Loading…
Data-driven time series forecasting of offshore wind turbine loads
Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks (LSTM) are used to build surrogate models to forecast time-series blade loads for both fixed and floating offshore wind turbines. In this paper, we train surrogate models on datasets generated with OpenFAST on the IEA-15MW-RWT under a range of metocea...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of physics. Conference series 2024-06, Vol.2767 (5), p.052060 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 052060 |
container_title | Journal of physics. Conference series |
container_volume | 2767 |
creator | Muhammad Amri, Hafiz Ghazali Bin Marramiero, Daniela Singh, Deepali Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem Viré, Axelle |
description | Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks (LSTM) are used to build surrogate models to forecast time-series blade loads for both fixed and floating offshore wind turbines. In this paper, we train surrogate models on datasets generated with OpenFAST on the IEA-15MW-RWT under a range of metocean conditions. The aim of the surrogate models is to generate load forecasts inexpensively and accurately such that they can be used in a model predictive controller. Two cases are investigated with different model inputs: one with only measurements available to typical PI controllers and another one with additional wave elevation and deflection measurements (alongside the endogenous variable). The model performances are evaluated and compared. It was found that for the fixed turbine, the models predicted all three blade loads to a high degree of accuracy. The floating turbine surrogate models performed relatively worse, but edgewise and pitching moments are still reasonably accurate. The surrogate model forecasts the flapwise moment to a satisfactory accuracy only in 58% out of 400 test cases. The addition of wave elevation and blade deflection features did not significantly improve the prediction performance of the surrogate, demonstrating that just the information used by current PI controllers may be sufficient for forecasting blade loads. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/5/052060 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3066476500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3066476500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i241t-d5921464b12ec6ce467cea7fd999c327afcdb37758c25459b6be4e8f58cd509e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkNtKxDAQhoMouK4-gwHvhNqc017qemZBQb0OaTLRLGu7Nl19fVNWVgSHwExm_n9CPoSOKTmjpKpKqgUrlKxVybTSpSyJZESRHTTZTna3dVXto4OUFoTwHHqCLi7tYAvfx09o8RDfASfoIyQcuh6cTUNsX3EX8gnpLbfwV2w9HtZ9E1vAy876dIj2gl0mOPrJU_RyffU8uy3mDzd3s_N5EZmgQ-FlzahQoqEMnHIglHZgdfB1XTvOtA3ON1xrWTkmhawb1YCAKuS7l6QGPkUnm72rvvtYQxrMolv3bX7ScKKU0Ermb00R36hit_oVUGJGWGbEYEYkZoRlpNnAyq7Tf1z3j7Onv0Kz8oF_A_AFakQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3066476500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data-driven time series forecasting of offshore wind turbine loads</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Muhammad Amri, Hafiz Ghazali Bin ; Marramiero, Daniela ; Singh, Deepali ; Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem ; Viré, Axelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Muhammad Amri, Hafiz Ghazali Bin ; Marramiero, Daniela ; Singh, Deepali ; Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem ; Viré, Axelle</creatorcontrib><description>Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks (LSTM) are used to build surrogate models to forecast time-series blade loads for both fixed and floating offshore wind turbines. In this paper, we train surrogate models on datasets generated with OpenFAST on the IEA-15MW-RWT under a range of metocean conditions. The aim of the surrogate models is to generate load forecasts inexpensively and accurately such that they can be used in a model predictive controller. Two cases are investigated with different model inputs: one with only measurements available to typical PI controllers and another one with additional wave elevation and deflection measurements (alongside the endogenous variable). The model performances are evaluated and compared. It was found that for the fixed turbine, the models predicted all three blade loads to a high degree of accuracy. The floating turbine surrogate models performed relatively worse, but edgewise and pitching moments are still reasonably accurate. The surrogate model forecasts the flapwise moment to a satisfactory accuracy only in 58% out of 400 test cases. The addition of wave elevation and blade deflection features did not significantly improve the prediction performance of the surrogate, demonstrating that just the information used by current PI controllers may be sufficient for forecasting blade loads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/5/052060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Controllers ; Deflection ; Forecasting ; Pitching moments ; Predictive control ; Recurrent neural networks ; Time series ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2024-06, Vol.2767 (5), p.052060</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3066476500?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muhammad Amri, Hafiz Ghazali Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marramiero, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Deepali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viré, Axelle</creatorcontrib><title>Data-driven time series forecasting of offshore wind turbine loads</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks (LSTM) are used to build surrogate models to forecast time-series blade loads for both fixed and floating offshore wind turbines. In this paper, we train surrogate models on datasets generated with OpenFAST on the IEA-15MW-RWT under a range of metocean conditions. The aim of the surrogate models is to generate load forecasts inexpensively and accurately such that they can be used in a model predictive controller. Two cases are investigated with different model inputs: one with only measurements available to typical PI controllers and another one with additional wave elevation and deflection measurements (alongside the endogenous variable). The model performances are evaluated and compared. It was found that for the fixed turbine, the models predicted all three blade loads to a high degree of accuracy. The floating turbine surrogate models performed relatively worse, but edgewise and pitching moments are still reasonably accurate. The surrogate model forecasts the flapwise moment to a satisfactory accuracy only in 58% out of 400 test cases. The addition of wave elevation and blade deflection features did not significantly improve the prediction performance of the surrogate, demonstrating that just the information used by current PI controllers may be sufficient for forecasting blade loads.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Deflection</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Pitching moments</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>Recurrent neural networks</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkNtKxDAQhoMouK4-gwHvhNqc017qemZBQb0OaTLRLGu7Nl19fVNWVgSHwExm_n9CPoSOKTmjpKpKqgUrlKxVybTSpSyJZESRHTTZTna3dVXto4OUFoTwHHqCLi7tYAvfx09o8RDfASfoIyQcuh6cTUNsX3EX8gnpLbfwV2w9HtZ9E1vAy876dIj2gl0mOPrJU_RyffU8uy3mDzd3s_N5EZmgQ-FlzahQoqEMnHIglHZgdfB1XTvOtA3ON1xrWTkmhawb1YCAKuS7l6QGPkUnm72rvvtYQxrMolv3bX7ScKKU0Ermb00R36hit_oVUGJGWGbEYEYkZoRlpNnAyq7Tf1z3j7Onv0Kz8oF_A_AFakQ</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Muhammad Amri, Hafiz Ghazali Bin</creator><creator>Marramiero, Daniela</creator><creator>Singh, Deepali</creator><creator>Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem</creator><creator>Viré, Axelle</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Data-driven time series forecasting of offshore wind turbine loads</title><author>Muhammad Amri, Hafiz Ghazali Bin ; Marramiero, Daniela ; Singh, Deepali ; Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem ; Viré, Axelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i241t-d5921464b12ec6ce467cea7fd999c327afcdb37758c25459b6be4e8f58cd509e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Deflection</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Pitching moments</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>Recurrent neural networks</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muhammad Amri, Hafiz Ghazali Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marramiero, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Deepali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viré, Axelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muhammad Amri, Hafiz Ghazali Bin</au><au>Marramiero, Daniela</au><au>Singh, Deepali</au><au>Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem</au><au>Viré, Axelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data-driven time series forecasting of offshore wind turbine loads</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2767</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>052060</spage><pages>052060-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks (LSTM) are used to build surrogate models to forecast time-series blade loads for both fixed and floating offshore wind turbines. In this paper, we train surrogate models on datasets generated with OpenFAST on the IEA-15MW-RWT under a range of metocean conditions. The aim of the surrogate models is to generate load forecasts inexpensively and accurately such that they can be used in a model predictive controller. Two cases are investigated with different model inputs: one with only measurements available to typical PI controllers and another one with additional wave elevation and deflection measurements (alongside the endogenous variable). The model performances are evaluated and compared. It was found that for the fixed turbine, the models predicted all three blade loads to a high degree of accuracy. The floating turbine surrogate models performed relatively worse, but edgewise and pitching moments are still reasonably accurate. The surrogate model forecasts the flapwise moment to a satisfactory accuracy only in 58% out of 400 test cases. The addition of wave elevation and blade deflection features did not significantly improve the prediction performance of the surrogate, demonstrating that just the information used by current PI controllers may be sufficient for forecasting blade loads.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/2767/5/052060</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-6588 |
ispartof | Journal of physics. Conference series, 2024-06, Vol.2767 (5), p.052060 |
issn | 1742-6588 1742-6596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3066476500 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Accuracy Controllers Deflection Forecasting Pitching moments Predictive control Recurrent neural networks Time series Wind turbines |
title | Data-driven time series forecasting of offshore wind turbine loads |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A05%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data-driven%20time%20series%20forecasting%20of%20offshore%20wind%20turbine%20loads&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Muhammad%20Amri,%20Hafiz%20Ghazali%20Bin&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=2767&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=052060&rft.pages=052060-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/2767/5/052060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E3066476500%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i241t-d5921464b12ec6ce467cea7fd999c327afcdb37758c25459b6be4e8f58cd509e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3066476500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |