Loading…
Health supply chain forecasting: a comparison of ARIMA and LSTM time series models for demand prediction of medicines
The ever-accelerating revolution along with digitalization of the healthcare industry has revealed the power of machine learning and deep learning prediction models in addressing health supply chain logistic issues. The purpose of this study was to predict the demand for medicines using autoregressi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta logistica 2024-06, Vol.11 (2), p.269-280 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 280 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 269 |
container_title | Acta logistica |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Mbonyinshuti, François Nkurunziza, Joseph Niyobuhungiro, Japhet Kayitare, Egide |
description | The ever-accelerating revolution along with digitalization of the healthcare industry has revealed the power of machine learning and deep learning prediction models in addressing health supply chain logistic issues. The purpose of this study was to predict the demand for medicines using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long short-term memory (LSTM) time series models while comparatively analysing their performance for medicine demand prediction to optimize the flow of supplies in the health system. Using data generated in Rwanda public health supply chain, in our study focused on predicting the demand of the top five medicines, identified as highly supplied (amoxicillin, penicillin v, ibuprofen, paracetamol, and metronidazole). We evaluated the models’ outputs by root mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination, R-squared (R2). In comparison to ARIMA, the deep learning LSTM model revealed superior performance with better accuracy and lower error rates in predicting the demand for medicines. Our results revealed that the LSTM model has an RMSE value of 2.0 for the training set and 2.043 for the test set, with R2 values of 0.952 and 0.912, respectively. ARIMA has an RMSE value of 9.35 for the training set and 8.926 for the test set as well as R2 value of 0.24 and 0.16 for the training and test sets, respectively. Based on these findings, we recommend that the LSTM time series model should be used for demand prediction in the management of medicines and their flow within health supply chain due to its remarkable performance for prediction task when applied to the dataset of our study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.22306/al.v11i2.510 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3096564742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3096564742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-4ea249e5033be88a5acaf0ae40a675e73ca8f66bc759bacb46e6a533e68ba36c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFLwzAUh4MoOOaO3gOeO5OmSVtvY6gbbAg6z-E1fXUZbVOTVth_77Z68PR-D77fe_ARcs_ZPI4FU49Qz384t_FccnZFJlyIPJIqzq__5VsyC-HAGOOpyDiTEzKsEOp-T8PQdfWRmj3YllbOo4HQ2_briQI1runA2-Ba6iq6eF9vFxTakm4-dlva2wZpQG8x0MaVWIdznZbYnJHOY2lNb8dqc15si-GO3FRQB5z9zSn5fHneLVfR5u11vVxsIsNz1kcJQpzkKJkQBWYZSDBQMcCEgUolpsJAVilVmFTmBZgiUahACoEqK0AoI6bkYbzbefc9YOj1wQ2-Pb3UguVKqiRN4hMVjZTxLgSPle68bcAfNWf6IldDrS9y9Umu-AXQ9G4u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3096564742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health supply chain forecasting: a comparison of ARIMA and LSTM time series models for demand prediction of medicines</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Mbonyinshuti, François ; Nkurunziza, Joseph ; Niyobuhungiro, Japhet ; Kayitare, Egide</creator><creatorcontrib>Mbonyinshuti, François ; Nkurunziza, Joseph ; Niyobuhungiro, Japhet ; Kayitare, Egide</creatorcontrib><description>The ever-accelerating revolution along with digitalization of the healthcare industry has revealed the power of machine learning and deep learning prediction models in addressing health supply chain logistic issues. The purpose of this study was to predict the demand for medicines using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long short-term memory (LSTM) time series models while comparatively analysing their performance for medicine demand prediction to optimize the flow of supplies in the health system. Using data generated in Rwanda public health supply chain, in our study focused on predicting the demand of the top five medicines, identified as highly supplied (amoxicillin, penicillin v, ibuprofen, paracetamol, and metronidazole). We evaluated the models’ outputs by root mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination, R-squared (R2). In comparison to ARIMA, the deep learning LSTM model revealed superior performance with better accuracy and lower error rates in predicting the demand for medicines. Our results revealed that the LSTM model has an RMSE value of 2.0 for the training set and 2.043 for the test set, with R2 values of 0.952 and 0.912, respectively. ARIMA has an RMSE value of 9.35 for the training set and 8.926 for the test set as well as R2 value of 0.24 and 0.16 for the training and test sets, respectively. Based on these findings, we recommend that the LSTM time series model should be used for demand prediction in the management of medicines and their flow within health supply chain due to its remarkable performance for prediction task when applied to the dataset of our study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1339-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1339-5629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22306/al.v11i2.510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Semsa: 4S go, s.r.o</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Amoxicillin ; Antibiotics ; Automation ; Autoregressive models ; Blood & organ donations ; Data science ; Deep learning ; Demand analysis ; Digitization ; Forecasting ; Human error ; Infectious diseases ; Inventory ; Literature reviews ; Logistics ; Machine learning ; Medical supplies ; Medicine ; Neural networks ; Penicillin ; Performance prediction ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Prediction models ; Public health ; Root-mean-square errors ; Supply chains ; Test sets ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Acta logistica, 2024-06, Vol.11 (2), p.269-280</ispartof><rights>Copyright 4S go, s.r.o. Jun 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3096564742?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3096564742?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,38515,43894,44589,74183,74897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mbonyinshuti, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nkurunziza, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niyobuhungiro, Japhet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayitare, Egide</creatorcontrib><title>Health supply chain forecasting: a comparison of ARIMA and LSTM time series models for demand prediction of medicines</title><title>Acta logistica</title><description>The ever-accelerating revolution along with digitalization of the healthcare industry has revealed the power of machine learning and deep learning prediction models in addressing health supply chain logistic issues. The purpose of this study was to predict the demand for medicines using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long short-term memory (LSTM) time series models while comparatively analysing their performance for medicine demand prediction to optimize the flow of supplies in the health system. Using data generated in Rwanda public health supply chain, in our study focused on predicting the demand of the top five medicines, identified as highly supplied (amoxicillin, penicillin v, ibuprofen, paracetamol, and metronidazole). We evaluated the models’ outputs by root mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination, R-squared (R2). In comparison to ARIMA, the deep learning LSTM model revealed superior performance with better accuracy and lower error rates in predicting the demand for medicines. Our results revealed that the LSTM model has an RMSE value of 2.0 for the training set and 2.043 for the test set, with R2 values of 0.952 and 0.912, respectively. ARIMA has an RMSE value of 9.35 for the training set and 8.926 for the test set as well as R2 value of 0.24 and 0.16 for the training and test sets, respectively. Based on these findings, we recommend that the LSTM time series model should be used for demand prediction in the management of medicines and their flow within health supply chain due to its remarkable performance for prediction task when applied to the dataset of our study.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Amoxicillin</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Autoregressive models</subject><subject>Blood & organ donations</subject><subject>Data science</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Demand analysis</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medical supplies</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Test sets</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1339-5629</issn><issn>1339-5629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFLwzAUh4MoOOaO3gOeO5OmSVtvY6gbbAg6z-E1fXUZbVOTVth_77Z68PR-D77fe_ARcs_ZPI4FU49Qz384t_FccnZFJlyIPJIqzq__5VsyC-HAGOOpyDiTEzKsEOp-T8PQdfWRmj3YllbOo4HQ2_briQI1runA2-Ba6iq6eF9vFxTakm4-dlva2wZpQG8x0MaVWIdznZbYnJHOY2lNb8dqc15si-GO3FRQB5z9zSn5fHneLVfR5u11vVxsIsNz1kcJQpzkKJkQBWYZSDBQMcCEgUolpsJAVilVmFTmBZgiUahACoEqK0AoI6bkYbzbefc9YOj1wQ2-Pb3UguVKqiRN4hMVjZTxLgSPle68bcAfNWf6IldDrS9y9Umu-AXQ9G4u</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Mbonyinshuti, François</creator><creator>Nkurunziza, Joseph</creator><creator>Niyobuhungiro, Japhet</creator><creator>Kayitare, Egide</creator><general>4S go, s.r.o</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Health supply chain forecasting: a comparison of ARIMA and LSTM time series models for demand prediction of medicines</title><author>Mbonyinshuti, François ; Nkurunziza, Joseph ; Niyobuhungiro, Japhet ; Kayitare, Egide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-4ea249e5033be88a5acaf0ae40a675e73ca8f66bc759bacb46e6a533e68ba36c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Amoxicillin</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Autoregressive models</topic><topic>Blood & organ donations</topic><topic>Data science</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Demand analysis</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medical supplies</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Test sets</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mbonyinshuti, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nkurunziza, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niyobuhungiro, Japhet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayitare, Egide</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Acta logistica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mbonyinshuti, François</au><au>Nkurunziza, Joseph</au><au>Niyobuhungiro, Japhet</au><au>Kayitare, Egide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health supply chain forecasting: a comparison of ARIMA and LSTM time series models for demand prediction of medicines</atitle><jtitle>Acta logistica</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>269-280</pages><issn>1339-5629</issn><eissn>1339-5629</eissn><abstract>The ever-accelerating revolution along with digitalization of the healthcare industry has revealed the power of machine learning and deep learning prediction models in addressing health supply chain logistic issues. The purpose of this study was to predict the demand for medicines using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long short-term memory (LSTM) time series models while comparatively analysing their performance for medicine demand prediction to optimize the flow of supplies in the health system. Using data generated in Rwanda public health supply chain, in our study focused on predicting the demand of the top five medicines, identified as highly supplied (amoxicillin, penicillin v, ibuprofen, paracetamol, and metronidazole). We evaluated the models’ outputs by root mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination, R-squared (R2). In comparison to ARIMA, the deep learning LSTM model revealed superior performance with better accuracy and lower error rates in predicting the demand for medicines. Our results revealed that the LSTM model has an RMSE value of 2.0 for the training set and 2.043 for the test set, with R2 values of 0.952 and 0.912, respectively. ARIMA has an RMSE value of 9.35 for the training set and 8.926 for the test set as well as R2 value of 0.24 and 0.16 for the training and test sets, respectively. Based on these findings, we recommend that the LSTM time series model should be used for demand prediction in the management of medicines and their flow within health supply chain due to its remarkable performance for prediction task when applied to the dataset of our study.</abstract><cop>Semsa</cop><pub>4S go, s.r.o</pub><doi>10.22306/al.v11i2.510</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1339-5629 |
ispartof | Acta logistica, 2024-06, Vol.11 (2), p.269-280 |
issn | 1339-5629 1339-5629 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3096564742 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Accuracy Amoxicillin Antibiotics Automation Autoregressive models Blood & organ donations Data science Deep learning Demand analysis Digitization Forecasting Human error Infectious diseases Inventory Literature reviews Logistics Machine learning Medical supplies Medicine Neural networks Penicillin Performance prediction Pharmaceutical industry Prediction models Public health Root-mean-square errors Supply chains Test sets Time series |
title | Health supply chain forecasting: a comparison of ARIMA and LSTM time series models for demand prediction of medicines |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20supply%20chain%20forecasting:%20a%20comparison%20of%20ARIMA%20and%20LSTM%20time%20series%20models%20for%20demand%20prediction%20of%20medicines&rft.jtitle=Acta%20logistica&rft.au=Mbonyinshuti,%20Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=269-280&rft.issn=1339-5629&rft.eissn=1339-5629&rft_id=info:doi/10.22306/al.v11i2.510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3096564742%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-4ea249e5033be88a5acaf0ae40a675e73ca8f66bc759bacb46e6a533e68ba36c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3096564742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |