Loading…
Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?
Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leaders...
Saved in:
Published in: | Personnel psychology 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.1055-1085 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213 |
container_end_page | 1085 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1055 |
container_title | Personnel psychology |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Lemoine, G. James Hartnell, Chad A. Hora, Snehal Watts, Daniel I. |
description | Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leadership's moral foundation—utilitarian consequentialism—and social learning theory to identify cognitive mechanisms (follower other‐orientation and cognitive reflection) through which servant leadership affects employee behavior benefiting two stakeholder groups: a community nonprofit organization and the employing organization. Furthermore, we evaluate the degree to which an employee's moral identity internalization acts as a boundary condition of servant leadership's effects. Data were collected from 274 employee‐supervisor dyads across three waves with objective cognitive reflection scores and objective measures of workplace charitable giving and employee performance. Results supported all hypothesized predictions even after accounting for three alternative mediators. In particular, servant leadership had a positive indirect effect on workplace charitable giving through follower other‐orientation; it also had a positive indirect effect on objective follower financial performance through other‐orientation and cognitive reflection. Both indirect effects were significant at low levels of moral identity internalization but not at high levels. We discuss the implications of these findings and delineate directions for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/peps.12605 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3086123828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3086123828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKcXf0HAm9CZpE2behEZ0wkTB-q5pOkX15kmNWkd-_d21rPv5bs87_vBg9AlJTM65KaFNswoSwk_QhOaJUmU8owcowkhMY24YOkpOgthS4awREzQx7Pz0uCmtlW4xUu3w9JWeLcBiysHAQfw39J22ICswIdN3eLaatODVYChaY3bw4B1DpdgQdcdbnrT1a0BHDr5CRtnDr27c3SipQlw8Xen6P1h8TZfRquXx6f5_SpScZ7wiGeyyiVjLIkzEBIIz1SZSappxWlaCq3jtORCq7zUZaY0EzxNE6o4V7kSjMZTdDXutt599RC6Yut6b4eXRUxESlksmBio65FS3oXgQRetrxvp9wUlxUFkcRBZ_IocYDrCu9rA_h-yWC_Wr2PnB8apdys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086123828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Lemoine, G. James ; Hartnell, Chad A. ; Hora, Snehal ; Watts, Daniel I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lemoine, G. James ; Hartnell, Chad A. ; Hora, Snehal ; Watts, Daniel I.</creatorcontrib><description>Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leadership's moral foundation—utilitarian consequentialism—and social learning theory to identify cognitive mechanisms (follower other‐orientation and cognitive reflection) through which servant leadership affects employee behavior benefiting two stakeholder groups: a community nonprofit organization and the employing organization. Furthermore, we evaluate the degree to which an employee's moral identity internalization acts as a boundary condition of servant leadership's effects. Data were collected from 274 employee‐supervisor dyads across three waves with objective cognitive reflection scores and objective measures of workplace charitable giving and employee performance. Results supported all hypothesized predictions even after accounting for three alternative mediators. In particular, servant leadership had a positive indirect effect on workplace charitable giving through follower other‐orientation; it also had a positive indirect effect on objective follower financial performance through other‐orientation and cognitive reflection. Both indirect effects were significant at low levels of moral identity internalization but not at high levels. We discuss the implications of these findings and delineate directions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/peps.12605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cognitive reflection ; Donations ; individual performance ; Leadership ; Learning Theories ; other‐orientation ; Servant leadership ; social learning ; Socialization ; Stakeholders ; utilitarian consequentialism ; workplace charitable giving</subject><ispartof>Personnel psychology, 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.1055-1085</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4092-7359 ; 0000-0002-1939-9440 ; 0000-0001-9599-6637 ; 0000-0002-4977-6112</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lemoine, G. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartnell, Chad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hora, Snehal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Daniel I.</creatorcontrib><title>Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?</title><title>Personnel psychology</title><description>Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leadership's moral foundation—utilitarian consequentialism—and social learning theory to identify cognitive mechanisms (follower other‐orientation and cognitive reflection) through which servant leadership affects employee behavior benefiting two stakeholder groups: a community nonprofit organization and the employing organization. Furthermore, we evaluate the degree to which an employee's moral identity internalization acts as a boundary condition of servant leadership's effects. Data were collected from 274 employee‐supervisor dyads across three waves with objective cognitive reflection scores and objective measures of workplace charitable giving and employee performance. Results supported all hypothesized predictions even after accounting for three alternative mediators. In particular, servant leadership had a positive indirect effect on workplace charitable giving through follower other‐orientation; it also had a positive indirect effect on objective follower financial performance through other‐orientation and cognitive reflection. Both indirect effects were significant at low levels of moral identity internalization but not at high levels. We discuss the implications of these findings and delineate directions for future research.</description><subject>cognitive reflection</subject><subject>Donations</subject><subject>individual performance</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>other‐orientation</subject><subject>Servant leadership</subject><subject>social learning</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>utilitarian consequentialism</subject><subject>workplace charitable giving</subject><issn>0031-5826</issn><issn>1744-6570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKcXf0HAm9CZpE2behEZ0wkTB-q5pOkX15kmNWkd-_d21rPv5bs87_vBg9AlJTM65KaFNswoSwk_QhOaJUmU8owcowkhMY24YOkpOgthS4awREzQx7Pz0uCmtlW4xUu3w9JWeLcBiysHAQfw39J22ICswIdN3eLaatODVYChaY3bw4B1DpdgQdcdbnrT1a0BHDr5CRtnDr27c3SipQlw8Xen6P1h8TZfRquXx6f5_SpScZ7wiGeyyiVjLIkzEBIIz1SZSappxWlaCq3jtORCq7zUZaY0EzxNE6o4V7kSjMZTdDXutt599RC6Yut6b4eXRUxESlksmBio65FS3oXgQRetrxvp9wUlxUFkcRBZ_IocYDrCu9rA_h-yWC_Wr2PnB8apdys</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Lemoine, G. James</creator><creator>Hartnell, Chad A.</creator><creator>Hora, Snehal</creator><creator>Watts, Daniel I.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-7359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1939-9440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-6637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-6112</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?</title><author>Lemoine, G. James ; Hartnell, Chad A. ; Hora, Snehal ; Watts, Daniel I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cognitive reflection</topic><topic>Donations</topic><topic>individual performance</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>other‐orientation</topic><topic>Servant leadership</topic><topic>social learning</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>utilitarian consequentialism</topic><topic>workplace charitable giving</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lemoine, G. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartnell, Chad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hora, Snehal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Daniel I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><jtitle>Personnel psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lemoine, G. James</au><au>Hartnell, Chad A.</au><au>Hora, Snehal</au><au>Watts, Daniel I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?</atitle><jtitle>Personnel psychology</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1055</spage><epage>1085</epage><pages>1055-1085</pages><issn>0031-5826</issn><eissn>1744-6570</eissn><abstract>Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leadership's moral foundation—utilitarian consequentialism—and social learning theory to identify cognitive mechanisms (follower other‐orientation and cognitive reflection) through which servant leadership affects employee behavior benefiting two stakeholder groups: a community nonprofit organization and the employing organization. Furthermore, we evaluate the degree to which an employee's moral identity internalization acts as a boundary condition of servant leadership's effects. Data were collected from 274 employee‐supervisor dyads across three waves with objective cognitive reflection scores and objective measures of workplace charitable giving and employee performance. Results supported all hypothesized predictions even after accounting for three alternative mediators. In particular, servant leadership had a positive indirect effect on workplace charitable giving through follower other‐orientation; it also had a positive indirect effect on objective follower financial performance through other‐orientation and cognitive reflection. Both indirect effects were significant at low levels of moral identity internalization but not at high levels. We discuss the implications of these findings and delineate directions for future research.</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/peps.12605</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-7359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1939-9440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-6637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-6112</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-5826 |
ispartof | Personnel psychology, 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.1055-1085 |
issn | 0031-5826 1744-6570 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3086123828 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | cognitive reflection Donations individual performance Leadership Learning Theories other‐orientation Servant leadership social learning Socialization Stakeholders utilitarian consequentialism workplace charitable giving |
title | Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A27%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moral%20minds:%20How%20and%20when%20does%20servant%20leadership%20influence%20employees%20to%20benefit%20multiple%20stakeholders?&rft.jtitle=Personnel%20psychology&rft.au=Lemoine,%20G.%20James&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1055&rft.epage=1085&rft.pages=1055-1085&rft.issn=0031-5826&rft.eissn=1744-6570&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/peps.12605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3086123828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086123828&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |