Loading…

Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?

Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leaders...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personnel psychology 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.1055-1085
Main Authors: Lemoine, G. James, Hartnell, Chad A., Hora, Snehal, Watts, Daniel I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213
container_end_page 1085
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1055
container_title Personnel psychology
container_volume 77
creator Lemoine, G. James
Hartnell, Chad A.
Hora, Snehal
Watts, Daniel I.
description Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leadership's moral foundation—utilitarian consequentialism—and social learning theory to identify cognitive mechanisms (follower other‐orientation and cognitive reflection) through which servant leadership affects employee behavior benefiting two stakeholder groups: a community nonprofit organization and the employing organization. Furthermore, we evaluate the degree to which an employee's moral identity internalization acts as a boundary condition of servant leadership's effects. Data were collected from 274 employee‐supervisor dyads across three waves with objective cognitive reflection scores and objective measures of workplace charitable giving and employee performance. Results supported all hypothesized predictions even after accounting for three alternative mediators. In particular, servant leadership had a positive indirect effect on workplace charitable giving through follower other‐orientation; it also had a positive indirect effect on objective follower financial performance through other‐orientation and cognitive reflection. Both indirect effects were significant at low levels of moral identity internalization but not at high levels. We discuss the implications of these findings and delineate directions for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/peps.12605
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3086123828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3086123828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKcXf0HAm9CZpE2behEZ0wkTB-q5pOkX15kmNWkd-_d21rPv5bs87_vBg9AlJTM65KaFNswoSwk_QhOaJUmU8owcowkhMY24YOkpOgthS4awREzQx7Pz0uCmtlW4xUu3w9JWeLcBiysHAQfw39J22ICswIdN3eLaatODVYChaY3bw4B1DpdgQdcdbnrT1a0BHDr5CRtnDr27c3SipQlw8Xen6P1h8TZfRquXx6f5_SpScZ7wiGeyyiVjLIkzEBIIz1SZSappxWlaCq3jtORCq7zUZaY0EzxNE6o4V7kSjMZTdDXutt599RC6Yut6b4eXRUxESlksmBio65FS3oXgQRetrxvp9wUlxUFkcRBZ_IocYDrCu9rA_h-yWC_Wr2PnB8apdys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086123828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Lemoine, G. James ; Hartnell, Chad A. ; Hora, Snehal ; Watts, Daniel I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lemoine, G. James ; Hartnell, Chad A. ; Hora, Snehal ; Watts, Daniel I.</creatorcontrib><description>Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leadership's moral foundation—utilitarian consequentialism—and social learning theory to identify cognitive mechanisms (follower other‐orientation and cognitive reflection) through which servant leadership affects employee behavior benefiting two stakeholder groups: a community nonprofit organization and the employing organization. Furthermore, we evaluate the degree to which an employee's moral identity internalization acts as a boundary condition of servant leadership's effects. Data were collected from 274 employee‐supervisor dyads across three waves with objective cognitive reflection scores and objective measures of workplace charitable giving and employee performance. Results supported all hypothesized predictions even after accounting for three alternative mediators. In particular, servant leadership had a positive indirect effect on workplace charitable giving through follower other‐orientation; it also had a positive indirect effect on objective follower financial performance through other‐orientation and cognitive reflection. Both indirect effects were significant at low levels of moral identity internalization but not at high levels. We discuss the implications of these findings and delineate directions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/peps.12605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cognitive reflection ; Donations ; individual performance ; Leadership ; Learning Theories ; other‐orientation ; Servant leadership ; social learning ; Socialization ; Stakeholders ; utilitarian consequentialism ; workplace charitable giving</subject><ispartof>Personnel psychology, 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.1055-1085</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4092-7359 ; 0000-0002-1939-9440 ; 0000-0001-9599-6637 ; 0000-0002-4977-6112</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lemoine, G. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartnell, Chad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hora, Snehal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Daniel I.</creatorcontrib><title>Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?</title><title>Personnel psychology</title><description>Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leadership's moral foundation—utilitarian consequentialism—and social learning theory to identify cognitive mechanisms (follower other‐orientation and cognitive reflection) through which servant leadership affects employee behavior benefiting two stakeholder groups: a community nonprofit organization and the employing organization. Furthermore, we evaluate the degree to which an employee's moral identity internalization acts as a boundary condition of servant leadership's effects. Data were collected from 274 employee‐supervisor dyads across three waves with objective cognitive reflection scores and objective measures of workplace charitable giving and employee performance. Results supported all hypothesized predictions even after accounting for three alternative mediators. In particular, servant leadership had a positive indirect effect on workplace charitable giving through follower other‐orientation; it also had a positive indirect effect on objective follower financial performance through other‐orientation and cognitive reflection. Both indirect effects were significant at low levels of moral identity internalization but not at high levels. We discuss the implications of these findings and delineate directions for future research.</description><subject>cognitive reflection</subject><subject>Donations</subject><subject>individual performance</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>other‐orientation</subject><subject>Servant leadership</subject><subject>social learning</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>utilitarian consequentialism</subject><subject>workplace charitable giving</subject><issn>0031-5826</issn><issn>1744-6570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKcXf0HAm9CZpE2behEZ0wkTB-q5pOkX15kmNWkd-_d21rPv5bs87_vBg9AlJTM65KaFNswoSwk_QhOaJUmU8owcowkhMY24YOkpOgthS4awREzQx7Pz0uCmtlW4xUu3w9JWeLcBiysHAQfw39J22ICswIdN3eLaatODVYChaY3bw4B1DpdgQdcdbnrT1a0BHDr5CRtnDr27c3SipQlw8Xen6P1h8TZfRquXx6f5_SpScZ7wiGeyyiVjLIkzEBIIz1SZSappxWlaCq3jtORCq7zUZaY0EzxNE6o4V7kSjMZTdDXutt599RC6Yut6b4eXRUxESlksmBio65FS3oXgQRetrxvp9wUlxUFkcRBZ_IocYDrCu9rA_h-yWC_Wr2PnB8apdys</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Lemoine, G. James</creator><creator>Hartnell, Chad A.</creator><creator>Hora, Snehal</creator><creator>Watts, Daniel I.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-7359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1939-9440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-6637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-6112</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?</title><author>Lemoine, G. James ; Hartnell, Chad A. ; Hora, Snehal ; Watts, Daniel I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cognitive reflection</topic><topic>Donations</topic><topic>individual performance</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>other‐orientation</topic><topic>Servant leadership</topic><topic>social learning</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>utilitarian consequentialism</topic><topic>workplace charitable giving</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lemoine, G. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartnell, Chad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hora, Snehal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Daniel I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><jtitle>Personnel psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lemoine, G. James</au><au>Hartnell, Chad A.</au><au>Hora, Snehal</au><au>Watts, Daniel I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?</atitle><jtitle>Personnel psychology</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1055</spage><epage>1085</epage><pages>1055-1085</pages><issn>0031-5826</issn><eissn>1744-6570</eissn><abstract>Servant leadership's unique focus on care and concern for multiple stakeholders has caught the attention of academic and practitioners alike. Its theoretical novelty, however, remains underutilized as a means to contribute unique insights to the leadership literature. We draw on servant leadership's moral foundation—utilitarian consequentialism—and social learning theory to identify cognitive mechanisms (follower other‐orientation and cognitive reflection) through which servant leadership affects employee behavior benefiting two stakeholder groups: a community nonprofit organization and the employing organization. Furthermore, we evaluate the degree to which an employee's moral identity internalization acts as a boundary condition of servant leadership's effects. Data were collected from 274 employee‐supervisor dyads across three waves with objective cognitive reflection scores and objective measures of workplace charitable giving and employee performance. Results supported all hypothesized predictions even after accounting for three alternative mediators. In particular, servant leadership had a positive indirect effect on workplace charitable giving through follower other‐orientation; it also had a positive indirect effect on objective follower financial performance through other‐orientation and cognitive reflection. Both indirect effects were significant at low levels of moral identity internalization but not at high levels. We discuss the implications of these findings and delineate directions for future research.</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/peps.12605</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-7359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1939-9440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-6637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-6112</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-5826
ispartof Personnel psychology, 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.1055-1085
issn 0031-5826
1744-6570
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3086123828
source Wiley
subjects cognitive reflection
Donations
individual performance
Leadership
Learning Theories
other‐orientation
Servant leadership
social learning
Socialization
Stakeholders
utilitarian consequentialism
workplace charitable giving
title Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A27%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moral%20minds:%20How%20and%20when%20does%20servant%20leadership%20influence%20employees%20to%20benefit%20multiple%20stakeholders?&rft.jtitle=Personnel%20psychology&rft.au=Lemoine,%20G.%20James&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1055&rft.epage=1085&rft.pages=1055-1085&rft.issn=0031-5826&rft.eissn=1744-6570&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/peps.12605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3086123828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-57ad9a222437e8ae057cb7a1f1d516b8ff36b58fc9bfb7cf2856641c55c9c8213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086123828&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true