety. Participants strongly agreed a CSP would improve mental health and well-being, relieve stress, reduce feelings of homesickness, provide support, comfort, and enable social interactions. Conclusion: There is strong support among the study population for CSP to be established on campus. This study supports earlier research that CSP has benefit potential for new, stressed, and/or students who love dogs. The preferences of students should inform program design to enhance utility and impact. This aligns with Health Promoting Universities and College's Okanagan Charter principle of 'engaging student voices'. More institutional awareness and support for CSPs will be necessary for integration. So What? This study reveals the need for tailored and creative student support beyond traditional offerings including those that focus on student well-being and social initiatives. CSPs can be utilised as an advocate, enabler, and medium for mental health promotion action and well-being support for tertiary students; thereby, contributing to the 'Health Promoting University' agenda in Australia. It also reinforces the need for a Health in All Policies approach to be incorporated into our tertiary education sector. Future actions should focus on improving institutional awareness, support, and sector implementation.