Loading…
Efficient implementation on accuracy improvement of the two-dimensional node-to-segment contact approach for explicit dynamic analysis
The penalty-method-based node-to-segment (NTS) approach is widely employed in the explicit dynamic analysis owing to its computational efficiency and implementation simplicity. However, the classical approach does not pass the contact patch test and results in severe inaccuracies. This study attempt...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computational mechanics 2024-07, Vol.74 (1), p.113-127 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The penalty-method-based node-to-segment (NTS) approach is widely employed in the explicit dynamic analysis owing to its computational efficiency and implementation simplicity. However, the classical approach does not pass the contact patch test and results in severe inaccuracies. This study attempts the accuracy enhancement of an explicit dynamic contact analysis with minimum efficiency loss using the NTS algorithm with the modified area regularization technique (NTS-mAR). The computational procedure is compared to an allied modified penalty-method-based NTS approach, i.e., the virtual node-to-segment algorithm passing the patch test (VTS-PPT). Then, an extension to an explicit dynamic analysis framework is attempted, wherein the speed of the contact force calculation significantly influences the overall computational efficiency. The cost of the remaining computation was minimized by employing a lumped mass matrix and a one-point integration rule for the internal force. Elastoplasticity was considered to extend its application. The accuracy improvement compared to the classical one-pass NTS approach was similar for the modified approaches. The VTS-PPT approach requires more than twice the cost of contact force estimation compared with the classical one-pass NTS approach. In contrast, NTS-mAR approach induces a cost increase from 6 to 36% that of classical one-pass NTS approaches. For the given examples, the NTS-mAR approach is beneficial when an improvement in accuracy is desired with minimum efficiency loss. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0178-7675 1432-0924 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00466-023-02425-5 |