Loading…
Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships
This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shap...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of social and personal relationships 2024-05, Vol.41 (5), p.1113-1135 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763 |
container_end_page | 1135 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1113 |
container_title | Journal of social and personal relationships |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Buehler, Emily M. Crowley, Jenny L. Peterson, Ashley M. Jackl, Jennifer A. |
description | This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/02654075221145628 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3050101065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02654075221145628</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3050101065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9Kw0AQhxdRsFYfwNuC16bO5n-8lWJVKHjRc5hkJ-2WZBN3t0pvvoMXn88nMW0FUZE5zGF-3zeHH2PnAsZCJMkl-HEUQhL5vhBhFPvpARuIMAYviCE9ZIPt3dsGjtmJtSsAEfhBNmDvM2xUveFl2zRrrUp0qtW8Q-fIaDviDUmFjuTPwIijlvyF6torSOnFFZ_8MijdCyR1pCXpknhHxnZUOvVMfPfAkHYfr28o17Xj5VLVkhuqd7Bdqs6esqMKa0tnX3vIHmfXD9Nbb35_czedzL0yEL7zZFalkGQSocgSpACjrBJ-hSkCCoFlQQEUBfkJIEIs0yKkmMIoJZFGQEkcDNnF3tuZ9mlN1uWrdm10_zIPIALRTxz1KbFPlaa11lCVd0Y1aDa5gHxbQP6ngJ4Z7xmLC_q2_g98AvEnisM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050101065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Buehler, Emily M. ; Crowley, Jenny L. ; Peterson, Ashley M. ; Jackl, Jennifer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Emily M. ; Crowley, Jenny L. ; Peterson, Ashley M. ; Jackl, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3608</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02654075221145628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult children ; Adults ; Closeness ; Communication ; Conformity ; Families & family life ; Indirect effects ; Interdependence ; Interpersonal communication ; Loneliness ; Parent-adult child relations ; Parents & parenting ; Psychological well being ; Segmentation ; Technology ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Journal of social and personal relationships, 2024-05, Vol.41 (5), p.1113-1135</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5557-6638 ; 0000-0003-1274-8131 ; 0000-0003-2436-2826 ; 0000-0003-3908-6174</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Jenny L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackl, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships</title><title>Journal of social and personal relationships</title><description>This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication.</description><subject>Adult children</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Closeness</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Conformity</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Indirect effects</subject><subject>Interdependence</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>Parent-adult child relations</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Psychological well being</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0265-4075</issn><issn>1460-3608</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9Kw0AQhxdRsFYfwNuC16bO5n-8lWJVKHjRc5hkJ-2WZBN3t0pvvoMXn88nMW0FUZE5zGF-3zeHH2PnAsZCJMkl-HEUQhL5vhBhFPvpARuIMAYviCE9ZIPt3dsGjtmJtSsAEfhBNmDvM2xUveFl2zRrrUp0qtW8Q-fIaDviDUmFjuTPwIijlvyF6torSOnFFZ_8MijdCyR1pCXpknhHxnZUOvVMfPfAkHYfr28o17Xj5VLVkhuqd7Bdqs6esqMKa0tnX3vIHmfXD9Nbb35_czedzL0yEL7zZFalkGQSocgSpACjrBJ-hSkCCoFlQQEUBfkJIEIs0yKkmMIoJZFGQEkcDNnF3tuZ9mlN1uWrdm10_zIPIALRTxz1KbFPlaa11lCVd0Y1aDa5gHxbQP6ngJ4Z7xmLC_q2_g98AvEnisM</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Buehler, Emily M.</creator><creator>Crowley, Jenny L.</creator><creator>Peterson, Ashley M.</creator><creator>Jackl, Jennifer A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5557-6638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-8131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-2826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-6174</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships</title><author>Buehler, Emily M. ; Crowley, Jenny L. ; Peterson, Ashley M. ; Jackl, Jennifer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult children</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Closeness</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Conformity</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Indirect effects</topic><topic>Interdependence</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>Parent-adult child relations</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Psychological well being</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Jenny L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackl, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of social and personal relationships</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buehler, Emily M.</au><au>Crowley, Jenny L.</au><au>Peterson, Ashley M.</au><au>Jackl, Jennifer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social and personal relationships</jtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1113</spage><epage>1135</epage><pages>1113-1135</pages><issn>0265-4075</issn><eissn>1460-3608</eissn><abstract>This study investigated how technology use, as understood through the communication interdependence perspective (CIP) and family communication patterns (FCPs), influence well-being in parent–adult child relationships. We proposed a model in which beliefs and attitudes about family communication shape adult children’s interdependent use of multiple modes of communication with a parent, which in turn impact their loneliness, psychological well-being, relational satisfaction, and closeness with a parent. Results revealed conversation orientation largely promoted communication interdependence (i.e., increased integration of face-to-face and mediated communication and ease of transitioning between channels), whereas conformity orientation largely dampened communication interdependence (i.e., increased segmentation to mediated channels and difficulty transitioning between channels). In turn, more communication interdependence (i.e., less segmentation to mediated channels and more ease transitioning between channels) corresponded with more relational well-being while segmentation to face-to-face reduced loneliness. Several indirect effects suggest that the ways adult children use technology with a parent help explain how cognitive schemas fostered by FCPs affect well-being. Theoretical implications are discussed as they pertain to the CIP and family communication.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/02654075221145628</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5557-6638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-8131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-2826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-6174</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0265-4075 |
ispartof | Journal of social and personal relationships, 2024-05, Vol.41 (5), p.1113-1135 |
issn | 0265-4075 1460-3608 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3050101065 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Adult children Adults Closeness Communication Conformity Families & family life Indirect effects Interdependence Interpersonal communication Loneliness Parent-adult child relations Parents & parenting Psychological well being Segmentation Technology Well being |
title | Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20communication%20patterns,%20mediated%20communication,%20and%20well-being:%20A%20communication%20interdependence%20perspective%20on%20parent%E2%80%93adult%20child%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20and%20personal%20relationships&rft.au=Buehler,%20Emily%20M.&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1113&rft.epage=1135&rft.pages=1113-1135&rft.issn=0265-4075&rft.eissn=1460-3608&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02654075221145628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3050101065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-d9f8079da0b97ae3a59f12fa8a0a11acbe30bbe270aa06d8b4e6e458e1850e763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050101065&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02654075221145628&rfr_iscdi=true |