Loading…

Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?

We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability 2024-07, Vol.16 (14), p.6233
Main Authors: Krieger, Kevin, Mauck, Nathan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page 6233
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 16
creator Krieger, Kevin
Mauck, Nathan
description We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given that both dividends and ESG relate to firm spending decisions, it may be that the choice is “either/or”, and that ESG and dividends are substitutes. We document a positive relationship between ESG and dividend-payer status in U.S. firms over the period 1991–2016. In particular, we find that the proportion of dividend-payers is roughly 13% higher for firms with positive ESG compared to those with negative ESG. Including ESG in the models used to predict payer status provides, on average, a nearly 26% improvement in relative forecast accuracy. Our results are robust in regards to estimation techniques and the inclusion of variables known to be determinants of payer status. The results indicate that, on average, firms are not forced to sacrifice dividends in favor of ESG spending.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su16146233
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3085058765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A803774487</galeid><sourcerecordid>A803774487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkFtLAzEQhYMoWGpf_AULPilsTTbX9UVK66VQEKw-h2ySLSm7m5pkxf57VypoZx5mGL5zBg4AlwhOMS7hbewRQ4QVGJ-AUQE5yhGk8PTffg4mMW7hUBijErERKNd9TMp1qnKNS_tMdSZbuE9nbGfiXTb37a6xre1SzHzI1n0Vk0t9svH-ApzVqol28jvH4P3x4W3-nK9enpbz2SrXBeUpZxUqjUGcUMNhBRnjhlW4YkQQJYiGRGBqKdNIUw05V4WyCHFacFGignCFx-Dq4LsL_qO3Mcmt70M3vJQYCgqp4IwO1PRAbVRjpetqn4LSQxvbOu07W7vhPhMQc06I4IPg-kgwMMl-pY3qY5TL9esxe3NgdfAxBlvLXXCtCnuJoPyJXv5Fj78BlKJyng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085058765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Krieger, Kevin ; Mauck, Nathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Kevin ; Mauck, Nathan</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given that both dividends and ESG relate to firm spending decisions, it may be that the choice is “either/or”, and that ESG and dividends are substitutes. We document a positive relationship between ESG and dividend-payer status in U.S. firms over the period 1991–2016. In particular, we find that the proportion of dividend-payers is roughly 13% higher for firms with positive ESG compared to those with negative ESG. Including ESG in the models used to predict payer status provides, on average, a nearly 26% improvement in relative forecast accuracy. Our results are robust in regards to estimation techniques and the inclusion of variables known to be determinants of payer status. The results indicate that, on average, firms are not forced to sacrifice dividends in favor of ESG spending.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16146233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Capital expenditures ; Cash flow ; Dividend policy ; Dividends ; Environmental sustainability ; Hypotheses ; Investments ; Profitability ; Stockholders ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-07, Vol.16 (14), p.6233</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0721-3506 ; 0000-0001-6371-9010</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085058765/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085058765?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauck, Nathan</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given that both dividends and ESG relate to firm spending decisions, it may be that the choice is “either/or”, and that ESG and dividends are substitutes. We document a positive relationship between ESG and dividend-payer status in U.S. firms over the period 1991–2016. In particular, we find that the proportion of dividend-payers is roughly 13% higher for firms with positive ESG compared to those with negative ESG. Including ESG in the models used to predict payer status provides, on average, a nearly 26% improvement in relative forecast accuracy. Our results are robust in regards to estimation techniques and the inclusion of variables known to be determinants of payer status. The results indicate that, on average, firms are not forced to sacrifice dividends in favor of ESG spending.</description><subject>Capital expenditures</subject><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Dividend policy</subject><subject>Dividends</subject><subject>Environmental sustainability</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkFtLAzEQhYMoWGpf_AULPilsTTbX9UVK66VQEKw-h2ySLSm7m5pkxf57VypoZx5mGL5zBg4AlwhOMS7hbewRQ4QVGJ-AUQE5yhGk8PTffg4mMW7hUBijErERKNd9TMp1qnKNS_tMdSZbuE9nbGfiXTb37a6xre1SzHzI1n0Vk0t9svH-ApzVqol28jvH4P3x4W3-nK9enpbz2SrXBeUpZxUqjUGcUMNhBRnjhlW4YkQQJYiGRGBqKdNIUw05V4WyCHFacFGignCFx-Dq4LsL_qO3Mcmt70M3vJQYCgqp4IwO1PRAbVRjpetqn4LSQxvbOu07W7vhPhMQc06I4IPg-kgwMMl-pY3qY5TL9esxe3NgdfAxBlvLXXCtCnuJoPyJXv5Fj78BlKJyng</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Krieger, Kevin</creator><creator>Mauck, Nathan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-3506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-9010</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?</title><author>Krieger, Kevin ; Mauck, Nathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Capital expenditures</topic><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Dividend policy</topic><topic>Dividends</topic><topic>Environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauck, Nathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krieger, Kevin</au><au>Mauck, Nathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>6233</spage><pages>6233-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>We examine the relationship between environmental, social, and governance commitment levels (ESG) and firm dividend-payer status. Given that larger and more profitable firms are positively associated with both payer status and ESG, it could be that ESG and dividends are complements. However, given that both dividends and ESG relate to firm spending decisions, it may be that the choice is “either/or”, and that ESG and dividends are substitutes. We document a positive relationship between ESG and dividend-payer status in U.S. firms over the period 1991–2016. In particular, we find that the proportion of dividend-payers is roughly 13% higher for firms with positive ESG compared to those with negative ESG. Including ESG in the models used to predict payer status provides, on average, a nearly 26% improvement in relative forecast accuracy. Our results are robust in regards to estimation techniques and the inclusion of variables known to be determinants of payer status. The results indicate that, on average, firms are not forced to sacrifice dividends in favor of ESG spending.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16146233</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-3506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-9010</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2024-07, Vol.16 (14), p.6233
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3085058765
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Capital expenditures
Cash flow
Dividend policy
Dividends
Environmental sustainability
Hypotheses
Investments
Profitability
Stockholders
Sustainability
title Sustainability and Dividends: Complements or Substitutes?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainability%20and%20Dividends:%20Complements%20or%20Substitutes?&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Krieger,%20Kevin&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=6233&rft.pages=6233-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16146233&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA803774487%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-6b19dd1745d70b0667d6b3b6484a84c04835e56c1c5c077a2ae117527891247a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085058765&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A803774487&rfr_iscdi=true