Loading…
Green rating systems development and trend worldwide for sustainable built environment: A comparative review
Sustainability has been increasing its popularity in construction development and evaluating the sustainability of a project has become a necessity. The construction industry has a serious impact on the environment. Sustainability rating systems have been established and deployed across the construc...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 2944 |
creator | Yousif, Omar Sedeeq Zakaria, Rozana Munikanan, Vikneswaran Khan, Jam Shahzaib Sahamir, Shaza Rina Wahi, Noraziah |
description | Sustainability has been increasing its popularity in construction development and evaluating the sustainability of a project has become a necessity. The construction industry has a serious impact on the environment. Sustainability rating systems have been established and deployed across the construction industry over the last decade to tackle and mitigate the environmental implications of construction projects. However, during the last few years, several organizations have begun to establish sustainable rating systems for construction projects. Various rating tools, on the other hand, use varied methodologies for measuring sustainability and place different emphases on different sustainability issues. As a result, a review of existing rating tools is required so that industry participants are aware of their functionalities as well as their sustainability initiatives. In this paper, a comparison of the 52 most prominent emerging sustainability green rating systems worldwide from 1990 to 2019 has been reviewed. The analysis indicates that all systems have a lot in common. Each rating system considers elements relating to the use and management of water, energy, and materials in particular. The procedure and execution requirements, as well as how weights are assigned among grading criteria, are the main differences. The comparison shows the benefits and drawbacks, as well as the aspects, applications, and goals of various approaches, and encourages further study into green rating systems for developing sustainable construction projects worldwide. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0205628 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3069308196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3069308196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p638-333f75549c6bc4a1222b12d1d11032585db924240fd73208128c5ccfd927d4a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUM1LwzAcDaLgnB78DwLehM58NGnrbQw3hYGXHbyVtPlVMtqkJmnH_ntbtst7l_fFQ-iZkhUlkr-JFWFESJbfoAUVgiaZpPIWLQgp0oSl_OcePYRwJIQVWZYvULvzABZ7FY39xeEcInQBaxihdX0HNmJlNY4eJjw53-qT0YAb53EYQlTGqqoFXA2mjRjsaLyzs-sdr3Htul7NwSNgD6OB0yO6a1Qb4OnKS3TYfhw2n8n-e_e1We-TXvI84Zw3mRBpUcuqThVljFWUaaopJZyJXOiqYClLSaMzzkhOWV6Lum50wTKdKsmX6OUS23v3N0CI5dEN3k6NJSey4JOlmFWvF1WoTZxWOlv23nTKn0tKyvnMUpTXM_k__6lnNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3069308196</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Green rating systems development and trend worldwide for sustainable built environment: A comparative review</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Yousif, Omar Sedeeq ; Zakaria, Rozana ; Munikanan, Vikneswaran ; Khan, Jam Shahzaib ; Sahamir, Shaza Rina ; Wahi, Noraziah</creator><contributor>Al-Omar, Omar Rafee ; Jacksi, Karwan ; Abdulrazzaq, Nabeel Mukhlif</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yousif, Omar Sedeeq ; Zakaria, Rozana ; Munikanan, Vikneswaran ; Khan, Jam Shahzaib ; Sahamir, Shaza Rina ; Wahi, Noraziah ; Al-Omar, Omar Rafee ; Jacksi, Karwan ; Abdulrazzaq, Nabeel Mukhlif</creatorcontrib><description>Sustainability has been increasing its popularity in construction development and evaluating the sustainability of a project has become a necessity. The construction industry has a serious impact on the environment. Sustainability rating systems have been established and deployed across the construction industry over the last decade to tackle and mitigate the environmental implications of construction projects. However, during the last few years, several organizations have begun to establish sustainable rating systems for construction projects. Various rating tools, on the other hand, use varied methodologies for measuring sustainability and place different emphases on different sustainability issues. As a result, a review of existing rating tools is required so that industry participants are aware of their functionalities as well as their sustainability initiatives. In this paper, a comparison of the 52 most prominent emerging sustainability green rating systems worldwide from 1990 to 2019 has been reviewed. The analysis indicates that all systems have a lot in common. Each rating system considers elements relating to the use and management of water, energy, and materials in particular. The procedure and execution requirements, as well as how weights are assigned among grading criteria, are the main differences. The comparison shows the benefits and drawbacks, as well as the aspects, applications, and goals of various approaches, and encourages further study into green rating systems for developing sustainable construction projects worldwide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0205628</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Built environment ; Construction industry ; Environmental impact ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2944 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Al-Omar, Omar Rafee</contributor><contributor>Jacksi, Karwan</contributor><contributor>Abdulrazzaq, Nabeel Mukhlif</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yousif, Omar Sedeeq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, Rozana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munikanan, Vikneswaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Jam Shahzaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahamir, Shaza Rina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wahi, Noraziah</creatorcontrib><title>Green rating systems development and trend worldwide for sustainable built environment: A comparative review</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>Sustainability has been increasing its popularity in construction development and evaluating the sustainability of a project