Loading…
A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)
Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient H...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità 2024-01, Vol.60 (1), p.55 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Stefana, Alberto Cena, Loredana Trainini, Alice Palumbo, Gabriella Gigantesco, Antonella Fiorino Mirabella |
description | Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in pregnant individuals. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 953 third-trimester pregnant Italian individuals completed both the EPDS and the PHQ-9. Results. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (EPDS ω=0.83, PHQ-9 ω=0.80) and a moderate correlation between their scores (r=0.59). Concordance at recommended cut-off points (≥14 for both) was moderate (k=0.55). Factor analyses indicated a bifactor solution for the EPDS (dimensions: “depression” and “anxiety”) and for the PHQ-9 (dimensions: “depression”, “pregnancy symptoms”, “somatic”). Benchmarks for clinical change were also established. Conclusions. The EPDS and PHQ-9 capture distinct aspects of perinatal depressive symptomatology. Clinically, these findings recommend using both scales in obstetric and gynaecologic settings to minimize false positives and negatives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4415/ANN_24_01_08 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3090954192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090953993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p197t-5837309862327559d9a83ac7693e841a2834fc69aabfc561e1e1f2b1d7eb8c8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscYFDwD9xYnOrSqFIUIoK52ibbNpUqRMcB4mn4hVxVcQV7WH2MPPNagk55-w6jrm6Gc1mmYgzxjOmD8hASB1HWil5SAaMCR4JlfJjctJ1G8YSnuhkQL5HdJE7RFvZFS0bR8F6tOChplvw6GxYCmwddl3V2FuaN9sWHPjqE2mLLiS2YHOkTUn9GumkqOyyd6s1nTed33Pu_uKhCmoMFQWdBwRaT6cItV_T1x47HxwWKoeRoZeLvm1r3AYLuC_6vDulgrq7OiVHZVA8-9Uheb-fvI2n0dPLw-N49BS13KQ-UlqmkhmdCClSpUxhQEvI08RI1DEHoWVc5okBWJa5SjiGKcWSFykuda4LOSQXe27rmo_dcdmm6Xff6LLAZUbF3Ij_XdIYKX8Ac8uAEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090953993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Stefana, Alberto ; Cena, Loredana ; Trainini, Alice ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Gigantesco, Antonella ; Fiorino Mirabella</creator><creatorcontrib>Stefana, Alberto ; Cena, Loredana ; Trainini, Alice ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Gigantesco, Antonella ; Fiorino Mirabella</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in pregnant individuals. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 953 third-trimester pregnant Italian individuals completed both the EPDS and the PHQ-9. Results. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (EPDS ω=0.83, PHQ-9 ω=0.80) and a moderate correlation between their scores (r=0.59). Concordance at recommended cut-off points (≥14 for both) was moderate (k=0.55). Factor analyses indicated a bifactor solution for the EPDS (dimensions: “depression” and “anxiety”) and for the PHQ-9 (dimensions: “depression”, “pregnancy symptoms”, “somatic”). Benchmarks for clinical change were also established. Conclusions. The EPDS and PHQ-9 capture distinct aspects of perinatal depressive symptomatology. Clinically, these findings recommend using both scales in obstetric and gynaecologic settings to minimize false positives and negatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-2571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2384-8553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4415/ANN_24_01_08</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rome: Istituto Superiore di Sanità</publisher><subject>Maternal & child health ; Medical screening ; Postpartum depression ; Pregnancy ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità, 2024-01, Vol.60 (1), p.55</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3090954192?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stefana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trainini, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigantesco, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorino Mirabella</creatorcontrib><title>A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)</title><title>Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità</title><description>Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in pregnant individuals. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 953 third-trimester pregnant Italian individuals completed both the EPDS and the PHQ-9. Results. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (EPDS ω=0.83, PHQ-9 ω=0.80) and a moderate correlation between their scores (r=0.59). Concordance at recommended cut-off points (≥14 for both) was moderate (k=0.55). Factor analyses indicated a bifactor solution for the EPDS (dimensions: “depression” and “anxiety”) and for the PHQ-9 (dimensions: “depression”, “pregnancy symptoms”, “somatic”). Benchmarks for clinical change were also established. Conclusions. The EPDS and PHQ-9 capture distinct aspects of perinatal depressive symptomatology. Clinically, these findings recommend using both scales in obstetric and gynaecologic settings to minimize false positives and negatives.</description><subject>Maternal & child health</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><issn>0021-2571</issn><issn>2384-8553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscYFDwD9xYnOrSqFIUIoK52ibbNpUqRMcB4mn4hVxVcQV7WH2MPPNagk55-w6jrm6Gc1mmYgzxjOmD8hASB1HWil5SAaMCR4JlfJjctJ1G8YSnuhkQL5HdJE7RFvZFS0bR8F6tOChplvw6GxYCmwddl3V2FuaN9sWHPjqE2mLLiS2YHOkTUn9GumkqOyyd6s1nTed33Pu_uKhCmoMFQWdBwRaT6cItV_T1x47HxwWKoeRoZeLvm1r3AYLuC_6vDulgrq7OiVHZVA8-9Uheb-fvI2n0dPLw-N49BS13KQ-UlqmkhmdCClSpUxhQEvI08RI1DEHoWVc5okBWJa5SjiGKcWSFykuda4LOSQXe27rmo_dcdmm6Xff6LLAZUbF3Ij_XdIYKX8Ac8uAEQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Stefana, Alberto</creator><creator>Cena, Loredana</creator><creator>Trainini, Alice</creator><creator>Palumbo, Gabriella</creator><creator>Gigantesco, Antonella</creator><creator>Fiorino Mirabella</creator><general>Istituto Superiore di Sanità</general><scope>8C1</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>COVID</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)</title><author>Stefana, Alberto ; Cena, Loredana ; Trainini, Alice ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Gigantesco, Antonella ; Fiorino Mirabella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p197t-5837309862327559d9a83ac7693e841a2834fc69aabfc561e1e1f2b1d7eb8c8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Maternal & child health</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stefana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trainini, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigantesco, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorino Mirabella</creatorcontrib><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><jtitle>Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stefana, Alberto</au><au>Cena, Loredana</au><au>Trainini, Alice</au><au>Palumbo, Gabriella</au><au>Gigantesco, Antonella</au><au>Fiorino Mirabella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials)</atitle><jtitle>Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><pages>55-</pages><issn>0021-2571</issn><eissn>2384-8553</eissn><abstract>Background. Maternal antenatal depression affects 21-28% of expectants globally and negatively impacts both maternal and child health in the short and long term.Objective. To compare the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in pregnant individuals. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 953 third-trimester pregnant Italian individuals completed both the EPDS and the PHQ-9. Results. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (EPDS ω=0.83, PHQ-9 ω=0.80) and a moderate correlation between their scores (r=0.59). Concordance at recommended cut-off points (≥14 for both) was moderate (k=0.55). Factor analyses indicated a bifactor solution for the EPDS (dimensions: “depression” and “anxiety”) and for the PHQ-9 (dimensions: “depression”, “pregnancy symptoms”, “somatic”). Benchmarks for clinical change were also established. Conclusions. The EPDS and PHQ-9 capture distinct aspects of perinatal depressive symptomatology. Clinically, these findings recommend using both scales in obstetric and gynaecologic settings to minimize false positives and negatives.</abstract><cop>Rome</cop><pub>Istituto Superiore di Sanità</pub><doi>10.4415/ANN_24_01_08</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-2571 |
ispartof | Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità, 2024-01, Vol.60 (1), p.55 |
issn | 0021-2571 2384-8553 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3090954192 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Maternal & child health Medical screening Postpartum depression Pregnancy Quantitative psychology Questionnaires |
title | A Screening for antenatal maternal depression: comparative performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Supplementary Materials) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A57%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Screening%20for%20antenatal%20maternal%20depression:%20comparative%20performance%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%20Postnatal%20Depression%20Scale%20and%20Patient%20Health%20Questionnaire-9%20(Supplementary%20Materials)&rft.jtitle=Annali%20dell'Istituto%20superiore%20di%20sanita%CC%80&rft.au=Stefana,%20Alberto&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.pages=55-&rft.issn=0021-2571&rft.eissn=2384-8553&rft_id=info:doi/10.4415/ANN_24_01_08&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3090953993%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p197t-5837309862327559d9a83ac7693e841a2834fc69aabfc561e1e1f2b1d7eb8c8d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090953993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |