Calibration areas in ecological niche and species distribution modelling: Unravelling approaches and concepts

• Published in: Journal of biogeography 2024-08, Vol.51 (8), p.1416-1428
• Main Authors: Rojas‐Soto, Octavio, Forero‐Rodríguez, Juan S., Galindo‐Cruz, Alejandra, Mota‐Vargas, Claudio, Parra‐Henao, Keisy D., Peña‐Peniche, Alexander, Piña‐Torres, Javier, Rojas‐Herrera, Karen, Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Juan D., Toro‐Cardona, Felipe A., Trinidad‐Domínguez, Carlos D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accessibility; accessible area; Algorithms; Amphibians; Arthropods; biogeographic entities; Biogeography; Calibration; Dispersal; Ecological niches; environmental background; expert maps; Geographical distribution; Literature reviews; maxent; Niches; Reptiles; Reptiles & amphibians; spatial constraints; Species; Taxa
• ISSN: 0305-0270; 1365-2699
• DOI: 10.1111/jbi.14834

Aim The calibration area (CA) corresponds to the geographic region used by different algorithms that estimate the species' environmental preferences and delimit its geographic distribution. This study intended to identify, test and compare current literature's most commonly employed approaches and methods for CA creation, highlighting the differences with the accessible area (M), a frequently misapplied concept. Location Global. Taxon Arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Methods We conducted a literature review and analysed 129 recent articles on species distribution that use correlative models to identify the methods used to establish the CA and their frequency. We also evaluated seven of the most widely used methods for 31 species from different taxa. Results We found that the most frequently used methods in literature corresponded to biogeographic entities (BE). Moreover, according to our evaluation, those methods that seek to establish the CA through the accessible area approach (including BE and ‘grinnell’) were the best evaluated. Finally, we highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the analysed methods in selecting CA. Main Conclusions Although we cannot fail to recognize the usefulness and validity of the different methods to establish CAs, we suggest calibrating ecological niche and species distribution models in light of explicit a priori hypotheses regarding the extent of accessible areas (M) as a delimitation of the CA, which theoretically includes the species' dispersal ability and its barriers. We recommend using the BE method, which is simple to establish and highly operational.