Loading…
Reinterpreting Authoritarian Populisms: The Elitist Plebeian Vision of State
Authoritarian populists offer a vision of state. This ideologically fixed imaginary provides an electoral-authoritarian template for how to shape states once in power. Yet not all those called populists are populist. Some are elitist plebeians. They construct themselves as ‘the moral elite’ above wh...
Saved in:
Published in: | Political studies 2024-08, Vol.72 (3), p.961-983 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-72786e97fac2113641f71852ce7ebab16f272bdb914acaaf096021b0e6ab7bdf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-72786e97fac2113641f71852ce7ebab16f272bdb914acaaf096021b0e6ab7bdf3 |
container_end_page | 983 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 961 |
container_title | Political studies |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Paget, Dan |
description | Authoritarian populists offer a vision of state. This ideologically fixed imaginary provides an electoral-authoritarian template for how to shape states once in power. Yet not all those called populists are populist. Some are elitist plebeians. They construct themselves as ‘the moral elite’ above which fights for ‘the people’ below against ‘the corrupt’. I argue that elitist plebeianism contains a distinct vision of government as elected guardianship. Like populists, elitist plebeians advocate extending executive power. Yet they envisage this not as the realization of the people’s will, but as the projection of accountability downwards. To them, divisions of power are acceptable as divisions of guardian labour. Rival opinions are not illegitimate, just irrelevant, but opposition is intolerable. Therefore, studies of populist authoritarianism should be revisited. Elitist plebeian visions of state may have been misread as authoritarian populist ones. I examine President Magufuli (Tanzania) as an exemplar and identify other potential elitist plebeians worldwide. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00323217231154098 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3086981406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00323217231154098</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3086981406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-72786e97fac2113641f71852ce7ebab16f272bdb914acaaf096021b0e6ab7bdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKc_wFvAc2e-pE1ab2PMKQwcOr2WpPuyZXRtTdKD_96VCR7E03d4n-f94CXkFtgEQKl7xgQXHBQXAFnKivyMjCCVKil4mp-T0ZAnA3BJrkLYMwaCy3RElq_omoi-8xhds6XTPu5a76L2Tjd01XZ97cIhPND1Dum8dtGFSFc1GhzyDxdc29DW0reoI16TC6vrgDc_d0zeH-fr2VOyfFk8z6bLpBJZFhPFVS6xUFZXHEDIFKyCPOMVKjTagLRccbMxBaS60tqyQjIOhqHURpmNFWNyd-rtfPvZY4jlvu19c3xZCpbLIoeUySMFJ6rybQgebdl5d9D-qwRWDqOVf0Y7OpOTE_QWf1v_F74B-b1r9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086981406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reinterpreting Authoritarian Populisms: The Elitist Plebeian Vision of State</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Paget, Dan</creator><creatorcontrib>Paget, Dan</creatorcontrib><description>Authoritarian populists offer a vision of state. This ideologically fixed imaginary provides an electoral-authoritarian template for how to shape states once in power. Yet not all those called populists are populist. Some are elitist plebeians. They construct themselves as ‘the moral elite’ above which fights for ‘the people’ below against ‘the corrupt’. I argue that elitist plebeianism contains a distinct vision of government as elected guardianship. Like populists, elitist plebeians advocate extending executive power. Yet they envisage this not as the realization of the people’s will, but as the projection of accountability downwards. To them, divisions of power are acceptable as divisions of guardian labour. Rival opinions are not illegitimate, just irrelevant, but opposition is intolerable. Therefore, studies of populist authoritarianism should be revisited. Elitist plebeian visions of state may have been misread as authoritarian populist ones. I examine President Magufuli (Tanzania) as an exemplar and identify other potential elitist plebeians worldwide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00323217231154098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Authoritarianism ; Elitism ; Guardianship ; Populism ; Power ; Presidential powers</subject><ispartof>Political studies, 2024-08, Vol.72 (3), p.961-983</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-72786e97fac2113641f71852ce7ebab16f272bdb914acaaf096021b0e6ab7bdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-72786e97fac2113641f71852ce7ebab16f272bdb914acaaf096021b0e6ab7bdf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3883-1649</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paget, Dan</creatorcontrib><title>Reinterpreting Authoritarian Populisms: The Elitist Plebeian Vision of State</title><title>Political studies</title><description>Authoritarian populists offer a vision of state. This ideologically fixed imaginary provides an electoral-authoritarian template for how to shape states once in power. Yet not all those called populists are populist. Some are elitist plebeians. They construct themselves as ‘the moral elite’ above which fights for ‘the people’ below against ‘the corrupt’. I argue that elitist plebeianism contains a distinct vision of government as elected guardianship. Like populists, elitist plebeians advocate extending executive power. Yet they envisage this not as the realization of the people’s will, but as the projection of accountability downwards. To them, divisions of power are acceptable as divisions of guardian labour. Rival opinions are not illegitimate, just irrelevant, but opposition is intolerable. Therefore, studies of populist authoritarianism should be revisited. Elitist plebeian visions of state may have been misread as authoritarian populist ones. I examine President Magufuli (Tanzania) as an exemplar and identify other potential elitist plebeians worldwide.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Elitism</subject><subject>Guardianship</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Presidential powers</subject><issn>0032-3217</issn><issn>1467-9248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKc_wFvAc2e-pE1ab2PMKQwcOr2WpPuyZXRtTdKD_96VCR7E03d4n-f94CXkFtgEQKl7xgQXHBQXAFnKivyMjCCVKil4mp-T0ZAnA3BJrkLYMwaCy3RElq_omoi-8xhds6XTPu5a76L2Tjd01XZ97cIhPND1Dum8dtGFSFc1GhzyDxdc29DW0reoI16TC6vrgDc_d0zeH-fr2VOyfFk8z6bLpBJZFhPFVS6xUFZXHEDIFKyCPOMVKjTagLRccbMxBaS60tqyQjIOhqHURpmNFWNyd-rtfPvZY4jlvu19c3xZCpbLIoeUySMFJ6rybQgebdl5d9D-qwRWDqOVf0Y7OpOTE_QWf1v_F74B-b1r9Q</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Paget, Dan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-1649</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Reinterpreting Authoritarian Populisms: The Elitist Plebeian Vision of State</title><author>Paget, Dan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-72786e97fac2113641f71852ce7ebab16f272bdb914acaaf096021b0e6ab7bdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Elitism</topic><topic>Guardianship</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Presidential powers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paget, Dan</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paget, Dan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reinterpreting Authoritarian Populisms: The Elitist Plebeian Vision of State</atitle><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>961</spage><epage>983</epage><pages>961-983</pages><issn>0032-3217</issn><eissn>1467-9248</eissn><abstract>Authoritarian populists offer a vision of state. This ideologically fixed imaginary provides an electoral-authoritarian template for how to shape states once in power. Yet not all those called populists are populist. Some are elitist plebeians. They construct themselves as ‘the moral elite’ above which fights for ‘the people’ below against ‘the corrupt’. I argue that elitist plebeianism contains a distinct vision of government as elected guardianship. Like populists, elitist plebeians advocate extending executive power. Yet they envisage this not as the realization of the people’s will, but as the projection of accountability downwards. To them, divisions of power are acceptable as divisions of guardian labour. Rival opinions are not illegitimate, just irrelevant, but opposition is intolerable. Therefore, studies of populist authoritarianism should be revisited. Elitist plebeian visions of state may have been misread as authoritarian populist ones. I examine President Magufuli (Tanzania) as an exemplar and identify other potential elitist plebeians worldwide.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00323217231154098</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-1649</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-3217 |
ispartof | Political studies, 2024-08, Vol.72 (3), p.961-983 |
issn | 0032-3217 1467-9248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3086981406 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Accountability Authoritarianism Elitism Guardianship Populism Power Presidential powers |
title | Reinterpreting Authoritarian Populisms: The Elitist Plebeian Vision of State |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A22%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reinterpreting%20Authoritarian%20Populisms:%20The%20Elitist%20Plebeian%20Vision%20of%20State&rft.jtitle=Political%20studies&rft.au=Paget,%20Dan&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=961&rft.epage=983&rft.pages=961-983&rft.issn=0032-3217&rft.eissn=1467-9248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00323217231154098&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3086981406%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-72786e97fac2113641f71852ce7ebab16f272bdb914acaaf096021b0e6ab7bdf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086981406&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00323217231154098&rfr_iscdi=true |