Loading…
Consumer Attributions of Profit- and Customer Need-Driven Firm Motives in Coproduction Contexts
In the last two decades, technological advancements have stimulated many firms to employ a coproduction concept, in which customers play a more active role in the creation of goods and services (Stadler and Bolton 2019; Vargo and Lusch 2016). Today, many firms engage their customers in the creation...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 380 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 379 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Güntürkün, Pascal Haumann, Till Edinger-Schons, Laura-Marie Wieseke, Jan |
description | In the last two decades, technological advancements have stimulated many firms to employ a coproduction concept, in which customers play a more active role in the creation of goods and services (Stadler and Bolton 2019; Vargo and Lusch 2016). Today, many firms engage their customers in the creation of the final offering using self-production kits (e.g., Ikea, Hello Fresh), self-service technologies (e.g., American Airlines, Walmart), or offer toolkits for product customization (e.g., Nike, Dell) (Atakan, Bagozzi, and Yoon 2014). Academics and practitioners have often praised coproduction as a win-win concept that enables firms to 1) realize cost-efficiencies and 2) better satisfy customer needs at the same time (Prahalad and Ramaswamy 2000). However, recent studies and business cases reveal that coproduction does not always lead to favorable outcomes, thus indicating that the underlying mechanisms that explain when and why coproduction yields positive or negative outcomes for customer relationships are not fully understood yet (Dong and Sivakumar 2017). The present research integrates theoretical notions of the multiple inference model (Reeder et al. 2004) and the negativity bias (Baumeister et al. 2001) to suggest that customer beliefs about a firm's coproduction motives (cost/profit and customer-need motive) offer a psychological mechanism that helps to explain when and why coproduction has positive/ negative short- and long-term consequences for customer relationships. Two qualitative studies provide initial support for the notion that these two motives are highly prevalent among customers in different countries and coproduction contexts. Using a longitudinal field study and a randomized experiment, we then examine the key notion that the negative effects of attributions of profit-driven firm motives are temporally more persistent than the positive effects of attributions of customer-need driven firm motives. We further investigate how customers infer these motives based on managerial decisions related to the extent of labor customers have to contribute in the process, the degree to which they can customize the outcome, and the extent to which they can realize savings through their active engagement. Study 1 builds on a large-scale multi-wave longitudinal data set in which the subjects were customers of a multinational retailer that sells ready-to-assemble furniture. We employ a latent growth modeling approach to analyze longitudinal data at the individ |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3090691387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090691387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30906913873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMsKwjAURLNQsD7-4YLrQLTaNkuJFjeKC_el2hRSbK4mN-Lnm4If4Go4M4cZsUQIWXC53hYTNvW-E2KVb7IsYZVC60OvHeyInLkFMrEAbOHisDXEobYNqOAJB-msdcP3zry1hdK4Hk5IETwYCwqfDptwHx4iWNIf8nM2buuH14tfztiyPFzVkUf3FbSnqsPgbJyqVEiRyVVa5Ol_1hcyc0QW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3090691387</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Consumer Attributions of Profit- and Customer Need-Driven Firm Motives in Coproduction Contexts</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Güntürkün, Pascal ; Haumann, Till ; Edinger-Schons, Laura-Marie ; Wieseke, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Güntürkün, Pascal ; Haumann, Till ; Edinger-Schons, Laura-Marie ; Wieseke, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>In the last two decades, technological advancements have stimulated many firms to employ a coproduction concept, in which customers play a more active role in the creation of goods and services (Stadler and Bolton 2019; Vargo and Lusch 2016). Today, many firms engage their customers in the creation of the final offering using self-production kits (e.g., Ikea, Hello Fresh), self-service technologies (e.g., American Airlines, Walmart), or offer toolkits for product customization (e.g., Nike, Dell) (Atakan, Bagozzi, and Yoon 2014). Academics and practitioners have often praised coproduction as a win-win concept that enables firms to 1) realize cost-efficiencies and 2) better satisfy customer needs at the same time (Prahalad and Ramaswamy 2000). However, recent studies and business cases reveal that coproduction does not always lead to favorable outcomes, thus indicating that the underlying mechanisms that explain when and why coproduction yields positive or negative outcomes for customer relationships are not fully understood yet (Dong and Sivakumar 2017). The present research integrates theoretical notions of the multiple inference model (Reeder et al. 2004) and the negativity bias (Baumeister et al. 2001) to suggest that customer beliefs about a firm's coproduction motives (cost/profit and customer-need motive) offer a psychological mechanism that helps to explain when and why coproduction has positive/ negative short- and long-term consequences for customer relationships. Two qualitative studies provide initial support for the notion that these two motives are highly prevalent among customers in different countries and coproduction contexts. Using a longitudinal field study and a randomized experiment, we then examine the key notion that the negative effects of attributions of profit-driven firm motives are temporally more persistent than the positive effects of attributions of customer-need driven firm motives. We further investigate how customers infer these motives based on managerial decisions related to the extent of labor customers have to contribute in the process, the degree to which they can customize the outcome, and the extent to which they can realize savings through their active engagement. Study 1 builds on a large-scale multi-wave longitudinal data set in which the subjects were customers of a multinational retailer that sells ready-to-assemble furniture. We employ a latent growth modeling approach to analyze longitudinal data at the individual customer level (Bollen and Curran 2006). The results of Study 1 show that customers can hold perceptions of both profit- and customer need-driven firm motives for offering coproduction simultaneously and that these motive attributions have substantial short- and long-term influences on relevant marketing outcomes. Specifically, the results confirm our predictions that the positive effects of attributions of customer need-driven motives on customers' satisfaction and willingness to pay decrease over time whereas customers' perceptions of profit-driven motives have detrimental effects on both outcomes, which are highly persistent over time. The field study further shows how motive attributions vary with the nature of a firm's coproduction offer. Specifically, the results show that greater coproduction effort and time investments reduce attributions of customer-need driven motives but fuel attributions of profit-driven motives, while greater customization possibilities amplify attributions of customer-need driven motives. Study 2 is a large experimental study in which we offer additional evidence for the causality of the proposed relationships and provide insights into the role of perceived monetary savings through engaging in coproduction processes. The study was administered online and builds on a 2 (degree of customization: low vs. high) x 2 (degree of effort: low vs. high) x 2 (degree of savings: low vs. high) between-subjects design. We kept the study context constant to offer a better comparison to the results of the field study. Results of Study 2 replicate the results of the field study and thereby provide further support for the robustness of the proposed relationships. Due to the manipulation of the factors that characterize a firm's coproduction concept (coproduction effort, customization, and savings), the study offers further insights into the generalizability of the relationships. This research makes three major contributions to marketing theory and practice. First, it extends the coproduction literature by providing first insights into the differential roles of customer attributions of mixed coproduction motives. We show that profit- and customerneed driven motive attributions serve as independent mechanisms that guide customers' impression of a firm's coproduction concept and exert differential influence on customers' satisfaction and willingness to pay. The study thereby answers calls for research on the psychological mechanisms that link coproduction with outcomes and helps to explain controversial findings regarding the success of a coproduction concept in research and practice (Dong and Sivakumar 2017). From a practical perspective, it significantly advances managers understanding of how decisions related to the configuration of a coproduction concept interact to affect customer attitudes and behaviors. Second, the study advances both research on coproduction and motive attribution by offering first insights into longitudinal dynamics of the effects of mixed motive attributions on marketing outcomes. A novel and intriguing finding that adds to both literature streams is that the effects of self- and other-centered motive attributions follow different temporal patterns. Whereas the positive effects of customer-centered motive attributions decrease over time, the negative effects of self-centered motive attributions remain persistent over time. The shift from a static to a dynamic perspective thus offers a deeper understanding of the differential short- and long-term effects of managerial decisions related to coproduction concept on customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. Third, we advance current coproduction literature by identifying three managerial decisions that are central to the configuration of a coproduction concept influence customer attributions of firm motives. Specifically, we show that customers draw inferences of coproduction motives based on the extent to which customers participate in coproduction (intensity), the degree to which they gain autonomy to influence the configuration and design of the outcome (customization), and the degree to which they can realize financial benefits for their engagement in coproduction (savings). We thereby contribute to a better understanding of the joint effects of customer participation in design and production stage (Atakan, Bagozzi, and Yoon 2014; Buechel and Janisczewski 2014) on the development of favorable customer relationships over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-9258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Urbana: Association for Consumer Research</publisher><subject>Consumer behavior ; Customer services ; Customization ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>Advances in consumer research, 2020, Vol.48, p.379-380</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Consumer Research 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,778,782,787,788,23917,23918,25127</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Güntürkün, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haumann, Till</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edinger-Schons, Laura-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieseke, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Consumer Attributions of Profit- and Customer Need-Driven Firm Motives in Coproduction Contexts</title><title>Advances in consumer research</title><description>In the last two decades, technological advancements have stimulated many firms to employ a coproduction concept, in which customers play a more active role in the creation of goods and services (Stadler and Bolton 2019; Vargo and Lusch 2016). Today, many firms engage their customers in the creation of the final offering using self-production kits (e.g., Ikea, Hello Fresh), self-service technologies (e.g., American Airlines, Walmart), or offer toolkits for product customization (e.g., Nike, Dell) (Atakan, Bagozzi, and Yoon 2014). Academics and practitioners have often praised coproduction as a win-win concept that enables firms to 1) realize cost-efficiencies and 2) better satisfy customer needs at the same time (Prahalad and Ramaswamy 2000). However, recent studies and business cases reveal that coproduction does not always lead to favorable outcomes, thus indicating that the underlying mechanisms that explain when and why coproduction yields positive or negative outcomes for customer relationships are not fully understood yet (Dong and Sivakumar 2017). The present research integrates theoretical notions of the multiple inference model (Reeder et al. 2004) and the negativity bias (Baumeister et al. 2001) to suggest that customer beliefs about a firm's coproduction motives (cost/profit and customer-need motive) offer a psychological mechanism that helps to explain when and why coproduction has positive/ negative short- and long-term consequences for customer relationships. Two qualitative studies provide initial support for the notion that these two motives are highly prevalent among customers in different countries and coproduction contexts. Using a longitudinal field study and a randomized experiment, we then examine the key notion that the negative effects of attributions of profit-driven firm motives are temporally more persistent than the positive effects of attributions of customer-need driven firm motives. We further investigate how customers infer these motives based on managerial decisions related to the extent of labor customers have to contribute in the process, the degree to which they can customize the outcome, and the extent to which they can realize savings through their active engagement. Study 1 builds on a large-scale multi-wave longitudinal data set in which the subjects were customers of a multinational retailer that sells ready-to-assemble furniture. We employ a latent growth modeling approach to analyze longitudinal data at the individual customer level (Bollen and Curran 2006). The results of Study 1 show that customers can hold perceptions of both profit- and customer need-driven firm motives for offering coproduction simultaneously and that these motive attributions have substantial short- and long-term influences on relevant marketing outcomes. Specifically, the results confirm our predictions that the positive effects of attributions of customer need-driven motives on customers' satisfaction and willingness to pay decrease over time whereas customers' perceptions of profit-driven motives have detrimental effects on both outcomes, which are highly persistent over time. The field study further shows how motive attributions vary with the nature of a firm's coproduction offer. Specifically, the results show that greater coproduction effort and time investments reduce attributions of customer-need driven motives but fuel attributions of profit-driven motives, while greater customization possibilities amplify attributions of customer-need driven motives. Study 2 is a large experimental study in which we offer additional evidence for the causality of the proposed relationships and provide insights into the role of perceived monetary savings through engaging in coproduction processes. The study was administered online and builds on a 2 (degree of customization: low vs. high) x 2 (degree of effort: low vs. high) x 2 (degree of savings: low vs. high) between-subjects design. We kept the study context constant to offer a better comparison to the results of the field study. Results of Study 2 replicate the results of the field study and thereby provide further support for the robustness of the proposed relationships. Due to the manipulation of the factors that characterize a firm's coproduction concept (coproduction effort, customization, and savings), the study offers further insights into the generalizability of the relationships. This research makes three major contributions to marketing theory and practice. First, it extends the coproduction literature by providing first insights into the differential roles of customer attributions of mixed coproduction motives. We show that profit- and customerneed driven motive attributions serve as independent mechanisms that guide customers' impression of a firm's coproduction concept and exert differential influence on customers' satisfaction and willingness to pay. The study thereby answers calls for research on the psychological mechanisms that link coproduction with outcomes and helps to explain controversial findings regarding the success of a coproduction concept in research and practice (Dong and Sivakumar 2017). From a practical perspective, it significantly advances managers understanding of how decisions related to the configuration of a coproduction concept interact to affect customer attitudes and behaviors. Second, the study advances both research on coproduction and motive attribution by offering first insights into longitudinal dynamics of the effects of mixed motive attributions on marketing outcomes. A novel and intriguing finding that adds to both literature streams is that the effects of self- and other-centered motive attributions follow different temporal patterns. Whereas the positive effects of customer-centered motive attributions decrease over time, the negative effects of self-centered motive attributions remain persistent over time. The shift from a static to a dynamic perspective thus offers a deeper understanding of the differential short- and long-term effects of managerial decisions related to coproduction concept on customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. Third, we advance current coproduction literature by identifying three managerial decisions that are central to the configuration of a coproduction concept influence customer attributions of firm motives. Specifically, we show that customers draw inferences of coproduction motives based on the extent to which customers participate in coproduction (intensity), the degree to which they gain autonomy to influence the configuration and design of the outcome (customization), and the degree to which they can realize financial benefits for their engagement in coproduction (savings). We thereby contribute to a better understanding of the joint effects of customer participation in design and production stage (Atakan, Bagozzi, and Yoon 2014; Buechel and Janisczewski 2014) on the development of favorable customer relationships over time.</description><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>0098-9258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjMsKwjAURLNQsD7-4YLrQLTaNkuJFjeKC_el2hRSbK4mN-Lnm4If4Go4M4cZsUQIWXC53hYTNvW-E2KVb7IsYZVC60OvHeyInLkFMrEAbOHisDXEobYNqOAJB-msdcP3zry1hdK4Hk5IETwYCwqfDptwHx4iWNIf8nM2buuH14tfztiyPFzVkUf3FbSnqsPgbJyqVEiRyVVa5Ol_1hcyc0QW</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Güntürkün, Pascal</creator><creator>Haumann, Till</creator><creator>Edinger-Schons, Laura-Marie</creator><creator>Wieseke, Jan</creator><general>Association for Consumer Research</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Consumer Attributions of Profit- and Customer Need-Driven Firm Motives in Coproduction Contexts</title><author>Güntürkün, Pascal ; Haumann, Till ; Edinger-Schons, Laura-Marie ; Wieseke, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30906913873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Güntürkün, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haumann, Till</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edinger-Schons, Laura-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieseke, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Güntürkün, Pascal</au><au>Haumann, Till</au><au>Edinger-Schons, Laura-Marie</au><au>Wieseke, Jan</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Consumer Attributions of Profit- and Customer Need-Driven Firm Motives in Coproduction Contexts</atitle><btitle>Advances in consumer research</btitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>48</volume><spage>379</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>379-380</pages><issn>0098-9258</issn><abstract>In the last two decades, technological advancements have stimulated many firms to employ a coproduction concept, in which customers play a more active role in the creation of goods and services (Stadler and Bolton 2019; Vargo and Lusch 2016). Today, many firms engage their customers in the creation of the final offering using self-production kits (e.g., Ikea, Hello Fresh), self-service technologies (e.g., American Airlines, Walmart), or offer toolkits for product customization (e.g., Nike, Dell) (Atakan, Bagozzi, and Yoon 2014). Academics and practitioners have often praised coproduction as a win-win concept that enables firms to 1) realize cost-efficiencies and 2) better satisfy customer needs at the same time (Prahalad and Ramaswamy 2000). However, recent studies and business cases reveal that coproduction does not always lead to favorable outcomes, thus indicating that the underlying mechanisms that explain when and why coproduction yields positive or negative outcomes for customer relationships are not fully understood yet (Dong and Sivakumar 2017). The present research integrates theoretical notions of the multiple inference model (Reeder et al. 2004) and the negativity bias (Baumeister et al. 2001) to suggest that customer beliefs about a firm's coproduction motives (cost/profit and customer-need motive) offer a psychological mechanism that helps to explain when and why coproduction has positive/ negative short- and long-term consequences for customer relationships. Two qualitative studies provide initial support for the notion that these two motives are highly prevalent among customers in different countries and coproduction contexts. Using a longitudinal field study and a randomized experiment, we then examine the key notion that the negative effects of attributions of profit-driven firm motives are temporally more persistent than the positive effects of attributions of customer-need driven firm motives. We further investigate how customers infer these motives based on managerial decisions related to the extent of labor customers have to contribute in the process, the degree to which they can customize the outcome, and the extent to which they can realize savings through their active engagement. Study 1 builds on a large-scale multi-wave longitudinal data set in which the subjects were customers of a multinational retailer that sells ready-to-assemble furniture. We employ a latent growth modeling approach to analyze longitudinal data at the individual customer level (Bollen and Curran 2006). The results of Study 1 show that customers can hold perceptions of both profit- and customer need-driven firm motives for offering coproduction simultaneously and that these motive attributions have substantial short- and long-term influences on relevant marketing outcomes. Specifically, the results confirm our predictions that the positive effects of attributions of customer need-driven motives on customers' satisfaction and willingness to pay decrease over time whereas customers' perceptions of profit-driven motives have detrimental effects on both outcomes, which are highly persistent over time. The field study further shows how motive attributions vary with the nature of a firm's coproduction offer. Specifically, the results show that greater coproduction effort and time investments reduce attributions of customer-need driven motives but fuel attributions of profit-driven motives, while greater customization possibilities amplify attributions of customer-need driven motives. Study 2 is a large experimental study in which we offer additional evidence for the causality of the proposed relationships and provide insights into the role of perceived monetary savings through engaging in coproduction processes. The study was administered online and builds on a 2 (degree of customization: low vs. high) x 2 (degree of effort: low vs. high) x 2 (degree of savings: low vs. high) between-subjects design. We kept the study context constant to offer a better comparison to the results of the field study. Results of Study 2 replicate the results of the field study and thereby provide further support for the robustness of the proposed relationships. Due to the manipulation of the factors that characterize a firm's coproduction concept (coproduction effort, customization, and savings), the study offers further insights into the generalizability of the relationships. This research makes three major contributions to marketing theory and practice. First, it extends the coproduction literature by providing first insights into the differential roles of customer attributions of mixed coproduction motives. We show that profit- and customerneed driven motive attributions serve as independent mechanisms that guide customers' impression of a firm's coproduction concept and exert differential influence on customers' satisfaction and willingness to pay. The study thereby answers calls for research on the psychological mechanisms that link coproduction with outcomes and helps to explain controversial findings regarding the success of a coproduction concept in research and practice (Dong and Sivakumar 2017). From a practical perspective, it significantly advances managers understanding of how decisions related to the configuration of a coproduction concept interact to affect customer attitudes and behaviors. Second, the study advances both research on coproduction and motive attribution by offering first insights into longitudinal dynamics of the effects of mixed motive attributions on marketing outcomes. A novel and intriguing finding that adds to both literature streams is that the effects of self- and other-centered motive attributions follow different temporal patterns. Whereas the positive effects of customer-centered motive attributions decrease over time, the negative effects of self-centered motive attributions remain persistent over time. The shift from a static to a dynamic perspective thus offers a deeper understanding of the differential short- and long-term effects of managerial decisions related to coproduction concept on customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. Third, we advance current coproduction literature by identifying three managerial decisions that are central to the configuration of a coproduction concept influence customer attributions of firm motives. Specifically, we show that customers draw inferences of coproduction motives based on the extent to which customers participate in coproduction (intensity), the degree to which they gain autonomy to influence the configuration and design of the outcome (customization), and the degree to which they can realize financial benefits for their engagement in coproduction (savings). We thereby contribute to a better understanding of the joint effects of customer participation in design and production stage (Atakan, Bagozzi, and Yoon 2014; Buechel and Janisczewski 2014) on the development of favorable customer relationships over time.</abstract><cop>Urbana</cop><pub>Association for Consumer Research</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-9258 |
ispartof | Advances in consumer research, 2020, Vol.48, p.379-380 |
issn | 0098-9258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3090691387 |
source | Business Source Ultimate |
subjects | Consumer behavior Customer services Customization Technological change |
title | Consumer Attributions of Profit- and Customer Need-Driven Firm Motives in Coproduction Contexts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A51%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Consumer%20Attributions%20of%20Profit-%20and%20Customer%20Need-Driven%20Firm%20Motives%20in%20Coproduction%20Contexts&rft.btitle=Advances%20in%20consumer%20research&rft.au=G%C3%BCnt%C3%BCrk%C3%BCn,%20Pascal&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=379-380&rft.issn=0098-9258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3090691387%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30906913873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090691387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |