Loading…
Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?
We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sustainability 2024-07, Vol.16 (14), p.6233 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 6233 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Krieger, Kevin Mauck, Nathan |
description | We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given that both dividends and ESG relate to firm spending decisions, it may be that the choice is “either/or”, and that ESG and dividends are substitutes. We document a positive relationship between ESG and dividend-payer status in U.S. firms over the period 1991–2016. In particular, we find that the proportion of dividend-payers is roughly 13% higher for firms with positive ESG compared to those with negative ESG. Including ESG in the models used to predict payer status provides, on average, a nearly 26% improvement in relative forecast accuracy. Our results are robust in regards to estimation techniques and the inclusion of variables known to be determinants of payer status. The results indicate that, on average, firms are not forced to sacrifice dividends in favor of ESG spending. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su16146233 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3085058765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A803774487</galeid><sourcerecordid>A803774487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkFtLAzEQhYMoWGpf_AULPilsTTbX9UVK66VQEKw-h2ySLSm7m5pkxf57VypoZx5mGL5zBg4AlwhOMS7hbewRQ4QVGJ-AUQE5yhGk8PTffg4mMW7hUBijErERKNd9TMp1qnKNS_tMdSZbuE9nbGfiXTb37a6xre1SzHzI1n0Vk0t9svH-ApzVqol28jvH4P3x4W3-nK9enpbz2SrXBeUpZxUqjUGcUMNhBRnjhlW4YkQQJYiGRGBqKdNIUw05V4WyCHFacFGignCFx-Dq4LsL_qO3Mcmt70M3vJQYCgqp4IwO1PRAbVRjpetqn4LSQxvbOu07W7vhPhMQc06I4IPg-kgwMMl-pY3qY5TL9esxe3NgdfAxBlvLXXCtCnuJoPyJXv5Fj78BlKJyng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085058765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Krieger, Kevin ; Mauck, Nathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Kevin ; Mauck, Nathan</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given that both dividends and ESG relate to firm spending decisions, it may be that the choice is “either/or”, and that ESG and dividends are substitutes. We document a positive relationship between ESG and dividend-payer status in U.S. firms over the period 1991–2016. In particular, we find that the proportion of dividend-payers is roughly 13% higher for firms with positive ESG compared to those with negative ESG. Including ESG in the models used to predict payer status provides, on average, a nearly 26% improvement in relative forecast accuracy. Our results are robust in regards to estimation techniques and the inclusion of variables known to be determinants of payer status. The results indicate that, on average, firms are not forced to sacrifice dividends in favor of ESG spending.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16146233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Capital expenditures ; Cash flow ; Dividend policy ; Dividends ; Environmental sustainability ; Hypotheses ; Investments ; Profitability ; Stockholders ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-07, Vol.16 (14), p.6233</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0721-3506 ; 0000-0001-6371-9010</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085058765/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085058765?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauck, Nathan</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given that both dividends and ESG relate to firm spending decisions, it may be that the choice is “either/or”, and that ESG and dividends are substitutes. We document a positive relationship between ESG and dividend-payer status in U.S. firms over the period 1991–2016. In particular, we find that the proportion of dividend-payers is roughly 13% higher for firms with positive ESG compared to those with negative ESG. Including ESG in the models used to predict payer status provides, on average, a nearly 26% improvement in relative forecast accuracy. Our results are robust in regards to estimation techniques and the inclusion of variables known to be determinants of payer status. The results indicate that, on average, firms are not forced to sacrifice dividends in favor of ESG spending.</description><subject>Capital expenditures</subject><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Dividend policy</subject><subject>Dividends</subject><subject>Environmental sustainability</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkFtLAzEQhYMoWGpf_AULPilsTTbX9UVK66VQEKw-h2ySLSm7m5pkxf57VypoZx5mGL5zBg4AlwhOMS7hbewRQ4QVGJ-AUQE5yhGk8PTffg4mMW7hUBijErERKNd9TMp1qnKNS_tMdSZbuE9nbGfiXTb37a6xre1SzHzI1n0Vk0t9svH-ApzVqol28jvH4P3x4W3-nK9enpbz2SrXBeUpZxUqjUGcUMNhBRnjhlW4YkQQJYiGRGBqKdNIUw05V4WyCHFacFGignCFx-Dq4LsL_qO3Mcmt70M3vJQYCgqp4IwO1PRAbVRjpetqn4LSQxvbOu07W7vhPhMQc06I4IPg-kgwMMl-pY3qY5TL9esxe3NgdfAxBlvLXXCtCnuJoPyJXv5Fj78BlKJyng</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Krieger, Kevin</creator><creator>Mauck, Nathan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-3506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-9010</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?</title><author>Krieger, Kevin ; Mauck, Nathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Capital expenditures</topic><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Dividend policy</topic><topic>Dividends</topic><topic>Environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauck, Nathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krieger, Kevin</au><au>Mauck, Nathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>6233</spage><pages>6233-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given that both dividends and ESG relate to firm spending decisions, it may be that the choice is “either/or”, and that ESG and dividends are substitutes. We document a positive relationship between ESG and dividend-payer status in U.S. firms over the period 1991–2016. In particular, we find that the proportion of dividend-payers is roughly 13% higher for firms with positive ESG compared to those with negative ESG. Including ESG in the models used to predict payer status provides, on average, a nearly 26% improvement in relative forecast accuracy. Our results are robust in regards to estimation techniques and the inclusion of variables known to be determinants of payer status. The results indicate that, on average, firms are not forced to sacrifice dividends in favor of ESG spending.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16146233</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-3506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-9010</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2024-07, Vol.16 (14), p.6233 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3085058765 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Capital expenditures Cash flow Dividend policy Dividends Environmental sustainability Hypotheses Investments Profitability Stockholders Sustainability |
title | Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainability%20and%20Dividends:%20Complements%20or%20Substitutes?&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Krieger,%20Kevin&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=6233&rft.pages=6233-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16146233&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA803774487%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085058765&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A803774487&rfr_iscdi=true |