Loading…

A “Tyranny of Structurelessness”? The Benefits and Burdens of Power Sharing and Governance Models in Citizen Science

In 1970, Jo Freeman wrote the essay "The Tyranny of Structurelessness," drawing attention to the ways power dynamics pervaded so-called "structureless" groups during the women's liberation movement. Similarly, biomedical citizen science groups are looking to new ways to orga...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Citizen science : theory and practice 2022-12, Vol.7 (1), p.46
Main Author: Foti, Nicole
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2668-f2750dcc52fec40de150fd3a615ab7f58b1a4a5d4f842dfe392a1ee43c62b6153
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Citizen science : theory and practice
container_volume 7
creator Foti, Nicole
description In 1970, Jo Freeman wrote the essay "The Tyranny of Structurelessness," drawing attention to the ways power dynamics pervaded so-called "structureless" groups during the women's liberation movement. Similarly, biomedical citizen science groups are looking to new ways to organize themselves, and are grappling with questions of structure, governance, and leadership (or lack thereof), particularly given the problematic hierarchies found in corporate and academic biomedicine. Based on three years of observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis of a community biology initiative to make insulin, this paper follows the group's collective decision-making practices and the shift from horizontal, self-directed governance approaches to the implementation of a formal organizational structure. This paper identifies three mutually constitutive themes that acted as sites of change and shaped how internal governance was enacted, including membership and mechanisms of exclusion and inclusion; leadership and decision-making structures; and the mission as a social process in which objectives and implicit values were regularly negotiated. Findings underscore both the benefits of an open structure, such as facilitating participation in science, as well as challenges, including questions of when, how, and by whom decisions are made. I argue that thoughtful governance to actualize values such as power sharing can be difficult to construct and put into practice; yet, failing to do so risks reproducing problematic structures and norms many biomedical citizen scientists seek to avoid.
doi_str_mv 10.5334/cstp.528
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3093603431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A730857199</galeid><sourcerecordid>A730857199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2668-f2750dcc52fec40de150fd3a615ab7f58b1a4a5d4f842dfe392a1ee43c62b6153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd1KXDEQxw-lhYoKfYSAN_Zi13yej6uyLlYFS4u7vQ7ZZLJGzibbJKd1e-WD6Mv5JGZroV2QYZgw8_uHYf5V9YHgsWCMn-iU12NB2zfVHsWiGfGuI2__e7-vDlO6xRhTQloumr3qboKe7h_mm6i836Bg0SzHQechQg8p-ZJP94-f0PwG0Cl4sC4npLxBp0M04NNW8S38gohmNyo6v_wzPA8_IXrlNaAvwUCfkPNo6rL7DR7NtIMyOajeWdUnOPxb96vvn8_m04vR1dfzy-nkaqRpXbcjSxuBjdaCWtAcGyACW8NUTYRaNFa0C6K4EobbllNjgXVUEQDOdE0XBWL71dHLv-sYfgyQsrwNQ1muT5LhjtWYcUb-UUvVg3TehhyVXrmk5aRhuBUN6bpCjV-hShhYOR225yn9HcHHHUFhMtzlpRpSkpez6132-IXVMaQUwcp1dCsVN5JguXVXbt2VxV32DCvml_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3093603431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A “Tyranny of Structurelessness”? The Benefits and Burdens of Power Sharing and Governance Models in Citizen Science</title><source>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</source><creator>Foti, Nicole</creator><creatorcontrib>Foti, Nicole</creatorcontrib><description>In 1970, Jo Freeman wrote the essay "The Tyranny of Structurelessness," drawing attention to the ways power dynamics pervaded so-called "structureless" groups during the women's liberation movement. Similarly, biomedical citizen science groups are looking to new ways to organize themselves, and are grappling with questions of structure, governance, and leadership (or lack thereof), particularly given the problematic hierarchies found in corporate and academic biomedicine. Based on three years of observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis of a community biology initiative to make insulin, this paper follows the group's collective decision-making practices and the shift from horizontal, self-directed governance approaches to the implementation of a formal organizational structure. This paper identifies three mutually constitutive themes that acted as sites of change and shaped how internal governance was enacted, including membership and mechanisms of exclusion and inclusion; leadership and decision-making structures; and the mission as a social process in which objectives and implicit values were regularly negotiated. Findings underscore both the benefits of an open structure, such as facilitating participation in science, as well as challenges, including questions of when, how, and by whom decisions are made. I argue that thoughtful governance to actualize values such as power sharing can be difficult to construct and put into practice; yet, failing to do so risks reproducing problematic structures and norms many biomedical citizen scientists seek to avoid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2057-4991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-4991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5334/cstp.528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Ubiquity Press Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Analysis ; Biology ; Boards of directors ; Case studies ; Decision making ; Formal organization ; Freeman, Jo ; Insulin ; Power-sharing ; Science ; Scientists ; Social change</subject><ispartof>Citizen science : theory and practice, 2022-12, Vol.7 (1), p.46</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Ubiquity Press Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2668-f2750dcc52fec40de150fd3a615ab7f58b1a4a5d4f842dfe392a1ee43c62b6153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8812-8724</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3093603431?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foti, Nicole</creatorcontrib><title>A “Tyranny of Structurelessness”? The Benefits and Burdens of Power Sharing and Governance Models in Citizen Science</title><title>Citizen science : theory and practice</title><description>In 1970, Jo Freeman wrote the essay "The Tyranny of Structurelessness," drawing attention to the ways power dynamics pervaded so-called "structureless" groups during the women's liberation movement. Similarly, biomedical citizen science groups are looking to new ways to organize themselves, and are grappling with questions of structure, governance, and leadership (or lack thereof), particularly given the problematic hierarchies found in corporate and academic biomedicine. Based on three years of observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis of a community biology initiative to make insulin, this paper follows the group's collective decision-making practices and the shift from horizontal, self-directed governance approaches to the implementation of a formal organizational structure. This paper identifies three mutually constitutive themes that acted as sites of change and shaped how internal governance was enacted, including membership and mechanisms of exclusion and inclusion; leadership and decision-making structures; and the mission as a social process in which objectives and implicit values were regularly negotiated. Findings underscore both the benefits of an open structure, such as facilitating participation in science, as well as challenges, including questions of when, how, and by whom decisions are made. I argue that thoughtful governance to actualize values such as power sharing can be difficult to construct and put into practice; yet, failing to do so risks reproducing problematic structures and norms many biomedical citizen scientists seek to avoid.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Formal organization</subject><subject>Freeman, Jo</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Power-sharing</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Social change</subject><issn>2057-4991</issn><issn>2057-4991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkd1KXDEQxw-lhYoKfYSAN_Zi13yej6uyLlYFS4u7vQ7ZZLJGzibbJKd1e-WD6Mv5JGZroV2QYZgw8_uHYf5V9YHgsWCMn-iU12NB2zfVHsWiGfGuI2__e7-vDlO6xRhTQloumr3qboKe7h_mm6i836Bg0SzHQechQg8p-ZJP94-f0PwG0Cl4sC4npLxBp0M04NNW8S38gohmNyo6v_wzPA8_IXrlNaAvwUCfkPNo6rL7DR7NtIMyOajeWdUnOPxb96vvn8_m04vR1dfzy-nkaqRpXbcjSxuBjdaCWtAcGyACW8NUTYRaNFa0C6K4EobbllNjgXVUEQDOdE0XBWL71dHLv-sYfgyQsrwNQ1muT5LhjtWYcUb-UUvVg3TehhyVXrmk5aRhuBUN6bpCjV-hShhYOR225yn9HcHHHUFhMtzlpRpSkpez6132-IXVMaQUwcp1dCsVN5JguXVXbt2VxV32DCvml_s</recordid><startdate>20221215</startdate><enddate>20221215</enddate><creator>Foti, Nicole</creator><general>Ubiquity Press Ltd</general><general>Ubiquity Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-8724</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221215</creationdate><title>A “Tyranny of Structurelessness”? The Benefits and Burdens of Power Sharing and Governance Models in Citizen Science</title><author>Foti, Nicole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2668-f2750dcc52fec40de150fd3a615ab7f58b1a4a5d4f842dfe392a1ee43c62b6153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Formal organization</topic><topic>Freeman, Jo</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Power-sharing</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Social change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foti, Nicole</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Citizen science : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foti, Nicole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A “Tyranny of Structurelessness”? The Benefits and Burdens of Power Sharing and Governance Models in Citizen Science</atitle><jtitle>Citizen science : theory and practice</jtitle><date>2022-12-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><pages>46-</pages><issn>2057-4991</issn><eissn>2057-4991</eissn><abstract>In 1970, Jo Freeman wrote the essay "The Tyranny of Structurelessness," drawing attention to the ways power dynamics pervaded so-called "structureless" groups during the women's liberation movement. Similarly, biomedical citizen science groups are looking to new ways to organize themselves, and are grappling with questions of structure, governance, and leadership (or lack thereof), particularly given the problematic hierarchies found in corporate and academic biomedicine. Based on three years of observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis of a community biology initiative to make insulin, this paper follows the group's collective decision-making practices and the shift from horizontal, self-directed governance approaches to the implementation of a formal organizational structure. This paper identifies three mutually constitutive themes that acted as sites of change and shaped how internal governance was enacted, including membership and mechanisms of exclusion and inclusion; leadership and decision-making structures; and the mission as a social process in which objectives and implicit values were regularly negotiated. Findings underscore both the benefits of an open structure, such as facilitating participation in science, as well as challenges, including questions of when, how, and by whom decisions are made. I argue that thoughtful governance to actualize values such as power sharing can be difficult to construct and put into practice; yet, failing to do so risks reproducing problematic structures and norms many biomedical citizen scientists seek to avoid.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Ubiquity Press Ltd</pub><doi>10.5334/cstp.528</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-8724</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2057-4991
ispartof Citizen science : theory and practice, 2022-12, Vol.7 (1), p.46
issn 2057-4991
2057-4991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3093603431
source ProQuest Publicly Available Content database
subjects Accountability
Analysis
Biology
Boards of directors
Case studies
Decision making
Formal organization
Freeman, Jo
Insulin
Power-sharing
Science
Scientists
Social change
title A “Tyranny of Structurelessness”? The Benefits and Burdens of Power Sharing and Governance Models in Citizen Science
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20%E2%80%9CTyranny%20of%20Structurelessness%E2%80%9D?%20The%20Benefits%20and%20Burdens%20of%20Power%20Sharing%20and%20Governance%20Models%20in%20Citizen%20Science&rft.jtitle=Citizen%20science%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Foti,%20Nicole&rft.date=2022-12-15&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.pages=46-&rft.issn=2057-4991&rft.eissn=2057-4991&rft_id=info:doi/10.5334/cstp.528&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA730857199%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2668-f2750dcc52fec40de150fd3a615ab7f58b1a4a5d4f842dfe392a1ee43c62b6153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093603431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A730857199&rfr_iscdi=true