Semiempty collaborative concept mapping in history education: students’ engagement in historical reasoning and coconstruction

• Published in: Instructional science 2024-08, Vol.52 (4), p.557-581
• Main Authors: Lucero, Manuel, Montanero, Manuel, van Boxtel, Carla
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 19th century; Classroom Communication; Classrooms; Collaboration; Concept formation; Concept mapping; Convergence; Discourse analysis; Education; Educational Psychology; History Instruction; Imperialism; Learning; Learning and Instruction; Mapping; Pedagogic Psychology; Qualitative research; Review; Secondary education; Student participation; Students; Utterances
• ISSN: 0020-4277; 1573-1952
• DOI: 10.1007/s11251-024-09659-7

There is abundant research on the use of concept maps in education. However, the most notable efforts have focused on learning outcomes as a consequence of individually constructed concept mapping for science concept learning. In the less explored field of history, some studies have found positive effects of collaborative concept mapping. However, student interaction has not been analyzed. This study employed quantitative and qualitative methods based on classroom discourse analysis to examine the extent to which students engage in historical reasoning and transactive interaction when they collaboratively complete a semiempty concept map, versus when they collaboratively write a summary, about 19th-century Western imperialism. The participants were 20 secondary education students from two history classes with an average age of 16 years. Within each class, the students were randomly assigned to the different conditions: collaborative concept mapping and collaborative summary writing. Student interaction was analyzed at two different levels: the content level and modes of co-construction. The results show that the students in the semiempty concept mapping condition engaged significantly more in causal explanation and argumentation and used more historical and metahistorical concepts in their reasoning than the students in the summary writing condition. Interaction in the semiempty concept mapping condition included a much higher percentage of utterances which denoted the convergence and integration of the knowledge contributed by the partners in the dyad. This kind of transactive interaction not only reflected co-construction but also historical reasoning.