On Verbal Cognition: Śāntarakṣita’s and Kamalaśīla’s Treatment of vivakṣā

Jinendrabuddhi, Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla are those who, while putting the ‘intention of the speaker’ ( ) at the core of their analysis of verbal communication, opt for a formal and technical treatment of the topic. In order to prove through coherent arguments that is inference and therefore to su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asiatische Studien 2023-03, Vol.77 (1), p.37-63
Main Author: Sferra, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Buddhist logic
epistemology
philosophy of language
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Jinendrabuddhi, Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla are those who, while putting the ‘intention of the speaker’ ( ) at the core of their analysis of verbal communication, opt for a formal and technical treatment of the topic. In order to prove through coherent arguments that is inference and therefore to support Dignāga’s reduction of the valid means of correct knowledge, they all identify with the property-possessor ( ) or probandum ( ), and (‘word’) with the logical mark ( ) or probans ( ). They do so to counteract the criticisms of the opponents (Kumārila first of all). Nevertheless, while Jinendrabuddhi, following Dharmakīrti, recognizes the sheer pragmatic value of verbal cognition, Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla seem to follow Dignāga more closely and also recognize its epistemic value. The purpose of this article is precisely to describe the essential points of the arguments of Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla, and show their most original aspects.
ISSN:0004-4717
2235-5871
DOI:10.1515/asia-2023-0018