Loading…

Complexities of leveraging user-generated book reviews for scholarly research: transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency

In the past two decades, digital libraries (DL) have increasingly supported computational studies of digitized books (Jett et al. The hathitrust research center extracted features dataset (2.0), 2020; Underwood, Distant horizons: digital evidence and literary change, University of Chicago Press, Chi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal on digital libraries 2024-06, Vol.25 (2), p.317-340
Main Authors: Hu, Yuerong, LeBlanc, Zoe, Diesner, Jana, Underwood, Ted, Layne-Worthey, Glen, Downie, J. Stephen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e7688ccb97de3888d190a5be4d0cf85730a7b7824b02929c55349f942dce8043
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e7688ccb97de3888d190a5be4d0cf85730a7b7824b02929c55349f942dce8043
container_end_page 340
container_issue 2
container_start_page 317
container_title International journal on digital libraries
container_volume 25
creator Hu, Yuerong
LeBlanc, Zoe
Diesner, Jana
Underwood, Ted
Layne-Worthey, Glen
Downie, J. Stephen
description In the past two decades, digital libraries (DL) have increasingly supported computational studies of digitized books (Jett et al. The hathitrust research center extracted features dataset (2.0), 2020; Underwood, Distant horizons: digital evidence and literary change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2019; Organisciak et al. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 73:317–332, 2022; Michel et al. Science 331:176–182, 2011). Nonetheless, there remains a dearth of DL data provisions or infrastructures for research on book reception, and user-generated book reviews have opened up unprecedented research opportunities in this area. However, insufficient attention has been paid to real-world complexities and limitations of using these datasets in scholarly research, which may cause analytical oversights (Crawford and Finn, Geo J 80:491–502, 2015), methodological pitfalls (Olteanu et al. Front Big Data 2:13, 2019), and ethical concerns (Hu et al. Research with user-generated book review data: legal and ethical pitfalls and contextualized mitigations, Springer, Berlin, 2023; Diesner and Chin, Gratis, libre, or something else? regulations and misassumptions related to working with publicly available text data, 2016). In this paper, we present three case studies that contextually and empirically investigate book reviews for their temporal, cultural, and socio-participatory complexities: (1) a longitudinal analysis of a ranked book list across ten years and over one month; (2) a text classification of 20,000 sponsored and 20,000 non-sponsored books reviews; and (3) a comparative analysis of 537 book ratings from Anglophone and non-Anglophone readerships. Our work reflects on both (1) data curation challenges that researchers may encounter (e.g., platform providers’ lack of bibliographic control) when studying book reviews and (2) mitigations that researchers might adopt to address these challenges (e.g., how to align data from various platforms). Taken together, our findings illustrate some of the sociotechnical complexities of working with user-generated book reviews by revealing the transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency in these datasets. This paper explores some of the limitations and challenges of using user-generated book reviews for scholarship and calls for critical and contextualized usage of user-generated book reviews in future scholarly research.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00799-023-00376-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3072355199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3072355199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e7688ccb97de3888d190a5be4d0cf85730a7b7824b02929c55349f942dce8043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhSMEEuXxB5gssTZwbSfYZkMVLwmJBWbLsW9KILWDnbS0I7-cQJHYWO5L3zlXOll2QuGMAojzNBalcmA8B-DiIt_sZBNacJZTDrD7O5dA2X52kNIrAFBJxST7nIVF1-JH0zeYSKhJi0uMZt74ORkSxnyOftx7dKQK4Y1EXDa4SqQOkST7EloT2_V4TWiifbkkfTQ-Nejtekq6sMJI3NqbRWPTlBjviB3afoimJQ479O4bPMr2atMmPP7th9nzzfXT7C5_eLy9n1095JZT1ecCxYWU1lZKOORSSkcVmLLCwoGtZSk4GFEJyYoKmGLKliUvVK0K5ixKKPhhdrr17WJ4HzD1-jUM0Y8vNQfBeFlSpUaKbSkbQ0oRa93FZmHiWlPQ31nrbdZ6zFr_ZK03o4hvRWmE_Rzjn_U_qi-7mYTr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072355199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complexities of leveraging user-generated book reviews for scholarly research: transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Hu, Yuerong ; LeBlanc, Zoe ; Diesner, Jana ; Underwood, Ted ; Layne-Worthey, Glen ; Downie, J. Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yuerong ; LeBlanc, Zoe ; Diesner, Jana ; Underwood, Ted ; Layne-Worthey, Glen ; Downie, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>In the past two decades, digital libraries (DL) have increasingly supported computational studies of digitized books (Jett et al. The hathitrust research center extracted features dataset (2.0), 2020; Underwood, Distant horizons: digital evidence and literary change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2019; Organisciak et al. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 73:317–332, 2022; Michel et al. Science 331:176–182, 2011). Nonetheless, there remains a dearth of DL data provisions or infrastructures for research on book reception, and user-generated book reviews have opened up unprecedented research opportunities in this area. However, insufficient attention has been paid to real-world complexities and limitations of using these datasets in scholarly research, which may cause analytical oversights (Crawford and Finn, Geo J 80:491–502, 2015), methodological pitfalls (Olteanu et al. Front Big Data 2:13, 2019), and ethical concerns (Hu et al. Research with user-generated book review data: legal and ethical pitfalls and contextualized mitigations, Springer, Berlin, 2023; Diesner and Chin, Gratis, libre, or something else? regulations and misassumptions related to working with publicly available text data, 2016). In this paper, we present three case studies that contextually and empirically investigate book reviews for their temporal, cultural, and socio-participatory complexities: (1) a longitudinal analysis of a ranked book list across ten years and over one month; (2) a text classification of 20,000 sponsored and 20,000 non-sponsored books reviews; and (3) a comparative analysis of 537 book ratings from Anglophone and non-Anglophone readerships. Our work reflects on both (1) data curation challenges that researchers may encounter (e.g., platform providers’ lack of bibliographic control) when studying book reviews and (2) mitigations that researchers might adopt to address these challenges (e.g., how to align data from various platforms). Taken together, our findings illustrate some of the sociotechnical complexities of working with user-generated book reviews by revealing the transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency in these datasets. This paper explores some of the limitations and challenges of using user-generated book reviews for scholarship and calls for critical and contextualized usage of user-generated book reviews in future scholarly research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-5012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00799-023-00376-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anglophones ; Bibliographic control ; Big Data ; Computer Science ; Database Management ; Datasets ; E-books ; Ethics ; Information Systems and Communication Service ; Research facilities</subject><ispartof>International journal on digital libraries, 2024-06, Vol.25 (2), p.317-340</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e7688ccb97de3888d190a5be4d0cf85730a7b7824b02929c55349f942dce8043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e7688ccb97de3888d190a5be4d0cf85730a7b7824b02929c55349f942dce8043</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8375-9108 ; 0000-0001-9784-5090 ; 0000-0001-8183-7109 ; 0000-0001-8960-1846 ; 0000-0003-2785-0040 ; 0000-0003-2012-8805</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27922,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yuerong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diesner, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Layne-Worthey, Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downie, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Complexities of leveraging user-generated book reviews for scholarly research: transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency</title><title>International journal on digital libraries</title><addtitle>Int J Digit Libr</addtitle><description>In the past two decades, digital libraries (DL) have increasingly supported computational studies of digitized books (Jett et al. The hathitrust research center extracted features dataset (2.0), 2020; Underwood, Distant horizons: digital evidence and literary change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2019; Organisciak et al. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 73:317–332, 2022; Michel et al. Science 331:176–182, 2011). Nonetheless, there remains a dearth of DL data provisions or infrastructures for research on book reception, and user-generated book reviews have opened up unprecedented research opportunities in this area. However, insufficient attention has been paid to real-world complexities and limitations of using these datasets in scholarly research, which may cause analytical oversights (Crawford and Finn, Geo J 80:491–502, 2015), methodological pitfalls (Olteanu et al. Front Big Data 2:13, 2019), and ethical concerns (Hu et al. Research with user-generated book review data: legal and ethical pitfalls and contextualized mitigations, Springer, Berlin, 2023; Diesner and Chin, Gratis, libre, or something else? regulations and misassumptions related to working with publicly available text data, 2016). In this paper, we present three case studies that contextually and empirically investigate book reviews for their temporal, cultural, and socio-participatory complexities: (1) a longitudinal analysis of a ranked book list across ten years and over one month; (2) a text classification of 20,000 sponsored and 20,000 non-sponsored books reviews; and (3) a comparative analysis of 537 book ratings from Anglophone and non-Anglophone readerships. Our work reflects on both (1) data curation challenges that researchers may encounter (e.g., platform providers’ lack of bibliographic control) when studying book reviews and (2) mitigations that researchers might adopt to address these challenges (e.g., how to align data from various platforms). Taken together, our findings illustrate some of the sociotechnical complexities of working with user-generated book reviews by revealing the transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency in these datasets. This paper explores some of the limitations and challenges of using user-generated book reviews for scholarship and calls for critical and contextualized usage of user-generated book reviews in future scholarly research.</description><subject>Anglophones</subject><subject>Bibliographic control</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Database Management</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>E-books</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Information Systems and Communication Service</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><issn>1432-5012</issn><issn>1432-1300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhSMEEuXxB5gssTZwbSfYZkMVLwmJBWbLsW9KILWDnbS0I7-cQJHYWO5L3zlXOll2QuGMAojzNBalcmA8B-DiIt_sZBNacJZTDrD7O5dA2X52kNIrAFBJxST7nIVF1-JH0zeYSKhJi0uMZt74ORkSxnyOftx7dKQK4Y1EXDa4SqQOkST7EloT2_V4TWiifbkkfTQ-Nejtekq6sMJI3NqbRWPTlBjviB3afoimJQ479O4bPMr2atMmPP7th9nzzfXT7C5_eLy9n1095JZT1ecCxYWU1lZKOORSSkcVmLLCwoGtZSk4GFEJyYoKmGLKliUvVK0K5ixKKPhhdrr17WJ4HzD1-jUM0Y8vNQfBeFlSpUaKbSkbQ0oRa93FZmHiWlPQ31nrbdZ6zFr_ZK03o4hvRWmE_Rzjn_U_qi-7mYTr</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Hu, Yuerong</creator><creator>LeBlanc, Zoe</creator><creator>Diesner, Jana</creator><creator>Underwood, Ted</creator><creator>Layne-Worthey, Glen</creator><creator>Downie, J. Stephen</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-9108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-7109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8960-1846</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-0040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2012-8805</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Complexities of leveraging user-generated book reviews for scholarly research: transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency</title><author>Hu, Yuerong ; LeBlanc, Zoe ; Diesner, Jana ; Underwood, Ted ; Layne-Worthey, Glen ; Downie, J. Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e7688ccb97de3888d190a5be4d0cf85730a7b7824b02929c55349f942dce8043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anglophones</topic><topic>Bibliographic control</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Database Management</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>E-books</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Information Systems and Communication Service</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yuerong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diesner, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Layne-Worthey, Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downie, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal on digital libraries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Yuerong</au><au>LeBlanc, Zoe</au><au>Diesner, Jana</au><au>Underwood, Ted</au><au>Layne-Worthey, Glen</au><au>Downie, J. Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complexities of leveraging user-generated book reviews for scholarly research: transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency</atitle><jtitle>International journal on digital libraries</jtitle><stitle>Int J Digit Libr</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>317-340</pages><issn>1432-5012</issn><eissn>1432-1300</eissn><abstract>In the past two decades, digital libraries (DL) have increasingly supported computational studies of digitized books (Jett et al. The hathitrust research center extracted features dataset (2.0), 2020; Underwood, Distant horizons: digital evidence and literary change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2019; Organisciak et al. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 73:317–332, 2022; Michel et al. Science 331:176–182, 2011). Nonetheless, there remains a dearth of DL data provisions or infrastructures for research on book reception, and user-generated book reviews have opened up unprecedented research opportunities in this area. However, insufficient attention has been paid to real-world complexities and limitations of using these datasets in scholarly research, which may cause analytical oversights (Crawford and Finn, Geo J 80:491–502, 2015), methodological pitfalls (Olteanu et al. Front Big Data 2:13, 2019), and ethical concerns (Hu et al. Research with user-generated book review data: legal and ethical pitfalls and contextualized mitigations, Springer, Berlin, 2023; Diesner and Chin, Gratis, libre, or something else? regulations and misassumptions related to working with publicly available text data, 2016). In this paper, we present three case studies that contextually and empirically investigate book reviews for their temporal, cultural, and socio-participatory complexities: (1) a longitudinal analysis of a ranked book list across ten years and over one month; (2) a text classification of 20,000 sponsored and 20,000 non-sponsored books reviews; and (3) a comparative analysis of 537 book ratings from Anglophone and non-Anglophone readerships. Our work reflects on both (1) data curation challenges that researchers may encounter (e.g., platform providers’ lack of bibliographic control) when studying book reviews and (2) mitigations that researchers might adopt to address these challenges (e.g., how to align data from various platforms). Taken together, our findings illustrate some of the sociotechnical complexities of working with user-generated book reviews by revealing the transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency in these datasets. This paper explores some of the limitations and challenges of using user-generated book reviews for scholarship and calls for critical and contextualized usage of user-generated book reviews in future scholarly research.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00799-023-00376-z</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-9108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-7109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8960-1846</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-0040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2012-8805</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-5012
ispartof International journal on digital libraries, 2024-06, Vol.25 (2), p.317-340
issn 1432-5012
1432-1300
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3072355199
source Springer Link
subjects Anglophones
Bibliographic control
Big Data
Computer Science
Database Management
Datasets
E-books
Ethics
Information Systems and Communication Service
Research facilities
title Complexities of leveraging user-generated book reviews for scholarly research: transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependency
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complexities%20of%20leveraging%20user-generated%20book%20reviews%20for%20scholarly%20research:%20transiency,%20power%20dynamics,%20and%20cultural%20dependency&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20on%20digital%20libraries&rft.au=Hu,%20Yuerong&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=317-340&rft.issn=1432-5012&rft.eissn=1432-1300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00799-023-00376-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3072355199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e7688ccb97de3888d190a5be4d0cf85730a7b7824b02929c55349f942dce8043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072355199&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true