Loading…

Patterns of Early Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: Fat Free Mass Loss versus Fat Mass Loss

Background: Bariatric surgery remains the most effective method for weight loss and mitigation of comorbid conditions for obese patients. Early post-operative weight loss is rapid and slowly levels off, creating characteristic asymptotic weight loss curves. Little is known with regard tto the relati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Md.), 2023-11, Vol.31, p.243-243
Main Authors: Standish, Julia, Carlton, Carrie, Mikhailova, Tatiana, Jones, Andrulisa, Rabach, Lauren, Shope, Timothy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 243
container_issue
container_start_page 243
container_title Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)
container_volume 31
creator Standish, Julia
Carlton, Carrie
Mikhailova, Tatiana
Jones, Andrulisa
Rabach, Lauren
Shope, Timothy
description Background: Bariatric surgery remains the most effective method for weight loss and mitigation of comorbid conditions for obese patients. Early post-operative weight loss is rapid and slowly levels off, creating characteristic asymptotic weight loss curves. Little is known with regard tto the relative degrees of fat free mass (FFM) loss versus fat mass (FM) loss in this early period. Ideally, weight loss methods including bariatric surgery will provide FM loss that is much greater than FFM loss, thus preserving lean body mass. We sought to better characterize the patterns of early weight loss after bariatric surgery. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who had bariatric surgery at our institution between March 2019 and November 2022 was performed. A total of 184 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS). Body composition analysis was performed using bioimpedance methods with a medical body composition analyzer. The following values were obtained for each patient: fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and total weight (WT). Data was collected pre-surgery and in post-surgery follow up at 2 weeks-1 month, 2-4 months and 5-7 months. Results: The highest rates of FFM loss were found in the first 2 weeks post-bariatric surgery (p < 10e-7, 95%CI [10.5-17.9]). FFM and FM loss showed no significant difference within the initial 2 weeks postsurgery (p = 0.74). Following the initial 2 months post-surgery, FFM rates slowed down significantly. FM loss rates continued to progress after the initial 2 weeks compared to FFM loss. Significant differences between FFM and FM loss were seen at 2-4 months (p = 1.0e-09, 95% Cl[5.8-9.1]) and 5-7 months post-surgery (p = 5.1e-08, 95% Cl [1.6-5.5]). The RYGB procedure showed significantly more mean FFM loss within the first 2 weeks compared to patients who underwent SG (RYGB = 7.54, SG = 5.82, p = 0.04678, 95%CI [0.03-3.4]). No difference was seen after this. No other significant differences were seen based on surgical procedure. Long term weight loss is not impacted by early excessive FFM. Conclusions: FFM loss is highest in the first 2 weeks post-surgery. FM loss predominated subsequently. Overall weight loss is not significantly impacted by excessive FFM loss. FFM loss is short-term. Type of procedure only affects early FFM loss.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3058875767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3058875767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30588757673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNis0KgkAURocoyH7e4UJrYWTS0ZaF0qIgKKhVMsRoimjdOxP49omE61bf4TtnxBwvEtyVIrqNBw69KZsRlZyvA-57DruflDEaa4Img1hh1cJVF_nTwKEhApV1ErYKC2WweMDZYq6x3UCiDCSoNRxVl_XtRyNZ6s1wLtgkUxXp5W_nbJXEl93efWHztppMWjYW606lgvthKH0ZSPFf9QXpwkRf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3058875767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of Early Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: Fat Free Mass Loss versus Fat Mass Loss</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Standish, Julia ; Carlton, Carrie ; Mikhailova, Tatiana ; Jones, Andrulisa ; Rabach, Lauren ; Shope, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>Standish, Julia ; Carlton, Carrie ; Mikhailova, Tatiana ; Jones, Andrulisa ; Rabach, Lauren ; Shope, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Bariatric surgery remains the most effective method for weight loss and mitigation of comorbid conditions for obese patients. Early post-operative weight loss is rapid and slowly levels off, creating characteristic asymptotic weight loss curves. Little is known with regard tto the relative degrees of fat free mass (FFM) loss versus fat mass (FM) loss in this early period. Ideally, weight loss methods including bariatric surgery will provide FM loss that is much greater than FFM loss, thus preserving lean body mass. We sought to better characterize the patterns of early weight loss after bariatric surgery. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who had bariatric surgery at our institution between March 2019 and November 2022 was performed. A total of 184 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS). Body composition analysis was performed using bioimpedance methods with a medical body composition analyzer. The following values were obtained for each patient: fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and total weight (WT). Data was collected pre-surgery and in post-surgery follow up at 2 weeks-1 month, 2-4 months and 5-7 months. Results: The highest rates of FFM loss were found in the first 2 weeks post-bariatric surgery (p &lt; 10e-7, 95%CI [10.5-17.9]). FFM and FM loss showed no significant difference within the initial 2 weeks postsurgery (p = 0.74). Following the initial 2 months post-surgery, FFM rates slowed down significantly. FM loss rates continued to progress after the initial 2 weeks compared to FFM loss. Significant differences between FFM and FM loss were seen at 2-4 months (p = 1.0e-09, 95% Cl[5.8-9.1]) and 5-7 months post-surgery (p = 5.1e-08, 95% Cl [1.6-5.5]). The RYGB procedure showed significantly more mean FFM loss within the first 2 weeks compared to patients who underwent SG (RYGB = 7.54, SG = 5.82, p = 0.04678, 95%CI [0.03-3.4]). No difference was seen after this. No other significant differences were seen based on surgical procedure. Long term weight loss is not impacted by early excessive FFM. Conclusions: FFM loss is highest in the first 2 weeks post-surgery. FM loss predominated subsequently. Overall weight loss is not significantly impacted by excessive FFM loss. FFM loss is short-term. Type of procedure only affects early FFM loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-7381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-739X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Silver Spring: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Body composition ; Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><ispartof>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2023-11, Vol.31, p.243-243</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Nov 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Standish, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlton, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikhailova, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Andrulisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabach, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shope, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of Early Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: Fat Free Mass Loss versus Fat Mass Loss</title><title>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</title><description>Background: Bariatric surgery remains the most effective method for weight loss and mitigation of comorbid conditions for obese patients. Early post-operative weight loss is rapid and slowly levels off, creating characteristic asymptotic weight loss curves. Little is known with regard tto the relative degrees of fat free mass (FFM) loss versus fat mass (FM) loss in this early period. Ideally, weight loss methods including bariatric surgery will provide FM loss that is much greater than FFM loss, thus preserving lean body mass. We sought to better characterize the patterns of early weight loss after bariatric surgery. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who had bariatric surgery at our institution between March 2019 and November 2022 was performed. A total of 184 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS). Body composition analysis was performed using bioimpedance methods with a medical body composition analyzer. The following values were obtained for each patient: fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and total weight (WT). Data was collected pre-surgery and in post-surgery follow up at 2 weeks-1 month, 2-4 months and 5-7 months. Results: The highest rates of FFM loss were found in the first 2 weeks post-bariatric surgery (p &lt; 10e-7, 95%CI [10.5-17.9]). FFM and FM loss showed no significant difference within the initial 2 weeks postsurgery (p = 0.74). Following the initial 2 months post-surgery, FFM rates slowed down significantly. FM loss rates continued to progress after the initial 2 weeks compared to FFM loss. Significant differences between FFM and FM loss were seen at 2-4 months (p = 1.0e-09, 95% Cl[5.8-9.1]) and 5-7 months post-surgery (p = 5.1e-08, 95% Cl [1.6-5.5]). The RYGB procedure showed significantly more mean FFM loss within the first 2 weeks compared to patients who underwent SG (RYGB = 7.54, SG = 5.82, p = 0.04678, 95%CI [0.03-3.4]). No difference was seen after this. No other significant differences were seen based on surgical procedure. Long term weight loss is not impacted by early excessive FFM. Conclusions: FFM loss is highest in the first 2 weeks post-surgery. FM loss predominated subsequently. Overall weight loss is not significantly impacted by excessive FFM loss. FFM loss is short-term. Type of procedure only affects early FFM loss.</description><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><issn>1930-7381</issn><issn>1930-739X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNis0KgkAURocoyH7e4UJrYWTS0ZaF0qIgKKhVMsRoimjdOxP49omE61bf4TtnxBwvEtyVIrqNBw69KZsRlZyvA-57DruflDEaa4Img1hh1cJVF_nTwKEhApV1ErYKC2WweMDZYq6x3UCiDCSoNRxVl_XtRyNZ6s1wLtgkUxXp5W_nbJXEl93efWHztppMWjYW606lgvthKH0ZSPFf9QXpwkRf</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Standish, Julia</creator><creator>Carlton, Carrie</creator><creator>Mikhailova, Tatiana</creator><creator>Jones, Andrulisa</creator><creator>Rabach, Lauren</creator><creator>Shope, Timothy</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Patterns of Early Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: Fat Free Mass Loss versus Fat Mass Loss</title><author>Standish, Julia ; Carlton, Carrie ; Mikhailova, Tatiana ; Jones, Andrulisa ; Rabach, Lauren ; Shope, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30588757673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Standish, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlton, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikhailova, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Andrulisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabach, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shope, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Standish, Julia</au><au>Carlton, Carrie</au><au>Mikhailova, Tatiana</au><au>Jones, Andrulisa</au><au>Rabach, Lauren</au><au>Shope, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of Early Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: Fat Free Mass Loss versus Fat Mass Loss</atitle><jtitle>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>243</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>243-243</pages><issn>1930-7381</issn><eissn>1930-739X</eissn><abstract>Background: Bariatric surgery remains the most effective method for weight loss and mitigation of comorbid conditions for obese patients. Early post-operative weight loss is rapid and slowly levels off, creating characteristic asymptotic weight loss curves. Little is known with regard tto the relative degrees of fat free mass (FFM) loss versus fat mass (FM) loss in this early period. Ideally, weight loss methods including bariatric surgery will provide FM loss that is much greater than FFM loss, thus preserving lean body mass. We sought to better characterize the patterns of early weight loss after bariatric surgery. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who had bariatric surgery at our institution between March 2019 and November 2022 was performed. A total of 184 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS). Body composition analysis was performed using bioimpedance methods with a medical body composition analyzer. The following values were obtained for each patient: fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and total weight (WT). Data was collected pre-surgery and in post-surgery follow up at 2 weeks-1 month, 2-4 months and 5-7 months. Results: The highest rates of FFM loss were found in the first 2 weeks post-bariatric surgery (p &lt; 10e-7, 95%CI [10.5-17.9]). FFM and FM loss showed no significant difference within the initial 2 weeks postsurgery (p = 0.74). Following the initial 2 months post-surgery, FFM rates slowed down significantly. FM loss rates continued to progress after the initial 2 weeks compared to FFM loss. Significant differences between FFM and FM loss were seen at 2-4 months (p = 1.0e-09, 95% Cl[5.8-9.1]) and 5-7 months post-surgery (p = 5.1e-08, 95% Cl [1.6-5.5]). The RYGB procedure showed significantly more mean FFM loss within the first 2 weeks compared to patients who underwent SG (RYGB = 7.54, SG = 5.82, p = 0.04678, 95%CI [0.03-3.4]). No difference was seen after this. No other significant differences were seen based on surgical procedure. Long term weight loss is not impacted by early excessive FFM. Conclusions: FFM loss is highest in the first 2 weeks post-surgery. FM loss predominated subsequently. Overall weight loss is not significantly impacted by excessive FFM loss. FFM loss is short-term. Type of procedure only affects early FFM loss.</abstract><cop>Silver Spring</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1930-7381
ispartof Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2023-11, Vol.31, p.243-243
issn 1930-7381
1930-739X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3058875767
source Wiley
subjects Body composition
Gastrointestinal surgery
title Patterns of Early Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: Fat Free Mass Loss versus Fat Mass Loss
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A16%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20Early%20Weight%20Loss%20after%20Bariatric%20Surgery:%20Fat%20Free%20Mass%20Loss%20versus%20Fat%20Mass%20Loss&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20(Silver%20Spring,%20Md.)&rft.au=Standish,%20Julia&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=243-243&rft.issn=1930-7381&rft.eissn=1930-739X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3058875767%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30588757673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3058875767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true