Loading…
Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method
This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2024-06 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | D'Onofrio, L Astone, P S Dal Pra D'Antonio, S M Di Giovanni De Rosa, R Leaci, P Mastrogiovanni, S Mirasola, L Muciaccia, F Palomba, C Pierini, L |
description | This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3068240881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068240881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a956-6c17be07938f410712b1f569783b1eea1917f3a6601a3a6e8ebe9a35086833bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LAzEURYMgWGp_gLuA69SXvMmXOxmsCgU3sy_JzBs6xU50klZ_vkN1dbh3cS6XsTsJ68ppDQ9h-hnOa1WBWYNXaK7YQiFK4Sqlbtgq5wMAKGOV1rhgdfOdeB46yjz1vOyJ53Ak3qZhfLzEjcgllCGXoeVh7C6dFmdqS5r4kco-dbfsug8fmVb_XLJm89zUr2L7_vJWP21F8NoI00obCaxH11cSrFRR9tp46zBKoiC9tD0GY0CGGeQokg-owRmHGCMu2f2f9nNKXyfKZXdIp2mcF3cIxs2PnZP4C1ASSdo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068240881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>D'Onofrio, L ; Astone, P ; S Dal Pra ; D'Antonio, S ; M Di Giovanni ; De Rosa, R ; Leaci, P ; Mastrogiovanni, S ; Mirasola, L ; Muciaccia, F ; Palomba, C ; Pierini, L</creator><creatorcontrib>D'Onofrio, L ; Astone, P ; S Dal Pra ; D'Antonio, S ; M Di Giovanni ; De Rosa, R ; Leaci, P ; Mastrogiovanni, S ; Mirasola, L ; Muciaccia, F ; Palomba, C ; Pierini, L</creatorcontrib><description>This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Data processing ; False alarms ; Gravitational waves ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-06</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3068240881?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>D'Onofrio, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astone, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S Dal Pra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Antonio, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M Di Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Rosa, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leaci, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastrogiovanni, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirasola, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muciaccia, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomba, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierini, L</creatorcontrib><title>Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.</description><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>False alarms</subject><subject>Gravitational waves</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LAzEURYMgWGp_gLuA69SXvMmXOxmsCgU3sy_JzBs6xU50klZ_vkN1dbh3cS6XsTsJ68ppDQ9h-hnOa1WBWYNXaK7YQiFK4Sqlbtgq5wMAKGOV1rhgdfOdeB46yjz1vOyJ53Ak3qZhfLzEjcgllCGXoeVh7C6dFmdqS5r4kco-dbfsug8fmVb_XLJm89zUr2L7_vJWP21F8NoI00obCaxH11cSrFRR9tp46zBKoiC9tD0GY0CGGeQokg-owRmHGCMu2f2f9nNKXyfKZXdIp2mcF3cIxs2PnZP4C1ASSdo</recordid><startdate>20240613</startdate><enddate>20240613</enddate><creator>D'Onofrio, L</creator><creator>Astone, P</creator><creator>S Dal Pra</creator><creator>D'Antonio, S</creator><creator>M Di Giovanni</creator><creator>De Rosa, R</creator><creator>Leaci, P</creator><creator>Mastrogiovanni, S</creator><creator>Mirasola, L</creator><creator>Muciaccia, F</creator><creator>Palomba, C</creator><creator>Pierini, L</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240613</creationdate><title>Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method</title><author>D'Onofrio, L ; Astone, P ; S Dal Pra ; D'Antonio, S ; M Di Giovanni ; De Rosa, R ; Leaci, P ; Mastrogiovanni, S ; Mirasola, L ; Muciaccia, F ; Palomba, C ; Pierini, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a956-6c17be07938f410712b1f569783b1eea1917f3a6601a3a6e8ebe9a35086833bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>False alarms</topic><topic>Gravitational waves</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D'Onofrio, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astone, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S Dal Pra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Antonio, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M Di Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Rosa, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leaci, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastrogiovanni, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirasola, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muciaccia, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomba, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierini, L</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D'Onofrio, L</au><au>Astone, P</au><au>S Dal Pra</au><au>D'Antonio, S</au><au>M Di Giovanni</au><au>De Rosa, R</au><au>Leaci, P</au><au>Mastrogiovanni, S</au><au>Mirasola, L</au><au>Muciaccia, F</au><au>Palomba, C</au><au>Pierini, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-06-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the \(\mathcal{F}\)-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-06 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3068240881 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Data processing False alarms Gravitational waves Sensitivity analysis Statistical analysis Statistical methods |
title | Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20sides%20of%20the%20same%20coin:%20the%20F-statistic%20and%20the%205-vector%20method&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=D'Onofrio,%20L&rft.date=2024-06-13&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3068240881%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a956-6c17be07938f410712b1f569783b1eea1917f3a6601a3a6e8ebe9a35086833bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068240881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |