Loading…

A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)

Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità 2024-01, Vol.60 (1), p.55
Main Authors: Stefana, Alberto, Cena, Loredana, Trainini, Alice, Palumbo, Gabriella, Gigantesco, Antonella, Fiorino Mirabella
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità
container_volume 60
creator Stefana, Alberto
Cena, Loredana
Trainini, Alice
Palumbo, Gabriella
Gigantesco, Antonella
Fiorino Mirabella
description Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in pregnant individuals. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 953 third-trimester pregnant Italian individuals completed both the EPDS and the PHQ-9. Results. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (EPDS ω=0.83, PHQ-9 ω=0.80) and a moderate correlation between their scores (r=0.59). Concordance at recommended cut-off points (≥14 for both) was moderate (k=0.55). Factor analyses indicated a bifactor solution for the EPDS (dimensions: “depression” and “anxiety”) and for the PHQ-9 (dimensions: “depression”, “pregnancy symptoms”, “somatic”). Benchmarks for clinical change were also established. Conclusions. The EPDS and PHQ-9 capture distinct aspects of perinatal depressive symptomatology. Clinically, these findings recommend using both scales in obstetric and gynaecologic settings to minimize false positives and negatives.
doi_str_mv 10.4415/ANN_24_01_08
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3090954192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090953993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p197t-5837309862327559d9a83ac7693e841a2834fc69aabfc561e1e1f2b1d7eb8c8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscYFDwD9xYnOrSqFIUIoK52ibbNpUqRMcB4mn4hVxVcQV7WH2MPPNagk55-w6jrm6Gc1mmYgzxjOmD8hASB1HWil5SAaMCR4JlfJjctJ1G8YSnuhkQL5HdJE7RFvZFS0bR8F6tOChplvw6GxYCmwddl3V2FuaN9sWHPjqE2mLLiS2YHOkTUn9GumkqOyyd6s1nTed33Pu_uKhCmoMFQWdBwRaT6cItV_T1x47HxwWKoeRoZeLvm1r3AYLuC_6vDulgrq7OiVHZVA8-9Uheb-fvI2n0dPLw-N49BS13KQ-UlqmkhmdCClSpUxhQEvI08RI1DEHoWVc5okBWJa5SjiGKcWSFykuda4LOSQXe27rmo_dcdmm6Xff6LLAZUbF3Ij_XdIYKX8Ac8uAEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090953993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Stefana, Alberto ; Cena, Loredana ; Trainini, Alice ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Gigantesco, Antonella ; Fiorino Mirabella</creator><creatorcontrib>Stefana, Alberto ; Cena, Loredana ; Trainini, Alice ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Gigantesco, Antonella ; Fiorino Mirabella</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in pregnant individuals. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 953 third-trimester pregnant Italian individuals completed both the EPDS and the PHQ-9. Results. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (EPDS ω=0.83, PHQ-9 ω=0.80) and a moderate correlation between their scores (r=0.59). Concordance at recommended cut-off points (≥14 for both) was moderate (k=0.55). Factor analyses indicated a bifactor solution for the EPDS (dimensions: “depression” and “anxiety”) and for the PHQ-9 (dimensions: “depression”, “pregnancy symptoms”, “somatic”). Benchmarks for clinical change were also established. Conclusions. The EPDS and PHQ-9 capture distinct aspects of perinatal depressive symptomatology. Clinically, these findings recommend using both scales in obstetric and gynaecologic settings to minimize false positives and negatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-2571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2384-8553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4415/ANN_24_01_08</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rome: Istituto Superiore di Sanità</publisher><subject>Maternal &amp; child health ; Medical screening ; Postpartum depression ; Pregnancy ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità, 2024-01, Vol.60 (1), p.55</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3090954192?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stefana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trainini, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigantesco, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorino Mirabella</creatorcontrib><title>A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)</title><title>Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità</title><description>Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in pregnant individuals. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 953 third-trimester pregnant Italian individuals completed both the EPDS and the PHQ-9. Results. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (EPDS ω=0.83, PHQ-9 ω=0.80) and a moderate correlation between their scores (r=0.59). Concordance at recommended cut-off points (≥14 for both) was moderate (k=0.55). Factor analyses indicated a bifactor solution for the EPDS (dimensions: “depression” and “anxiety”) and for the PHQ-9 (dimensions: “depression”, “pregnancy symptoms”, “somatic”). Benchmarks for clinical change were also established. Conclusions. The EPDS and PHQ-9 capture distinct aspects of perinatal depressive symptomatology. Clinically, these findings recommend using both scales in obstetric and gynaecologic settings to minimize false positives and negatives.</description><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><issn>0021-2571</issn><issn>2384-8553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscYFDwD9xYnOrSqFIUIoK52ibbNpUqRMcB4mn4hVxVcQV7WH2MPPNagk55-w6jrm6Gc1mmYgzxjOmD8hASB1HWil5SAaMCR4JlfJjctJ1G8YSnuhkQL5HdJE7RFvZFS0bR8F6tOChplvw6GxYCmwddl3V2FuaN9sWHPjqE2mLLiS2YHOkTUn9GumkqOyyd6s1nTed33Pu_uKhCmoMFQWdBwRaT6cItV_T1x47HxwWKoeRoZeLvm1r3AYLuC_6vDulgrq7OiVHZVA8-9Uheb-fvI2n0dPLw-N49BS13KQ-UlqmkhmdCClSpUxhQEvI08RI1DEHoWVc5okBWJa5SjiGKcWSFykuda4LOSQXe27rmo_dcdmm6Xff6LLAZUbF3Ij_XdIYKX8Ac8uAEQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Stefana, Alberto</creator><creator>Cena, Loredana</creator><creator>Trainini, Alice</creator><creator>Palumbo, Gabriella</creator><creator>Gigantesco, Antonella</creator><creator>Fiorino Mirabella</creator><general>Istituto Superiore di Sanità</general><scope>8C1</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>COVID</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)</title><author>Stefana, Alberto ; Cena, Loredana ; Trainini, Alice ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Gigantesco, Antonella ; Fiorino Mirabella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p197t-5837309862327559d9a83ac7693e841a2834fc69aabfc561e1e1f2b1d7eb8c8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stefana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trainini, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigantesco, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorino Mirabella</creatorcontrib><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><jtitle>Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stefana, Alberto</au><au>Cena, Loredana</au><au>Trainini, Alice</au><au>Palumbo, Gabriella</au><au>Gigantesco, Antonella</au><au>Fiorino Mirabella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)</atitle><jtitle>Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><pages>55-</pages><issn>0021-2571</issn><eissn>2384-8553</eissn><abstract>Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in pregnant individuals. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 953 third-trimester pregnant Italian individuals completed both the EPDS and the PHQ-9. Results. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (EPDS ω=0.83, PHQ-9 ω=0.80) and a moderate correlation between their scores (r=0.59). Concordance at recommended cut-off points (≥14 for both) was moderate (k=0.55). Factor analyses indicated a bifactor solution for the EPDS (dimensions: “depression” and “anxiety”) and for the PHQ-9 (dimensions: “depression”, “pregnancy symptoms”, “somatic”). Benchmarks for clinical change were also established. Conclusions. The EPDS and PHQ-9 capture distinct aspects of perinatal depressive symptomatology. Clinically, these findings recommend using both scales in obstetric and gynaecologic settings to minimize false positives and negatives.</abstract><cop>Rome</cop><pub>Istituto Superiore di Sanità</pub><doi>10.4415/ANN_24_01_08</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-2571
ispartof Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità, 2024-01, Vol.60 (1), p.55
issn 0021-2571
2384-8553
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3090954192
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Maternal & child health
Medical screening
Postpartum depression
Pregnancy
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
title A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A57%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Screening%20for%20antenatal%20maternal%20depression:%20comparative%20performance%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%20Postnatal%20Depression%20Scale%20and%20Patient%20Health%20Questionnaire-9%20(Supplementary%20Materials)&rft.jtitle=Annali%20dell'Istituto%20superiore%20di%20sanita%CC%80&rft.au=Stefana,%20Alberto&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.pages=55-&rft.issn=0021-2571&rft.eissn=2384-8553&rft_id=info:doi/10.4415/ANN_24_01_08&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3090953993%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p197t-5837309862327559d9a83ac7693e841a2834fc69aabfc561e1e1f2b1d7eb8c8d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090953993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true