Loading…

Evaluating efficiency of metro-led urban underground public space: a case study in Shanghai

Metro-led urban underground public space (UUPS) are among the most common and important types of underground and public spaces. The need to measure metro-led UUPS performance and improve urban planning and public services has facilitated the development of various evaluation methods. However, the es...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2024-05, Vol.1333 (1), p.12003
Main Authors: Zhang, Z Y, Ma, C-X, Qiao, Y-K, Peng, F-L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f64aadb59fed831c61e3efca2928cc453d9719dab6b45239bcc5a993221fa2fa3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12003
container_title IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science
container_volume 1333
creator Zhang, Z Y
Ma, C-X
Qiao, Y-K
Peng, F-L
description Metro-led urban underground public space (UUPS) are among the most common and important types of underground and public spaces. The need to measure metro-led UUPS performance and improve urban planning and public services has facilitated the development of various evaluation methods. However, the essential performance aspects of efficiency and effectiveness are rarely balanced. Most methods focus on evaluating effectiveness while neglecting the cost incurred. This study proposed two sets of efficiency indicators of cost (input) and effectiveness (output) separately and used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to analyze the relative efficiency of 20 metro-led UUPS in Shanghai, China. The results indicated that the UUPS of People’s Square, Hanzhong Road, and Huamu Road were the most efficient. Whereas, the South Shanghai Railway Station UUPS and other five cases were neither technically efficient nor scale efficient; a waste of space volume was observed in half of the inefficient cases. Through comparisons of the results with previous studies, it was determined that different conclusions could be drawn when considering efficiency. Moreover, the evaluation framework based on the DEA method proposed in study paper can provide a comprehensive and holistic approach to guide metro-led UUPS planning optimization.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1755-1315/1333/1/012003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3058787246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3058787246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f64aadb59fed831c61e3efca2928cc453d9719dab6b45239bcc5a993221fa2fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKw0AUhgdRsFafwQFXLmLmkkky7kTqBQouqisXw8lc2pQ0iTOJ0Lc3IVIRBFf_gfOd88OH0CUlN5TkeUwzISLKqYgp5zymMaGMEH6EZofN8WEm2Sk6C2FLSJolXM7Q--ITqh66sl5j61ypS1vrPW4c3tnON1FlDe59ATXua2P92jdD4rYvqlLj0IK2txiwhmBx6Hqzx2WNVxuo1xsoz9GJgyrYi--co7eHxev9U7R8eXy-v1tGmuV5F7k0ATCFkM6anFOdUsut08Aky7VOBDcyo9JAkRaJYFwWWguQkjNGHTAHfI6upr-tbz56Gzq1bXpfD5WKE5FnecaSdKCyidK-CcFbp1pf7sDvFSVqNKlGR2r0pUaTiqrJ5HB5PV2WTfvzerFY_eZUa9zA8j_Y_xq-AG_bg0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3058787246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating efficiency of metro-led urban underground public space: a case study in Shanghai</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Zhang, Z Y ; Ma, C-X ; Qiao, Y-K ; Peng, F-L</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Z Y ; Ma, C-X ; Qiao, Y-K ; Peng, F-L</creatorcontrib><description>Metro-led urban underground public space (UUPS) are among the most common and important types of underground and public spaces. The need to measure metro-led UUPS performance and improve urban planning and public services has facilitated the development of various evaluation methods. However, the essential performance aspects of efficiency and effectiveness are rarely balanced. Most methods focus on evaluating effectiveness while neglecting the cost incurred. This study proposed two sets of efficiency indicators of cost (input) and effectiveness (output) separately and used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to analyze the relative efficiency of 20 metro-led UUPS in Shanghai, China. The results indicated that the UUPS of People’s Square, Hanzhong Road, and Huamu Road were the most efficient. Whereas, the South Shanghai Railway Station UUPS and other five cases were neither technically efficient nor scale efficient; a waste of space volume was observed in half of the inefficient cases. Through comparisons of the results with previous studies, it was determined that different conclusions could be drawn when considering efficiency. Moreover, the evaluation framework based on the DEA method proposed in study paper can provide a comprehensive and holistic approach to guide metro-led UUPS planning optimization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1333/1/012003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Cost analysis ; Data envelopment analysis ; Effectiveness ; Efficiency ; Optimization ; Performance evaluation ; Public spaces ; Railway stations ; Roads ; Subways ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2024-05, Vol.1333 (1), p.12003</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f64aadb59fed831c61e3efca2928cc453d9719dab6b45239bcc5a993221fa2fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3058787246?