Loading…
Comparison of single incision surgical gastrostomy with other gastrostomy methods
[LANGUAGE= "English"] INTRODUCTION: Many surgical methods have been defined for gastrostomy, including open surgery and endoscopic methods. There are very few reports on single-incision gastrostomy. In this study, we aimed to share our experience of single-incision surgical gastrostomy, wh...
Saved in:
Published in: | Haydarpașa Numune Hastanesi tıp dergisi = The medical journal of Haydarpașa Numune Hospital 2020, Vol.60 (1), p.71 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | Haydarpașa Numune Hastanesi tıp dergisi = The medical journal of Haydarpașa Numune Hospital |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Akış Yıldız, Zeliha |
description | [LANGUAGE= "English"] INTRODUCTION: Many surgical methods have been defined for gastrostomy, including open surgery and endoscopic methods. There are very few reports on single-incision gastrostomy. In this study, we aimed to share our experience of single-incision surgical gastrostomy, which is less known than other methods, by comparing it with other gastrostomy methods.METHODS: Between June 2016 and June 2019, in Ümraniye E.A.H. 15, patients undergoing SIG, 14 patients undergoing Stamm gastrostomy (SG) and 11 patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) were evaluated retrospectively in this study. Age, sex, indication for operation, operation method, operation time and postoperative complications were compared.RESULTS: Gastric perforation was observed in one patient, and a gastrostomy tube was absent in another patient. Laparotomy and SG were performed in both patients. Two patients who underwent SIG had eventration at the incision site and granulation around the tube in six patients. Evolution was treated with local suture and granulation was treated with silver nitrate. In one patient who underwent Stamm gastrostomy, laparotomy was performed because of the development of brid ileus. No major complication requiring laparotomy was seen in any patient who underwent SIG.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: SIG is easy to perform, minimally invasive, and the complication rate is lower than other methods.[LANGUAGE= "Turkish"] GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Gastrostomi için günümüzde açık cerrahi ve endoskopik yöntemler olmak üzere birçok cerrahi yöntem tanımlanmıştır. Tek insizyon gastrostomi (TİG) ile ilgili ise oldukça az sayıda yayın mevcuttur. Diğer yöntemlere göre daha az bilinen tek insizyon cerrahi gastrostomi deneyimimizi diğer gastrostomi yöntemleri ile karşılaştırarak paylaşmayı amaçladık.YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Haziran 2016 ile Haziran 2019 tarihleri arasında Ümraniye E.A.H. de TİG yapılan 15 olgu, Stamm gastrostomi (SG) yapılan 14 olgu ve perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi (PEG) yapılan 11 olgu retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Olguların yaş, cinsiyet, ameliyat endikasyonu, ameliyat yöntemi, ameliyat süresi, postoperatif komplikasyonlar karşılaştırıldı.BULGULAR: PEG yapılan olgulardan birinde mide perforasyonu ve diğerinde gastrostomi tüpünün yerinde olmadığı izlendi. Her iki hastayada laparotomi ve SG yapıldı. TİG yapılan 2 olguda insizyon yerinde evantrasyon ve altı hastada tüp çevresinde granülasyon izlendi. Evantrasyon lokal sütürle tedavi edilirken gra |
doi_str_mv | 10.14744/hnhj.2020.35902 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3090769811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090769811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1112-88c4a26877a5d48e54807bb6f39adfe37433aeac4b8f5e81432da8d6863abc573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkD1rwzAYhDW00JBm72jo7PSVXlmSxxL6BYFSaGchy3IsE1uu5FDy7-skXTodHMfd8RByR2FNueT8oR3abs2AwRqLEtgVWVAEyAUKvCGrlDoAYAVFCWJBPjahH030KQxZaLLkh93eZX6wPvnZSoe489bss51JUwxpCv0x-_FTm4WpdfGf3bupDXW6JdeN2Se3-tMl-Xp--ty85tv3l7fN4za3lFKWK2W5YUJJaYqaK1dwBbKqRIOlqRuHkiMaZyyvVFM4RTmy2qhaKIGmsoXEJbm_9I4xfB9cmnQXDnGYJzVCCVKUitI5BZeUnW-m6Bo9Rt-beNQU9JmXPvHSJ176zAt_ASWDYb0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090769811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of single incision surgical gastrostomy with other gastrostomy methods</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Akış Yıldız, Zeliha</creator><creatorcontrib>Akış Yıldız, Zeliha</creatorcontrib><description>[LANGUAGE= "English"] INTRODUCTION: Many surgical methods have been defined for gastrostomy, including open surgery and endoscopic methods. There are very few reports on single-incision gastrostomy. In this study, we aimed to share our experience of single-incision surgical gastrostomy, which is less known than other methods, by comparing it with other gastrostomy methods.METHODS: Between June 2016 and June 2019, in Ümraniye E.A.H. 15, patients undergoing SIG, 14 patients undergoing Stamm gastrostomy (SG) and 11 patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) were evaluated retrospectively in this study. Age, sex, indication for operation, operation method, operation time and postoperative complications were compared.RESULTS: Gastric perforation was observed in one patient, and a gastrostomy tube was absent in another patient. Laparotomy and SG were performed in both patients. Two patients who underwent SIG had eventration at the incision site and granulation around the tube in six patients. Evolution was treated with local suture and granulation was treated with silver nitrate. In one patient who underwent Stamm gastrostomy, laparotomy was performed because of the development of brid ileus. No major complication requiring laparotomy was seen in any patient who underwent SIG.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: SIG is easy to perform, minimally invasive, and the complication rate is lower than other methods.[LANGUAGE= "Turkish"] GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Gastrostomi için günümüzde açık cerrahi ve endoskopik yöntemler olmak üzere birçok cerrahi yöntem tanımlanmıştır. Tek insizyon gastrostomi (TİG) ile ilgili ise oldukça az sayıda yayın mevcuttur. Diğer yöntemlere göre daha az bilinen tek insizyon cerrahi gastrostomi deneyimimizi diğer gastrostomi yöntemleri ile karşılaştırarak paylaşmayı amaçladık.YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Haziran 2016 ile Haziran 2019 tarihleri arasında Ümraniye E.A.H. de TİG yapılan 15 olgu, Stamm gastrostomi (SG) yapılan 14 olgu ve perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi (PEG) yapılan 11 olgu retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Olguların yaş, cinsiyet, ameliyat endikasyonu, ameliyat yöntemi, ameliyat süresi, postoperatif komplikasyonlar karşılaştırıldı.BULGULAR: PEG yapılan olgulardan birinde mide perforasyonu ve diğerinde gastrostomi tüpünün yerinde olmadığı izlendi. Her iki hastayada laparotomi ve SG yapıldı. TİG yapılan 2 olguda insizyon yerinde evantrasyon ve altı hastada tüp çevresinde granülasyon izlendi. Evantrasyon lokal sütürle tedavi edilirken granülasyon gümüş nitrat ile tedavi edildi. Stam gastrostomi yapılan 1 olguda brid ileus gelişmesi nedeniyle laparotomi yapıldı. TİG yapılan hiçbir olguda laparatomi gerektirecek majör komplikasyon görülmedi.TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: TİG kolay uygulanabilir, minimal invaziv ve komplikasyon oranı da diğer yöntemlere göre düşüktür.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-6363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14744/hnhj.2020.35902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Istanbul: Kare Publishing</publisher><subject>Endoscopy ; Laparotomy ; Ostomy ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Haydarpașa Numune Hastanesi tıp dergisi = The medical journal of Haydarpașa Numune Hospital, 2020, Vol.60 (1), p.71</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3090769811?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,25731,27900,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akış Yıldız, Zeliha</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of single incision surgical gastrostomy with other gastrostomy methods</title><title>Haydarpașa Numune Hastanesi tıp dergisi = The medical journal of Haydarpașa Numune Hospital</title><description>[LANGUAGE= "English"] INTRODUCTION: Many surgical methods have been defined for gastrostomy, including open surgery and endoscopic methods. There are very few reports on single-incision gastrostomy. In this study, we aimed to share our experience of single-incision surgical gastrostomy, which is less known than other methods, by comparing it with other gastrostomy methods.METHODS: Between June 2016 and June 2019, in Ümraniye E.A.H. 15, patients undergoing SIG, 14 patients undergoing Stamm gastrostomy (SG) and 11 patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) were evaluated retrospectively in this study. Age, sex, indication for operation, operation method, operation time and postoperative complications were compared.RESULTS: Gastric perforation was observed in one patient, and a gastrostomy tube was absent in another patient. Laparotomy and SG were performed in both patients. Two patients who underwent SIG had eventration at the incision site and granulation around the tube in six patients. Evolution was treated with local suture and granulation was treated with silver nitrate. In one patient who underwent Stamm gastrostomy, laparotomy was performed because of the development of brid ileus. No major complication requiring laparotomy was seen in any patient who underwent SIG.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: SIG is easy to perform, minimally invasive, and the complication rate is lower than other methods.[LANGUAGE= "Turkish"] GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Gastrostomi için günümüzde açık cerrahi ve endoskopik yöntemler olmak üzere birçok cerrahi yöntem tanımlanmıştır. Tek insizyon gastrostomi (TİG) ile ilgili ise oldukça az sayıda yayın mevcuttur. Diğer yöntemlere göre daha az bilinen tek insizyon cerrahi gastrostomi deneyimimizi diğer gastrostomi yöntemleri ile karşılaştırarak paylaşmayı amaçladık.YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Haziran 2016 ile Haziran 2019 tarihleri arasında Ümraniye E.A.H. de TİG yapılan 15 olgu, Stamm gastrostomi (SG) yapılan 14 olgu ve perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi (PEG) yapılan 11 olgu retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Olguların yaş, cinsiyet, ameliyat endikasyonu, ameliyat yöntemi, ameliyat süresi, postoperatif komplikasyonlar karşılaştırıldı.BULGULAR: PEG yapılan olgulardan birinde mide perforasyonu ve diğerinde gastrostomi tüpünün yerinde olmadığı izlendi. Her iki hastayada laparotomi ve SG yapıldı. TİG yapılan 2 olguda insizyon yerinde evantrasyon ve altı hastada tüp çevresinde granülasyon izlendi. Evantrasyon lokal sütürle tedavi edilirken granülasyon gümüş nitrat ile tedavi edildi. Stam gastrostomi yapılan 1 olguda brid ileus gelişmesi nedeniyle laparotomi yapıldı. TİG yapılan hiçbir olguda laparatomi gerektirecek majör komplikasyon görülmedi.TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: TİG kolay uygulanabilir, minimal invaziv ve komplikasyon oranı da diğer yöntemlere göre düşüktür.</description><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>1300-6363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkD1rwzAYhDW00JBm72jo7PSVXlmSxxL6BYFSaGchy3IsE1uu5FDy7-skXTodHMfd8RByR2FNueT8oR3abs2AwRqLEtgVWVAEyAUKvCGrlDoAYAVFCWJBPjahH030KQxZaLLkh93eZX6wPvnZSoe489bss51JUwxpCv0x-_FTm4WpdfGf3bupDXW6JdeN2Se3-tMl-Xp--ty85tv3l7fN4za3lFKWK2W5YUJJaYqaK1dwBbKqRIOlqRuHkiMaZyyvVFM4RTmy2qhaKIGmsoXEJbm_9I4xfB9cmnQXDnGYJzVCCVKUitI5BZeUnW-m6Bo9Rt-beNQU9JmXPvHSJ176zAt_ASWDYb0</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Akış Yıldız, Zeliha</creator><general>Kare Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Comparison of single incision surgical gastrostomy with other gastrostomy methods</title><author>Akış Yıldız, Zeliha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1112-88c4a26877a5d48e54807bb6f39adfe37433aeac4b8f5e81432da8d6863abc573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akış Yıldız, Zeliha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Haydarpașa Numune Hastanesi tıp dergisi = The medical journal of Haydarpașa Numune Hospital</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akış Yıldız, Zeliha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of single incision surgical gastrostomy with other gastrostomy methods</atitle><jtitle>Haydarpașa Numune Hastanesi tıp dergisi = The medical journal of Haydarpașa Numune Hospital</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><pages>71-</pages><issn>1300-6363</issn><abstract>[LANGUAGE= "English"] INTRODUCTION: Many surgical methods have been defined for gastrostomy, including open surgery and endoscopic methods. There are very few reports on single-incision gastrostomy. In this study, we aimed to share our experience of single-incision surgical gastrostomy, which is less known than other methods, by comparing it with other gastrostomy methods.METHODS: Between June 2016 and June 2019, in Ümraniye E.A.H. 15, patients undergoing SIG, 14 patients undergoing Stamm gastrostomy (SG) and 11 patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) were evaluated retrospectively in this study. Age, sex, indication for operation, operation method, operation time and postoperative complications were compared.RESULTS: Gastric perforation was observed in one patient, and a gastrostomy tube was absent in another patient. Laparotomy and SG were performed in both patients. Two patients who underwent SIG had eventration at the incision site and granulation around the tube in six patients. Evolution was treated with local suture and granulation was treated with silver nitrate. In one patient who underwent Stamm gastrostomy, laparotomy was performed because of the development of brid ileus. No major complication requiring laparotomy was seen in any patient who underwent SIG.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: SIG is easy to perform, minimally invasive, and the complication rate is lower than other methods.[LANGUAGE= "Turkish"] GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Gastrostomi için günümüzde açık cerrahi ve endoskopik yöntemler olmak üzere birçok cerrahi yöntem tanımlanmıştır. Tek insizyon gastrostomi (TİG) ile ilgili ise oldukça az sayıda yayın mevcuttur. Diğer yöntemlere göre daha az bilinen tek insizyon cerrahi gastrostomi deneyimimizi diğer gastrostomi yöntemleri ile karşılaştırarak paylaşmayı amaçladık.YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Haziran 2016 ile Haziran 2019 tarihleri arasında Ümraniye E.A.H. de TİG yapılan 15 olgu, Stamm gastrostomi (SG) yapılan 14 olgu ve perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi (PEG) yapılan 11 olgu retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Olguların yaş, cinsiyet, ameliyat endikasyonu, ameliyat yöntemi, ameliyat süresi, postoperatif komplikasyonlar karşılaştırıldı.BULGULAR: PEG yapılan olgulardan birinde mide perforasyonu ve diğerinde gastrostomi tüpünün yerinde olmadığı izlendi. Her iki hastayada laparotomi ve SG yapıldı. TİG yapılan 2 olguda insizyon yerinde evantrasyon ve altı hastada tüp çevresinde granülasyon izlendi. Evantrasyon lokal sütürle tedavi edilirken granülasyon gümüş nitrat ile tedavi edildi. Stam gastrostomi yapılan 1 olguda brid ileus gelişmesi nedeniyle laparotomi yapıldı. TİG yapılan hiçbir olguda laparatomi gerektirecek majör komplikasyon görülmedi.TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: TİG kolay uygulanabilir, minimal invaziv ve komplikasyon oranı da diğer yöntemlere göre düşüktür.</abstract><cop>Istanbul</cop><pub>Kare Publishing</pub><doi>10.14744/hnhj.2020.35902</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1300-6363 |
ispartof | Haydarpașa Numune Hastanesi tıp dergisi = The medical journal of Haydarpașa Numune Hospital, 2020, Vol.60 (1), p.71 |
issn | 1300-6363 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3090769811 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Endoscopy Laparotomy Ostomy Patients |
title | Comparison of single incision surgical gastrostomy with other gastrostomy methods |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A29%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20single%20incision%20surgical%20gastrostomy%20with%20other%20gastrostomy%20methods&rft.jtitle=Haydarpa%C8%99a%20Numune%20Hastanesi%20t%C4%B1p%20dergisi%20=%20The%20medical%20journal%20of%20Haydarpa%C8%99a%20Numune%20Hospital&rft.au=Ak%C4%B1%C5%9F%20Y%C4%B1ld%C4%B1z,%20Zeliha&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.pages=71-&rft.issn=1300-6363&rft_id=info:doi/10.14744/hnhj.2020.35902&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3090769811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1112-88c4a26877a5d48e54807bb6f39adfe37433aeac4b8f5e81432da8d6863abc573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090769811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |