Dual Narratives of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict in Court: Shaping the Perception of International Terrorism

This article focuses on trials stemming from attacks on El Al aircraft in Athens (1968) and Zurich (1969) and their role in shaping the narrative surrounding the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The defense framed the attacks as part of a Palestinian military campaign against Israel, thus rationalizing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of contemporary history 2024-07, Vol.59 (3), p.576-596
Main Author: Porat, Dan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Air travel
Aircraft
Arab Israeli relations
Conflict
Conventions
Court decisions
Court hearings & proceedings
Hijacking
International conferences
Military occupations
Narratives
Palestinian people
Terrorism
Trials
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article focuses on trials stemming from attacks on El Al aircraft in Athens (1968) and Zurich (1969) and their role in shaping the narrative surrounding the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The defense framed the attacks as part of a Palestinian military campaign against Israel, thus rationalizing the behavior as a legitimate response to its actions in occupied territories. In doing so, the Palestinians sought to portray themselves as political resistance fighters. Conversely, the Israelis depicted the attacks as deplorable acts of terrorism that targeted innocent civilians. Their objective was to counter the political motivations put forward by the Palestinians and emphasize the potential repercussions of such attacks on international air travel. These trials marked the first instances of legal proceedings specifically addressing international terrorism, framing these incidents as acts of terrorism rather than legitimate acts of liberation. The trials, along with their outcomes and the subsequent verdicts issued by the courts, played a significant role in defining these actions as terrorism. Subsequent international conventions on hijacking further reinforced this perspective, solidifying them as illegitimate acts of terror.
ISSN:0022-0094
1461-7250
DOI:10.1177/00220094241264089