Loading…

Japan and the liberal international order: rules-based, multilateral, inclusive and localized

This article examines Japan's security and foreign policies to analyze how a major Asian power engages with the liberal international order (LIO). Using the theory of norm localization, it argues that Japan adapts the LIO principles to fit the local normative environment in Asia. Abstract This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International affairs (London) 2023-07, Vol.99 (4), p.1421-1438
Main Author: Nakano, Ryoko
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article examines Japan's security and foreign policies to analyze how a major Asian power engages with the liberal international order (LIO). Using the theory of norm localization, it argues that Japan adapts the LIO principles to fit the local normative environment in Asia. Abstract This article examines Japan's security and foreign policy as an example of how a major power engages in the liberal international order (LIO) and what this implies for the future of that order. Facing China's increased power and influence in the past two decades, Japan has made strategic adjustments in response to regional and global power transitions while developing an idea of a wider geopolitical landscape on Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's initiative. However, this article argues that Japan's idea of an expanded regional scope and its vision of order were addressed decades earlier through ‘comprehensive security’ (sogo anzen hosho). While the country is an ally of the United States and clearly accepts the alliance as a key part of international order, Japan has its own ideas about international order; these accept much of the LIO but go beyond it, particularly in the articulation and operationalization of comprehensive security. By adopting the concept of norm localization, this article argues that Japan does not have the power to coerce others to take any actions to defend the current international order, but it can adapt and tweak the dominant LIO norms, principles and practices to build congruence with local norms of sovereignty and territorial integrity embedded in its own region. To create a broader consensus in favour of sustaining the LIO, major powers like Japan can approach the sceptics by presenting an alternative to either total rejection or total acceptance of the LIO norms.
ISSN:0020-5850
1468-2346
DOI:10.1093/ia/iiad166