Identifying the capacity needs of built environment professionals to deliver environmentally sustainable buildings: a scientometric review

• Published in: Journal of engineering, design and technology design and technology, 2024-08, Vol.22 (5), p.1464-1490
• Main Authors: Afful, Aba Essanowa, Ayarkwa, Joshua, Godwin Kojo Kumi Acquah, Ama Antwi Darkwa Ossei Assibey, Dickson Osei-Asibey
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bibliometrics; Buildings; Built environment; Construction industry; Content analysis; Data analysis; Design; Literature reviews; Reproducibility; Scientometrics; Search engines; Technology adoption; Trends
• ISSN: 1726-0531; 1758-8901
• DOI: 10.1108/JEDT-04-2022-0217

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to identify the capacity needs of building professionals to deliver environmentally sustainable buildings (ESBs) globally, from a unique systems approach. Through a review of extant literature, this study contributes to knowledge of the global delivery of ESBs by identifying research trends and gaps that can be tackled in future research, and current hotspots in capacity building (CB) research within the built environment (BE). The adopted systems approach to CB postulates that the construction industry is systemized in nature, and thus, CB solutions within the industry should be approached from a systems approach.Design/methodology/approachA literature search was conducted using the Scopus search engine, augmented by Google Scholar and Web of Science, to produce 54 relevant articles for analysis. The scientometric analysis was undertaken with the use of VOSViewer to better understand the broad literature on CB in the construction industry which would not have been possible with traditional data analysis. The content analysis allowed, for a systematic review of selected articles, to reveal key themes in this study.FindingsThrough a content analysis, four levels of CB were identified within the construction industry; individual level, organizational level, industry level and state level. Nine sub-capacities were subsumed under the four identified levels adopted from Potter and Brough (2004), including but not limited to Performance capacity, Workload capacity, Supervisory capacity, Industry Role capacity and Systems capacity. Under each sub-capacity, key questions were posed to aid identify the capacity needs of BE professionals. A framework for identifying capacity needs in the BE is proposed.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study serve as a useful reference for practitioners and policymakers to assess their level of commitment to CB efforts for ESB delivery. The findings of this study have revealed that building the capacities of BE professionals to deliver ESBs should be addressed as part of a broader framework, interdependent on the other levels of CB in the systemic construction industry.Originality/valueAs a review study identifying capacity needs for BE professionals to deliver ESBs, this study enhances knowledge of CB within the construction industry.