Loading…

Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships

This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of social and personal relationships 2024-05, Vol.41 (5), p.1113-1135
Main Authors: Buehler, Emily M., Crowley, Jenny L., Peterson, Ashley M., Jackl, Jennifer A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763
container_end_page 1135
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1113
container_title Journal of social and personal relationships
container_volume 41
creator Buehler, Emily M.
Crowley, Jenny L.
Peterson, Ashley M.
Jackl, Jennifer A.
description This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/02654075221145628
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3050101065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02654075221145628</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3050101065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9Kw0AQhxdRsFYfwNuC16bO5n-8lWJVKHjRc5hkJ-2WZBN3t0pvvoMXn88nMW0FUZE5zGF-3zeHH2PnAsZCJMkl-HEUQhL5vhBhFPvpARuIMAYviCE9ZIPt3dsGjtmJtSsAEfhBNmDvM2xUveFl2zRrrUp0qtW8Q-fIaDviDUmFjuTPwIijlvyF6torSOnFFZ_8MijdCyR1pCXpknhHxnZUOvVMfPfAkHYfr28o17Xj5VLVkhuqd7Bdqs6esqMKa0tnX3vIHmfXD9Nbb35_czedzL0yEL7zZFalkGQSocgSpACjrBJ-hSkCCoFlQQEUBfkJIEIs0yKkmMIoJZFGQEkcDNnF3tuZ9mlN1uWrdm10_zIPIALRTxz1KbFPlaa11lCVd0Y1aDa5gHxbQP6ngJ4Z7xmLC_q2_g98AvEnisM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050101065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Buehler, Emily M. ; Crowley, Jenny L. ; Peterson, Ashley M. ; Jackl, Jennifer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Emily M. ; Crowley, Jenny L. ; Peterson, Ashley M. ; Jackl, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3608</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02654075221145628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult children ; Adults ; Closeness ; Communication ; Conformity ; Families &amp; family life ; Indirect effects ; Interdependence ; Interpersonal communication ; Loneliness ; Parent-adult child relations ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Psychological well being ; Segmentation ; Technology ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Journal of social and personal relationships, 2024-05, Vol.41 (5), p.1113-1135</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5557-6638 ; 0000-0003-1274-8131 ; 0000-0003-2436-2826 ; 0000-0003-3908-6174</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Jenny L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackl, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships</title><title>Journal of social and personal relationships</title><description>This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication.</description><subject>Adult children</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Closeness</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Conformity</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Indirect effects</subject><subject>Interdependence</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>Parent-adult child relations</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Psychological well being</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0265-4075</issn><issn>1460-3608</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9Kw0AQhxdRsFYfwNuC16bO5n-8lWJVKHjRc5hkJ-2WZBN3t0pvvoMXn88nMW0FUZE5zGF-3zeHH2PnAsZCJMkl-HEUQhL5vhBhFPvpARuIMAYviCE9ZIPt3dsGjtmJtSsAEfhBNmDvM2xUveFl2zRrrUp0qtW8Q-fIaDviDUmFjuTPwIijlvyF6torSOnFFZ_8MijdCyR1pCXpknhHxnZUOvVMfPfAkHYfr28o17Xj5VLVkhuqd7Bdqs6esqMKa0tnX3vIHmfXD9Nbb35_czedzL0yEL7zZFalkGQSocgSpACjrBJ-hSkCCoFlQQEUBfkJIEIs0yKkmMIoJZFGQEkcDNnF3tuZ9mlN1uWrdm10_zIPIALRTxz1KbFPlaa11lCVd0Y1aDa5gHxbQP6ngJ4Z7xmLC_q2_g98AvEnisM</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Buehler, Emily M.</creator><creator>Crowley, Jenny L.</creator><creator>Peterson, Ashley M.</creator><creator>Jackl, Jennifer A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5557-6638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-8131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-2826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-6174</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships</title><author>Buehler, Emily M. ; Crowley, Jenny L. ; Peterson, Ashley M. ; Jackl, Jennifer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult children</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Closeness</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Conformity</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Indirect effects</topic><topic>Interdependence</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>Parent-adult child relations</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Psychological well being</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Jenny L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackl, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of social and personal relationships</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buehler, Emily M.</au><au>Crowley, Jenny L.</au><au>Peterson, Ashley M.</au><au>Jackl, Jennifer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social and personal relationships</jtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1113</spage><epage>1135</epage><pages>1113-1135</pages><issn>0265-4075</issn><eissn>1460-3608</eissn><abstract>This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/02654075221145628</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5557-6638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-8131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-2826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-6174</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-4075
ispartof Journal of social and personal relationships, 2024-05, Vol.41 (5), p.1113-1135
issn 0265-4075
1460-3608
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3050101065
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Adult children
Adults
Closeness
Communication
Conformity
Families & family life
Indirect effects
Interdependence
Interpersonal communication
Loneliness
Parent-adult child relations
Parents & parenting
Psychological well being
Segmentation
Technology
Well being
title Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20communication%20patterns,%20mediated%20communication,%20and%20well-being:%20A%20communication%20interdependence%20perspective%20on%20parent%E2%80%93adult%20child%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20and%20personal%20relationships&rft.au=Buehler,%20Emily%20M.&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1113&rft.epage=1135&rft.pages=1113-1135&rft.issn=0265-4075&rft.eissn=1460-3608&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02654075221145628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3050101065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050101065&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02654075221145628&rfr_iscdi=true