Loading…

Influence of Instantaneous Shut‐In on the Safety of Tubing String in Ultra‐Deep High‐Temperature and High‐Pressure Gas Well

In this article, considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure (hereinafter referred to as HTHP) gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany) Germany), 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.n/a
Main Authors: Zhang, Xuliang, Zheng, Yushan, Yang, Chengxin, Zhang, Yuhan, Liu, Huiliang, Chu, Shengli, Guo, Haiqing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2029-815c163ba200c4fc607a60253cae241f69f93194b82de6b889a3834773c9fced3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany)
container_volume 12
creator Zhang, Xuliang
Zheng, Yushan
Yang, Chengxin
Zhang, Yuhan
Liu, Huiliang
Chu, Shengli
Guo, Haiqing
description In this article, considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure (hereinafter referred to as HTHP) gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave along the well depth is obtained, and the effects of different production and shut‐in time on the fluctuating pressure and its variation range are analyzed. Through calculation and analysis, it can be seen that there are differences in pressure waveforms at different well depths. The closer to the bottom of the well, the more delayed the occurrence of water hammer, and the smaller the water hammer pressure value. The larger the production, the greater the pressure wave velocity, and the closer to the wellhead, the more obvious the change. For well X, the pressure wave velocity in the well section below 6500 m varies greatly with the increase of production. When the production is 140 × 104 m3 D−1, the difference of pressure wave velocity between the bottom hole and the wellhead is 105.19 m s−1. After instantaneous shut‐in, the wellhead pressure increases by 3.2% compared with the initial pressure and the bottom hole pressure increases by 0.6%. Considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave along the well depth is obtained, and the effects of different production and shut‐in time on the fluctuating pressure and its variation range are analyzed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ente.202400809
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3089875322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3089875322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2029-815c163ba200c4fc607a60253cae241f69f93194b82de6b889a3834773c9fced3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9KAzEQxhdRsNRePQc8t84m-yc5Sq1toajQFo9LNp20W7bZmmSR3gRfwGf0SdylWo_CwAwfv2-G-YLgOoRBCEBv0XgcUKARAAdxFnRoKKJ-REVyfpo5vwx6zm0BIISYxcA6wcfU6LJGo5BUmkyN89I0hVXtyHxT-6_3z6khlSF-g2QuNfpDCy7qvDBrMve2bYUhy9Jb2cD3iHsyKdabZl7gbo9W-toikWb1Kz9bdK7VxtKRFyzLq-BCy9Jh76d3g-XDaDGc9GdP4-nwbtZXzWOiz8NYhQnLJQVQkVYJpDIBGjMlkUahToQWrPk053SFSc65kIyzKE2ZElrhinWDm-Peva1ea3Q-21a1Nc3JjAEXPI0ZpQ01OFLKVs5Z1NneFjtpD1kIWZt11madnbJuDOJoeCtKPPxDZ6PHxejP-w1hbobr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3089875322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Instantaneous Shut‐In on the Safety of Tubing String in Ultra‐Deep High‐Temperature and High‐Pressure Gas Well</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Zhang, Xuliang ; Zheng, Yushan ; Yang, Chengxin ; Zhang, Yuhan ; Liu, Huiliang ; Chu, Shengli ; Guo, Haiqing</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xuliang ; Zheng, Yushan ; Yang, Chengxin ; Zhang, Yuhan ; Liu, Huiliang ; Chu, Shengli ; Guo, Haiqing</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure (hereinafter referred to as HTHP) gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave along the well depth is obtained, and the effects of different production and shut‐in time on the fluctuating pressure and its variation range are analyzed. Through calculation and analysis, it can be seen that there are differences in pressure waveforms at different well depths. The closer to the bottom of the well, the more delayed the occurrence of water hammer, and the smaller the water hammer pressure value. The larger the production, the greater the pressure wave velocity, and the closer to the wellhead, the more obvious the change. For well X, the pressure wave velocity in the well section below 6500 m varies greatly with the increase of production. When the production is 140 × 104 m3 D−1, the difference of pressure wave velocity between the bottom hole and the wellhead is 105.19 m s−1. After instantaneous shut‐in, the wellhead pressure increases by 3.2% compared with the initial pressure and the bottom hole pressure increases by 0.6%. Considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave along the well depth is obtained, and the effects of different production and shut‐in time on the fluctuating pressure and its variation range are analyzed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-4288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2194-4296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ente.202400809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Elastic waves ; Gas wells ; Hammers ; high‐temperatures and high‐pressures (HTHPs) ; Initial pressure ; instantaneous shut‐in ; Pressure effects ; pressure fluctuations ; Strings ; tubing strings ; ultra‐deep gas wells ; Water hammer ; Wave propagation ; Wave velocity ; Waveforms ; Wellheads</subject><ispartof>Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany), 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2029-815c163ba200c4fc607a60253cae241f69f93194b82de6b889a3834773c9fced3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2124-3242</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xuliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yushan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chengxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huiliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Shengli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Haiqing</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Instantaneous Shut‐In on the Safety of Tubing String in Ultra‐Deep High‐Temperature and High‐Pressure Gas Well</title><title>Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany)</title><description>In this article, considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure (hereinafter referred to as HTHP) gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave along the well depth is obtained, and the effects of different production and shut‐in time on the fluctuating pressure and its variation range are analyzed. Through calculation and analysis, it can be seen that there are differences in pressure waveforms at different well depths. The closer to the bottom of the well, the more delayed the occurrence of water hammer, and the smaller the water hammer pressure value. The larger the production, the greater the pressure wave velocity, and the closer to the wellhead, the more obvious the change. For well X, the pressure wave velocity in the well section below 6500 m varies greatly with the increase of production. When the production is 140 × 104 m3 D−1, the difference of pressure wave velocity between the bottom hole and the wellhead is 105.19 m s−1. After instantaneous shut‐in, the wellhead pressure increases by 3.2% compared with the initial pressure and the bottom hole pressure increases by 0.6%. Considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave along the well depth is obtained, and the effects of different production and shut‐in time on the fluctuating pressure and its variation range are analyzed.</description><subject>Elastic waves</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Hammers</subject><subject>high‐temperatures and high‐pressures (HTHPs)</subject><subject>Initial pressure</subject><subject>instantaneous shut‐in</subject><subject>Pressure effects</subject><subject>pressure fluctuations</subject><subject>Strings</subject><subject>tubing strings</subject><subject>ultra‐deep gas wells</subject><subject>Water hammer</subject><subject>Wave propagation</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><subject>Wellheads</subject><issn>2194-4288</issn><issn>2194-4296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9KAzEQxhdRsNRePQc8t84m-yc5Sq1toajQFo9LNp20W7bZmmSR3gRfwGf0SdylWo_CwAwfv2-G-YLgOoRBCEBv0XgcUKARAAdxFnRoKKJ-REVyfpo5vwx6zm0BIISYxcA6wcfU6LJGo5BUmkyN89I0hVXtyHxT-6_3z6khlSF-g2QuNfpDCy7qvDBrMve2bYUhy9Jb2cD3iHsyKdabZl7gbo9W-toikWb1Kz9bdK7VxtKRFyzLq-BCy9Jh76d3g-XDaDGc9GdP4-nwbtZXzWOiz8NYhQnLJQVQkVYJpDIBGjMlkUahToQWrPk053SFSc65kIyzKE2ZElrhinWDm-Peva1ea3Q-21a1Nc3JjAEXPI0ZpQ01OFLKVs5Z1NneFjtpD1kIWZt11madnbJuDOJoeCtKPPxDZ6PHxejP-w1hbobr</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Zhang, Xuliang</creator><creator>Zheng, Yushan</creator><creator>Yang, Chengxin</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuhan</creator><creator>Liu, Huiliang</creator><creator>Chu, Shengli</creator><creator>Guo, Haiqing</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2124-3242</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Influence of Instantaneous Shut‐In on the Safety of Tubing String in Ultra‐Deep High‐Temperature and High‐Pressure Gas Well</title><author>Zhang, Xuliang ; Zheng, Yushan ; Yang, Chengxin ; Zhang, Yuhan ; Liu, Huiliang ; Chu, Shengli ; Guo, Haiqing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2029-815c163ba200c4fc607a60253cae241f69f93194b82de6b889a3834773c9fced3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Elastic waves</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Hammers</topic><topic>high‐temperatures and high‐pressures (HTHPs)</topic><topic>Initial pressure</topic><topic>instantaneous shut‐in</topic><topic>Pressure effects</topic><topic>pressure fluctuations</topic><topic>Strings</topic><topic>tubing strings</topic><topic>ultra‐deep gas wells</topic><topic>Water hammer</topic><topic>Wave propagation</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><topic>Wellheads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xuliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yushan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chengxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huiliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Shengli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Haiqing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Xuliang</au><au>Zheng, Yushan</au><au>Yang, Chengxin</au><au>Zhang, Yuhan</au><au>Liu, Huiliang</au><au>Chu, Shengli</au><au>Guo, Haiqing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Instantaneous Shut‐In on the Safety of Tubing String in Ultra‐Deep High‐Temperature and High‐Pressure Gas Well</atitle><jtitle>Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany)</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2194-4288</issn><eissn>2194-4296</eissn><abstract>In this article, considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure (hereinafter referred to as HTHP) gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave along the well depth is obtained, and the effects of different production and shut‐in time on the fluctuating pressure and its variation range are analyzed. Through calculation and analysis, it can be seen that there are differences in pressure waveforms at different well depths. The closer to the bottom of the well, the more delayed the occurrence of water hammer, and the smaller the water hammer pressure value. The larger the production, the greater the pressure wave velocity, and the closer to the wellhead, the more obvious the change. For well X, the pressure wave velocity in the well section below 6500 m varies greatly with the increase of production. When the production is 140 × 104 m3 D−1, the difference of pressure wave velocity between the bottom hole and the wellhead is 105.19 m s−1. After instantaneous shut‐in, the wellhead pressure increases by 3.2% compared with the initial pressure and the bottom hole pressure increases by 0.6%. Considering the factors such as well trajectory and tubing string structures, the transient shut‐in tubing string pressure fluctuation model of ultra‐deep high‐temperature and high‐pressure gas well is established, the propagation of pressure wave along the well depth is obtained, and the effects of different production and shut‐in time on the fluctuating pressure and its variation range are analyzed.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ente.202400809</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2124-3242</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2194-4288
ispartof Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany), 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.n/a
issn 2194-4288
2194-4296
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3089875322
source Wiley
subjects Elastic waves
Gas wells
Hammers
high‐temperatures and high‐pressures (HTHPs)
Initial pressure
instantaneous shut‐in
Pressure effects
pressure fluctuations
Strings
tubing strings
ultra‐deep gas wells
Water hammer
Wave propagation
Wave velocity
Waveforms
Wellheads
title Influence of Instantaneous Shut‐In on the Safety of Tubing String in Ultra‐Deep High‐Temperature and High‐Pressure Gas Well
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A15%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Instantaneous%20Shut%E2%80%90In%20on%20the%20Safety%20of%20Tubing%20String%20in%20Ultra%E2%80%90Deep%20High%E2%80%90Temperature%20and%20High%E2%80%90Pressure%20Gas%20Well&rft.jtitle=Energy%20technology%20(Weinheim,%20Germany)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Xuliang&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2194-4288&rft.eissn=2194-4296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ente.202400809&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3089875322%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2029-815c163ba200c4fc607a60253cae241f69f93194b82de6b889a3834773c9fced3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3089875322&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true