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Z Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, C-X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Y-K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, F-L</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating efficiency of metro-led urban underground public space: a case study in Shanghai</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><description>Metro-led urban underground public space (UUPS) are among the most common and important types of underground and public spaces. The need to measure metro-led UUPS performance and improve urban planning and public services has facilitated the development of various evaluation methods. However, the essential performance aspects of efficiency and effectiveness are rarely balanced. Most methods focus on evaluating effectiveness while neglecting the cost incurred. This study proposed two sets of efficiency indicators of cost (input) and effectiveness (output) separately and used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to analyze the relative efficiency of 20 metro-led UUPS in Shanghai, China. The results indicated that the UUPS of People’s Square, Hanzhong Road, and Huamu Road were the most efficient. Whereas, the South Shanghai Railway Station UUPS and other five cases were neither technically efficient nor scale efficient; a waste of space volume was observed in half of the inefficient cases. Through comparisons of the results with previous studies, it was determined that different conclusions could be drawn when considering efficiency. Moreover, the evaluation framework based on the DEA method proposed in study paper can provide a comprehensive and holistic approach to guide metro-led UUPS planning optimization.</description><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Railway stations</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Subways</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKw0AUhgdRsFafwQFXLmLmkkky7kTqBQouqisXw8lc2pQ0iTOJ0Lc3IVIRBFf_gfOd88OH0CUlN5TkeUwzISLKqYgp5zymMaGMEH6EZofN8WEm2Sk6C2FLSJolXM7Q--ITqh66sl5j61ypS1vrPW4c3tnON1FlDe59ATXua2P92jdD4rYvqlLj0IK2txiwhmBx6Hqzx2WNVxuo1xsoz9GJgyrYi--co7eHxev9U7R8eXy-v1tGmuV5F7k0ATCFkM6anFOdUsut08Aky7VOBDcyo9JAkRaJYFwWWguQkjNGHTAHfI6upr-tbz56Gzq1bXpfD5WKE5FnecaSdKCyidK-CcFbp1pf7sDvFSVqNKlGR2r0pUaTiqrJ5HB5PV2WTfvzerFY_eZUa9zA8j_Y_xq-AG_bg0k</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Zhang, Z Y</creator><creator>Ma, C-X</creator><creator>Qiao, Y-K</creator><creator>Peng, F-L</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Evaluating efficiency of metro-led urban underground public space: a case study in Shanghai</title><author>Zhang, Z Y ; Ma, C-X ; Qiao, Y-K ; Peng, F-L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f64aadb59fed831c61e3efca2928cc453d9719dab6b45239bcc5a993221fa2fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Railway stations</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Subways</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Z Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, C-X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Y-K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, F-L</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Z Y</au><au>Ma, C-X</au><au>Qiao, Y-K</au><au>Peng, F-L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating efficiency of metro-led urban underground public space: a case study in Shanghai</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>1333</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12003</spage><pages>12003-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>Metro-led urban underground public space (UUPS) are among the most common and important types of underground and public spaces. The need to measure metro-led UUPS performance and improve urban planning and public services has facilitated the development of various evaluation methods. However, the essential performance aspects of efficiency and effectiveness are rarely balanced. Most methods focus on evaluating effectiveness while neglecting the cost incurred. This study proposed two sets of efficiency indicators of cost (input) and effectiveness (output) separately and used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to analyze the relative efficiency of 20 metro-led UUPS in Shanghai, China. The results indicated that the UUPS of People’s Square, Hanzhong Road, and Huamu Road were the most efficient. Whereas, the South Shanghai Railway Station UUPS and other five cases were neither technically efficient nor scale efficient; a waste of space volume was observed in half of the inefficient cases. Through comparisons of the results with previous studies, it was determined that different conclusions could be drawn when considering efficiency. Moreover, the evaluation framework based on the DEA method proposed in study paper can provide a comprehensive and holistic approach to guide metro-led UUPS planning optimization.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/1333/1/012003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-1307
ispartof IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2024-05, Vol.1333 (1), p.12003
issn 1755-1307
1755-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3058787246
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Cost analysis
Data envelopment analysis
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Optimization
Performance evaluation
Public spaces
Railway stations
Roads
Subways
Urban planning
title Evaluating efficiency of metro-led urban underground public space: a case study in Shanghai
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T12%3A15%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20efficiency%20of%20metro-led%20urban%20underground%20public%20space:%20a%20case%20study%20in%20Shanghai&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Zhang,%20Z%20Y&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=1333&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12003&rft.pages=12003-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/1333/1/012003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E3058787246%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-f64aadb59fed831c61e3efca2928cc453d9719dab6b45239bcc5a993221fa2fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3058787246&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true