Loading…
Griefbots, Deadbots, Postmortem Avatars: on Responsible Applications of Generative AI in the Digital Afterlife Industry
To analyze potential negative consequences of adopting generative AI solutions in the digital afterlife industry (DAI), in this paper we present three speculative design scenarios for AI-enabled simulation of the deceased. We highlight the perspectives of the data donor, data recipient, and service...
Saved in:
Published in: | Philosophy & technology 2024-06, Vol.37 (2), p.63, Article 63 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229w-a766039e5664e07cd6eb4fbb651671a36b545e4106001e23f81a90547f1b00833 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Philosophy & technology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Hollanek, Tomasz Nowaczyk-Basińska, Katarzyna |
description | To analyze potential negative consequences of adopting generative AI solutions in the digital afterlife industry (DAI), in this paper we present three speculative design scenarios for AI-enabled simulation of the deceased. We highlight the perspectives of the
data donor, data recipient,
and
service interactant
– terms we employ to denote those whose data is used to create ‘deadbots,’ those in possession of the donor’s data after their death, and those who are meant to interact with the end product. We draw on the scenarios to map out several key ethical concerns posed by ‘re-creation services’ and to put forward recommendations on the ethical development of AI systems in this specific area of application. The recommendations, targeted at providers of AI-enabled re-creation services, include suggestions for developing sensitive procedures for retiring deadbots, ensuring meaningful transparency, restricting access to such services to adult users only, and adhering to the principle of mutual consent of both data donors and service interactants. While we suggest practical solutions to the socio-ethical challenges posed by the emergence of re-creation services, we also emphasize the importance of ongoing interdisciplinary research at the intersection of the ethics of AI and the ethics of the DAI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13347-024-00744-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3052927610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3052927610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229w-a766039e5664e07cd6eb4fbb651671a36b545e4106001e23f81a90547f1b00833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1PAjEQ3RhNJMgf8NTEq6vTj-2CNwKKJCQao-emC1MsWbZrWyD8e6tr9OZc5uu9N5OXZZcUbihAeRso56LMgYk8tULkh5OsxxiFvBCCnv7WnJ9ngxA2kKKgkrOylx1m3qKpXAzXZIp61VXPLsSt8xG3ZLzXUftwR1xDXjC0rgm2qpGM27a2Sx1tGhBnyAwb9Kndp9Wc2IbEdyRTu7ZR12RsIvraGiTzZrUL0R8vsjOj64CDn9zP3h7uXyeP-eJpNp-MF_mSsdEh16WUwEdYSCkQyuVKYiVMVcn0f0k1l1UhChQUJABFxs2Q6hEUojS0Ahhy3s-uOt3Wu48dhqg2buebdFJxKNiIlZJCQrEOtfQuBI9Gtd5utT8qCurLY9V5rJLH6ttjdUgk3pFCAjdr9H_S_7A-AXJ4fso</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3052927610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Griefbots, Deadbots, Postmortem Avatars: on Responsible Applications of Generative AI in the Digital Afterlife Industry</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Hollanek, Tomasz ; Nowaczyk-Basińska, Katarzyna</creator><creatorcontrib>Hollanek, Tomasz ; Nowaczyk-Basińska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze potential negative consequences of adopting generative AI solutions in the digital afterlife industry (DAI), in this paper we present three speculative design scenarios for AI-enabled simulation of the deceased. We highlight the perspectives of the
data donor, data recipient,
and
service interactant
– terms we employ to denote those whose data is used to create ‘deadbots,’ those in possession of the donor’s data after their death, and those who are meant to interact with the end product. We draw on the scenarios to map out several key ethical concerns posed by ‘re-creation services’ and to put forward recommendations on the ethical development of AI systems in this specific area of application. The recommendations, targeted at providers of AI-enabled re-creation services, include suggestions for developing sensitive procedures for retiring deadbots, ensuring meaningful transparency, restricting access to such services to adult users only, and adhering to the principle of mutual consent of both data donors and service interactants. While we suggest practical solutions to the socio-ethical challenges posed by the emergence of re-creation services, we also emphasize the importance of ongoing interdisciplinary research at the intersection of the ethics of AI and the ethics of the DAI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-5433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-5441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13347-024-00744-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Ethics ; Generative artificial intelligence ; Interdisciplinary studies ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Technology ; Research Article</subject><ispartof>Philosophy & technology, 2024-06, Vol.37 (2), p.63, Article 63</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229w-a766039e5664e07cd6eb4fbb651671a36b545e4106001e23f81a90547f1b00833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5061-7442</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hollanek, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowaczyk-Basińska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><title>Griefbots, Deadbots, Postmortem Avatars: on Responsible Applications of Generative AI in the Digital Afterlife Industry</title><title>Philosophy & technology</title><addtitle>Philos. Technol</addtitle><description>To analyze potential negative consequences of adopting generative AI solutions in the digital afterlife industry (DAI), in this paper we present three speculative design scenarios for AI-enabled simulation of the deceased. We highlight the perspectives of the
data donor, data recipient,
and
service interactant
– terms we employ to denote those whose data is used to create ‘deadbots,’ those in possession of the donor’s data after their death, and those who are meant to interact with the end product. We draw on the scenarios to map out several key ethical concerns posed by ‘re-creation services’ and to put forward recommendations on the ethical development of AI systems in this specific area of application. The recommendations, targeted at providers of AI-enabled re-creation services, include suggestions for developing sensitive procedures for retiring deadbots, ensuring meaningful transparency, restricting access to such services to adult users only, and adhering to the principle of mutual consent of both data donors and service interactants. While we suggest practical solutions to the socio-ethical challenges posed by the emergence of re-creation services, we also emphasize the importance of ongoing interdisciplinary research at the intersection of the ethics of AI and the ethics of the DAI.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Generative artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary studies</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Technology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>2210-5433</issn><issn>2210-5441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1PAjEQ3RhNJMgf8NTEq6vTj-2CNwKKJCQao-emC1MsWbZrWyD8e6tr9OZc5uu9N5OXZZcUbihAeRso56LMgYk8tULkh5OsxxiFvBCCnv7WnJ9ngxA2kKKgkrOylx1m3qKpXAzXZIp61VXPLsSt8xG3ZLzXUftwR1xDXjC0rgm2qpGM27a2Sx1tGhBnyAwb9Kndp9Wc2IbEdyRTu7ZR12RsIvraGiTzZrUL0R8vsjOj64CDn9zP3h7uXyeP-eJpNp-MF_mSsdEh16WUwEdYSCkQyuVKYiVMVcn0f0k1l1UhChQUJABFxs2Q6hEUojS0Ahhy3s-uOt3Wu48dhqg2buebdFJxKNiIlZJCQrEOtfQuBI9Gtd5utT8qCurLY9V5rJLH6ttjdUgk3pFCAjdr9H_S_7A-AXJ4fso</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Hollanek, Tomasz</creator><creator>Nowaczyk-Basińska, Katarzyna</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5061-7442</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Griefbots, Deadbots, Postmortem Avatars: on Responsible Applications of Generative AI in the Digital Afterlife Industry</title><author>Hollanek, Tomasz ; Nowaczyk-Basińska, Katarzyna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229w-a766039e5664e07cd6eb4fbb651671a36b545e4106001e23f81a90547f1b00833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Generative artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary studies</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Technology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hollanek, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowaczyk-Basińska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Philosophy & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hollanek, Tomasz</au><au>Nowaczyk-Basińska, Katarzyna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Griefbots, Deadbots, Postmortem Avatars: on Responsible Applications of Generative AI in the Digital Afterlife Industry</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy & technology</jtitle><stitle>Philos. Technol</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>63</spage><pages>63-</pages><artnum>63</artnum><issn>2210-5433</issn><eissn>2210-5441</eissn><abstract>To analyze potential negative consequences of adopting generative AI solutions in the digital afterlife industry (DAI), in this paper we present three speculative design scenarios for AI-enabled simulation of the deceased. We highlight the perspectives of the
data donor, data recipient,
and
service interactant
– terms we employ to denote those whose data is used to create ‘deadbots,’ those in possession of the donor’s data after their death, and those who are meant to interact with the end product. We draw on the scenarios to map out several key ethical concerns posed by ‘re-creation services’ and to put forward recommendations on the ethical development of AI systems in this specific area of application. The recommendations, targeted at providers of AI-enabled re-creation services, include suggestions for developing sensitive procedures for retiring deadbots, ensuring meaningful transparency, restricting access to such services to adult users only, and adhering to the principle of mutual consent of both data donors and service interactants. While we suggest practical solutions to the socio-ethical challenges posed by the emergence of re-creation services, we also emphasize the importance of ongoing interdisciplinary research at the intersection of the ethics of AI and the ethics of the DAI.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13347-024-00744-w</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5061-7442</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2210-5433 |
ispartof | Philosophy & technology, 2024-06, Vol.37 (2), p.63, Article 63 |
issn | 2210-5433 2210-5441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3052927610 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Education Ethics Generative artificial intelligence Interdisciplinary studies Philosophy Philosophy of Technology Research Article |
title | Griefbots, Deadbots, Postmortem Avatars: on Responsible Applications of Generative AI in the Digital Afterlife Industry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Griefbots,%20Deadbots,%20Postmortem%20Avatars:%20on%20Responsible%20Applications%20of%20Generative%20AI%20in%20the%20Digital%20Afterlife%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20&%20technology&rft.au=Hollanek,%20Tomasz&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=63&rft.pages=63-&rft.artnum=63&rft.issn=2210-5433&rft.eissn=2210-5441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13347-024-00744-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3052927610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229w-a766039e5664e07cd6eb4fbb651671a36b545e4106001e23f81a90547f1b00833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3052927610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |