Double-Anonymous Review for Robotics

Prior research has investigated the benefits and costs of double-anonymous review (DAR, also known as double-blind review) in comparison to single-anonymous review (SAR) and open review (OR). Several review papers have attempted to compile experimental results in peer review research both broadly an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2024-06
Main Authors: Yim, Justin K, Nadan, Paul, Zhu, James, Stutt, Alexandra, Payne, J Joe, Pavlov, Catherine, Johnson, Aaron M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Privacy
Robotics
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Yim, Justin K
Nadan, Paul
Zhu, James
Stutt, Alexandra
Payne, J Joe
Pavlov, Catherine
Johnson, Aaron M
description Prior research has investigated the benefits and costs of double-anonymous review (DAR, also known as double-blind review) in comparison to single-anonymous review (SAR) and open review (OR). Several review papers have attempted to compile experimental results in peer review research both broadly and in engineering and computer science. This document summarizes prior research in peer review that may inform decisions about the format of peer review in the field of robotics and makes some recommendations for potential next steps for robotics publication.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3068911869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068911869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30689118693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQcckvTcpJ1XXMy8-rzM0vLVYISi3LTC1XSMsvUgjKT8ovyUwu5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeGMDMwtLQ0MLM0tj4lQBANNuLr4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068911869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Double-Anonymous Review for Robotics</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><creator>Yim, Justin K ; Nadan, Paul ; Zhu, James ; Stutt, Alexandra ; Payne, J Joe ; Pavlov, Catherine ; Johnson, Aaron M</creator><creatorcontrib>Yim, Justin K ; Nadan, Paul ; Zhu, James ; Stutt, Alexandra ; Payne, J Joe ; Pavlov, Catherine ; Johnson, Aaron M</creatorcontrib><description>Prior research has investigated the benefits and costs of double-anonymous review (DAR, also known as double-blind review) in comparison to single-anonymous review (SAR) and open review (OR). Several review papers have attempted to compile experimental results in peer review research both broadly and in engineering and computer science. This document summarizes prior research in peer review that may inform decisions about the format of peer review in the field of robotics and makes some recommendations for potential next steps for robotics publication.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Privacy ; Robotics</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-06</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3068911869?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yim, Justin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stutt, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, J Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Aaron M</creatorcontrib><title>Double-Anonymous Review for Robotics</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Prior research has investigated the benefits and costs of double-anonymous review (DAR, also known as double-blind review) in comparison to single-anonymous review (SAR) and open review (OR). Several review papers have attempted to compile experimental results in peer review research both broadly and in engineering and computer science. This document summarizes prior research in peer review that may inform decisions about the format of peer review in the field of robotics and makes some recommendations for potential next steps for robotics publication.</description><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQcckvTcpJ1XXMy8-rzM0vLVYISi3LTC1XSMsvUgjKT8ovyUwu5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeGMDMwtLQ0MLM0tj4lQBANNuLr4</recordid><startdate>20240614</startdate><enddate>20240614</enddate><creator>Yim, Justin K</creator><creator>Nadan, Paul</creator><creator>Zhu, James</creator><creator>Stutt, Alexandra</creator><creator>Payne, J Joe</creator><creator>Pavlov, Catherine</creator><creator>Johnson, Aaron M</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240614</creationdate><title>Double-Anonymous Review for Robotics</title><author>Yim, Justin K ; Nadan, Paul ; Zhu, James ; Stutt, Alexandra ; Payne, J Joe ; Pavlov, Catherine ; Johnson, Aaron M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30689118693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yim, Justin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stutt, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, J Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Aaron M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yim, Justin K</au><au>Nadan, Paul</au><au>Zhu, James</au><au>Stutt, Alexandra</au><au>Payne, J Joe</au><au>Pavlov, Catherine</au><au>Johnson, Aaron M</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Double-Anonymous Review for Robotics</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-06-14</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Prior research has investigated the benefits and costs of double-anonymous review (DAR, also known as double-blind review) in comparison to single-anonymous review (SAR) and open review (OR). Several review papers have attempted to compile experimental results in peer review research both broadly and in engineering and computer science. This document summarizes prior research in peer review that may inform decisions about the format of peer review in the field of robotics and makes some recommendations for potential next steps for robotics publication.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2024-06
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3068911869
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access)
subjects Privacy
Robotics
title Double-Anonymous Review for Robotics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A51%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Double-Anonymous%20Review%20for%20Robotics&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Yim,%20Justin%20K&rft.date=2024-06-14&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3068911869%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30689118693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068911869&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true