118 Nutrient Cycling Potential from Manure from Heifers Fed Four Bermudagrass Cultivars

• Published in: Journal of animal science 2023-05, Vol.101 (Supplement_1), p.53-53
• Main Authors: Hines, Abbigail R, Siziba, Cynthia, Mullenix, Kim K, Dillard, Leanne L, Smith, William B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cattle; Cultivars; Cynodon dactylon; Forage; Manures; Nutrient cycles; Nutrient uptake; Operating costs; Pasture; Soil chemistry; Soil pH
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad068.063

Abstract Maintenance of pastures for grazing accounts for $132.50/animal in the United States (23% of operating costs), and pasture nutrient input represents the single greatest influence in productivity per unit area. Cultivar differences in the forage offered to cattle have the potential to manifest differences in digestive efficiency, resulting in different nutrient excretion profiles. The objective of this study was to assess the growth potential and incorporation of N, P, and K into forage material from manure from cattle fed one of four bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon [L.] Pers.) cultivars. Ruminally fistulated heifers (n = 4) were assigned randomly to one of four bermudagrass cultivars (Coastal, Russell, Tifton 44, or Tifton 85) for four 30-d in vivo periods (21-d adaptation and 9-d collection). On d 23, total fecal collections were subsampled from each heifer. As a hierarchical addition, a controlled greenhouse experiment was conducted for each period [15 pots per period; 5 manure treatments (four bermudagrass diets plus a negative control) × 3 replications]. Manure was added to 4.58 L pots based on stocking rate estimates for Central Alabama (1,110 kg/ha). The pots were seeded with bermudagrass (cv. Giant) as an indicator for forage nutrient uptake. At harvest (d 70), herbage, root, and soil samples were collected. Herbage and root samples were assayed for CP. Soil samples were assayed for pH, N, P, K, Mg, and Ca. Data were analyzed using SAS v. 9.4. There was no effect of manure treatment on herbage (P = 0.88) or root DM yield (P =.00;.54 and.73 g/pot, respectively). Similarly, there was no effect of manure treatment on soil pH (P = 0.18; 5.5), P (P = 0.78; 24.2 kg/ha), or K (P = 0.42;56.7 kg/ha). Results are interpreted to mean that, regardless of the cultivar effects on ruminal digestive dynamics, there is little to no effect of the resulting manure on subsequent forage production and nutrient uptake.