Neurorights, Mental Privacy, and Mind Reading

A pressing worry in the ongoing neurorights debate is the language used to advocate for newly proposed rights. This paper addresses this concern by first examining the partial and ambiguous associations between mind reading and neurotechnology, often cited by advocates in support of the right to men...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuroethics 2024-07, Vol.17 (2), p.34, Article 34
Main Author: Brown, Cohen Marcus Lionel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Education
Ethics
Human rights
Neurology
Neuropsychology
Neuroradiology
Neurosciences
Neurosurgery
Original Paper
Philosophy
Privacy
Reading
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A pressing worry in the ongoing neurorights debate is the language used to advocate for newly proposed rights. This paper addresses this concern by first examining the partial and ambiguous associations between mind reading and neurotechnology, often cited by advocates in support of the right to mental privacy. Secondly, it addresses the conceptual foundations of mind reading, distinguishing between natural, digital, and neurotechnological forms. These distinctions serve to highlight the normative parallels in privacy vulnerabilities between neurotechnology and other mind-reading methods, with an emphasis on multimodal digital systems. I suggest that authentic safeguards for the mental realm demand an expansion of the protective ambit beyond brain-targeted devices to recognize the spectrum of mind-reading applications. Ultimately, this urges re-evaluation of the scope and justification of a right to mental privacy owing to the need for coherent frameworks in an increasingly interconnected digital landscape.
ISSN:1874-5490
1874-5504
DOI:10.1007/s12152-024-09568-z