Loading…
State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen
Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global media and China 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.362-383 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133 |
container_end_page | 383 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 362 |
container_title | Global media and China |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Chan, Ngai Keung Kwok, Chi |
description | Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but as instruments for providing social good and resolving social problems. This article presents a qualitative thematic analysis of the official discourses about platforms for and against social good in four major cities that represent key technology and innovation hubs in China: Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. The analysis reveals how platforms are discursively portrayed as emerging providers of social good, both nationally and locally. This discursive construction of platforms in conjunction with social good, in turn, encourages the state to legitimize collaborative governance and surveillance practices in cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Finally, this study affords opportunities to regionalize platform studies in China by considering how diverse forms of intergovernmental relationships might result in diverse interpretations of a “platform for social good” in practical scenarios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/20594364241226845 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3096352421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20594364241226845</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3096352421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRUNQHcBdw26n5ncy4q0WtILioroc0uemkTJOazAjtC_jajlZ0IS4u93A554N7suyC4DEhUl5RLCrOCk45obQouTjITj5vOWeSHv7ogh9n5ymtMMaklJKy6iR7n3eqg7wFg2C9AGPAeEjpGk28arc755eoawAZl3Qfk3sDpINPXex154JHwaJNqzob4joh5Q1KQTvVomUIBjmPbsCtBsYIzZRf7prQj9C8GWSj3OjLP2_A74Y5y46sahOcf-_T7OXu9nk6yx-f7h-mk8dcMyG6XEhbMIyBlmVBOZeGW8l4BYaLhebKak0pNmUlCaOWGUqtMQWTC1GAqQRh7DS73HM3Mbz2kLp6Ffo4_JpqhquCCcopGVxk79IxpBTB1pvo1ipua4Lrz8rrP5UPmfE-k9QSfqn_Bz4Ayq2BMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3096352421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><description>Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but as instruments for providing social good and resolving social problems. This article presents a qualitative thematic analysis of the official discourses about platforms for and against social good in four major cities that represent key technology and innovation hubs in China: Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. The analysis reveals how platforms are discursively portrayed as emerging providers of social good, both nationally and locally. This discursive construction of platforms in conjunction with social good, in turn, encourages the state to legitimize collaborative governance and surveillance practices in cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Finally, this study affords opportunities to regionalize platform studies in China by considering how diverse forms of intergovernmental relationships might result in diverse interpretations of a “platform for social good” in practical scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-4364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-4372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20594364241226845</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Discourses ; Embeddedness ; Governance ; Innovations ; Public good ; Social problems ; Surveillance ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Global media and China, 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.362-383</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3754-2447 ; 0000-0002-5848-3098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20594364241226845$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3096352421?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21964,25751,27342,27851,27922,27923,33221,33772,37010,44588,44943,45331</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><title>State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen</title><title>Global media and China</title><description>Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but as instruments for providing social good and resolving social problems. This article presents a qualitative thematic analysis of the official discourses about platforms for and against social good in four major cities that represent key technology and innovation hubs in China: Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. The analysis reveals how platforms are discursively portrayed as emerging providers of social good, both nationally and locally. This discursive construction of platforms in conjunction with social good, in turn, encourages the state to legitimize collaborative governance and surveillance practices in cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Finally, this study affords opportunities to regionalize platform studies in China by considering how diverse forms of intergovernmental relationships might result in diverse interpretations of a “platform for social good” in practical scenarios.</description><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Embeddedness</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Public good</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>2059-4364</issn><issn>2059-4372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRUNQHcBdw26n5ncy4q0WtILioroc0uemkTJOazAjtC_jajlZ0IS4u93A554N7suyC4DEhUl5RLCrOCk45obQouTjITj5vOWeSHv7ogh9n5ymtMMaklJKy6iR7n3eqg7wFg2C9AGPAeEjpGk28arc755eoawAZl3Qfk3sDpINPXex154JHwaJNqzob4joh5Q1KQTvVomUIBjmPbsCtBsYIzZRf7prQj9C8GWSj3OjLP2_A74Y5y46sahOcf-_T7OXu9nk6yx-f7h-mk8dcMyG6XEhbMIyBlmVBOZeGW8l4BYaLhebKak0pNmUlCaOWGUqtMQWTC1GAqQRh7DS73HM3Mbz2kLp6Ffo4_JpqhquCCcopGVxk79IxpBTB1pvo1ipua4Lrz8rrP5UPmfE-k9QSfqn_Bz4Ayq2BMQ</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Chan, Ngai Keung</creator><creator>Kwok, Chi</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-2447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5848-3098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen</title><author>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Embeddedness</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Public good</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global media and China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Ngai Keung</au><au>Kwok, Chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen</atitle><jtitle>Global media and China</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>362-383</pages><issn>2059-4364</issn><eissn>2059-4372</eissn><abstract>Drawing on Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness, this article introduces the concept of “state-led embeddedness” to theorize non-competitive and subordinating state-platform relations in China. Under state-led embeddedness, platforms are not conceived first and foremost as private economic actors but as instruments for providing social good and resolving social problems. This article presents a qualitative thematic analysis of the official discourses about platforms for and against social good in four major cities that represent key technology and innovation hubs in China: Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. The analysis reveals how platforms are discursively portrayed as emerging providers of social good, both nationally and locally. This discursive construction of platforms in conjunction with social good, in turn, encourages the state to legitimize collaborative governance and surveillance practices in cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Finally, this study affords opportunities to regionalize platform studies in China by considering how diverse forms of intergovernmental relationships might result in diverse interpretations of a “platform for social good” in practical scenarios.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20594364241226845</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-2447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5848-3098</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2059-4364 |
ispartof | Global media and China, 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.362-383 |
issn | 2059-4364 2059-4372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3096352421 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Discourses Embeddedness Governance Innovations Public good Social problems Surveillance Technology |
title | State-led embeddedness: Analyzing the discursive construction of platforms and social good in Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A26%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State-led%20embeddedness:%20Analyzing%20the%20discursive%20construction%20of%20platforms%20and%20social%20good%20in%20Beijing,%20Hangzhou,%20Shanghai,%20and%20Shenzhen&rft.jtitle=Global%20media%20and%20China&rft.au=Chan,%20Ngai%20Keung&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=362-383&rft.issn=2059-4364&rft.eissn=2059-4372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20594364241226845&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3096352421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-57f6300e28862447d4f7349ed45bc4afcc220d897132f3d22fdd637b56ed95133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3096352421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20594364241226845&rfr_iscdi=true |