Loading…
Impact of Dead Fish Degradation on the Monitoring of Fish Losses in the Pregrowing and Growing Phase of Caged European Sea Bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax )
The interplay between environmental, biological, and physical factors often leads to the deterioration of dead fish in marine cages prior to their removal. Depending on the weight of the dead fish and the frequency of their removal, deterioration can progress to a stage where visual identification b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Aquaculture research 2024-01, Vol.2024 (1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c150t-7c8b883aa82a2dad298f07b7f80161e70a85294af11b5a68f4996c7676cbec443 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Aquaculture research |
container_volume | 2024 |
creator | Chadli, Housni Ennayer, Ikram Bahida, Abdeljallil Nhhala, Hassan Er-Raioui, Hassan |
description | The interplay between environmental, biological, and physical factors often leads to the deterioration of dead fish in marine cages prior to their removal. Depending on the weight of the dead fish and the frequency of their removal, deterioration can progress to a stage where visual identification by divers becomes challenging, thereby disrupting accurate counting of dead fish. This study presents a practical precision tool for monitoring the number of dead fish during the pregrowth and growth phases of caged European sea bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ). To improve the assessment of collected mortality, experiments were conducted in farming cages with various fish weights. Identifiable fish rates ( I , %) were calculated every 24 hr and classified into four weight classes: WC1 (4–15 g), WC2 (15–30 g), WC3 (30–80 g), and WC4 (>80 g). The corrected number of dead fish (M) was calculated by dividing the collected number (C) by a correction factor (McR), which was determined based on the adopted removal frequency. The possible mortality removal frequencies per week (Fn) included operations such as F7 (daily), F3 (3 times), F2 (2 times), and F1 (once). The smallest correction denominator was 22% for WC1 at a frequency of once per week, whereas the maximum was 100% for WC3 and WC4 daily. The results revealed a high negative significant correlation between Fn and uncollected degraded fish rate (UR) ( r = –0.841, p < 0.05). Applying corrections to mortality collected in three finished batches (B2, B3, and B7) led to an increase in the mortality rate by 3.9% ± 1.5%, 5.5% ± 0.7%, and 5.0% ± 0.5%, respectively. This explained 16.8% ± 4.7%, 65.5% ± 26.7%, and 30.3% ± 3.7% of fish disappearances in B2, B3, and B7, respectively. The significance of this study lies in its practical applicability to fish farms as a precise tool for monitoring fish raised in marine cages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2024/8369485 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3083002324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3083002324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c150t-7c8b883aa82a2dad298f07b7f80161e70a85294af11b5a68f4996c7676cbec443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkN1Kw0AQhRdRsFbvfIAFbxQauz_ZZHOp_bNQsaCCd2Gy2TQpbTbublDfxMc1sYWBORffmeEchK4puadUiDEjLBxLHiWhFCdoQHkkAkZJctprIQIh4o9zdOHclhAaEk4H6He5b0B5bAo81ZDjeeXKTm0s5OArU-NufKnxs6krb2xVb3r0n1oZ57TD1QFY285kvnoA6hwvjnpdgtO9ZQIbneNZa02jocavGvAjOIdv8bRSuvYWrCpbh3eQWfjGd5forICd01fHPUTv89nb5ClYvSyWk4dVoKggPoiVzKTkAJIByyFniSxInMWFJDSiOiYgBUtCKCjNBESyCJMkUnEURyrTKgz5EN0c7jbWfLba-XRrWlt3L1NOJCeEcdZTowOlbJfa6iJtbLUH-5NSkvbdp3336bF7_gcf1HXR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3083002324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Dead Fish Degradation on the Monitoring of Fish Losses in the Pregrowing and Growing Phase of Caged European Sea Bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax )</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Chadli, Housni ; Ennayer, Ikram ; Bahida, Abdeljallil ; Nhhala, Hassan ; Er-Raioui, Hassan</creator><contributor>Abdelsalam, Mohamed ; Mohamed Abdelsalam</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chadli, Housni ; Ennayer, Ikram ; Bahida, Abdeljallil ; Nhhala, Hassan ; Er-Raioui, Hassan ; Abdelsalam, Mohamed ; Mohamed Abdelsalam</creatorcontrib><description>The interplay between environmental, biological, and physical factors often leads to the deterioration of dead fish in marine cages prior to their removal. Depending on the weight of the dead fish and the frequency of their removal, deterioration can progress to a stage where visual identification by divers becomes challenging, thereby disrupting accurate counting of dead fish. This study presents a practical precision tool for monitoring the number of dead fish during the pregrowth and growth phases of caged European sea bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ). To improve the assessment of collected mortality, experiments were conducted in farming cages with various fish weights. Identifiable fish rates ( I , %) were calculated every 24 hr and classified into four weight classes: WC1 (4–15 g), WC2 (15–30 g), WC3 (30–80 g), and WC4 (>80 g). The corrected number of dead fish (M) was calculated by dividing the collected number (C) by a correction factor (McR), which was determined based on the adopted removal frequency. The possible mortality removal frequencies per week (Fn) included operations such as F7 (daily), F3 (3 times), F2 (2 times), and F1 (once). The smallest correction denominator was 22% for WC1 at a frequency of once per week, whereas the maximum was 100% for WC3 and WC4 daily. The results revealed a high negative significant correlation between Fn and uncollected degraded fish rate (UR) ( r = –0.841, p < 0.05). Applying corrections to mortality collected in three finished batches (B2, B3, and B7) led to an increase in the mortality rate by 3.9% ± 1.5%, 5.5% ± 0.7%, and 5.0% ± 0.5%, respectively. This explained 16.8% ± 4.7%, 65.5% ± 26.7%, and 30.3% ± 3.7% of fish disappearances in B2, B3, and B7, respectively. The significance of this study lies in its practical applicability to fish farms as a precise tool for monitoring fish raised in marine cages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2024/8369485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Bass ; Biodegradation ; Biomonitoring ; Cages ; Deterioration ; Dicentrarchus labrax ; Divers ; Environmental degradation ; Experiments ; Farms ; Fish ; Fish culture ; Fish farms ; Fisheries ; Marine biology ; Marine fish ; Marine fishes ; Mortality ; Physical factors ; Salinity ; Sea bass ; Seawater ; Variance analysis ; Visual aspects ; Weight ; Whitefish</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2024-01, Vol.2024 (1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Housni Chadli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c150t-7c8b883aa82a2dad298f07b7f80161e70a85294af11b5a68f4996c7676cbec443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5302-1003 ; 0000-0001-6869-7973 ; 0009-0009-9194-8019 ; 0000-0001-6794-1401 ; 0000-0003-4938-9881</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3083002324/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3083002324?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Abdelsalam, Mohamed</contributor><contributor>Mohamed Abdelsalam</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chadli, Housni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ennayer, Ikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahida, Abdeljallil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nhhala, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Er-Raioui, Hassan</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Dead Fish Degradation on the Monitoring of Fish Losses in the Pregrowing and Growing Phase of Caged European Sea Bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax )</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><description>The interplay between environmental, biological, and physical factors often leads to the deterioration of dead fish in marine cages prior to their removal. Depending on the weight of the dead fish and the frequency of their removal, deterioration can progress to a stage where visual identification by divers becomes challenging, thereby disrupting accurate counting of dead fish. This study presents a practical precision tool for monitoring the number of dead fish during the pregrowth and growth phases of caged European sea bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ). To improve the assessment of collected mortality, experiments were conducted in farming cages with various fish weights. Identifiable fish rates ( I , %) were calculated every 24 hr and classified into four weight classes: WC1 (4–15 g), WC2 (15–30 g), WC3 (30–80 g), and WC4 (>80 g). The corrected number of dead fish (M) was calculated by dividing the collected number (C) by a correction factor (McR), which was determined based on the adopted removal frequency. The possible mortality removal frequencies per week (Fn) included operations such as F7 (daily), F3 (3 times), F2 (2 times), and F1 (once). The smallest correction denominator was 22% for WC1 at a frequency of once per week, whereas the maximum was 100% for WC3 and WC4 daily. The results revealed a high negative significant correlation between Fn and uncollected degraded fish rate (UR) ( r = –0.841, p < 0.05). Applying corrections to mortality collected in three finished batches (B2, B3, and B7) led to an increase in the mortality rate by 3.9% ± 1.5%, 5.5% ± 0.7%, and 5.0% ± 0.5%, respectively. This explained 16.8% ± 4.7%, 65.5% ± 26.7%, and 30.3% ± 3.7% of fish disappearances in B2, B3, and B7, respectively. The significance of this study lies in its practical applicability to fish farms as a precise tool for monitoring fish raised in marine cages.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Bass</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biomonitoring</subject><subject>Cages</subject><subject>Deterioration</subject><subject>Dicentrarchus labrax</subject><subject>Divers</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish culture</subject><subject>Fish farms</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Marine fish</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Physical factors</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Sea bass</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Visual aspects</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Whitefish</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotkN1Kw0AQhRdRsFbvfIAFbxQauz_ZZHOp_bNQsaCCd2Gy2TQpbTbublDfxMc1sYWBORffmeEchK4puadUiDEjLBxLHiWhFCdoQHkkAkZJctprIQIh4o9zdOHclhAaEk4H6He5b0B5bAo81ZDjeeXKTm0s5OArU-NufKnxs6krb2xVb3r0n1oZ57TD1QFY285kvnoA6hwvjnpdgtO9ZQIbneNZa02jocavGvAjOIdv8bRSuvYWrCpbh3eQWfjGd5forICd01fHPUTv89nb5ClYvSyWk4dVoKggPoiVzKTkAJIByyFniSxInMWFJDSiOiYgBUtCKCjNBESyCJMkUnEURyrTKgz5EN0c7jbWfLba-XRrWlt3L1NOJCeEcdZTowOlbJfa6iJtbLUH-5NSkvbdp3336bF7_gcf1HXR</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Chadli, Housni</creator><creator>Ennayer, Ikram</creator><creator>Bahida, Abdeljallil</creator><creator>Nhhala, Hassan</creator><creator>Er-Raioui, Hassan</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5302-1003</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-7973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9194-8019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-1401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4938-9881</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Impact of Dead Fish Degradation on the Monitoring of Fish Losses in the Pregrowing and Growing Phase of Caged European Sea Bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax )</title><author>Chadli, Housni ; Ennayer, Ikram ; Bahida, Abdeljallil ; Nhhala, Hassan ; Er-Raioui, Hassan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c150t-7c8b883aa82a2dad298f07b7f80161e70a85294af11b5a68f4996c7676cbec443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Bass</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biomonitoring</topic><topic>Cages</topic><topic>Deterioration</topic><topic>Dicentrarchus labrax</topic><topic>Divers</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish culture</topic><topic>Fish farms</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Marine fish</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Physical factors</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Sea bass</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Visual aspects</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Whitefish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chadli, Housni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ennayer, Ikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahida, Abdeljallil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nhhala, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Er-Raioui, Hassan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chadli, Housni</au><au>Ennayer, Ikram</au><au>Bahida, Abdeljallil</au><au>Nhhala, Hassan</au><au>Er-Raioui, Hassan</au><au>Abdelsalam, Mohamed</au><au>Mohamed Abdelsalam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Dead Fish Degradation on the Monitoring of Fish Losses in the Pregrowing and Growing Phase of Caged European Sea Bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax )</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2024</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>The interplay between environmental, biological, and physical factors often leads to the deterioration of dead fish in marine cages prior to their removal. Depending on the weight of the dead fish and the frequency of their removal, deterioration can progress to a stage where visual identification by divers becomes challenging, thereby disrupting accurate counting of dead fish. This study presents a practical precision tool for monitoring the number of dead fish during the pregrowth and growth phases of caged European sea bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ). To improve the assessment of collected mortality, experiments were conducted in farming cages with various fish weights. Identifiable fish rates ( I , %) were calculated every 24 hr and classified into four weight classes: WC1 (4–15 g), WC2 (15–30 g), WC3 (30–80 g), and WC4 (>80 g). The corrected number of dead fish (M) was calculated by dividing the collected number (C) by a correction factor (McR), which was determined based on the adopted removal frequency. The possible mortality removal frequencies per week (Fn) included operations such as F7 (daily), F3 (3 times), F2 (2 times), and F1 (once). The smallest correction denominator was 22% for WC1 at a frequency of once per week, whereas the maximum was 100% for WC3 and WC4 daily. The results revealed a high negative significant correlation between Fn and uncollected degraded fish rate (UR) ( r = –0.841, p < 0.05). Applying corrections to mortality collected in three finished batches (B2, B3, and B7) led to an increase in the mortality rate by 3.9% ± 1.5%, 5.5% ± 0.7%, and 5.0% ± 0.5%, respectively. This explained 16.8% ± 4.7%, 65.5% ± 26.7%, and 30.3% ± 3.7% of fish disappearances in B2, B3, and B7, respectively. The significance of this study lies in its practical applicability to fish farms as a precise tool for monitoring fish raised in marine cages.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1155/2024/8369485</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5302-1003</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-7973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9194-8019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-1401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4938-9881</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-557X |
ispartof | Aquaculture research, 2024-01, Vol.2024 (1) |
issn | 1355-557X 1365-2109 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3083002324 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Aquaculture Bass Biodegradation Biomonitoring Cages Deterioration Dicentrarchus labrax Divers Environmental degradation Experiments Farms Fish Fish culture Fish farms Fisheries Marine biology Marine fish Marine fishes Mortality Physical factors Salinity Sea bass Seawater Variance analysis Visual aspects Weight Whitefish |
title | Impact of Dead Fish Degradation on the Monitoring of Fish Losses in the Pregrowing and Growing Phase of Caged European Sea Bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A35%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Dead%20Fish%20Degradation%20on%20the%20Monitoring%20of%20Fish%20Losses%20in%20the%20Pregrowing%20and%20Growing%20Phase%20of%20Caged%20European%20Sea%20Bass%20(%20Dicentrarchus%20labrax%20)&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Chadli,%20Housni&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=2024&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2024/8369485&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3083002324%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c150t-7c8b883aa82a2dad298f07b7f80161e70a85294af11b5a68f4996c7676cbec443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3083002324&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |