Loading…

State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen

Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global media and China 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.362-383
Main Authors: Chan, Ngai Keung, Kwok, Chi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133
container_end_page 383
container_issue 3
container_start_page 362
container_title Global media and China
container_volume 9
creator Chan, Ngai Keung
Kwok, Chi
description Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but as instruments for providing social good and resolving social problems. This article presents a qualitative thematic analysis of the official discourses about platforms for and against social good in four major cities that represent key technology and innovation hubs in China: Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. The analysis reveals how platforms are discursively portrayed as emerging providers of social good, both nationally and locally. This discursive construction of platforms in conjunction with social good, in turn, encourages the state to legitimize collaborative governance and surveillance practices in cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Finally, this study affords opportunities to regionalize platform studies in China by considering how diverse forms of intergovernmental relationships might result in diverse interpretations of a “platform for social good” in practical scenarios.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/20594364241226845
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3096352421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20594364241226845</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3096352421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRUNQHcBdw26n5ncy4q0WtILioroc0uemkTJOazAjtC_jajlZ0IS4u93A554N7suyC4DEhUl5RLCrOCk45obQouTjITj5vOWeSHv7ogh9n5ymtMMaklJKy6iR7n3eqg7wFg2C9AGPAeEjpGk28arc755eoawAZl3Qfk3sDpINPXex154JHwaJNqzob4joh5Q1KQTvVomUIBjmPbsCtBsYIzZRf7prQj9C8GWSj3OjLP2_A74Y5y46sahOcf-_T7OXu9nk6yx-f7h-mk8dcMyG6XEhbMIyBlmVBOZeGW8l4BYaLhebKak0pNmUlCaOWGUqtMQWTC1GAqQRh7DS73HM3Mbz2kLp6Ffo4_JpqhquCCcopGVxk79IxpBTB1pvo1ipua4Lrz8rrP5UPmfE-k9QSfqn_Bz4Ayq2BMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3096352421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><description>Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but as instruments for providing social good and resolving social problems. This article presents a qualitative thematic analysis of the official discourses about platforms for and against social good in four major cities that represent key technology and innovation hubs in China: Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. The analysis reveals how platforms are discursively portrayed as emerging providers of social good, both nationally and locally. This discursive construction of platforms in conjunction with social good, in turn, encourages the state to legitimize collaborative governance and surveillance practices in cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Finally, this study affords opportunities to regionalize platform studies in China by considering how diverse forms of intergovernmental relationships might result in diverse interpretations of a “platform for social good” in practical scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-4364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-4372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20594364241226845</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Discourses ; Embeddedness ; Governance ; Innovations ; Public good ; Social problems ; Surveillance ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Global media and China, 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.362-383</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3754-2447 ; 0000-0002-5848-3098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20594364241226845$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3096352421?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21964,25751,27342,27851,27922,27923,33221,33772,37010,44588,44943,45331</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><title>State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen</title><title>Global media and China</title><description>Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but as instruments for providing social good and resolving social problems. This article presents a qualitative thematic analysis of the official discourses about platforms for and against social good in four major cities that represent key technology and innovation hubs in China: Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. The analysis reveals how platforms are discursively portrayed as emerging providers of social good, both nationally and locally. This discursive construction of platforms in conjunction with social good, in turn, encourages the state to legitimize collaborative governance and surveillance practices in cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Finally, this study affords opportunities to regionalize platform studies in China by considering how diverse forms of intergovernmental relationships might result in diverse interpretations of a “platform for social good” in practical scenarios.</description><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Embeddedness</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Public good</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>2059-4364</issn><issn>2059-4372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRUNQHcBdw26n5ncy4q0WtILioroc0uemkTJOazAjtC_jajlZ0IS4u93A554N7suyC4DEhUl5RLCrOCk45obQouTjITj5vOWeSHv7ogh9n5ymtMMaklJKy6iR7n3eqg7wFg2C9AGPAeEjpGk28arc755eoawAZl3Qfk3sDpINPXex154JHwaJNqzob4joh5Q1KQTvVomUIBjmPbsCtBsYIzZRf7prQj9C8GWSj3OjLP2_A74Y5y46sahOcf-_T7OXu9nk6yx-f7h-mk8dcMyG6XEhbMIyBlmVBOZeGW8l4BYaLhebKak0pNmUlCaOWGUqtMQWTC1GAqQRh7DS73HM3Mbz2kLp6Ffo4_JpqhquCCcopGVxk79IxpBTB1pvo1ipua4Lrz8rrP5UPmfE-k9QSfqn_Bz4Ayq2BMQ</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Chan, Ngai Keung</creator><creator>Kwok, Chi</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-2447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5848-3098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen</title><author>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Embeddedness</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Public good</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global media and China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Ngai Keung</au><au>Kwok, Chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen</atitle><jtitle>Global media and China</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>362-383</pages><issn>2059-4364</issn><eissn>2059-4372</eissn><abstract>Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but as instruments for providing social good and resolving social problems. This article presents a qualitative thematic analysis of the official discourses about platforms for and against social good in four major cities that represent key technology and innovation hubs in China: Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. The analysis reveals how platforms are discursively portrayed as emerging providers of social good, both nationally and locally. This discursive construction of platforms in conjunction with social good, in turn, encourages the state to legitimize collaborative governance and surveillance practices in cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Finally, this study affords opportunities to regionalize platform studies in China by considering how diverse forms of intergovernmental relationships might result in diverse interpretations of a “platform for social good” in practical scenarios.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20594364241226845</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-2447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5848-3098</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2059-4364
ispartof Global media and China, 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.362-383
issn 2059-4364
2059-4372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3096352421
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Discourses
Embeddedness
Governance
Innovations
Public good
Social problems
Surveillance
Technology
title State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A26%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State-led%20embeddedness:%20Analyzing%20the%20discursive%20construction%20of%20platforms%20and%20social%20good%20in%20Beijing,%20Hangzhou,%20Shanghai,%20and%20Shenzhen&rft.jtitle=Global%20media%20and%20China&rft.au=Chan,%20Ngai%20Keung&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=362-383&rft.issn=2059-4364&rft.eissn=2059-4372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20594364241226845&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3096352421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3096352421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20594364241226845&rfr_iscdi=true