Supramolecular delivery of dinuclear ruthenium and osmium MCU inhibitors

• Published in: Inorganic chemistry frontiers 2024-08, Vol.11 (16), p.5064-5079
• Main Authors: Bigham, Nicholas P, Novorolsky, Robyn J, Davis, Keana R, Zou, Haipei, MacMillan, Samantha N, Stevenson, Michael J, Robertson, George S, Wilson, Justin J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ammonia; Biocompatibility; Biological effects; Biological properties; Calcium ions; Chemical damage; Complex formation; Functional groups; In vivo methods and tests; Low concentrations; Osmium; Pharmacology; Ruthenium; Stoichiometry
• ISSN: 2052-1545; 2052-1553
• DOI: 10.1039/d4qi01102c

The transmembrane protein known as the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) mediates the influx of calcium ions (Ca2+) into the mitochondrial matrix. An overload of mitochondrial Ca2+ (mCa2+) is directly linked to damaging effects in pathological conditions. Therefore, inhibitors of the MCU are important chemical biology tools and therapeutic agents. Here, two new analogues of previously reported Ru- and Os-based MCU inhibitors Ru265 and Os245, of the general formula [(C10H15CO2)M(NH3)4(μ-N)M(NH3)4(O2CC10H15)](CF3SO3)3, where M = Ru (1) or Os (2), are reported. These analogues bear adamantane functional groups, which were installed to act as guests for the host molecule cucurbit-[7]-uril (CB[7]). These complexes were characterized and analyzed for their efficiency as guests for CB[7]. As shown through a variety of spectroscopic techniques, each adamantane ligand is encapsulated into one CB[7], affording a supramolecular complex of 1 : 2 stoichiometry. The biological effects of these compounds in the presence and absence of two equiv. CB[7] were assessed. Both complexes 1 and 2 exhibit enhanced cellular uptake compared to the parent compounds Ru265 and Os245, and their uptake is increased further in the presence of CB[7]. Compared to Ru265 and Os245, 1 and 2 are less potent as mCa2+ uptake inhibitors in permeabilized cell models. However, in intact cell systems, 1 and 2 inhibit the MCU at concentrations as low as 1 μM, marking an advantage over Ru265 and Os245 which require an order of magnitude higher doses for similar biological effects. The presence of CB[7] did not affect the inhibitory properties of 1 and 2. Experiments in primary cortical neurons showed that 1 and 2 can elicit protective effects against oxygen-glucose deprivation at lower doses than those required for Ru265 or Os245. At low concentrations, the protective effects of 1 were modulated by CB[7], suggesting that supramolecular complex formation can play a role in these biological conditions. The in vivo biocompatibility of 1 was investigated in mice. The intraperitoneal administration of these compounds and their CB[7] complexes led to time-dependent induction of seizures with no protective effects elicited by CB[7]. This work demonstrates the potential for supramolecular interactions in the development of MCU inhibitors.