has become a necessity. The construction industry has a serious impact on the environment. Sustainability rating systems have been established and deployed across the construction industry over the last decade to tackle and mitigate the environmental implications of construction projects. However, during the last few years, several organizations have begun to establish sustainable rating systems for construction projects. Various rating tools, on the other hand, use varied methodologies for measuring sustainability and place different emphases on different sustainability issues. As a result, a review of existing rating tools is required so that industry participants are aware of their functionalities as well as their sustainability initiatives. In this paper, a comparison of the 52 most prominent emerging sustainability green rating systems worldwide from 1990 to 2019 has been reviewed. The analysis indicates that all systems have a lot in common. Each rating system considers elements relating to the use and management of water, energy, and materials in particular. The procedure and execution requirements, as well as how weights are assigned among grading criteria, are the main differences. The comparison shows the benefits and drawbacks, as well as the aspects, applications, and goals of various approaches, and encourages further study into green rating systems for developing sustainable construction projects worldwide.</description><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotUM1LwzAcDaLgnB78DwLehM58NGnrbQw3hYGXHbyVtPlVMtqkJmnH_ntbtst7l_fFQ-iZkhUlkr-JFWFESJbfoAUVgiaZpPIWLQgp0oSl_OcePYRwJIQVWZYvULvzABZ7FY39xeEcInQBaxihdX0HNmJlNY4eJjw53-qT0YAb53EYQlTGqqoFXA2mjRjsaLyzs-sdr3Htul7NwSNgD6OB0yO6a1Qb4OnKS3TYfhw2n8n-e_e1We-TXvI84Zw3mRBpUcuqThVljFWUaaopJZyJXOiqYClLSaMzzkhOWV6Lum50wTKdKsmX6OUS23v3N0CI5dEN3k6NJSey4JOlmFWvF1WoTZxWOlv23nTKn0tKyvnMUpTXM_k__6lnNw</recordid><startdate>20240618</startdate><enddate>20240618</enddate><creator>Yousif, Omar Sedeeq</creator><creator>Zakaria, Rozana</creator><creator>Munikanan, Vikneswaran</creator><creator>Khan, Jam Shahzaib</creator><creator>Sahamir, Shaza Rina</creator><creator>Wahi, Noraziah</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240618</creationdate><title>Green rating systems development and trend worldwide for sustainable built environment: A comparative review</title><author>Yousif, Omar Sedeeq ; Zakaria, Rozana ; Munikanan, Vikneswaran ; Khan, Jam Shahzaib ; Sahamir, Shaza Rina ; Wahi, Noraziah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p638-333f75549c6bc4a1222b12d1d11032585db924240fd73208128c5ccfd927d4a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yousif, Omar Sedeeq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, Rozana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munikanan, Vikneswaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Jam Shahzaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahamir, Shaza Rina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wahi, Noraziah</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yousif, Omar Sedeeq</au><au>Zakaria, Rozana</au><au>Munikanan, Vikneswaran</au><au>Khan, Jam Shahzaib</au><au>Sahamir, Shaza Rina</au><au>Wahi, Noraziah</au><au>Al-Omar, Omar Rafee</au><au>Jacksi, Karwan</au><au>Abdulrazzaq, Nabeel Mukhlif</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Green rating systems development and trend worldwide for sustainable built environment: A comparative review</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-06-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2944</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>Sustainability has been increasing its popularity in construction development and evaluating the sustainability of a project has become a necessity. The construction industry has a serious impact on the environment. Sustainability rating systems have been established and deployed across the construction industry over the last decade to tackle and mitigate the environmental implications of construction projects. However, during the last few years, several organizations have begun to establish sustainable rating systems for construction projects. Various rating tools, on the other hand, use varied methodologies for measuring sustainability and place different emphases on different sustainability issues. As a result, a review of existing rating tools is required so that industry participants are aware of their functionalities as well as their sustainability initiatives. In this paper, a comparison of the 52 most prominent emerging sustainability green rating systems worldwide from 1990 to 2019 has been reviewed. The analysis indicates that all systems have a lot in common. Each rating system considers elements relating to the use and management of water, energy, and materials in particular. The procedure and execution requirements, as well as how weights are assigned among grading criteria, are the main differences. The comparison shows the benefits and drawbacks, as well as the aspects, applications, and goals of various approaches, and encourages further study into green rating systems for developing sustainable construction projects worldwide.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0205628</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2944 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3069308196 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
subjects | Built environment Construction industry Environmental impact Sustainability |
title | Green rating systems development and trend worldwide for sustainable built environment: A comparative review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A49%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Green%20rating%20systems%20development%20and%20trend%20worldwide%20for%20sustainable%20built%20environment:%20A%20comparative%20review&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Yousif,%20Omar%20Sedeeq&rft.date=2024-06-18&rft.volume=2944&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0205628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3069308196%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p638-333f75549c6bc4a1222b12d1d11032585db924240fd73208128c5ccfd927d4a63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069308196&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |