Loading…

Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture

Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO 2 capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy & environmental science 2024-07, Vol.17 (13), p.4594-4621
Main Authors: Fulham, George J, Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V, Marek, Ewa J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3
container_end_page 4621
container_issue 13
container_start_page 4594
container_title Energy & environmental science
container_volume 17
creator Fulham, George J
Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V
Marek, Ewa J
description Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO 2 capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H 2 and CO 2 allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between −760 and −1240 kg CO 2 eq. per t MeOH , demonstrating successful CCU. This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO 2 drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d4ee00933a
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3074316619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3074316619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbsQ8CZW06ZN0uOY8wdMvOi5pMnrltElNUkZ--_trD_I4YXHh_ceX4QuU3KXElre6xyAkJJSeYQmKS_ypOCEHf_-WZmdorMQNoSwjPBygrpXaeXK2BU2NoLfmhjBqj12DfZgYSfrFnDnduAHgEMfojR2bHqnexWNswe8hbiW1rW3WLm-a0HjnYlrrI0HFbE0HivZxd7DOTppZBvg4qdO0cfj4n3-nCzfnl7ms2WiMsJiwlMuuNCCs1qXJciG0bzhwIXIBdEpzbQCKIHVRaZlwRuRDa8uaqlroRsNdIqux7nDnZ89hFhtXO_tsLKihOc0ZSwtB3UzKuVdCB6aqvNmK_2-Skl1SLR6yBeL70RnA74asQ_qz_0nTr8ALBN1IQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074316619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry</source><creator>Fulham, George J ; Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V ; Marek, Ewa J</creator><creatorcontrib>Fulham, George J ; Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V ; Marek, Ewa J</creatorcontrib><description>Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO 2 capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H 2 and CO 2 allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between −760 and −1240 kg CO 2 eq. per t MeOH , demonstrating successful CCU. This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO 2 drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-5706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d4ee00933a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Catalysts ; Climate change ; Electric power generation ; Electricity pricing ; Electrolysis ; Fossil fuels ; Global warming ; Installation costs ; Intermittency ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Methanol ; Natural gas ; Offshore ; Offshore energy sources ; Power consumption ; Power plants ; Renewable energy ; Sustainable production ; Wind farms ; Wind power ; Wind power generation</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; environmental science, 2024-07, Vol.17 (13), p.4594-4621</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-1063-8141 ; 0000-0002-8318-2131</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fulham, George J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Ewa J</creatorcontrib><title>Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture</title><title>Energy &amp; environmental science</title><description>Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO 2 capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H 2 and CO 2 allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between −760 and −1240 kg CO 2 eq. per t MeOH , demonstrating successful CCU. This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO 2 drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Electrolysis</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Installation costs</subject><subject>Intermittency</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Offshore energy sources</subject><subject>Power consumption</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Sustainable production</subject><subject>Wind farms</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind power generation</subject><issn>1754-5692</issn><issn>1754-5706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbsQ8CZW06ZN0uOY8wdMvOi5pMnrltElNUkZ--_trD_I4YXHh_ceX4QuU3KXElre6xyAkJJSeYQmKS_ypOCEHf_-WZmdorMQNoSwjPBygrpXaeXK2BU2NoLfmhjBqj12DfZgYSfrFnDnduAHgEMfojR2bHqnexWNswe8hbiW1rW3WLm-a0HjnYlrrI0HFbE0HivZxd7DOTppZBvg4qdO0cfj4n3-nCzfnl7ms2WiMsJiwlMuuNCCs1qXJciG0bzhwIXIBdEpzbQCKIHVRaZlwRuRDa8uaqlroRsNdIqux7nDnZ89hFhtXO_tsLKihOc0ZSwtB3UzKuVdCB6aqvNmK_2-Skl1SLR6yBeL70RnA74asQ_qz_0nTr8ALBN1IQ</recordid><startdate>20240702</startdate><enddate>20240702</enddate><creator>Fulham, George J</creator><creator>Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V</creator><creator>Marek, Ewa J</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1063-8141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-2131</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240702</creationdate><title>Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture</title><author>Fulham, George J ; Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V ; Marek, Ewa J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Electrolysis</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Installation costs</topic><topic>Intermittency</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Offshore energy sources</topic><topic>Power consumption</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Sustainable production</topic><topic>Wind farms</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind power generation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fulham, George J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Ewa J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fulham, George J</au><au>Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V</au><au>Marek, Ewa J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; environmental science</jtitle><date>2024-07-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>4594</spage><epage>4621</epage><pages>4594-4621</pages><issn>1754-5692</issn><eissn>1754-5706</eissn><abstract>Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO 2 capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H 2 and CO 2 allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between −760 and −1240 kg CO 2 eq. per t MeOH , demonstrating successful CCU. This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO 2 drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/d4ee00933a</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1063-8141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-2131</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-5692
ispartof Energy & environmental science, 2024-07, Vol.17 (13), p.4594-4621
issn 1754-5692
1754-5706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3074316619
source Royal Society of Chemistry
subjects Alternative energy sources
Carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
Catalysts
Climate change
Electric power generation
Electricity pricing
Electrolysis
Fossil fuels
Global warming
Installation costs
Intermittency
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Methanol
Natural gas
Offshore
Offshore energy sources
Power consumption
Power plants
Renewable energy
Sustainable production
Wind farms
Wind power
Wind power generation
title Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A24%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20intermittency%20of%20renewable%20power%20in%20sustainable%20production%20of%20methanol,%20coupled%20with%20direct%20air%20capture&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Fulham,%20George%20J&rft.date=2024-07-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=4594&rft.epage=4621&rft.pages=4594-4621&rft.issn=1754-5692&rft.eissn=1754-5706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d4ee00933a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3074316619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074316619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true