Loading…

Empirical analysis of sensor type importance for data preparation of real-time operational status monitoring in fused deposition modeling 3D printers

The fused deposition modeling (FDM)-type three-dimensional (3D) printer is a popular choice in manufacturing facilities due to its capability of printing complex-shaped objects with simple machine control. To monitor the operational state of such 3D printing systems and detect faults, analog sensor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2024-05, Vol.132 (5-6), p.2617-2630
Main Authors: Baek, Sujeong, Kim, Byeong Su, Lee, Yebon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b9bb6a2101cedbf9c08c0f9f47925aae422fe22cc548de09727facb2afd909e33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b9bb6a2101cedbf9c08c0f9f47925aae422fe22cc548de09727facb2afd909e33
container_end_page 2630
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 2617
container_title International journal of advanced manufacturing technology
container_volume 132
creator Baek, Sujeong
Kim, Byeong Su
Lee, Yebon
description The fused deposition modeling (FDM)-type three-dimensional (3D) printer is a popular choice in manufacturing facilities due to its capability of printing complex-shaped objects with simple machine control. To monitor the operational state of such 3D printing systems and detect faults, analog sensor signals can be collected and analyzed in real-time. Several research works have used traditional sensor types to monitor machinery movement, such as acceleration and temperature sensor signals, and have applied dimension reduction for efficient analysis. However, since the quality of operational state monitoring easily varies depending on the sensor information obtained, identifying meaningful sensor types at the sensor installation and data preparation stage is crucial for efficient data collection and analysis, prior to performing real-time status monitoring in 3D printing systems. In this study, we analyzed the relative importance of different sensor types for improving state monitoring performance and efficiency through statistical inference. It was evident that analyzing a set of five magnetic sensor signals was more effective and efficient for support vector machine-based classification of working stages and autoencoder-based fault detection than analyzing the entire set of signals, which includes 3-axis acceleration, 3-axis Euler angle, 3-axis magnetic field, temperature, and overall current sensors. By efficiently monitoring current working stages and detecting faults, this proposed strategy not only enhances the printing speed and product quality of FDM 3D printers but also improves the efficiency of original data storage in cloud services. This facilitates the control and remote monitoring of multiple 3D printers simultaneously.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00170-024-13522-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3045983059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3045983059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b9bb6a2101cedbf9c08c0f9f47925aae422fe22cc548de09727facb2afd909e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qHDEQhEVwwGsnL-CTIGclLWn-dAyO8wMGX5yz0GhaRmZmNFFrwfsged9oPYHccmqoriq6P8ZuJHyUAP0nApA9CFCNkLpVSry8YQfZaC00yPaCHUB1g9B9N1yyK6Lnau9kNxzY77tlizl6N3O3uvlEkXgKnHCllHk5bcjjsqVc3OqRh6pNrji-ZdxcdiWm9WzP6GZR4oI8bbjLtZCKK0fiS1pjSTmuTzyuPBwJJz7hlii-xpc04Xxe6i-1Nq4FM71jb4ObCd__ndfs59e7x9vv4v7h24_bz_fCa2mKGM04dk5JkB6nMRgPg4dgQtMb1TqHjVIBlfK-bYYJwfSqD86PyoXJgEGtr9mHvXfL6dcRqdjndMz1drIamtYMGlpTXWp3-ZyIMgZb71xcPlkJ9ozf7vhtxW9f8duXGtJ7iM5PPWH-V_2f1B-h0o19</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3045983059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical analysis of sensor type importance for data preparation of real-time operational status monitoring in fused deposition modeling 3D printers</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Baek, Sujeong ; Kim, Byeong Su ; Lee, Yebon</creator><creatorcontrib>Baek, Sujeong ; Kim, Byeong Su ; Lee, Yebon</creatorcontrib><description>The fused deposition modeling (FDM)-type three-dimensional (3D) printer is a popular choice in manufacturing facilities due to its capability of printing complex-shaped objects with simple machine control. To monitor the operational state of such 3D printing systems and detect faults, analog sensor signals can be collected and analyzed in real-time. Several research works have used traditional sensor types to monitor machinery movement, such as acceleration and temperature sensor signals, and have applied dimension reduction for efficient analysis. However, since the quality of operational state monitoring easily varies depending on the sensor information obtained, identifying meaningful sensor types at the sensor installation and data preparation stage is crucial for efficient data collection and analysis, prior to performing real-time status monitoring in 3D printing systems. In this study, we analyzed the relative importance of different sensor types for improving state monitoring performance and efficiency through statistical inference. It was evident that analyzing a set of five magnetic sensor signals was more effective and efficient for support vector machine-based classification of working stages and autoencoder-based fault detection than analyzing the entire set of signals, which includes 3-axis acceleration, 3-axis Euler angle, 3-axis magnetic field, temperature, and overall current sensors. By efficiently monitoring current working stages and detecting faults, this proposed strategy not only enhances the printing speed and product quality of FDM 3D printers but also improves the efficiency of original data storage in cloud services. This facilitates the control and remote monitoring of multiple 3D printers simultaneously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-024-13522-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>3-D printers ; Acceleration ; CAE) and Design ; Complex shape objects ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Data collection ; Data storage ; Deposition ; Empirical analysis ; Engineering ; Euler angles ; Fault detection ; Fused deposition modeling ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Mechanical Engineering ; Media Management ; Original Article ; Real time operation ; Remote control ; Remote monitoring ; Sensors ; Statistical inference ; Support vector machines ; Temperature sensors ; Three axis ; Three dimensional models ; Three dimensional printing</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2024-05, Vol.132 (5-6), p.2617-2630</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b9bb6a2101cedbf9c08c0f9f47925aae422fe22cc548de09727facb2afd909e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b9bb6a2101cedbf9c08c0f9f47925aae422fe22cc548de09727facb2afd909e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baek, Sujeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Byeong Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yebon</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical analysis of sensor type importance for data preparation of real-time operational status monitoring in fused deposition modeling 3D printers</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><addtitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</addtitle><description>The fused deposition modeling (FDM)-type three-dimensional (3D) printer is a popular choice in manufacturing facilities due to its capability of printing complex-shaped objects with simple machine control. To monitor the operational state of such 3D printing systems and detect faults, analog sensor signals can be collected and analyzed in real-time. Several research works have used traditional sensor types to monitor machinery movement, such as acceleration and temperature sensor signals, and have applied dimension reduction for efficient analysis. However, since the quality of operational state monitoring easily varies depending on the sensor information obtained, identifying meaningful sensor types at the sensor installation and data preparation stage is crucial for efficient data collection and analysis, prior to performing real-time status monitoring in 3D printing systems. In this study, we analyzed the relative importance of different sensor types for improving state monitoring performance and efficiency through statistical inference. It was evident that analyzing a set of five magnetic sensor signals was more effective and efficient for support vector machine-based classification of working stages and autoencoder-based fault detection than analyzing the entire set of signals, which includes 3-axis acceleration, 3-axis Euler angle, 3-axis magnetic field, temperature, and overall current sensors. By efficiently monitoring current working stages and detecting faults, this proposed strategy not only enhances the printing speed and product quality of FDM 3D printers but also improves the efficiency of original data storage in cloud services. This facilitates the control and remote monitoring of multiple 3D printers simultaneously.</description><subject>3-D printers</subject><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Complex shape objects</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data storage</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Euler angles</subject><subject>Fault detection</subject><subject>Fused deposition modeling</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Media Management</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Real time operation</subject><subject>Remote control</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Statistical inference</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Temperature sensors</subject><subject>Three axis</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Three dimensional printing</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1qHDEQhEVwwGsnL-CTIGclLWn-dAyO8wMGX5yz0GhaRmZmNFFrwfsged9oPYHccmqoriq6P8ZuJHyUAP0nApA9CFCNkLpVSry8YQfZaC00yPaCHUB1g9B9N1yyK6Lnau9kNxzY77tlizl6N3O3uvlEkXgKnHCllHk5bcjjsqVc3OqRh6pNrji-ZdxcdiWm9WzP6GZR4oI8bbjLtZCKK0fiS1pjSTmuTzyuPBwJJz7hlii-xpc04Xxe6i-1Nq4FM71jb4ObCd__ndfs59e7x9vv4v7h24_bz_fCa2mKGM04dk5JkB6nMRgPg4dgQtMb1TqHjVIBlfK-bYYJwfSqD86PyoXJgEGtr9mHvXfL6dcRqdjndMz1drIamtYMGlpTXWp3-ZyIMgZb71xcPlkJ9ozf7vhtxW9f8duXGtJ7iM5PPWH-V_2f1B-h0o19</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Baek, Sujeong</creator><creator>Kim, Byeong Su</creator><creator>Lee, Yebon</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Empirical analysis of sensor type importance for data preparation of real-time operational status monitoring in fused deposition modeling 3D printers</title><author>Baek, Sujeong ; Kim, Byeong Su ; Lee, Yebon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b9bb6a2101cedbf9c08c0f9f47925aae422fe22cc548de09727facb2afd909e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>3-D printers</topic><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Complex shape objects</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data storage</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Euler angles</topic><topic>Fault detection</topic><topic>Fused deposition modeling</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Media Management</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Real time operation</topic><topic>Remote control</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Statistical inference</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Temperature sensors</topic><topic>Three axis</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Three dimensional printing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baek, Sujeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Byeong Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yebon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baek, Sujeong</au><au>Kim, Byeong Su</au><au>Lee, Yebon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical analysis of sensor type importance for data preparation of real-time operational status monitoring in fused deposition modeling 3D printers</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>2617</spage><epage>2630</epage><pages>2617-2630</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>The fused deposition modeling (FDM)-type three-dimensional (3D) printer is a popular choice in manufacturing facilities due to its capability of printing complex-shaped objects with simple machine control. To monitor the operational state of such 3D printing systems and detect faults, analog sensor signals can be collected and analyzed in real-time. Several research works have used traditional sensor types to monitor machinery movement, such as acceleration and temperature sensor signals, and have applied dimension reduction for efficient analysis. However, since the quality of operational state monitoring easily varies depending on the sensor information obtained, identifying meaningful sensor types at the sensor installation and data preparation stage is crucial for efficient data collection and analysis, prior to performing real-time status monitoring in 3D printing systems. In this study, we analyzed the relative importance of different sensor types for improving state monitoring performance and efficiency through statistical inference. It was evident that analyzing a set of five magnetic sensor signals was more effective and efficient for support vector machine-based classification of working stages and autoencoder-based fault detection than analyzing the entire set of signals, which includes 3-axis acceleration, 3-axis Euler angle, 3-axis magnetic field, temperature, and overall current sensors. By efficiently monitoring current working stages and detecting faults, this proposed strategy not only enhances the printing speed and product quality of FDM 3D printers but also improves the efficiency of original data storage in cloud services. This facilitates the control and remote monitoring of multiple 3D printers simultaneously.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-024-13522-x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3768
ispartof International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2024-05, Vol.132 (5-6), p.2617-2630
issn 0268-3768
1433-3015
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3045983059
source Springer Nature
subjects 3-D printers
Acceleration
CAE) and Design
Complex shape objects
Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD
Data collection
Data storage
Deposition
Empirical analysis
Engineering
Euler angles
Fault detection
Fused deposition modeling
Industrial and Production Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Media Management
Original Article
Real time operation
Remote control
Remote monitoring
Sensors
Statistical inference
Support vector machines
Temperature sensors
Three axis
Three dimensional models
Three dimensional printing
title Empirical analysis of sensor type importance for data preparation of real-time operational status monitoring in fused deposition modeling 3D printers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20analysis%20of%20sensor%20type%20importance%20for%20data%20preparation%20of%20real-time%20operational%20status%20monitoring%20in%20fused%20deposition%20modeling%203D%20printers&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Baek,%20Sujeong&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=2617&rft.epage=2630&rft.pages=2617-2630&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-024-13522-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3045983059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b9bb6a2101cedbf9c08c0f9f47925aae422fe22cc548de09727facb2afd909e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3045983059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true