Loading…

Breaking barriers: supporting hematopoietic stem cell transplant program through collaborative radiation therapy service from a physically distant center

Background Total body irradiation (TBI) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has certain distinct advantages, such as uniform dose distribution and lack of drug resistance, but it is not widely available in resource-constrained settings. To overcome the limitations of in-house radiotherapy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Egyptian National Cancer Institute 2024-05, Vol.36 (1), p.17-7
Main Authors: Pandit, Subhas, Sapkota, Simit, Adhikari, Abish, Karki, Prakriti, Shrestha, Roshani, Jha, Deepak Suman, Prajapati, Rajan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Journal of Egyptian National Cancer Institute
container_volume 36
creator Pandit, Subhas
Sapkota, Simit
Adhikari, Abish
Karki, Prakriti
Shrestha, Roshani
Jha, Deepak Suman
Prajapati, Rajan
description Background Total body irradiation (TBI) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has certain distinct advantages, such as uniform dose distribution and lack of drug resistance, but it is not widely available in resource-constrained settings. To overcome the limitations of in-house radiotherapy services in hematology centers, we evaluated the feasibility of conducting HSCT programs in coordination with two physically distant centers using a reduced-intensity TBI protocol. Methods Thirty-two patients with a median age of 20.5 years were included in the study. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with aplastic anemia, 10 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 3 patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and 4 patients with other hematological conditions. Conditioning regimens used were fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in 29 cases, fludarabine-cytarabine ATG in 2 cases, and busulfan plus fludarabine in 1 case. The TBI dose was 3 Gy in 28 cases and 2 Gy in 4 cases. Patients were followed monthly after TBI, and the major toxicities were recorded. Results The median follow-up was 22 months. The most common acute complication was acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which occurred in 15.6% of patients. The major late complications were chronic GVHD (9.3%), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (34.3%), and CMV-induced secondary graft failure (6.2%). Seventy-five percent of patients were alive, 21.9% were dead, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Conclusions HSCT based on TBI is feasible even if the center lacks a radiotherapy facility by coordinating with a remote radiotherapy facility. without compromising the patient's outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s43046-024-00221-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3056527773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A794480233</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e6a0d6cf29634161bdfccc2a4f162c37</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A794480233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-6826bb75b004777fbedeea6bfa3be393995534d6f0479c3167036c6565756bd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMuO1DAQRSMEEs3AD7CyxDqDX7E77IYRj5FGYgPrqOyU026SOJTdI_Wn8Le4GSRYIC_KunXrVOk2zWvBr4XYm7dZK65Ny6VuOZdStPZJs5Pdvm-55v3TZieE4C1XRj5vXuR85NwYbrtd8_M9IXyP68QcEEWk_I7l07YlKhfxgAuUtKWIJXqWCy7M4zyzQrDmbYa1sI3SRLCwcqB0mg7Mp3kGlwhKfEBGMMb6S2vtI8F2ZhnpIXpkgdLCgG2Hc44e5vnMxpjLhehxLUgvm2cB5oyv_tSr5tvHD19vP7f3Xz7d3d7ct77jqrRmL41ztnOca2ttcDgignEBlEPVq77vOqVHE2q790oYW1PwpjOd7Ywbtbpq7h65Y4LjsFFcgM5Dgjj8FhJNA9Qw_IwDGuCj8UH2RmlhhBuD916CDsJIr2xlvXlk1VB-nDCX4ZhOtNbzB8XrSlkvVH9dE1RoXEOqcfolZj_c2F7rPZfq4rr-j6u-EZfo04ohVv2fgV-4daLF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3056527773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breaking barriers: supporting hematopoietic stem cell transplant program through collaborative radiation therapy service from a physically distant center</title><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Pandit, Subhas ; Sapkota, Simit ; Adhikari, Abish ; Karki, Prakriti ; Shrestha, Roshani ; Jha, Deepak Suman ; Prajapati, Rajan</creator><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Subhas ; Sapkota, Simit ; Adhikari, Abish ; Karki, Prakriti ; Shrestha, Roshani ; Jha, Deepak Suman ; Prajapati, Rajan</creatorcontrib><description>Background Total body irradiation (TBI) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has certain distinct advantages, such as uniform dose distribution and lack of drug resistance, but it is not widely available in resource-constrained settings. To overcome the limitations of in-house radiotherapy services in hematology centers, we evaluated the feasibility of conducting HSCT programs in coordination with two physically distant centers using a reduced-intensity TBI protocol. Methods Thirty-two patients with a median age of 20.5 years were included in the study. