Foreign direct investment (FDI) and environmental quality: Is greenfield FDI greener than mergers and acquisitions FDI?

Environmental sustainability is a key objective of sustainable development. In this connection, there are growing concerns about the environmental impact of foreign direct investment (FDI), even though it is a potentially powerful engine of growth and development in developing countries. In this stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World economy 2024-05, Vol.47 (5), p.1827-1850
Main Authors: Ly‐My, Dung, Le, Thai‐Ha, Park, Donghyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Comparative studies
Developed countries
Developing countries
Economic analysis
Emerging markets
Environmental aspects
Foreign investment
greenfield FDI
LDCs
M&A FDI
Mergers
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Environmental sustainability is a key objective of sustainable development. In this connection, there are growing concerns about the environmental impact of foreign direct investment (FDI), even though it is a potentially powerful engine of growth and development in developing countries. In this study, we empirically examine and compare the environmental impact of two different types of FDI, namely greenfield FDI, and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) FDI. Using data from 91 countries in 2005–2020, we find significant differences in the environmental effects of the two different types of FDI. In particular, our empirical results show that greenfield FDI is more harmful to the environment of host countries than M&A FDI. In addition, FDI from emerging markets and developing countries tends to be more harmful to the environment than FDI from developed countries.
ISSN:0378-5920
1467-9701
DOI:10.1111/twec.13513