Loading…

Assessment of the socio-economic impact of camel breeding in Mauritania

The dromedary is a species closely linked to the culture of Mauritanian society, essential for food security, livelihood, and socio-economic development. The present study was undertaken to assess the socio-economic aspect of camel breeding in Mauritania, a typical Sahelian country. The specific obj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:GeoJournal 2024-09, Vol.89 (5), p.204, Article 204
Main Authors: Ould Ahmed, Mohamed, Fall, Mohamed, Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha, Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim, Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem, Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled, Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf, Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh, Brahim Abba, Ahmedou, Dièye, Cheikh Yahya, Bengoumi, Mohammed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8730544d8990d89cb4daafb1aa4d8dfd53f5ea3e73cc371bc70dcc3163d92e0e3
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 204
container_title GeoJournal
container_volume 89
creator Ould Ahmed, Mohamed
Fall, Mohamed
Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha
Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim
Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem
Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled
Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf
Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh
Brahim Abba, Ahmedou
Dièye, Cheikh Yahya
Bengoumi, Mohammed
description The dromedary is a species closely linked to the culture of Mauritanian society, essential for food security, livelihood, and socio-economic development. The present study was undertaken to assess the socio-economic aspect of camel breeding in Mauritania, a typical Sahelian country. The specific objectives are to characterize the socio-demographic and zootechnical parameters of camel breeding and to evaluate its economic impact. For this purpose, an individual semi-direct questionnaire was administered to a sample of 359 breeders throughout Mauritania, who collectively keep 26,527 dromedaries. Over 72% of breeders were over 45 years old, and 70% had never received formal education. 80% of breeders had been breeding camels for over 25 years. The zootechnical performances were 2.82 L per day, 12.04 months, 11.73 months, and 23.13 months respectively for milk production, age at weaning, lactation duration, and calving-to-calving interval. Average selling prices were 13,544.24 MRU (equivalent to 342.89 $USD), 42,023.88 MRU (1,063.89 $USD), and 44,174.22 MRU (1,118.33 $USD) for young, adult females and adult males respectively. The selling age of young animals varies from 6 to 48 months, with an average of 16.17 ± 7.08 months. Pertinent indicators of economic importance were calculated, such as animal sales volume per breeder per year, job creation, annual total income per breeder, and annual total income per adult female, clearly showing the encouraging impact of camel breeding. A multifactor analysis based on productivity variables allowed us to identify 4 types of breeders, including two with a focus on dairy production and two whose primary focus is the production of live animals “Meat production”. The four types identified were “Dairy production in accessible pastoral areas”, “Dairy production around peri-urban areas”, “Meat production in remote pastoral areas” and “Meat production around peri-urban areas”. The first group consists of 164 (43.21%) farms with an average herd size of 69.90 ± 55.86 heads, generating the annual total income of 941,572.96 MRU/breeder (equivalent 23,837.22 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 14,790.11 MRU (375 $USD). The second group includes 73 (20.33%) farms. They have an average herd size of 74.53 ± 54.69 heads, and generate the annual total income of 976,336.15 MRU/breeder (24,717.37 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 15,818.68 MRU (625.50 $USD). The third group consists of 78 (21.72%)
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10708-024-11204-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3099335226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3099335226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8730544d8990d89cb4daafb1aa4d8dfd53f5ea3e73cc371bc70dcc3163d92e0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5giMRvOdlzHY1VBQSpigdlynEtx1cTFTgb-PaZBgonl7nT33jvpI-SawS0DUHeJgYKKAi8pYxxKKk_IjEnFqa60OP0zn5OLlHYAoJViM7JepoQpddgPRWiL4R2LFJwPFF3oQ-dd4buDdcejsx3uizoiNr7fFr4vnu0Y_WB7by_JWWv3Ca9--py8Pdy_rh7p5mX9tFpuqONlOdBKCZBl2VRaQy6uLhtr25pZm3dN20jRSrQClXBOKFY7BU2e2EI0miOgmJObKfcQw8eIaTC7MMY-vzQCtBZCcr7IKj6pXAwpRWzNIfrOxk_DwHwDMxMwk4GZIzAjs0lMppTF_Rbjb_Q_ri_Iv246</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099335226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the socio-economic impact of camel breeding in Mauritania</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Ould Ahmed, Mohamed ; Fall, Mohamed ; Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha ; Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim ; Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem ; Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled ; Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf ; Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh ; Brahim Abba, Ahmedou ; Dièye, Cheikh Yahya ; Bengoumi, Mohammed</creator><creatorcontrib>Ould Ahmed, Mohamed ; Fall, Mohamed ; Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha ; Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim ; Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem ; Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled ; Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf ; Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh ; Brahim Abba, Ahmedou ; Dièye, Cheikh Yahya ; Bengoumi, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><description>The dromedary is a species closely linked to the culture of Mauritanian society, essential for food security, livelihood, and socio-economic development. The present study was undertaken to assess the socio-economic aspect of camel breeding in Mauritania, a typical Sahelian country. The specific objectives are to characterize the socio-demographic and zootechnical parameters of camel breeding and to evaluate its economic impact. For this purpose, an individual semi-direct questionnaire was administered to a sample of 359 breeders throughout Mauritania, who collectively keep 26,527 dromedaries. Over 72% of breeders were over 45 years old, and 70% had never received formal education. 80% of breeders had been breeding camels for over 25 years. The zootechnical performances were 2.82 L per day, 12.04 months, 11.73 months, and 23.13 months respectively for milk production, age at weaning, lactation duration, and calving-to-calving interval. Average selling prices were 13,544.24 MRU (equivalent to 342.89 $USD), 42,023.88 MRU (1,063.89 $USD), and 44,174.22 MRU (1,118.33 $USD) for young, adult females and adult males respectively. The selling age of young animals varies from 6 to 48 months, with an average of 16.17 ± 7.08 months. Pertinent indicators of economic importance were calculated, such as animal sales volume per breeder per year, job creation, annual total income per breeder, and annual total income per adult female, clearly showing the encouraging impact of camel breeding. A multifactor analysis based on productivity variables allowed us to identify 4 types of breeders, including two with a focus on dairy production and two whose primary focus is the production of live animals “Meat production”. The four types identified were “Dairy production in accessible pastoral areas”, “Dairy production around peri-urban areas”, “Meat production in remote pastoral areas” and “Meat production around peri-urban areas”. The first group consists of 164 (43.21%) farms with an average herd size of 69.90 ± 55.86 heads, generating the annual total income of 941,572.96 MRU/breeder (equivalent 23,837.22 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 14,790.11 MRU (375 $USD). The second group includes 73 (20.33%) farms. They have an average herd size of 74.53 ± 54.69 heads, and generate the annual total income of 976,336.15 MRU/breeder (24,717.37 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 15,818.68 MRU (625.50 $USD). The third group consists of 78 (21.72%) farms with an average herd size of 88.39 ± 103.8 heads. They generate the annual total income of 1,116,282.45 MRU/breeder (28,260.31 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 23,757.47 MRU (601.45 $USD). The tetrad group consists of 44 (12.25%) farms with an average herd size of 67.26 ± 58.93 heads, generating the annual total income of 825,592.58 MRU/breeder (20,5901.07 $USD), and the highest annual total income per adult female of 40,176.11 MRU (1,017.11 $USD). These results demonstrate the positive impact of camel breeding and can be used as a basis for any future development scenario for Mauritanian dromedaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-9893</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0343-2521</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10708-024-11204-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age ; Animal breeding ; Animals ; Annual ; Averages ; Breastfeeding &amp; lactation ; Breeding ; Breeding of animals ; Economic development ; Economic impact ; Economic importance ; Economics ; Environmental Management ; Equivalence ; Farms ; Females ; Food security ; Geography ; Human Geography ; Impact analysis ; Income ; Job creation ; Lactation ; Livelihood ; Livestock industry ; Meat ; Meat production ; Milk ; Milk production ; Peri-urban areas ; Prices ; Production ; Productivity ; Sales ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Socioeconomic aspects ; Socioeconomic development ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Urban areas ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>GeoJournal, 2024-09, Vol.89 (5), p.204, Article 204</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8730544d8990d89cb4daafb1aa4d8dfd53f5ea3e73cc371bc70dcc3163d92e0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1679-9657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ould Ahmed, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fall, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brahim Abba, Ahmedou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dièye, Cheikh Yahya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bengoumi, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the socio-economic impact of camel breeding in Mauritania</title><title>GeoJournal</title><addtitle>GeoJournal</addtitle><description>The dromedary is a species closely linked to the culture of Mauritanian society, essential for food security, livelihood, and socio-economic development. The present study was undertaken to assess the socio-economic aspect of camel breeding in Mauritania, a typical Sahelian country. The specific objectives are to characterize the socio-demographic and zootechnical parameters of camel breeding and to evaluate its economic impact. For this purpose, an individual semi-direct questionnaire was administered to a sample of 359 breeders throughout Mauritania, who collectively keep 26,527 dromedaries. Over 72% of breeders were over 45 years old, and 70% had never received formal education. 80% of breeders had been breeding camels for over 25 years. The zootechnical performances were 2.82 L per day, 12.04 months, 11.73 months, and 23.13 months respectively for milk production, age at weaning, lactation duration, and calving-to-calving interval. Average selling prices were 13,544.24 MRU (equivalent to 342.89 $USD), 42,023.88 MRU (1,063.89 $USD), and 44,174.22 MRU (1,118.33 $USD) for young, adult females and adult males respectively. The selling age of young animals varies from 6 to 48 months, with an average of 16.17 ± 7.08 months. Pertinent indicators of economic importance were calculated, such as animal sales volume per breeder per year, job creation, annual total income per breeder, and annual total income per adult female, clearly showing the encouraging impact of camel breeding. A multifactor analysis based on productivity variables allowed us to identify 4 types of breeders, including two with a focus on dairy production and two whose primary focus is the production of live animals “Meat production”. The four types identified were “Dairy production in accessible pastoral areas”, “Dairy production around peri-urban areas”, “Meat production in remote pastoral areas” and “Meat production around peri-urban areas”. The first group consists of 164 (43.21%) farms with an average herd size of 69.90 ± 55.86 heads, generating the annual total income of 941,572.96 MRU/breeder (equivalent 23,837.22 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 14,790.11 MRU (375 $USD). The second group includes 73 (20.33%) farms. They have an average herd size of 74.53 ± 54.69 heads, and generate the annual total income of 976,336.15 MRU/breeder (24,717.37 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 15,818.68 MRU (625.50 $USD). The third group consists of 78 (21.72%) farms with an average herd size of 88.39 ± 103.8 heads. They generate the annual total income of 1,116,282.45 MRU/breeder (28,260.31 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 23,757.47 MRU (601.45 $USD). The tetrad group consists of 44 (12.25%) farms with an average herd size of 67.26 ± 58.93 heads, generating the annual total income of 825,592.58 MRU/breeder (20,5901.07 $USD), and the highest annual total income per adult female of 40,176.11 MRU (1,017.11 $USD). These results demonstrate the positive impact of camel breeding and can be used as a basis for any future development scenario for Mauritanian dromedaries.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Annual</subject><subject>Averages</subject><subject>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic importance</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Job creation</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Livelihood</subject><subject>Livestock industry</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat production</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Milk production</subject><subject>Peri-urban areas</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Socioeconomic aspects</subject><subject>Socioeconomic development</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>1572-9893</issn><issn>0343-2521</issn><issn>1572-9893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5giMRvOdlzHY1VBQSpigdlynEtx1cTFTgb-PaZBgonl7nT33jvpI-SawS0DUHeJgYKKAi8pYxxKKk_IjEnFqa60OP0zn5OLlHYAoJViM7JepoQpddgPRWiL4R2LFJwPFF3oQ-dd4buDdcejsx3uizoiNr7fFr4vnu0Y_WB7by_JWWv3Ca9--py8Pdy_rh7p5mX9tFpuqONlOdBKCZBl2VRaQy6uLhtr25pZm3dN20jRSrQClXBOKFY7BU2e2EI0miOgmJObKfcQw8eIaTC7MMY-vzQCtBZCcr7IKj6pXAwpRWzNIfrOxk_DwHwDMxMwk4GZIzAjs0lMppTF_Rbjb_Q_ri_Iv246</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Ould Ahmed, Mohamed</creator><creator>Fall, Mohamed</creator><creator>Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha</creator><creator>Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim</creator><creator>Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem</creator><creator>Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled</creator><creator>Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf</creator><creator>Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh</creator><creator>Brahim Abba, Ahmedou</creator><creator>Dièye, Cheikh Yahya</creator><creator>Bengoumi, Mohammed</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1679-9657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Assessment of the socio-economic impact of camel breeding in Mauritania</title><author>Ould Ahmed, Mohamed ; Fall, Mohamed ; Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha ; Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim ; Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem ; Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled ; Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf ; Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh ; Brahim Abba, Ahmedou ; Dièye, Cheikh Yahya ; Bengoumi, Mohammed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8730544d8990d89cb4daafb1aa4d8dfd53f5ea3e73cc371bc70dcc3163d92e0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Annual</topic><topic>Averages</topic><topic>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic importance</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Job creation</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Livelihood</topic><topic>Livestock industry</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat production</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Milk production</topic><topic>Peri-urban areas</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Socioeconomic aspects</topic><topic>Socioeconomic development</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ould Ahmed, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fall, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brahim Abba, Ahmedou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dièye, Cheikh Yahya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bengoumi, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>GeoJournal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ould Ahmed, Mohamed</au><au>Fall, Mohamed</au><au>Sidi Mohamed Ali, Mohamed El Moustapha</au><au>Mademba Diop, Abdel Kerim</au><au>Amar Vall, Mohamed Salem</au><au>Mohamed Sidelemine, Khaled</au><au>Sidatt, Mohamed Maarouf</au><au>Mohamed Salem, Mahfoudh</au><au>Brahim Abba, Ahmedou</au><au>Dièye, Cheikh Yahya</au><au>Bengoumi, Mohammed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the socio-economic impact of camel breeding in Mauritania</atitle><jtitle>GeoJournal</jtitle><stitle>GeoJournal</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>204</spage><pages>204-</pages><artnum>204</artnum><issn>1572-9893</issn><issn>0343-2521</issn><eissn>1572-9893</eissn><abstract>The dromedary is a species closely linked to the culture of Mauritanian society, essential for food security, livelihood, and socio-economic development. The present study was undertaken to assess the socio-economic aspect of camel breeding in Mauritania, a typical Sahelian country. The specific objectives are to characterize the socio-demographic and zootechnical parameters of camel breeding and to evaluate its economic impact. For this purpose, an individual semi-direct questionnaire was administered to a sample of 359 breeders throughout Mauritania, who collectively keep 26,527 dromedaries. Over 72% of breeders were over 45 years old, and 70% had never received formal education. 80% of breeders had been breeding camels for over 25 years. The zootechnical performances were 2.82 L per day, 12.04 months, 11.73 months, and 23.13 months respectively for milk production, age at weaning, lactation duration, and calving-to-calving interval. Average selling prices were 13,544.24 MRU (equivalent to 342.89 $USD), 42,023.88 MRU (1,063.89 $USD), and 44,174.22 MRU (1,118.33 $USD) for young, adult females and adult males respectively. The selling age of young animals varies from 6 to 48 months, with an average of 16.17 ± 7.08 months. Pertinent indicators of economic importance were calculated, such as animal sales volume per breeder per year, job creation, annual total income per breeder, and annual total income per adult female, clearly showing the encouraging impact of camel breeding. A multifactor analysis based on productivity variables allowed us to identify 4 types of breeders, including two with a focus on dairy production and two whose primary focus is the production of live animals “Meat production”. The four types identified were “Dairy production in accessible pastoral areas”, “Dairy production around peri-urban areas”, “Meat production in remote pastoral areas” and “Meat production around peri-urban areas”. The first group consists of 164 (43.21%) farms with an average herd size of 69.90 ± 55.86 heads, generating the annual total income of 941,572.96 MRU/breeder (equivalent 23,837.22 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 14,790.11 MRU (375 $USD). The second group includes 73 (20.33%) farms. They have an average herd size of 74.53 ± 54.69 heads, and generate the annual total income of 976,336.15 MRU/breeder (24,717.37 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 15,818.68 MRU (625.50 $USD). The third group consists of 78 (21.72%) farms with an average herd size of 88.39 ± 103.8 heads. They generate the annual total income of 1,116,282.45 MRU/breeder (28,260.31 $USD), and the annual total income per adult female of 23,757.47 MRU (601.45 $USD). The tetrad group consists of 44 (12.25%) farms with an average herd size of 67.26 ± 58.93 heads, generating the annual total income of 825,592.58 MRU/breeder (20,5901.07 $USD), and the highest annual total income per adult female of 40,176.11 MRU (1,017.11 $USD). These results demonstrate the positive impact of camel breeding and can be used as a basis for any future development scenario for Mauritanian dromedaries.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10708-024-11204-5</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1679-9657</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1572-9893
ispartof GeoJournal, 2024-09, Vol.89 (5), p.204, Article 204
issn 1572-9893
0343-2521
1572-9893
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3099335226
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Springer Nature; PAIS Index
subjects Adults
Age
Animal breeding
Animals
Annual
Averages
Breastfeeding & lactation
Breeding
Breeding of animals
Economic development
Economic impact
Economic importance
Economics
Environmental Management
Equivalence
Farms
Females
Food security
Geography
Human Geography
Impact analysis
Income
Job creation
Lactation
Livelihood
Livestock industry
Meat
Meat production
Milk
Milk production
Peri-urban areas
Prices
Production
Productivity
Sales
Social Sciences
Sociodemographics
Socioeconomic aspects
Socioeconomic development
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomics
Urban areas
Weaning
title Assessment of the socio-economic impact of camel breeding in Mauritania
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20socio-economic%20impact%20of%20camel%20breeding%20in%20Mauritania&rft.jtitle=GeoJournal&rft.au=Ould%20Ahmed,%20Mohamed&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=204&rft.pages=204-&rft.artnum=204&rft.issn=1572-9893&rft.eissn=1572-9893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10708-024-11204-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3099335226%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8730544d8990d89cb4daafb1aa4d8dfd53f5ea3e73cc371bc70dcc3163d92e0e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099335226&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true