Loading…

Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method

The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was applied in a novel way in this study to the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP) of designing a two-stage helical gearbox with double gear-sets in the second stage. Finding the best fundamental components to increase gearbox efficiency and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Processes 2024-06, Vol.12 (6), p.1160
Main Authors: Van-Thanh, Dinh, Tran, Huu-Danh, Bui, Thanh-Danh, Vu, Duc-Binh, Duong Vu, Ngoc-Pi Vu, Thi-Thu-Huong Truong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-ccc6e35907f4ba4546af71de865a5bea8a52e8c8a0f10a51789328091b121d253
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1160
container_title Processes
container_volume 12
creator Van-Thanh, Dinh
Tran, Huu-Danh
Bui, Thanh-Danh
Vu, Duc-Binh
Duong Vu
Ngoc-Pi Vu
Thi-Thu-Huong Truong
description The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was applied in a novel way in this study to the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP) of designing a two-stage helical gearbox with double gear-sets in the second stage. Finding the best fundamental components to increase gearbox efficiency and decrease gearbox cross-section area was the aim of this study. Three main design factors were chosen for investigation in this work: the first stage gear ratio and the first and second stage coefficients of wheel face width (CWFW). Phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to reduce the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal critical design factors. This additionally splits the MOOP into two phases. Additionally, the TOPSIS method was used as an MCDM approach to address the multi-objective optimization issue, and the entropy approach was used to compute the weight criteria. In this study, gearbox efficiency is calculated by considering power losses during idle motion. The multi-objective optimization of a helical gearbox with second stage double gear-sets is addressed using the TOPSIS technique for the first time.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/pr12061160
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3072665432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3072665432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-ccc6e35907f4ba4546af71de865a5bea8a52e8c8a0f10a51789328091b121d253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLw0AYRQdBsNRu_AUDrkfnkXlkKVXbQkuEpOsymXxpJ8RMTSZW_PUt1ru5m8O5XIQeGH0SIqXPx55xqhhT9AZNOOeapJrpOzQbhoZekjJhpJqgfjO20ZOsbMBF_w04O0b_6X9t9KHDocYWF6dA8mj3gJfQemdbvADbl-EHn3w84Bxc6Cp8JV7DWLbwB5Ac4oC3g-_2uMg-8lWONxAPobpHt7VtB5j99xRt39-K-ZKss8Vq_rImjskkEuecAiFTquuktIlMlK01q8AoaWUJ1ljJwThjac2olUybVHBzOVYyziouxRQ9Xr3HPnyNMMRdE8a-u0zuBNVcKZkILs4_b1mS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072665432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Van-Thanh, Dinh ; Tran, Huu-Danh ; Bui, Thanh-Danh ; Vu, Duc-Binh ; Duong Vu ; Ngoc-Pi Vu ; Thi-Thu-Huong Truong</creator><creatorcontrib>Van-Thanh, Dinh ; Tran, Huu-Danh ; Bui, Thanh-Danh ; Vu, Duc-Binh ; Duong Vu ; Ngoc-Pi Vu ; Thi-Thu-Huong Truong</creatorcontrib><description>The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was applied in a novel way in this study to the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP) of designing a two-stage helical gearbox with double gear-sets in the second stage. Finding the best fundamental components to increase gearbox efficiency and decrease gearbox cross-section area was the aim of this study. Three main design factors were chosen for investigation in this work: the first stage gear ratio and the first and second stage coefficients of wheel face width (CWFW). Phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to reduce the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal critical design factors. This additionally splits the MOOP into two phases. Additionally, the TOPSIS method was used as an MCDM approach to address the multi-objective optimization issue, and the entropy approach was used to compute the weight criteria. In this study, gearbox efficiency is calculated by considering power losses during idle motion. The multi-objective optimization of a helical gearbox with second stage double gear-sets is addressed using the TOPSIS technique for the first time.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr12061160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bending stresses ; Decision making ; Design factors ; Design optimization ; Efficiency ; Gear ratios ; Gearboxes ; Genetic algorithms ; Geometry ; Helical gears ; Lubricants &amp; lubrication ; Methods ; Multiple criterion ; Multiple objective analysis ; Objectives ; Optimization ; Pareto optimum</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2024-06, Vol.12 (6), p.1160</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-ccc6e35907f4ba4546af71de865a5bea8a52e8c8a0f10a51789328091b121d253</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3072665432/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3072665432?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van-Thanh, Dinh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Huu-Danh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Thanh-Danh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Duc-Binh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoc-Pi Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thi-Thu-Huong Truong</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method</title><title>Processes</title><description>The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was applied in a novel way in this study to the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP) of designing a two-stage helical gearbox with double gear-sets in the second stage. Finding the best fundamental components to increase gearbox efficiency and decrease gearbox cross-section area was the aim of this study. Three main design factors were chosen for investigation in this work: the first stage gear ratio and the first and second stage coefficients of wheel face width (CWFW). Phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to reduce the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal critical design factors. This additionally splits the MOOP into two phases. Additionally, the TOPSIS method was used as an MCDM approach to address the multi-objective optimization issue, and the entropy approach was used to compute the weight criteria. In this study, gearbox efficiency is calculated by considering power losses during idle motion. The multi-objective optimization of a helical gearbox with second stage double gear-sets is addressed using the TOPSIS technique for the first time.</description><subject>Bending stresses</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design factors</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Gear ratios</subject><subject>Gearboxes</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Helical gears</subject><subject>Lubricants &amp; lubrication</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimum</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0tLw0AYRQdBsNRu_AUDrkfnkXlkKVXbQkuEpOsymXxpJ8RMTSZW_PUt1ru5m8O5XIQeGH0SIqXPx55xqhhT9AZNOOeapJrpOzQbhoZekjJhpJqgfjO20ZOsbMBF_w04O0b_6X9t9KHDocYWF6dA8mj3gJfQemdbvADbl-EHn3w84Bxc6Cp8JV7DWLbwB5Ac4oC3g-_2uMg-8lWONxAPobpHt7VtB5j99xRt39-K-ZKss8Vq_rImjskkEuecAiFTquuktIlMlK01q8AoaWUJ1ljJwThjac2olUybVHBzOVYyziouxRQ9Xr3HPnyNMMRdE8a-u0zuBNVcKZkILs4_b1mS</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Van-Thanh, Dinh</creator><creator>Tran, Huu-Danh</creator><creator>Bui, Thanh-Danh</creator><creator>Vu, Duc-Binh</creator><creator>Duong Vu</creator><creator>Ngoc-Pi Vu</creator><creator>Thi-Thu-Huong Truong</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method</title><author>Van-Thanh, Dinh ; Tran, Huu-Danh ; Bui, Thanh-Danh ; Vu, Duc-Binh ; Duong Vu ; Ngoc-Pi Vu ; Thi-Thu-Huong Truong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-ccc6e35907f4ba4546af71de865a5bea8a52e8c8a0f10a51789328091b121d253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bending stresses</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design factors</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Gear ratios</topic><topic>Gearboxes</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Helical gears</topic><topic>Lubricants &amp; lubrication</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van-Thanh, Dinh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Huu-Danh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Thanh-Danh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Duc-Binh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoc-Pi Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thi-Thu-Huong Truong</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van-Thanh, Dinh</au><au>Tran, Huu-Danh</au><au>Bui, Thanh-Danh</au><au>Vu, Duc-Binh</au><au>Duong Vu</au><au>Ngoc-Pi Vu</au><au>Thi-Thu-Huong Truong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1160</spage><pages>1160-</pages><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was applied in a novel way in this study to the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP) of designing a two-stage helical gearbox with double gear-sets in the second stage. Finding the best fundamental components to increase gearbox efficiency and decrease gearbox cross-section area was the aim of this study. Three main design factors were chosen for investigation in this work: the first stage gear ratio and the first and second stage coefficients of wheel face width (CWFW). Phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to reduce the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal critical design factors. This additionally splits the MOOP into two phases. Additionally, the TOPSIS method was used as an MCDM approach to address the multi-objective optimization issue, and the entropy approach was used to compute the weight criteria. In this study, gearbox efficiency is calculated by considering power losses during idle motion. The multi-objective optimization of a helical gearbox with second stage double gear-sets is addressed using the TOPSIS technique for the first time.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr12061160</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2227-9717
ispartof Processes, 2024-06, Vol.12 (6), p.1160
issn 2227-9717
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3072665432
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Bending stresses
Decision making
Design factors
Design optimization
Efficiency
Gear ratios
Gearboxes
Genetic algorithms
Geometry
Helical gears
Lubricants & lubrication
Methods
Multiple criterion
Multiple objective analysis
Objectives
Optimization
Pareto optimum
title Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Objective%20Optimization%20of%20a%20Two-Stage%20Helical%20Gearbox%20with%20Second%20Stage%20Double%20Gear-Sets%20Using%20TOPSIS%20Method&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Van-Thanh,%20Dinh&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1160&rft.pages=1160-&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr12061160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3072665432%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-ccc6e35907f4ba4546af71de865a5bea8a52e8c8a0f10a51789328091b121d253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072665432&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true