Loading…

Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method

This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2024-06
Main Authors: D'Onofrio, L, Astone, P, S Dal Pra, D'Antonio, S, M Di Giovanni, De Rosa, R, Leaci, P, Mastrogiovanni, S, Mirasola, L, Muciaccia, F, Palomba, C, Pierini, L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator D'Onofrio, L
Astone, P
S Dal Pra
D'Antonio, S
M Di Giovanni
De Rosa, R
Leaci, P
Mastrogiovanni, S
Mirasola, L
Muciaccia, F
Palomba, C
Pierini, L
description This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3068240881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068240881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a956-6c17be07938f410712b1f569783b1eea1917f3a6601a3a6e8ebe9a35086833bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LAzEURYMgWGp_gLuA69SXvMmXOxmsCgU3sy_JzBs6xU50klZ_vkN1dbh3cS6XsTsJ68ppDQ9h-hnOa1WBWYNXaK7YQiFK4Sqlbtgq5wMAKGOV1rhgdfOdeB46yjz1vOyJ53Ak3qZhfLzEjcgllCGXoeVh7C6dFmdqS5r4kco-dbfsug8fmVb_XLJm89zUr2L7_vJWP21F8NoI00obCaxH11cSrFRR9tp46zBKoiC9tD0GY0CGGeQokg-owRmHGCMu2f2f9nNKXyfKZXdIp2mcF3cIxs2PnZP4C1ASSdo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068240881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>D'Onofrio, L ; Astone, P ; S Dal Pra ; D'Antonio, S ; M Di Giovanni ; De Rosa, R ; Leaci, P ; Mastrogiovanni, S ; Mirasola, L ; Muciaccia, F ; Palomba, C ; Pierini, L</creator><creatorcontrib>D'Onofrio, L ; Astone, P ; S Dal Pra ; D'Antonio, S ; M Di Giovanni ; De Rosa, R ; Leaci, P ; Mastrogiovanni, S ; Mirasola, L ; Muciaccia, F ; Palomba, C ; Pierini, L</creatorcontrib><description>This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Data processing ; False alarms ; Gravitational waves ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-06</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3068240881?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>D'Onofrio, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astone, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S Dal Pra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Antonio, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M Di Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Rosa, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leaci, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastrogiovanni, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirasola, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muciaccia, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomba, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierini, L</creatorcontrib><title>Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.</description><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>False alarms</subject><subject>Gravitational waves</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LAzEURYMgWGp_gLuA69SXvMmXOxmsCgU3sy_JzBs6xU50klZ_vkN1dbh3cS6XsTsJ68ppDQ9h-hnOa1WBWYNXaK7YQiFK4Sqlbtgq5wMAKGOV1rhgdfOdeB46yjz1vOyJ53Ak3qZhfLzEjcgllCGXoeVh7C6dFmdqS5r4kco-dbfsug8fmVb_XLJm89zUr2L7_vJWP21F8NoI00obCaxH11cSrFRR9tp46zBKoiC9tD0GY0CGGeQokg-owRmHGCMu2f2f9nNKXyfKZXdIp2mcF3cIxs2PnZP4C1ASSdo</recordid><startdate>20240613</startdate><enddate>20240613</enddate><creator>D'Onofrio, L</creator><creator>Astone, P</creator><creator>S Dal Pra</creator><creator>D'Antonio, S</creator><creator>M Di Giovanni</creator><creator>De Rosa, R</creator><creator>Leaci, P</creator><creator>Mastrogiovanni, S</creator><creator>Mirasola, L</creator><creator>Muciaccia, F</creator><creator>Palomba, C</creator><creator>Pierini, L</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240613</creationdate><title>Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method</title><author>D'Onofrio, L ; Astone, P ; S Dal Pra ; D'Antonio, S ; M Di Giovanni ; De Rosa, R ; Leaci, P ; Mastrogiovanni, S ; Mirasola, L ; Muciaccia, F ; Palomba, C ; Pierini, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a956-6c17be07938f410712b1f569783b1eea1917f3a6601a3a6e8ebe9a35086833bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>False alarms</topic><topic>Gravitational waves</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D'Onofrio, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astone, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S Dal Pra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Antonio, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M Di Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Rosa, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leaci, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastrogiovanni, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirasola, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muciaccia, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomba, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierini, L</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D'Onofrio, L</au><au>Astone, P</au><au>S Dal Pra</au><au>D'Antonio, S</au><au>M Di Giovanni</au><au>De Rosa, R</au><au>Leaci, P</au><au>Mastrogiovanni, S</au><au>Mirasola, L</au><au>Muciaccia, F</au><au>Palomba, C</au><au>Pierini, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-06-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2024-06
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3068240881
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Data processing
False alarms
Gravitational waves
Sensitivity analysis
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
title Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20sides%20of%20the%20same%20coin:%20the%20F-statistic%20and%20the%205-vector%20method&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=D'Onofrio,%20L&rft.date=2024-06-13&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3068240881%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a956-6c17be07938f410712b1f569783b1eea1917f3a6601a3a6e8ebe9a35086833bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068240881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true