Loading…
Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture
Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO 2 capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy & environmental science 2024-07, Vol.17 (13), p.4594-4621 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3 |
container_end_page | 4621 |
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 4594 |
container_title | Energy & environmental science |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Fulham, George J Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V Marek, Ewa J |
description | Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO
2
capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H
2
and CO
2
allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between −760 and −1240 kg
CO
2
eq.
per t
MeOH
, demonstrating successful CCU.
This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO
2
drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d4ee00933a |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3074316619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3074316619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbsQ8CZW06ZN0uOY8wdMvOi5pMnrltElNUkZ--_trD_I4YXHh_ceX4QuU3KXElre6xyAkJJSeYQmKS_ypOCEHf_-WZmdorMQNoSwjPBygrpXaeXK2BU2NoLfmhjBqj12DfZgYSfrFnDnduAHgEMfojR2bHqnexWNswe8hbiW1rW3WLm-a0HjnYlrrI0HFbE0HivZxd7DOTppZBvg4qdO0cfj4n3-nCzfnl7ms2WiMsJiwlMuuNCCs1qXJciG0bzhwIXIBdEpzbQCKIHVRaZlwRuRDa8uaqlroRsNdIqux7nDnZ89hFhtXO_tsLKihOc0ZSwtB3UzKuVdCB6aqvNmK_2-Skl1SLR6yBeL70RnA74asQ_qz_0nTr8ALBN1IQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074316619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry</source><creator>Fulham, George J ; Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V ; Marek, Ewa J</creator><creatorcontrib>Fulham, George J ; Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V ; Marek, Ewa J</creatorcontrib><description>Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO
2
capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H
2
and CO
2
allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between −760 and −1240 kg
CO
2
eq.
per t
MeOH
, demonstrating successful CCU.
This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO
2
drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-5706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d4ee00933a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Catalysts ; Climate change ; Electric power generation ; Electricity pricing ; Electrolysis ; Fossil fuels ; Global warming ; Installation costs ; Intermittency ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Methanol ; Natural gas ; Offshore ; Offshore energy sources ; Power consumption ; Power plants ; Renewable energy ; Sustainable production ; Wind farms ; Wind power ; Wind power generation</subject><ispartof>Energy & environmental science, 2024-07, Vol.17 (13), p.4594-4621</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-1063-8141 ; 0000-0002-8318-2131</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fulham, George J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Ewa J</creatorcontrib><title>Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture</title><title>Energy & environmental science</title><description>Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO
2
capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H
2
and CO
2
allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between −760 and −1240 kg
CO
2
eq.
per t
MeOH
, demonstrating successful CCU.
This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO
2
drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Electrolysis</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Installation costs</subject><subject>Intermittency</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Offshore energy sources</subject><subject>Power consumption</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Sustainable production</subject><subject>Wind farms</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind power generation</subject><issn>1754-5692</issn><issn>1754-5706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbsQ8CZW06ZN0uOY8wdMvOi5pMnrltElNUkZ--_trD_I4YXHh_ceX4QuU3KXElre6xyAkJJSeYQmKS_ypOCEHf_-WZmdorMQNoSwjPBygrpXaeXK2BU2NoLfmhjBqj12DfZgYSfrFnDnduAHgEMfojR2bHqnexWNswe8hbiW1rW3WLm-a0HjnYlrrI0HFbE0HivZxd7DOTppZBvg4qdO0cfj4n3-nCzfnl7ms2WiMsJiwlMuuNCCs1qXJciG0bzhwIXIBdEpzbQCKIHVRaZlwRuRDa8uaqlroRsNdIqux7nDnZ89hFhtXO_tsLKihOc0ZSwtB3UzKuVdCB6aqvNmK_2-Skl1SLR6yBeL70RnA74asQ_qz_0nTr8ALBN1IQ</recordid><startdate>20240702</startdate><enddate>20240702</enddate><creator>Fulham, George J</creator><creator>Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V</creator><creator>Marek, Ewa J</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1063-8141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-2131</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240702</creationdate><title>Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture</title><author>Fulham, George J ; Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V ; Marek, Ewa J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Electrolysis</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Installation costs</topic><topic>Intermittency</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Offshore energy sources</topic><topic>Power consumption</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Sustainable production</topic><topic>Wind farms</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind power generation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fulham, George J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Ewa J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy & environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fulham, George J</au><au>Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V</au><au>Marek, Ewa J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture</atitle><jtitle>Energy & environmental science</jtitle><date>2024-07-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>4594</spage><epage>4621</epage><pages>4594-4621</pages><issn>1754-5692</issn><eissn>1754-5706</eissn><abstract>Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO
2
capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H
2
and CO
2
allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between −760 and −1240 kg
CO
2
eq.
per t
MeOH
, demonstrating successful CCU.
This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO
2
drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/d4ee00933a</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1063-8141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-2131</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1754-5692 |
ispartof | Energy & environmental science, 2024-07, Vol.17 (13), p.4594-4621 |
issn | 1754-5692 1754-5706 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3074316619 |
source | Royal Society of Chemistry |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Carbon dioxide Carbon sequestration Catalysts Climate change Electric power generation Electricity pricing Electrolysis Fossil fuels Global warming Installation costs Intermittency Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Methanol Natural gas Offshore Offshore energy sources Power consumption Power plants Renewable energy Sustainable production Wind farms Wind power Wind power generation |
title | Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A24%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20intermittency%20of%20renewable%20power%20in%20sustainable%20production%20of%20methanol,%20coupled%20with%20direct%20air%20capture&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Fulham,%20George%20J&rft.date=2024-07-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=4594&rft.epage=4621&rft.pages=4594-4621&rft.issn=1754-5692&rft.eissn=1754-5706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d4ee00933a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3074316619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-717878d876bd99eaf634f7e788480d132dcee9e6b52da57f82828b5badb8dfde3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074316619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |