Emigration, Social Remittances and Fiscal Policy Preferences: Experimental Evidence From Mexico

How does emigration affect tax preferences in migrant-sending countries? Experiencing public services in a high tax-capacity destination may reduce support for tax increases by throwing fiscal failure at home into stark relief (the socialization hypothesis). Alternatively, migrants’ exclusion from c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Comparative political studies 2024-09, Vol.57 (11), p.1902-1933
Main Authors: López García, Ana Isabel, Berens, Sarah, Maydom, Barry
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Emigration
Fiscal policy
Health care access
Health services
Households
Immigrants
Immigration policy
Migrants
Payments
Public services
Remittances
Socialization
Tax revenues
Taxation
Transnationalism
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:How does emigration affect tax preferences in migrant-sending countries? Experiencing public services in a high tax-capacity destination may reduce support for tax increases by throwing fiscal failure at home into stark relief (the socialization hypothesis). Alternatively, migrants’ exclusion from certain public services may increase desire to fund these services in migrant origin countries (the exclusion hypothesis). We test these competing hypotheses with an online survey experiment in Mexico and explore variation in US healthcare access on fiscal policy preferences of migrant households. Migrant households, especially those with returned migrant members, are more supportive of taxation when tax revenue is earmarked for healthcare, a service to which many Mexican immigrants in the US lack access. It is migrants’ exclusion from, rather than their socialization into, the fiscal contract in destination countries that influences fiscal policy preferences in their countries of origin.
ISSN:0010-4140
1552-3829
DOI:10.1177/00104140231204235