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with aplastic anemia, 10 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 3 patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and 4 patients with other hematological conditions. Conditioning regimens used were fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in 29 cases, fludarabine-cytarabine ATG in 2 cases, and busulfan plus fludarabine in 1 case. The TBI dose was 3 Gy in 28 cases and 2 Gy in 4 cases. Patients were followed monthly after TBI, and the major toxicities were recorded. Results The median follow-up was 22 months. The most common acute complication was acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which occurred in 15.6% of patients. The major late complications were chronic GVHD (9.3%), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (34.3%), and CMV-induced secondary graft failure (6.2%). Seventy-five percent of patients were alive, 21.9% were dead, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Conclusions HSCT based on TBI is feasible even if the center lacks a radiotherapy facility by coordinating with a remote radiotherapy facility. without compromising the patient's outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1110-0362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2589-0409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s43046-024-00221-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo: Springer</publisher><subject>Anemia ; Aplastic anemia ; Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Civil service ; Conditioning regimen ; Cyclophosphamide ; Cytomegalovirus ; Dosimetry ; Drug resistance ; Graft versus host disease ; Health aspects ; Hematology ; Hematopoietic stem cell transplant ; Hematopoietic stem cells ; Leukemia ; Low- and middle-income country ; Low-dose total body irradiation ; Oncology, Experimental ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Stem cell transplantation ; Stem cells ; Transplantation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2024-05, Vol.36 (1), p.17-7</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3056527773/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3056527773?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25751,27922,27923,37010,38514,43893,44588,74182,74896</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Subhas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapkota, Simit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adhikari, Abish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karki, Prakriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Roshani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Deepak Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prajapati, Rajan</creatorcontrib><title>Breaking barriers: supporting hematopoietic stem cell transplant program through collaborative radiation therapy service from a physically distant center</title><title>Journal of Egyptian National Cancer Institute</title><description>Background Total body irradiation (TBI) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has certain distinct advantages, such as uniform dose distribution and lack of drug resistance, but it is not widely available in resource-constrained settings. To overcome the limitations of in-house radiotherapy services in hematology centers, we evaluated the feasibility of conducting HSCT programs in coordination with two physically distant centers using a reduced-intensity TBI protocol. Methods Thirty-two patients with a median age of 20.5 years were included in the study. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with aplastic anemia, 10 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 3 patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and 4 patients with other hematological conditions. Conditioning regimens used were fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in 29 cases, fludarabine-cytarabine ATG in 2 cases, and busulfan plus fludarabine in 1 case. The TBI dose was 3 Gy in 28 cases and 2 Gy in 4 cases. Patients were followed monthly after TBI, and the major toxicities were recorded. Results The median follow-up was 22 months. The most common acute complication was acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which occurred in 15.6% of patients. The major late complications were chronic GVHD (9.3%), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (34.3%), and CMV-induced secondary graft failure (6.2%). Seventy-five percent of patients were alive, 21.9% were dead, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Conclusions HSCT based on TBI is feasible even if the center lacks a radiotherapy facility by coordinating with a remote radiotherapy facility. without compromising the patient's outcome.</description><subject>Anemia</subject><subject>Aplastic anemia</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Civil service</subject><subject>Conditioning regimen</subject><subject>Cyclophosphamide</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Graft versus host disease</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Hematopoietic stem cell transplant</subject><subject>Hematopoietic stem cells</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Low- and middle-income country</subject><subject>Low-dose total body irradiation</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><issn>1110-0362</issn><issn>2589-0409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMuO1DAQRSMEEs3AD7CyxDqDX7E77IYRj5FGYgPrqOyU026SOJTdI_Wn8Le4GSRYIC_KunXrVOk2zWvBr4XYm7dZK65Ny6VuOZdStPZJs5Pdvm-55v3TZieE4C1XRj5vXuR85NwYbrtd8_M9IXyP68QcEEWk_I7l07YlKhfxgAuUtKWIJXqWCy7M4zyzQrDmbYa1sI3SRLCwcqB0mg7Mp3kGlwhKfEBGMMb6S2vtI8F2ZhnpIXpkgdLCgG2Hc44e5vnMxpjLhehxLUgvm2cB5oyv_tSr5tvHD19vP7f3Xz7d3d7ct77jqrRmL41ztnOca2ttcDgignEBlEPVq77vOqVHE2q790oYW1PwpjOd7Ywbtbpq7h65Y4LjsFFcgM5Dgjj8FhJNA9Qw_IwDGuCj8UH2RmlhhBuD916CDsJIr2xlvXlk1VB-nDCX4ZhOtNbzB8XrSlkvVH9dE1RoXEOqcfolZj_c2F7rPZfq4rr-j6u-EZfo04ohVv2fgV-4daLF</recordid><startdate>20240520</startdate><enddate>20240520</enddate><creator>Pandit, Subhas</creator><creator>Sapkota, Simit</creator><creator>Adhikari, Abish</creator><creator>Karki, Prakriti</creator><creator>Shrestha, Roshani</creator><creator>Jha, Deepak Suman</creator><creator>Prajapati, Rajan</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240520</creationdate><title>Breaking barriers: supporting hematopoietic stem cell transplant program through collaborative radiation therapy service from a physically distant center</title><author>Pandit, Subhas ; Sapkota, Simit ; Adhikari, Abish ; Karki, Prakriti ; Shrestha, Roshani ; Jha, Deepak Suman ; Prajapati, Rajan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-6826bb75b004777fbedeea6bfa3be393995534d6f0479c3167036c6565756bd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anemia</topic><topic>Aplastic anemia</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Civil service</topic><topic>Conditioning regimen</topic><topic>Cyclophosphamide</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Graft versus host disease</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Hematopoietic stem cell transplant</topic><topic>Hematopoietic stem cells</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Low- and middle-income country</topic><topic>Low-dose total body irradiation</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Subhas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapkota, Simit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adhikari, Abish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karki, Prakriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Roshani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Deepak Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prajapati, Rajan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Egyptian National Cancer Institute</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pandit, Subhas</au><au>Sapkota, Simit</au><au>Adhikari, Abish</au><au>Karki, Prakriti</au><au>Shrestha, Roshani</au><au>Jha, Deepak Suman</au><au>Prajapati, Rajan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breaking barriers: supporting hematopoietic stem cell transplant program through collaborative radiation therapy service from a physically distant center</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Egyptian National Cancer Institute</jtitle><date>2024-05-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>17-7</pages><issn>1110-0362</issn><eissn>2589-0409</eissn><abstract>Background Total body irradiation (TBI) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has certain distinct advantages, such as uniform dose distribution and lack of drug resistance, but it is not widely available in resource-constrained settings. To overcome the limitations of in-house radiotherapy services in hematology centers, we evaluated the feasibility of conducting HSCT programs in coordination with two physically distant centers using a reduced-intensity TBI protocol. Methods Thirty-two patients with a median age of 20.5 years were included in the study. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with aplastic anemia, 10 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 3 patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and 4 patients with other hematological conditions. Conditioning regimens used were fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in 29 cases, fludarabine-cytarabine ATG in 2 cases, and busulfan plus fludarabine in 1 case. The TBI dose was 3 Gy in 28 cases and 2 Gy in 4 cases. Patients were followed monthly after TBI, and the major toxicities were recorded. Results The median follow-up was 22 months. The most common acute complication was acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which occurred in 15.6% of patients. The major late complications were chronic GVHD (9.3%), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (34.3%), and CMV-induced secondary graft failure (6.2%). Seventy-five percent of patients were alive, 21.9% were dead, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Conclusions HSCT based on TBI is feasible even if the center lacks a radiotherapy facility by coordinating with a remote radiotherapy facility. without compromising the patient's outcome.</abstract><cop>Cairo</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1186/s43046-024-00221-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1110-0362
ispartof Journal of Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2024-05, Vol.36 (1), p.17-7
issn 1110-0362
2589-0409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3056527773
source Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access ; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Anemia
Aplastic anemia
Cancer
Chemotherapy
Civil service
Conditioning regimen
Cyclophosphamide
Cytomegalovirus
Dosimetry
Drug resistance
Graft versus host disease
Health aspects
Hematology
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Hematopoietic stem cells
Leukemia
Low- and middle-income country
Low-dose total body irradiation
Oncology, Experimental
Patients
Pediatrics
Radiation
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Stem cell transplantation
Stem cells
Transplantation
title Breaking barriers: supporting hematopoietic stem cell transplant program through collaborative radiation therapy service from a physically distant center
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A23%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breaking%20barriers:%20supporting%20hematopoietic%20stem%20cell%20transplant%20program%20through%20collaborative%20radiation%20therapy%20service%20from%20a%20physically%20distant%20center&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Egyptian%20National%20Cancer%20Institute&rft.au=Pandit,%20Subhas&rft.date=2024-05-20&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=17-7&rft.issn=1110-0362&rft.eissn=2589-0409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s43046-024-00221-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA794480233%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-6826bb75b004777fbedeea6bfa3be393995534d6f0479c3167036c6565756bd43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3056527773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A794480233&rfr_iscdi=true